which is also quite a lot.
We will come back to this matter in some weeks with interesting documents and informations.

03.April.2019

12:31, 17:17, and 24:15 UTC+2
SOPR #173

*** Work in progress - some better wording ***
We would like to continue the discussion about the following topics:

License Model
We came to the conclusion that it would be helpful and advantageous for everybody when we extend or make more precise the scope of the provisions of the License Model (LM) by including a phrase with the following meaning:
The License Model (LM) applies for each technology (i.e. system, platform), product (i.e. device, application, vehicle), and service (i.e. electronic commerce, social networking) that is

our Ontologic System (OS), specifically our

Hardware royalties
We were also continuing with our considerations about the royalties for hardware, that is handled in accordance with the scope of the provisions as formulated in the previous section related to the LM, and came again to the following options:

• 5 cent per processor core,
• 50 cent per processor, and
• 5 cent per sensor,

The share is also reasonable, because virtually all manufacturers of computer hardware or other machines also provide software technologies, software products, or services related or directly connected with their hardware technologies and hardware products.
But in any case, an

+ the profit of a manufacturer, trader, or other involved entity.

05.April.2019

02:31 and 23:01 UTC+2
SOPR #174

*** Work in progress ***
We opted for the mixture of fixed fee and share for products, specifically Information and Communication Technology (ICT) hardware, as discussed in the issue #173 of the 3rd of April 2019.
This amendment will become legal matter beginning with the 1st of January 2015 for

The amendment has many advantages for everybody:

• management of infrastructures, platforms, services, etc.,
• oversight and support of the members of our SOPR, and
• creation of new benefits,

Luckily, we are working on the License Model (LM) and can make adjustments where appropriated and necessary to keep everybody happy.

09.April.2019
Ontonics Superstructure #22
We were looking for the location of another Asian gigahub of our World Wide Hover Association (WWHA) Transcontinental Network respectively Silk Skyway. The candidates were the following cities and urban areas around them:

All candidates have their advantages and a solution might be to construct a megahub location in Jakarta and a megahub location in Johor Bahru at first and then watch how they develop.

02:31 UTC+2
SOPR #175

*** Work in progress - common order with older messages ***
We have a new member with the

The company is planning to digitalize their railway infrastructure with sensors, actuators (e.g. track switches), and wireless networking based on

• Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and
• Industry 4.0,

as well as

as also utilized for smart cities.

Since this year, the company is performing Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) to

Style of Speed Further steps
We improved the efficience of a rotor once again this time by more than 5%.

In the last two weeks, we also worked on the variant of one of our aerial vehicle with Vertical Take-Off and Landing (VTOL) capability and created a new basic design. Today, we developed it further (see the Further steps of the the Further steps 9th, 11th, 13th, and 17th of December 2018, and 27th and 28th of January 2019).

We also developed a new variant of the system mentioned in the Further steps of the 28th of January 2019 and 24th of February 2019, which eliminates a conceptually mistake and eventually improves the energy efficiency of the overall system.

11.April.2019

01:50 UTC+2
More evidences Lockheed Martin mimicking C.S. and C.S. GmbH

*** Work in progress - some informations, links to C.S.' art projects, and discussions of royalties missing ***
As not expected otherwise, the company Lockheed Martin thought that it has to present once again solutions based on our original and unique, iconic works of art titled Ontologic System and Ontoscope, and created by C.S..

At first, we quote three articles of an online encyclopedia.
The first quote is about the development of the experimental coaxial-rotor compound helicopter S-69 (military designation XH-59) of its subsidiary Sikorsky Aircraft: "The 106-hour test program for the XH-59A ended in 1981. In 1982 it was proposed that the XH-59A be converted to the XH-59B configuration with advanced rotors, new powerplants [...], and a ducted pusher propeller at the tail. This proposed program did not proceed as Sikorsky refused to pay a share of the costs.[4][6][7] Sikorsky and its partners funded the development of the next helicopters using the Advancing Blade Concept; the Sikorsky X2 and Sikorsky S-97 Raider after 2007."
The second quote is about the development of the experimental coaxial-rotor compound helicopter X2 of Sikorsky Aircraft: "Test flights and flight simulations [of the X2] were combined to improve test procedure.[11][12]".
Both quotes prove that the company Sikorsky Aircraft developed related technologies, applications, and services after the publication of our Ontologic System and our Ontoscope.
Besides this, the second quote also shows nicely the difference between

• provides both directions or a bidirectional relation between the real or physical and the virtual or metaphysical world, specifically on the basis of digital signals and data,
• unifies, fuses, or merges the real or physical world and the virtual or metaphysical world, specifically on the basis of digital signals and data, and
• includes the fields of
  • Cyber-Physical Systems of the second generation (CPS 2.0), Internet of Things of the second generation (IoT 2.0), and Networked Embedded Systems of the second generation (NES 2.0), including the subfields of
    • Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and
    • Industry 4.0,

    as well as

  • Ubiquitous Computing of the second generation (UbiC 2.0).

The thrid quote is about a multimedia environment for the Future Vertical Lift (FVL) aircraft development program of the United States Armed Forces (USAF): "Lockheed Martin is developing a single "common missions system" that could be integrated into FVL light, medium, heavy, and ultra-heavy aircraft. The system could save the [U.S.] Army billions of dollars over the course procurement and sustainment, eliminating the need to train maintenance staff, trainers, and personnel in multiple systems. One component is a helmet derived from the one used on the [MultiRole Combat Aircraft (MRCA)] F-35 Lightning II using distributed aperture technology that uses integrated sensors to enable pilots to view "through" the aircraft."
The Head-Mounted Display (HMD) integrated in the F-35 helmet is a rudimentary Augmented Reality (AR) system of the first generation, that can be simply described as a binocular Head-Up Display (HUD) with two projectors based on Active Matrix Liquid Crystal Displays (AMLCDs), which beam (green) graphics onto the inside of the tinted visor.
Obviously, the derived helmet must have the capability to display video images and hence must be a system based on our Sp@ce environment and Active Components of Style of Speed.

In the following, we quote various sources in relation to the Sikorsky Matrix Technology Autonomous System utilized for Vertical Take-Off and Landing (VTOL) aircrafts and developed by its subsidiary having the same name.
We begin with quoting the webpage titled "Sikorsky MATRIX Technology" and publicated on the website of Lockheed Martin: "Sikorsky Autonomy Research Aircraft (SARA) utilizes MATRIX Technology which enables users of military and commercial helicopters, and vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft[s], to safely, reliably and affordably operate as autonomously or optionally piloted aircraft."

From a first report about said autonomous VTOL aircraft system we got the following information: "The Matrix, Inside Sikorsky's Autonomy Initiative
The Matrix Technology program is modeled on Sikorsky's X2 Technology demonstration, a $50 million internally funded effort that culminated in 2010 with a coaxial-rotor compound helicopter [...]."
modeling; What makes us a little wondering is that SARA is a helicopter of the type S-76 but not an X2.

Quoting a second report publicated in February of the year 2014 gives us more details about said autonomous VTOL aircraft system: "Sikorsky's Matrix Technology Program Launches Phase 2 of Flight Test Activities
Sikorsky Aircraft's Matrix Technology autonomy research program has progressed to the second phase of flight test activities with the installation of advanced sensors that will allow the Sikorsky Autonomy Research Aircraft (SARA) to conduct real-time perception work."
advanced sensors for real-time processing

From a third report about said autonomous helicopter system publicated in March of the year 2019 we got the following addtional informations: "Sikorsky Matrix Technology Autonomous Helicopter System
There's no shortage of autonomous vehicle concepts out there, but what if you could transform your vehicle into a self-driving machine? That's what the Lockheed Martin's subsidiary Sikorsky Matrix Technology Autonomous System is built to accomplish, as we're heading toward a future where machines are taking the wheel.
The Sikorsky Matrix Technology is built to reduce the workload of a pilot and it's being tested on a helicopter called S.A.R.A. (Sikorsky Autonomy Research Aircraft). The system is built to deflate fears of Terminator's Skynet becoming a reality, as the computer takes control when the pilot isn't maneuvering the vehicle, yet the system backs off when the pilot takes over again. This revolutionary system works with a tablet, where you can preset a mission or simply point to a spot on the map, choose your speed and attitude, and let the machine take care of the rest. The Sikorsky Matrix Technology will calculate the optimal route, working with inertial guidance systems, external sensors, and GPS to ensure a smooth flight. In about a year, the Sikorsky Matrix Technology will be featured in U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopters and may even be used for flying cars further down the line."

A fourth report about said autonomous VTOL aircraft system also proves that our works of art are the true sources of the company's technology: "Sikorsky Wants to Make Air Taxis as Safe, Reliable as Elevators
In Sikorsky's [our] vision of future urban air mobility, people ride helicopters above the din and congestion of modern cities with the same security and piece of mind they have when riding an elevator, a contraption that people once feared but now use without second thought in buildings all over the world.
No one wanted to ride an elevator until the invention of the safety elevator by Otis, with which Sikorsky is partnering on its new urban air mobility endeavor. [...] Sikorsky announced its partnership with the elevator manufacturer and [Virgin Galactic→]The Spaceship Company to bring its technologies to bear on the new urban air mobility market.
"In our view, urban air mobility and that future solution has the ability to connect destinations in the same way that an elevator first started connecting floors together, allowing builders to look upwards and build skyscrapers and the modern cities we have today," said Jonathan Hartman, disruptive technologies lead for Sikorsky Innovations.
"In order to do that, the people who use these systems have to trust them, fundamentally trust them," he added. "While the vehicle is part of that eventual urban air mobility solution, we think a lot of those technologies are already in process and already demonstrated capability. What we're focused on is that broader solution. How do we get to that seamless, integrated transportation experience?"
[...] Rather than develop bespoke air vehicles to address congestion issues in cities, as some of its peers have done, Sikorsky's [our] vision incorporate autonomous and pilot-assist technologies it already is developing together with traditional helicopters to alleviate the hassle of existing ground and public transportation.
"Urban air mobility is a topic that is gaining considerable attention and conversation within our community," Hartman said. "The problem of mobility in cities is growing more acute as we have more folks moving into those cities and straining existing transportation infrastructure."
Sikorsky doesn't look at the problem of city congestion and the need for rapid mobility in and around it as a new problem. [...] The company has invested considerable internal research and development funds and time developing the component technologies that will make urban air mobility a reality, Hartman said.
"Helicopters are used every day in the congested, dynamic airspaces in and around cities," Hartman said. "We have been a part of that story for a long time. ... We feel very strongly there are some emerging technologies coming out that can help assist and make that mission better and those technologies we have been developing for the last decade."
Foundational to Sikorsky entrance into the urban air taxi market is its Matrix "optimally piloted" technology that integrated an autonomous co-pilot of sorts into the cockpit. Developed through the Defense Advance Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Aircrew Labor In-Cockpit Automation System (ALIAS) program, Matrix is a drop-in retrofit kit that introduces autonomy into existing aircraft to lighten the workload on human crews.
Sikorsky is installing the system on a UH-60 Black Hawk for trials with the U.S. Army and recently demonstrated its capability to a group of non-pilots at Fort Eustis in Virginia.
"As part of that demonstration, we were flying folks in the non-piloting community, actually folks who had never been in or around a helicopter before," he said. "With an hour of training in our simulator, they were able to take the MATRIX interface that is in the cockpit, in the right-hand seat and operate that air vehicle on an extended-duration mission."
Sikorsky has moved on to thinking about how Matrix and similar technologies can be applied to future urban air mobility. It is also reinvesting in development of electric propulsion technologies, Hartman said.
"This set of technologies makes us very excited that we can work to bring a better, safer, more-affordable, more community-acceptable solution to the future urban airspace," Hartman said."

In addition, we also quote a news message publicated on the 23rd of December 2016 on the website of the DARPA: "DARPA's Aircrew Labor In-Cockpit Automation System (ALIAS) program envisions flight operations with reduced onboard aircrew while improving mission performance and flight safety - all through a tailorable, drop-in, removable kit that would provide advanced automation to existing aircraft."

Obviously, the DARPA and Lockheed Martin, its subsidiaries like Sikorsky Aircraft, and also its partners and customers like the U.S. Army have, are, and will be using our works of art for their technologies (e.g. systems and platforms), products (e.g. applications, devices, and vehicles), and services.
Style of Speed control system based on our OS and utilized for for example ...
We even have evidences that without any doubts provide causal links with our projects 3D urban living, Hovercity, Hoverland, and Superstructure.

So far so good. But this raises the question how our royalties are calculated. In fact, at least all helicopters based on the X2 technology demonstrator, such as for example the Sikorsky S-97 Raider and the Sikorsky-Boeing SB-1 Defiant, are developed on the basis of our OAOS and our fields of CPS 2.0, IoT 2.0, and NES 2.0, including IIoT and Industry 4.0.
But the same holds for the Sikorsky Aircraft's SARA technology based on our revolutionary Ontologic System as well.
share of 5% for hardware or a fixed fee as guaranteed royalty if overall revenue is too low
The problem is only the transition period when an item is not completely

our Ontologic System (OS), specifically our

Btw.: We do not know what this marketing nonsense comprising those attempts of camouflaging the true source, that is C.S. and our visions and works, should be good for, because all larger companies do know and utilize our works of art as well.

We are sorry to say, but we do not discuss that matter and those cheap tricks and strategies since some weeks anymore, but refer to the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our common statements:
All or nothing at all. Now and not in the future.
We will not make any further concessions.

13.April.2019

20:29 UTC+2
SOPR #176

*** Work in progress - ***
The topics of this issue are the following ones:

In the last years, several proposal and laws have be drafted, discusses, and passed:

The related discussions focus on their unconstitutionality, specifically the

• anonymity and
• freedom of speech,

To

requires

Therefore, bending the constitution and including provisions in the actual NetLEAs, that lack the required characteristics and imperative requirements, is not acceptable and demands their revisions As Soon As Possible (ASAP).
Especially in relation to the NetLEAs of member states of the European Union (EU), we demand the immediate publication of the related "documents on the Network [Law] Enforcement Act which examine the compatibility of the law with EU law with regard to the European Convention on Human Rights and the European legal requirements in the area of "Information Society Services" (e-commerce directive). An inquiry by [a] business magazine [...] was rejected, stating that "the publication of the documents ... would affect the climate of mutual trust between the member state and the Commission". According to a regulation issued in 2001, the EU Commission is obliged to make internal documents available on request." The public is neither one of the member states nor the European Commission.

An opinion of many so-called experts is that the NetLEA of the F.R.Germany would be "censorship in its worst form - self-censorship in the mind and foreign censorship by private companies", because decisions on the legality of contributions would be privatised
From our point of view the privatization of the social watchdog is not a problem at all, because the so-called free press, exclusive some public-law and state broadcasters, and the media companies already are private social watchdogs and therefore social networks simply have to be viewed as part of the media. The latter also corresponds with the taxation of online services in the Republic of Austria (see the related section below).
Furthermore, there is

But more important for us are the implications in relation to the regulations of the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR). One implication is that the platforms for social networking and electronic commerce become

Further considerations have to be done by us for reaching the goals, keeping up the integrity, and shaping the provisions of our SOPR.

There is no doubt but evidence that those NetLEAs come from the right wing parties. has happened in the RoA.

Taxation of online services
After the member states of the European Union (EU) still were unable to decide for a common taxation policy and draft a common taxation system some of them decided for solo efforts, like for example the

Despite perverting the common ways of taxation, which is the worst option that all governments could choose and For What It's Worth (FWIW) have chosen eventually, these efforts question our reduction of the share of 2.5% for public services (see issue SOPR #157 of the 23rd of December 2018), because

Further considerations have to be done by us for supporting the members of our SOPR and keeping up the goals, the integrity, and the provisions of our SOPR.

Mid-size companies
Associations of mid-size companies and owner families have critized the government of the B.R.D. for its industrial policy. We will not discuss this matter here but only note that we reject any kind of grandfathering for large industrial companies.
Some members of said associations, specifically those being active in the engineering sector, have critized our SOPR for its corporate policy as well. With all due respect, but we can only say that any criticism about the large members of our SOPR and our SOPR is neither appropriate nor comprehensible. In fact, all large members of our SOPR and our SOPR provide mid-size companies with

that for social, legal, and technical reasons

• were unimagineable a decade ago (for sure with the exception of C.S. and our corporation),
• enable them to set new goals, and
• grow their own and others prosperity.

For good and valuable consideration,

License Model (LM)
We are thinking about a

For sure, for being eligible at all a media company or a press-like entity must have the allowance for the performance of our OAOS and comply with the federal laws and the standards of our own media platform.

Further steps
Even if it does not look like that, but we have the impression that we touched the ground and now are catching up with our backlog of work in progress.

14.April.2019
Style of Speed Further steps
After we got all foundational technologies and designs together and improved them, we entered the next phase with designing the mass production process of our first 33,333 autonomous drones of the type Vertical Take-Off and Landing (VTOL) aircraft with our extraordinary fall-proof, all-aloft, non-crash, whisper, and all-weather capabilities.
In the course of this, we could solve a production problem and a structural problem with a single overall solution, that also provides us the foundation for the models and their variants of the next generation.

We are also looking for ways to decrease the unit cost down to around 70.000 U.S. Dollar, which would allow us to produce the 133,333 autonomous paletts and movers for the same initial budget money of 10 bn U.S. Dollar (see also the Ontonics Further steps of the 15th of February 2019 and 29th of March 2019).

In this relation, one might say that our approach is not economically viable, because the lifting gas helium is rare and hence already very expensive, and its use for recreational and commercial purposes already is a matter of intense discussions. But honestly, it is a problem of our competitors. :)

New York, New York
I want to wake up in that city
That never rides :D

15.April.2019
Style of Speed Further steps
The image below shows a quick doodle that C.S. made for getting a first impression of our new large panorama windows of the Leonardo→Leonardo Helicopters AugustaWestland AW101 (EH101) Merlin Very Very Very Important Person (VVVIP). We already checked that modifying its airframe is no problem.

© :I and Style of Speed

The reason for this and other exclusive modifications is that just only a Birkin travelling bag is much too profane as present for C.S.' mother. Now, D.S. gets her chopper for travelling, too, but in monochrome red. And C.S. has to get at first another bag also in red in addition to the grey one before starting with the paintjob. :)

If Leonardo wants to sell our design, then 5% of the overall revenue for the final helicopter are due, as is the case with our other original and unique works of art created by C.S. that the company already took.

21.April.2019
Style of Speed Further steps
In the last week, we worked on one of our special projects that we do just for fun and bridging the time gap. This project is about a foundational design of a specific type of Vertical TakeOff and Landing (VTOL) aircraft, which

The image below shows a VTOL aircraft with an intermeshing transverse rotor configuration, which gives merely a first impression of our design direction.

© :)

In subsequent steps, we added suitable elements of our

which

by considerable amounts.

Furthermore, our basic design of this type of VTOL aircraft can also be integrated with our basic design of our new type of business jet mentioned in the Further steps of the 14th of January 2019, though the result would not be classified as a jet anymore if turboprop engines are utilized instead of turbofan engines.

23.April.2019

08:56 and 10:00 UTC+2
More evidences Tesla mimicking C.S. and C.S. GmbH

*** Work in progress - some informations, links to C.S.' art projects, and discussions of royalties missing ***
After the companies Uber and SoftBank with its other portfolio companies reacted on our statement made in the Ontonics Further steps of the 29th of March 2019 it does not took too long that the company Tesla reacted, too. From a report we got the following information: "Tesla says robotaxis coming to U.S. roads next year, slams rivals' use of Lidar
Chief Executive Elon Musk said Tesla Inc robotaxis with no human drivers would be available in some U.S. markets next year, continuing a habit of bold pronouncements that have excited many investors while often missing deadlines.
"Probably two years from now we'll make a car with no steering wheels or pedals," Musk predicted, while acknowledging he is often late to meet aggressive targets.
Central to this promise is a new microchip for self-driving vehicles unveiled by Musk on Monday during a webcast presentation. Made by Samsung Electronics Co Ltd in Texas, the chip now in all vehicles is hoped to give Tesla an edge over rivals and show its massive investment in autonomous driving - described by Musk as "basically our entire expense structure" - will pay off.
[...]
"The fundamental message consumers should be taking away today is it's financially insane to buy something other than a Tesla. It's like buying a horse," saying Tesla was the only company to have a full self-driving suite of hardware.
Tesla has been working on a self-driving chip since 2016 and Musk had previously forecast that cars would be fully self-driving by 2018, a target Tesla has missed.
[...]
Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives said Tesla's robotaxi ambition was "impressive," but added that investors will be concerned by "the practicality and financial implications of this endeavor especially with Waymo miles ahead of the autonomous competition [utilizing lidar]."
[...]
Musk took a swipe at competitors relying on Lidar, light-based sensors that are a key element in most other self-driving systems.
"Lidar is a fools' errand. And anyone relying on Lidar is doomed," said Musk, who has been vocal about the technology's limitations. Tesla vehicles rely on cameras and radars as their vision system for self-driving.
Competitors will eventually "dump" Lidar, he said: "It's expensive and unnecessary and once you solved vision it's worthless."
[...]
Musk called Tesla's new chip the industry's best because it was dedicated for autonomous driving, while others, like Nvidia Corp, developed chips for multiple uses.
Tesla's chip was capable of seven times as many frames as Nvidia's Xavier system, said Pete Bannon, Tesla's head of Autopilot hardware. Nvidia said the comparison was inaccurate.
U.S. magazine Consumer Reports cautioned against Tesla's "bold claims about self-driving capabilities that overpromise and underdeliver."
"Claims about (Tesla's) driving automation systems and safety are not backed up by the data, and it seems today's presentations had more to do with investors than consumers' safety," wrote the publication.""

First of all, the clarifying information has to be added that Tesla is not the only company that has a full self-driving suite of hardware, because it merely does the same as every other company in this field that is buying the components of more specialized suppliers, as is the case here with Samsung.
Furthermore, that is not called being late but mimicking and conducting unfair business practices.

Obviously, Tesla together with Samsung have copied our AutoBrain, and Active Sensor and Active Actuator components, specifically the Active Camera components of our business unit Style of Speed.

So far so good. But this raises the question how our royalties are calculated. It seems to be that at least all automobiles are developed on the basis of our OAOS and our fields of CPS 2.0, IoT 2.0, and NES 2.0, including IIoT and Industry 4.0.
But the same holds for the autonomous vehicle technology based on our revolutionary Ontologic System as well.
share of 5% for hardware or a fixed fee as guaranteed royalty if overall revenue is too low
The problem is only the transition period when an item is not completely

our Ontologic System (OS), specifically our

Btw.: We do not know what this marketing nonsense comprising those attempts of camouflaging the true source, that is C.S. and our visions and works, should be good for, because all larger companies do know and utilize our works of art as well.

We are sorry to say, but we do not discuss that matter and those cheap tricks and strategies since some weeks anymore, but refer to the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our common statements:
All or nothing at all. Now and not in the future.
We will not make any further concessions.

OntomaX - The True News Leader™.
Proven by Reality™.

13:46 UTC+2
More evidences IAV GmbH mimicking C.S. and C.S. GmbH

*** Work in progress - some informations, links to C.S.' art projects, and discussions of royalties missing ***
Before we could work out the details of licensing our personal, original and unique, iconic works of art titled Ontologic System and Ontoscope, and created by C.S. in relation to the design, reasearch and development, manufacturing, marketing, sale, and maintenance of products by utilizing our Ontologic System (OS) and Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) we found out once again that these operations are done by utilizing our OS and OAOS since around the year 2008.

We quote an online encyclopedia about the company IAV GmbH: "IAV GmbH (German: Ingenieurgesellschaft Auto und Verkehr, literal Engineer Society Automobile and Traffic), abbreviated to IAV, is an engineering company in the automotive industry. [...] Clients include the Volkswagen Group, BMW, PSA Peugeot Citroën, Fiat, Ford Motor Company, General Motors, Porsche and Toyota.[2] Component manufacturer clients include Robert Bosch GmbH, Delphi, Continental AG and ZF Group.
[...]
As of 2013 the shareholders of IAV GmbH were:

Note that Schaeffler owns Continental.

From the document titled "Geared Up For Tomorrow" and publicated by IAV we also got the following information: "InDrive-Simulator
Feeling what virtual prototypes are like to drive
The InDrive-Simulator is an innovative development tool for simulating and designing complex vehicle and powertrain systems under real driving conditions. It combines the advantages of offline simulation with the experience of driving a real prototype. As such, the InDrive-Simulator bridges the gap between simulating the first concept draft and testing the real-life prototype. The system consists of several main components. These are the basic vehicle with its interfaces, the real-time simulation computer with models and acceleration controller together with a dataset and visualization system.
At the heart of it is IAV's tried and proven Velodyn simulation tool with the real-time system for computing vehicle dynamics. Based on current vehicle speed, position of the accelerator, brake pedal, gear, current slope and cornering radius, the system uses mathematical models of the powertrain components to calculate the virtual prototype's expected acceleration. Depending on the level of model detailing used, it also computes other target variables like energy demand, SOC of the battery or component temperatures.
An acceleration controller in the vehicle operates the test mule in a way that accurately reproduces the virtual prototype's setpoint acceleration computed on the real-time system. To do this, the controller sends its output signal to the engine and transmission control unit. In addition, the onboard ACC system actively controls any required deceleration by the brake system."
There is more content included in this document, which was copied from our websites.

But more important for us is the fact that the cases of IAV and its shareholders and customers reflect the case of the company Lockheed Martin (see the note of the 11th of April 2019) and also proves our impression in the case of the companies Boeing and Tesla (see the note of today) in relation to the field of Cyber-Physical Systems of the second generation (CPS 2.0) and the subfields of Industry 4.0 and 5.0.

This fact also implies that not only all vehicle manufacturers of all types of vehicles but all industries are already doing so and a transition has already taken place.
fluent transition until the whole production is based on OAOS
The problem is only the transition period when an item is not completely

our Ontologic System (OS), specifically our

But the transition process is taking place since more than 10 years.
see also the issue SOPR #174 of the 5th of April 2019

Huijuijui

Style of Speed Further steps
We looked for existing parts and airplanes, that could be utilized, adapted, and converted for the construction of two variants of the specific type of Vertical TakeOff and Landing (VTOL) aircraft with an intermeshing transverse rotor configuration mentioned in the Further steps of the 21st of April 2019 comprising a

• Sukhoi SU-80 and
• Lockheed Martin X-55 Advanced Composite Cargo Aircraft (ACCA), which again is based on the Fairchild Dornier 328JET.

In relation to another aircraft project for D.S., which is based on either the

we began with the design of the interior architecture and the exterior surface of the fuselage with (pansy) flower pattern.

We also worked on our new propulsion technologies, and integrated and scaled several components, modules, and systems, which are readily available and already matured.

25.April.2019
Ontonics Further steps
We continued the work on some of our new energy systems.

Style of Speed Further steps
For the construction of the larger Vertical TakeOff and Landing (VTOL) transport aircraft mentioned in the Further steps of the 21st and 23rd of April 2019 we created 16 designs and selected our favorites based on fuel efficient propulsion systems with high-bypass ratio engines of the types

for further proceeding.

We also looked for existing parts and airplanes, that could be utilized, adapted, and converted for the construction of a third variant of this specific type of VTOL aircraft, which is a larger airliner based on either the

In relation to the other aircraft project for D.S. also mentioned in the Further steps of the 23rd of April 2019, we opted for the Boeing Business Jet BBJ 747-8, because it has a unique feature that none of the other jets has even not the Airbus Corporate Jet ACJ380 Prestige.
For sure, we made several original and unique modifications, which might become iconic optional features as well, added a small pool respectively large bathtub and various other elements, and selected the design style of the interior architecture.
Sadly, the potential termination of its production is already a matter of discussion due to the reason that customers are placing a high value on fuel efficiency and prefer the long-range twin-engine jets eventually resulting in an insufficient demand and market for the aircraft.
Nevertheless, after we wondered why the 747 is not updated with a fuselage, wings, and an empennage based on state of the art technologies we took the X-55A Advanced Composite Cargo Aircraft (ACCA) of the company Lockheed Martin and the 747 Dreamlifter respectively 747-400 Large Cargo Freighter (LCF) aircraft as inspirations and designed the section of the 747 fuselage between the first entrance door at the nose section and the tail section by utilizing advanced composite materials, as it was done with the Fairchild Dornier 328 Jet and the X-55A. We also looked for every structural element of the airframe and the exterior, which is also suitable for the substitution with an element made of advanced composite materials, and other possibilities of weight reduction.

If Boeing wants to sell our design, then 5% of the overall revenue for the final jet are due, as is the case with our other original and unique works of art created by C.S. that the company already took.

Furthermore, we continued the work on our new propulsion systems and specific configurations of them, that we intend to utilize in fascinating surface and air vehicles (see the Ontonics Further steps of today above).

26.April.2019
Ontonics Further steps
We developed three new types of a basic component or module, which is utilized for many basic machines in general, and has many constructional and operational advantages in particular. If it works as expected, then it will become the new standard and a little revolution.

27.April.2019
Ontonics Further steps
We developed a series of machines.

We also continued the work on some of our new energy systems.

When looking at some clever solutions by others and working on some smart solutions by us, we also got a feeling, an impression, or an early idea for more crazy things.

Style of Speed Further steps
We developed a series of Turbo Pulse Detonation Engines (TPDEs) or Pulse Detonation Turbines (PDTs), including turbojet, turbofan, turboshaft, turboprop, and propfan PDEs with various counts of stages and sizes of bypass, ducted and unducted variants, etc., that are much more efficient, as well as significantly lighter and cleaner than comparable combustion engines (see also the Further steps of the 5th of October 2014).
We are also working on the next development step.

Furthermore, we continued the work on our new propulsion systems and specific configurations of them (see the Ontonics Further steps of today above).

Moreover, we improved the new rotor technology mentioned in the Further steps of the 8th of November 2018 in two different ways.
In addition, we improved the efficience of a rotor once again. This solution works together with other rotors of us.

28.April.2019
Ontonics Further steps
We have integrated one of the types of basic component or module mentioned in the Further steps of the 26th of April 2019 in another basic component or module.

We also improved a series of machines.

Furthermore, we reviewed a known material problem with a very basic part of our Hover technologies on the basis of research and development results of other experts and us, and found two related solutions, with the

Even better, we also got

• technologies making them better working, more simple but also reliable, and potentially more efficient, and
• production processes making them better running and more effective.

In relation to our other anti-gravity and repulsorlift technologies, we investigated a known solution in more detail and saw that

(see also the Ontonics Further steps of the 9th of February 2018).

Style of Speed Further steps
Let us talk about ... hoverboards again.
In the Further steps of the 28th of March 2017 we said that "we have a first generation [of hoverboards] in our stocks". But we stopped the start of their production and sale, and eventually also delayed all related products, including our Hoverpods, because an enthusiast also pointed out a foundational material problem with a very basic part of our Hover technologies to us, which we were already aware of and looking at.
This problem was also one of the reasons why we developed conventional Vertical Take-Off and Landing (VTOL) aircrafts as alternatives (see for example the Further steps of the 14th of January 2019).

But luckily, our OntoLab, the Lab of Visions, reviewed and eventually solved the problem (see the Ontonics Further steps of today above).
The tide has turned once again.

29.April.2019
Ontonics Further steps
We developed variants of machines.

We also continued the work on a specific group of our Hoverinium (see the Further steps of the 1st of February 2018.

Style of Speed Further steps
We made the next development step in relation to our series of Turbo Pulse Detonation Engines (TPDEs) or Pulse Detonation Turbines (PDTs) mentioned in the Further steps of 27th of April 2019, which was quite straightforward but required a specific approach.
We are also working on the next development step, which is about the