In addition, we began to implement or adapt a specific variant of our Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) respectively framework following the demand of a group of customers.

02.March.2017
OntoLix and OntoLinux Further step
We looked at the implementation of an undisclosed tool and refined it for a custom system.

Ontologic Net Further steps
We saw that the Virtual Object System (VOS) and related informations given by its developers were copied for the next generation of the internet called Conent-Centric Networking (CCN) and the Named Data Networking (NDN) that we discussed in the Further steps of the 18th of December 2016 (see also the Investigations::Multimedia, AI and Knowledge management of the 22nd of February 2017).

SuperBingo!!!

03.March.2017
Comment of the Day
Ontoorb
Ontorb

Picture of the Day
Last Strike

© 20th Century Fox

See also the Picture of the Day #2 of the 24th of April 2012.
Coming next to your theater: Gatecrash at Google, Microsoft, and Co..

Preliminary investigations against Google and ROS started
In relation with a patent of Google that connects the object node kit or object interlinking system of the so-called Robot Operating System (ROS), which again was initiated and funded by Google eventually, with its Linux kernel operating system Android, we have begun to investigate if and which laws Google has broken once again.

OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update
We added in the section Network Technology of the webpage Links to Software the following references:
(see also Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) already linked by GNOME with Metisse of the Mekensleep Underware software library set, and Virtual Object System (VOS)).

We also added to the section History of the webpage of the OntoGraphics software component the informations about the

We also listed the Virtual Object System (VOS) and our Ontologic Request Brokers (OntoRBs) on the webpage of the OntoNet software component.

OntoLix and OntoLinux Further step
While looking for the information how Metisse included in the Mekensleep Underware software library set is connected with the Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA), and updating the webpage about Underware with this information, we have read the document "Metisse is not a 3D Desktop!"once again, which is linked in the section Window System of the webpage Links to Software.

Specifically interesting are the chapters:

04.March.2017
Website update
We clarified the misleading information that Metisse is based on the Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA), because Metisse is not connected with a specific desktop environment. But in the case that Metisse is used together with the GNU's Not Unix! (GNU) Network Object Model Environment (GNOME) it is also connected with GNOME's underlying component model, which is based on the Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA).

Yes, we do know that the GNOME project has substituted ist ORB based on CORBA with the inter-process communication (IPC) and remote procedure call (RPC) mechanism respectively message bus system or software bus D-Bus.

OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update
On the webpage about the Mekensleep Underware software library set we added the link to the OntoGraphics software component and also mentioned "Machine Learning (ML), and other SoftBionic (SB) techniques" in addition to Artificial Intelligence (AI), which belong to the initial features of our Ontologic Systems such as OntoLinux.

In relation with the Website update of yesterday we also made the following updates.
In the section OntoGraphics of the webpage Components we added the missing list points:

In the section OntoNet of the same webpage we added the missing list points:

In the section Network Technology of the webpage Links to Software we added the missing link:

and rearranged the existing link:

05.March.2017
Website update
We saw that we also described a part of the Ontologic Net (ON) in the Ontonics, OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 2nd of May 2016. To reduce confusion and increase order we substituted the term "OntoWeb" with the terms "Ontologic Net (ON) and Ontologic Web (OW)" in this message.
Correspondingly, we also updated the Investigations::Multimedia, AI and Knowledge management of the 10th of May 2016 at the only one position.

While we were already cleaning up inconsistencies, we also replaced the acronyms "OntoNet or ON" and "OntoWeb or OW" with "ON" and "OW" in the webpages for the months May 2016 and June 2016, because the labels OntoNet and OntoWeb are used for the related software components of our Ontologic System.
Missing for the moment is the substitution of the term "Ontoverse" to "Ontologic uniVerse (OV)" and "OntoVerse" as appropriated.

Website review
In the last days, we reviewed the TUNES operating system/Language project and found out that on the one hand some more elements of our Ontologic System (OS) were discussed and described already by its main authors before, but on the other hand the interpretations of elements by its authors are different despite using the same or similar terms for the discussion and description of their work and others' works, and somehow they had not enough knowledge to go beyond a common operating system, object-oriented and functional programming languages with dynamic compiling, and a relational database in relation with its realization respectively implementation. Also some changes were made, which have to be investigated in some cases.

As a consequence, some of our statements and clarifications given by us might be misleading, going to far, or wrong in parts, and potentially we have to review, evaluate, clarify, and correct the contents of our website of OntomaX accordingly.
Nevertheless, we got a better view on TUNES, our OS, and the whole field on the one side and no entity should see this as a carte blanche or free pass on the other side.
In the cases of companies, such as Microsoft and Google for example, and organizations, such as the ones around the so-called Industry 4.0 approach for example, the situation does not change, because the obsession with our Ontologic System (OS) and Ontologic System Architecture (OSA), the motivation to copy and even steal, the lack of own developments, and the other issues are more than obvious after viewing and evaluating the evidences.

OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps
While reviewing the TUNES operating system/Language project, we rediscovered the link to the Concurrent Constraint Programming (CCP or ConcConsP), Concurrent Logic Programming (CLP or ConcLP), Constraint Logic Programming (CLP or ConsLP), and the actor model, which is also described as a special case of Concurrent Constraint (Logic) Programming (CC(L)P) (see also the OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update of the 16th of May 2016 and the 1st of June 2016), and some other elements of our Ontologic System Architecture (OSA).
When we will continue with our OS and OSA description, we will make references, show the differences, and explain our optimizations and extensions to this and other systems accordingly and as done in the past.

Ontologic Net Further steps
We would like to give the information that our Ontologic Net (ON) is capable to provide the Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking (DTN) service by design.
"DTN works by providing a reliable and automatic “store and forward” data network that stores partial bundles of data in nodes along a communication path until the parts can be forwarded or retrans- mitted, then re-bundled at the final destination - either to ground stations on Earth, robotic spacecraft in deep space, or, one day, humans living on other planets. This differs from traditional Internet Protocols that require all nodes in the transmission path to be available during the same time frame for successful data transmission.", [National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), 21st of June 2016]

Ontonics Superstructure #6
Because the Ontologic Net (ON) is capable to provide the Delay/ Disruption Tolerant Networking (DTN) service by design (see the Ontologic Net Further steps of today) on the one hand and on the other hand the ON is also an integral part of our Ontonics Superstructure (see the issues Superstructure #1 of the 29th of October 2016 and Superstructure #2 of the 31st of October 2016) we have a seamless network system architecture.

In this way the Superstructure can also be viewed as a

(see the issue Superstructure #5 of the 19th of January 2017).

06.March.2017
Clarification
We continued with the review of the TUNES operating system / Language project (see the Website review of yesterday) and got a better oversight about it once again on the one hand and about the changes that followed since 2000 and 2003 on the other hand after we looked at it the last time around 13 or more years ago.
In the course of this, we also looked at three prominent works (once again) that are directly connected with TUNES, and two more works that are connected with the first work:

We also saw the deficits of the other works once again, and also remembered our thoughts of that time, which led to the development of our OS and its Ontologic System Architecture (OSA), and made some interesting observations:

• For example, in the description of the Arrow System the binary relation is presented as elemental on the one hand and in the discussion of the KnowOS the connection between the Relational Data Model (RDM) and the Binary Decision Diagram (BDD) as well as the transformations of graphs in relational databases is referenced. But despite both authors belong to the prominent members of the TUNES project they were unable to connect their insights and findings in contrast to C.S..
• Another example is that in the description of the Arrow System the human thought is given as an example domain and explained by referencing the fields of ontology, natural language, and meaning in the scope of an ontology, and also the statement is made that "a knowledge system that functions non-monotonically in complete isolation from human attention constitutes artificial intelligence [and therefore r]egarded in the terms of cybernetics, the question of artificial intelligence shifts from the issue of construction to that of mapping existing knowledge systems onto available hardware". But we have the impression that particularly Natural Language Processing (NLP) is not regarded as a basic functioning or processing principle of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and in the sense of the Bridge from Natural Intelligence (NI) to Artificial Intelligence (AI) in general and an operating system respectively a dynamic knowledge system in particular.
• In the Arrow System the ontological frame is a prominent aspect. In the end, a foundation of a knowledge base management system is implemented in a dialect of an object-oriented, dynamically typed, reflective programming language, but computational ontology, specifically techniques and technologies of the semantic (world wide) web, are mentioned and discussed but not considered as means of realization, as said above.
• The technique of rewriting is said to be an elemental feature of the TUNES system, the technique of graph transformation is referenced in the discussion of the KnowOS (potentially in the year 2006), and graph, transformation, and n-reference arrow are considered as elemental features of the Arrow System. But the technique of graph rewriting systems respectively (imperativ) graph rewrite rules or graph grammars such as e.g. PROgramming with Graph REwriting Systems (PROGRES) are not considered.
• The TUNES system is based on a worlds interface metaphor and a "user "logs in" to a world". But including the Mediated Reality (MedR) paradigm in general and the Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR), and Mixed Reality (MR) paradigms in particular are not considered, and projecting the system on the whole real world or viewing the kernel-less reflective system in the sense of creating a new space, world, or universe, and even a new reality is not understood.
• Other modalities than text and speech, and multimedia systems are only reviewed.

See also the OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update of today below.

Furthermore, we could not find any references to:
mobile phones, smartphones, or wearable computers, maybe even mobile devices at all, and
cybernetic extensions of the user by for example a smartphone or a wearable computer.

In addition, we see once again that hardware and software companies and also vehicle manufacturers cannot overcome with their dialog systems, virtual assistants, and so on, which are running on mobile devices operated by e.g. related operating systems and connected to distributed systems (e.g. network and cloud computing), the original and unique combination of a mobile device with such a system like the TUNES system as done with our Ontologic System and Ontoscope, specifically the aspect of a cybernetic extension of the user realized in this way and reported by the free media based on the experiences of users who own an unforeseeable and unexpected smartphone.

OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update
We updated the webpages Links to Software and Literature in the following ways.

In the section Logics of the webpage Literature we added the link:

In the section Abstract Machine of the same webpage we added the link:

In the section Exotic Operating System of the webpage Links to Software we added the links:

Keep in mind that:

In the section Semantic File/Storage System of the same webpage we added the link:

07.March.2017
Ontologic Net Further steps
We continued with the expansion of our Ontologic Net (ON) (see the related OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps 6th of July 2016) .

Style of Speed Further steps
In the course of our transformation to the Automobile 3.0 (see the Further steps of the 26th27th of June 2016) we developed the next generation of an Active Component.

We also developed a new Active Component.

Furthermore We also worked on two new models of our 9x9 series.

08.March.2017
Ontonics Further steps
In relation with our Reactor technology, we worked on an older technology (see the Further steps of the 18th April 2016 and 26th of February 2017) and a new technology.
In the course of this, we developed a new module by adapting parts and components of other technologies of us as appropriated.

We also continued with the development of a specific technology.

OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update
*** Work in progress - selection and listing of documents; some more links to messages ***
Just to keep everybody amused we added the following links to the section Formal Verification:

• Really Visual Temporal Reasoning
• A Graphical Interval Logic Toolset for Verifying Concurrent System
• Visual Specifications for Temporal Reasoning
• Automated Deduction in Graphical Temporal Logic

The Real-Time Future Interval Logic (RTFIL) is presented, which is a visual linear-time temporal logic and a real-time extension of the Future Interval Logic (FIL). "[T]his logic, we have reffered to the graphical representation as Graphical Interval Logic (GIL) and to the textual representation as Future Interval Logic (FIL). In addition, a related automated theorem prover is presented and the connection to symbolic model-checking is shown."
"The [Graphical Interval L]ogic is equivalent in expressiveness to [P]ropositional [T]emporal [L]ogic [(PTL)] with the until operator but without the next operator." "For example, the Propositional Temporal Logic and the Interval Temporal Logic have both been encoded in ML, the meta-language of the higher-order logic theorem prover HOL." "[... the authors] have extended the toolset to include a decision procedure to support verification of real-time properties of concurrent systems."
Graphical Interval Logic (GIL) is a visual temporal logic and hence modal temporal logic respectively modal logic, has a proof checker, is connected with Petri nets, and supports formal specification and verification of concurrent systems. "[Its] editor interfaces with proof checking and model generator, which permit verification and temporal interferences." "[The authors] plan to integrate the GIL tools with an automated reasoning system that provides decision procedures [...] and [...] support for the management of proofs." The tools comprise a visual editor, are written in Common Lisp, and run in the X-Window system.
[The authors] developed an automated deduction system for the Real-Time Graphical Interval L]ogic [(RTGIL)], which includes a theorem prover and a user interface. The theorem prover checks the validity of proofs in the logic and produces counterexamples to invalid proofs." "The user interface includes a graphical editor [...], and a database and proof manager [...]" "[They] describe the logic, the automated deduction system, and an application to robotics."

Needless to say that our OntoBot replaces the user in the loop for example by applying Evolutionary Computing (EC) techniques, such as Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Genetic Programming (GP), to generate input specifications for an automated theorem prover. Indeed, OntoBot is creative.

Let us connect some dots in the following:

Now we see here:

which shows nicely how everything fits and works together. More remarkably, we even have not mentioned at this point the many other features of our OS such as the other SoftBionics (SB) techniques, including e.g. Machine Learning (ML), Multimodal User Interface (MUI), AR, VR, and MR, and so on, as well as our reduction of this coherent core and synthesizes of the OntoCore (OC).

It should be noted that we already did all these works in the period of the year 1999 to 2005, and (virtually) all of the related website updates and clarifications are only the resolution of what we have publicated in a very dense and minimalistic way in the end of October and the beginning of November of 2006 and the proof that the implementation of the OS was already possible at that time. The only really new additions were the

Investigations::Car #412

• a small but nevertheless substantial copyright infringement, because that company had 30 years to design, develop, and realize such an original and unique conversion, but only did it when we discussed and showed it, as it is the case with all the others inclusive the factory (see the Investigations::Car #404 of the 20th of November 2016), and
• an illegal act of unfair competition practicing, because it is more than obvious that the public has been misled deliberately about the true origin of the concept and related designs, and because this was not the first time.

We have seen this fraud trick several times before, for example with our 9EE GTE even in relation with Ruf, our Raptor, and our 458 GTO. Now, we wait for a model 911 with a monocoque chassis, suspension with reversing units, and a rear engine manufactured by the factory Porsche.

Give fraudsters no chance.

09.March.2017
Clarification
We have discussed our Ontologic System (OS) many times in the last years, but we would like to give some more informations in relation with the Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV) of our OS.
The foundational concept of our ON, OW, and OV comprises reflective, intelligent, and cognitive properties, but also multimodal properties (see also the second sketch of the Bridge from Natural Intelligence (NI) to Artificial Intelligence (AI)). This means that the content or information used with the techniques and technologies of Content-Addressable Memory (CAM), Content-Addressable Storage (CAS), and Content-Addressable Network (CAN), as well as Information-Centric Networking (ICN) must not only be text, and the addressing content or information even must not be of the same type like the addressed content or information (see also the Ontonics, OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 2nd of May 2016). For example,

In addition, we would also like to mention that we designed the whole ON and OW, and even the OV as a Content Management System (CMS) as well and not only as a Knowledge Management System (KMS) and an infrastructure of Product Lifecycle Management (PLM), including Total Quality Management (TQM) and Computer-Aided technologies (CAx) (see also the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further of the 20th of February 2014 ).

Ontonics Further steps
We optimized our Reactor technology in a very promising way.

10.March.2017
Ontonics Further steps
By happenstance, we have developed a new type of redox flow battery, which provides at least 95% more capacity in comparison with common redox flow batteries.
Such an improvement could or even should be declared as a game changer.

When looking at the new technology of us mentioned in the 26th of February 2017 we realized only now how revolutionary it truly is.

Now it is getting interesting and fascinating. We decided to start the prototyping and production phases of one of our new electric energy storage devices, which is designed for the utilization in mobile devices (see the Ontonics Further steps of the 25th of February 2017 for example).
But before we could begin with constructing a first prototype we already found a way to optimize it by using the technology mentioned in the Further steps of the 26th of February 2017.
The runtime of for example an Ontoscope, or a smartwatch, tablet computer, and smartphone, as well as other devices will increase by at least 10 times in the beginning, but we think a factor of 16 to 18 times should be possible.
Regenerating time is estimated to be 2 to 4 times faster in comparison to a common battery.

But before we could begin with constructing a first prototype we already developed another model.
Regenerating time is in less than 10 or even 5 minutes depending on the specific configuration of a variant.

To recall, the electric energy storage device has

It seems to be that we got it.

In addition, we have developed our own solar paving technology, which provides many advantages when compared with the existing solutions for solar roadways, sidewalks, bikeways, parking lots, etc..
Nevertheless, where we are going, we do not need roads. But sometimes we would like to have a walk and we also need a parking lot for our swoops and speeders.

Innovation happens.

Style of Speed Further steps
We developed a new model in three variants of our superior helicopter platform, which is much more flexible than comparable concepts on the one hand and on the other hand can be constructed immediately to close the gap until our Zero Gravity Manned Aerial Vehicle (ZGMAV) and Zero Gravity Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (ZGUAV) technologies are introduced.

12.March.2017
Clarification
Somehow we forgot to mention all the years why we referenced complete distributions based on the Linux kernel, such as Debian, Knoppix (see 12th of March 2017, and Ubuntu, Kubuntu, and Edubuntu (see the 22nd of September 2007). The reason can be found very easily, because in addition we also named explictily an automatic package manager in the webpage Ontologic Applications of the website of OntoLinux. Now guess why?
Maybe it has something in common with all the included software packages such as the programming language Java, Object Request Broker (ORB), OpenOffice, and so on.

Ah, what ... does Berners-Lee and Co. want?
"Sir Tim [Berners-Lee] said he wants to start to combat the misuse of personal data, which creates a "chilling effect on free speech".
[...]
The British computer scientist [and so-called inventor of the world wide web (there were many others involved, see for example the Project Xanadu)] said he wants the people who have helped develop the web with blogs, tweets, photos, videos and web pages to help come up with practical solutions to make a web "that gives equal power and opportunity to all".
[...]
However, central bodies deciding what is true or not should be avoided, he added.
[...]
Users are often unable to tell outlets what data they would not like shared, [Berners-Lee] said. Terms and conditions were "all or nothing". [Berners-Lee] said he wants to work with companies to put "a fair level of data control back in the hands of people"."

Ah, what ...?

Honestly, Berners-Lee and all the other cardsharpers either have no clue somehow what is going on, or they do not want to understand that they are out of the business since more than 10 years already. In fact, it is already the second time since 2006 that he and others want to get control over our OS, ON, OW, and OV.
And exactly this is the true reason why this web "that gives equal power and opportunity to all" does not exist, because all the time some Sirs, Docs, Profs, and other smart entities stray around, babble nonsense, spread lies, and steal other Intellectual Properties (IPs) for being in charge.

Do not think that we will tolerate persons in our ON, OW, and OV, who are doing only stupid politics and fraudulent entities doing only crimes, because what they created did not work in the last decades, obviously. This sounds more despotic then it truly is in practice (see also the Ontologic Web Further steps of the 11th of December 2016).
However, central figures telling what is right or wrong should be avoided. So please, shut up and go away with your fake web, fakepedia, fake book, fake press, and fake world.

Ontonics Further steps
We have developed a new Powerinium composite based on the new technology mentioned in the Further steps of the 26th of February 2017 and 10th of March 2017.

Besides this, we continued the work on a technology and integrated the new Powerinium composite developed today.

Rock 'n' Roll :D

13.March.2017
Comment of the Day
Ontostore™

Website update
To reduce confusion and increase order we substituted the terms "OntoNet" and "OntoWeb" with the terms "Ontologic Net" and Ontologic Web" in the Clarification of the 23rd of November 2016, and the Ontologic Web Further steps of the 9th and 10th of December 2016.

Nevertheless, the public still can use the short terms OntoNet, OntoWeb, and OntoVerse as well, for sure.

Ontonics Further steps
We continued the work on our Reactor technology and optimized a module that is around 33% more efficient now and in this way short before reaching the theorectical maximal efficiency of the common approach.
In addition, we have begun to substitute materials, components, and modules to make the final devices more cost effective.

We also developed a new reactor model, which might have some advantages.

In this relation, we are also investigating if the capacity of our electric energy storage devices is 2.5 times higher than estimated (see the Further steps of the 25th of February 2017 and 10th of March 2017). One reason is that we compared it with Liquid Hydrogen (LH) instead of Compressed Gaseous Hydrogen (CGH) stored at 700 bar/10,153 psi, which has been corrected in the related message. We already wondered why it performs so badly. Ooops.

Furthermore, we developed our model of a very interesting actuator.

In addition, we continued the work on a technology and developed its next generation.

Besides this, we found in a side note of a document a very interesting statement about a technology, which we are trying to develop further.

Ontologic Net Further steps
We continued with the expansion of our Ontologic Net (ON).

We also integrated this expansion with for example the ON expansion noted in the Further steps of the 7th of March 2017 and the Ontonics Further steps of the 8th of March 2017.

Ontologic Web Further steps
We improved one of our Ontologic Web (OW) services, which is based on basic features and functionalities of our Ontologic System (OS).

We also continued the work on our online shopping platform Ontostore.

In addition, we improved the synergies between our products and services.

14.March.2017
Ontonics Further steps
We combined an older solution of us with a technology mentioned in the Further steps of the 5th of February 2017 and with the crazy technology mentioned in the Further steps of the 20th of February 2017 for two different developments that increase the efficiency of a foundational technology.
In a subsequent step, we also integrated the two new resulting technologies with another one of the technologies mentioned in the Further steps of the 5th of February 2017.

Honestly, these developments are so straightforward that we were wondering at first why we have not seen them before some days ago.
You will love it. Definitely.

We also developed two new variants of a device with improved performance.
Furthermore, we continued the work on the component and module serious mentioned in the Further steps of 16th of November 2016.

Ontonics Hovercity #3
We improved the infrastructure of our Hovercity (see also issue #1 publicated on the 3rd of February 2017).

We love our OntoVerse with our new reality.

Ontonics Superstructure #7
We improved our 3D infrastructure.

OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps
We continued the work on the newest generation of an older variant of our Ontologic System (OS), which solves a foundational problem.
Honestly, we always only hoped to get so far, but now we are realizing that we reached this goal as well.

15.March.2017
Comment of the Day #1
Hoverbrick™
Hoverbrix™

Comment of the Day #2
"I deleted my social media apps because they were turning me into an idiot", [Headline of a report, Today]
But still quoting messages of a short messaging service so that we have to read a message twice all the time in a media report?

Joke of the Month
"Who checks the fact checkers? The lying press being checked."
Nice try.

Roboticle Further steps
Oh, how could this happen? We forgot to develop our Hoverbrick, which is a Lego brick made of Hoverinium.

Investigations::Car #413

Because our AutoMapCloud, AutoSemantic, and other multimedia works of art and computing paradigms are original and unique, it is not possible in general to describe, reuse, or transform them in any way

16.March.2017
Ontonics Further steps
We continued with the preparation of the production of one of our advanced processor series and one of our System on a Chip (SoC) series based on said processor series (see the Further steps of the 16th, 26th, and 27th of November 2016). Mildly said, this SoC has the potential to replace the SoCs that are used actually, specifically in the fields of mobile devices and robotics, which include autonomous vehicles. It is a hammer.

Style of Speed Further steps
We designed the initial variant of our ETE 3.0, with which we are writting automotive history once again on the one hand, as usual, and on the other hand we are making the next step to take over the automotive sector, transport sector, and mobility sector.

Honestly, we really do not know what the other companies want to achieve with the components and modules as well as mobility services mostly stolen from us if they have not the basic techniques and technologies as well as the vehicles.

17.March.2017
Comment of the Day
Hoverpod™
Hoverorb™
Hoverzorb™
Horb™
Flying orb™
Flying zorb™
Forb™

Ontonics Further steps
We reviewed the Hoverinium materials and composites to confirm their properties once again, selected the ones for production, and specify their form factors, as well as designed the production plant and its machines.

We also confirmed the

once again as well.

The Future Is Now! Exclusively created by C.S. for our fans, customers, and business units of Ontonics.

Ontonics Hovercity #4
We confirmed the first infrastructure elements of the first construction phase of our Hovercity (see also the related section of the Ontonics Further steps of the 5th of February 2017).

Ontonics Space Elevator #10
We confirmed the first construction phase of our Space Elevator 3 (SE3) with a projected height of 20 km/12.43 mi once again (see the issue #8 publicated on the 5th of December 2015).

Roboticle Further steps
We have developed our first hoverbot with modular actuator system that can receive modules like a gripper, succer, and lamp for example.
The hoverbots can be utilized for applications in

• communication
• warehouse,
• transportation,
• manufacturing,
• inspection,
• cleaning,
• security

• communication, robohub or hub robot, a fusion between smart home hub and smart home robot,
• inspection,
• cleaning,
• repair,
• security,
• kitchen work,
• gardening,
• recreation,
• sports,
  • ball collector in tennis and golf,
  • frisbee collector,
• transportation
  • trolly,
• dog sitter and walker (see also Back to the Future II),

• rescue services,
• law enforcement services,
• military,

Style of Speed Further steps
We are pleased to announce our new Hoverorb™ and Hoverpod™ aerial vehicle platforms, which can be described by the explanation we gave on the 2nd of February 2017 in relation with the incredible Hoverinium materials developed in the OntoLab:
"For a better way of understanding by our fans, friends, and readers we have chosen a hopper balloon as an exemplary aircraft. A hopper balloon is basically a personal hot air balloon, which in our case has the shape of a sphere with a radius of around 5 meter and a volume of around 524 m³[ (see the image)]. T]he balloon, the pilot, the gas burner, and the gas tank weight around 100 kg[/220.46 lb] all together.

Hoverinium is based on at least 2 physical effects that provide [considerably] more lift force in comparison to such a hot air balloon [depending on the type of material or composite]. If we take the balloon in the shape of a sphere with the radius of 5 m as compari- son[, which with a volume of 524 m³ of hot air having a temperature of 100 °C generates a lift force of around 1425 N respectively lifts 145 kg at an ambient temperature of 15 °C,] then the same amount of mass can be lifted with a sphere made of [one specific material of the] Hoverinium [class,] that has a radius of only 3.5 m and a volume of 180 m³."

©© BY 2.5 Roland Escher
©© BY-SA 3.0 Roland Escher
GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2

One of our mock-ups is based on the multimedia work of art titled Flying Orb or Forb, and created by C.S. as part of the Hovercity project, which again is based on the so-called zorb, also known as an inflatable human hamster ball, and correspondingly called Hoverorb. Now the hamster can fly. :D
The image shows a zorb in the standard size with an outer orb with a radius of 1.6 m and an inner orb with a radius of 0.9 m which results in around 14 m³ of air in the space between the outer and inner hulls.

© Shinra Inflatables Factory

Such a sphere or orb is used as the exchange for the coaxial rotor and the passenger pod of our helipod shown in the Further steps of the 13th of January 2016.
The image shows an inflatable bounce house that we adapted as another mock-up for our Hoverpod.

© Beston Inflatables

Take your seat and have a good flight.
Have we promised too much in the Ontonics Further steps of the 18th of December 2015 and the Style of Speed Further steps of the 19th of December 2015 in relation with this new device?

In contrast to our first series of powered lift aircrafts and the illegal copies of our techniques and technologies based on quadrocopters for example, which have many serious deficits, our original and unique Hoverorbs and Hoverpods are very safe and highly efficient, and have very long flight ranges and very long flight times of more than the 10 minutes of a quadrocopter (see also the Further steps of the 14th of February 2017).

18.March.2017
Style of Speed Further steps
We would also like to show another mock-up of our Hoverorb and Hoverpod aerial vehicle platforms that has the shape of a tube, also designated as roller. But is should have become obvious already that these aerial vehicle platforms can be made in arbitrary shapes.

© :(

Looks simple but it is not, definitely.

Investigations::Robotics

20.March.2017
Ontonics Space Elevator #11
We worked on the second construction phase of our Space Elevator 3 (SE3), that will put either the

on its first structure by our special way of construction.

In the following step, we reviewed the generation and distribution of the power required for the powertrain of the climber. In the course of this, we compared our architecture with the classic space elevator architecture once again and noted how far we have departed from the latter. Specifically, the cable and the climber are totally different and will convince every expert.

Style of Speed Further steps
In a first step, we overworked fuselages and wings of common airliners, such as the Boeing 737 and 787, with one of the 0 Gravity 2.0 composites developed by the OntoLab.
In a second step, we estimated the overall efficiency of such a conversion to a Vertical Take-Off and Landing (VTOL) aircraft.
In a third step, we reused as much as possible parts of common airliners for the design of two other airliners, which might be more advantageous from the point of view of such a VTOL conversion, because in either way similar works have to be done.

Most potentially, this development provided more advantageous besides VTOL capability, such as lower fuel consumption, Short Take-Off and Landing (STOL) capability, and Cruise-Efficient Short Take-Off and Landing (CESTOL) capability.

There is something in the wind.

21.March.2017
Roboticle Further steps
We worked on a specific type of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV).

22.March.2017
Comment of the Day
^♥^

Ontonics Further steps
We reviewed a production process for some special modules once again.

23.March.2017
Clarification
Keep in mind that we

Ontonics Further steps
We adapted a technology to solve a foundational problem with another technology.
In a subsequent development step we improved this integration and eventually concluded that we have solved the problem in a more straightforward way. Now, we are investigating if somebody else had this idea before.

24.March.2017
Ontonics Further steps
After we reviewed our internal innovation-pipeline we were able to confirm that we have improved a composite. This technology becomes better and better as well.

25.March.2017
Ontonics Further steps
We worked on the production process of one of our material and composite series, as well as related machines required for its production, and systems and products based on it.

Style of Speed Further steps
We worked on our Hoverorb and Hoverpod.

In this relation, we made the next comparison with the hopper balloon (see the Further steps of the 17th of March 2017) that is based on 21 N/m³ of generated lift force, which is 7.047 times better than hot air with a temperature of 100 °C and more than 2.027 times better than helium.
When we make the relation with the hopper balloon than we get: 524 m³:7=74 m³ and a radius of 2.605 m. Oh!

Roboticle Further steps
We worked on some details of our Personal Satellite Assistant (PSA) shown as Original on the 5th of February 2017.

We also worked on some details of Eve (see the Further steps of the 4th of February 2017).

We also worked on some details of a quadcopter, which is the first product of our Hovering Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (HUAV) platforms (see the Further steps of the 5th of February 2017 once again).

King Smiley Further steps
We worked on a special multimedia work of art created by C.S..

26.March.2017
Ontonics Hovercity #5
We worked on the infrastructure of our Hovercity.

Style of Speed Further steps
We worked on our supersonic aircrafts with sonic boom suppressor (see the Further steps of the 27th of January 2016) and more by happenstance we developed another supersonic aircraft that creates no sonic boom at all.

27.March.2017
Ontonics Further steps
We adapted a design in various ways to improve a technology.

We also adapted an improvement of a technology to improve one of our technologies.

iRaiment Further steps
We worked on the design of a new model of our Thin Watch series (see also the Further steps of the 19th and 20th of July 2016).

Style of Speed Further steps
We continued the work on our Hoverorb and Hoverpod.

In this relation, we made the next comparison with the hopper balloon (see the Further steps of the 17th and 25th of March 2017) that is based on 55 N/m³ of generated lift force, which is 18.456 times better than hot air with a temperature of 100 °C and more than 5.308 times better than helium.
When we make the relation with the hopper balloon than we get: 524 m³:18.4=28.5 m³ and a radius of 1.895 m respectively 2 of the zorbs or 1 of the UFO shown in the Further steps of the 17th of March 2017, or the tube shown in the Further steps of the 18th of March 2017 with the latter dimensioned accordingly. This should fit into a common automobile garage. OOh!

We also selected seven basic shapes that we find as most practicable.

The specification of our air taxis and larger delivery drones used in our Hovercity is in the beginning as follows:

These data are based on estimations and might change in the future. Other models have higher values.

28.March.2017
Style of Speed Further steps
We already discussed the latest developments in relation with our Speeders in the Further steps of the 14th of February 2017.

Today, let us talk about ... hoverboards. What else? :D
Yes, we have a first generation in our stocks since some weeks.

29.March.2017
Ontonics Further steps
Believe it or not, but we have also a microwave oven, respectively a whole line of such a device. And its unique features are quite impressive (see also the Further steps of the 5th of January 2017). Most potentially, we will take over this market segment as well.

We developed our first variant of a device, which is also a variant of a related device.
We also developed our second variant of the device, and our third variant of the device by integrating the first and the second variants.

We also worked on our new mobile computing platform and made a first simulation. It is absolutely amazing.

Style of Speed Further steps
We worked on the designs of a foldable hoverboard.

Furthermore, we adapted a technique and a technology to improve our hoverboard platform.

We also developed another variant of a sports equipment.

Investigations::Multimedia Preview

Furthermore,

This situation has become very easy to be interpreted and understood: If the whole ITC industry, specifically the mobile computing industry, copies our work, if the whole automotive, aerospace, and defense industries, as well as other industries copy our work, if 100s of universities copy our work, if this and that group copies our work, then our works can only be original and unique works.

30.March.2017
Ontonics Further steps
We added another technology to some of our devices and integrated their functionality with one of our related systems.

Ontoscope Further steps
We have perfected the implementation of our Ontoscope paradigm and technology by adding a neuromorphic chip that can be programmed to reflect, enhance, and extend the brain of a user conceptually in whole but in the beginning only in part. See also the project Enhanced Cognition in the Innovation-Pipeline of Ontonics.

The image shows such a neuromorphic chip of the year 2014 with 4096 neurosynaptic cores, #cores×256=1,048,576 programmable neurons, and #neurons×256=268,435,456 programmable synapses (see also the Clarification of the 8th of August 2014).

© :I and :I

Keep in mind that on the one hand our original and unique Ontoscope comprises all kinds of sensors, which are connected to its artificial brain, and on the other hand our other original and unique multimedia work of art titled Ontologic System is also designed for such an event-driven chip and computing, and has been publicated by C.S. accordingly many years ago. See for example the Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) described in The Proposal and the other related informations.

Please keep in mind: Original and unique work of art, copyrighted, patented, patent pending, or/and patent queuing.

iRaiment Further steps
We have perfected the implementation of our smartwatch and wrist-worn Ontoscope technology platforms and our smart eyewear and head-worn Ontoscope technology platforms by adding a neuromorphic chip that can be programmed to reflect, enhance, and extend the brain of a user conceptually in whole but in the beginning only in part (read also the Ontoscope Further steps of today).

We also developed new models of one of our modules.

31.March.2017
Style of Speed Further steps
We developed two more models of our Reactor technology as part of a hybrid powertrain that are more efficient and environmental friendly than a battery electric drivetrain in an overall view and with an optional module even in operation.