The two very dirty doodles show our foundational concept.

© Tatum, :(, and Style of Speed

So far, we have seen the combination of

but not this specific configuration on the basis of both combinations with one vehicle in general and on the basis of a Jeep in particular.
Also especially interesting for us are the

The model Gladiator has a large truck bed and what would be better than to use it for carrying a large V8 engine with a lot of power, which easily compensates the additional weight of the weight-optimized body in comparison to a sandrail and a sand car.
So far, we have the

What we have seen with other cars are crazy performances of acceleration, absorbtion, and animation.

More Power - More Speed - More Fun

08.September.2020

20:09, 25:28, 26:43 UTC+2
Ontonics Further steps

We have examined the idea of a collaboration or a deal between the vehicle manufacturer Volkswagen and Tesla (Motors) suggested by their Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) in a highly creative way.

Eventually, we really have no clue how such a collaboration or deal should work and be realized, specifically without blowing up the Tesla scheme and avoiding a resulting collapse, or loosing a huge amount of money for the purchase of hot air.
Howsoever, we do not intervene in the management of other companies in general and in the management of our companies in particular, if decisions are not beyond rationality in the latter case.

What might be a solution to this dilemma is

of the merger to be established, valued 4,000 billion U.S. Dollar or euro, and made (potentially) a Superbolt of one of our Blitz Fund investment programs. :)

10.September.2020

11:33 and 22:11 UTC+2
SOPR #300

*** Work in progress ***
Topics
This issue summarizes various informations publicated in the last days and some shares some new informations in relation to the usual topics:

Legal matter
In general, every country has the same rights like any other country in relation to the protection of its sovereingty and national security. But international laws, regulations, and acts, as well as agreements are effective in relation to personal rights, property rights, and trade rights.
Therefore, no entity, including governments and companies, holds any right related to our Ontologic System (OS) and our Ontoscope (Os).
And we have not made any restriction concerning an export or a sale of technologies, goods, and services based on our OS and our Os.

In case we come to the conclusion that asserting authority in this way equals another act of

by a government of a state, then we will consider an appropriate update of our measures. In fact, we have much more possibilities to improve the enforcement of our rights. For example, we could

which would also affect any collaboration with entities not from said state. :)

Howsoever, digital properties, specifically raw signals and data, informations, knowledge, models, and algorithms, belong to the respective owner with the exception that unrestricted access to raw signals and data has to be granted to our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR).

By the way: If someone wants to make a judge laugh, then claim for a customary right for our OS. In fact, if the whole world plays a song played before by the media, then it still does not own the copyright for the song.

Legal matter [Measures]
Only in the last few months, we have once again frequently demanded that entities, including governments and companies, respect our rights and stop disturbing our activities and instead ensure law and order.
Therefore, our SOPR is short about to introduce the 51% ownership regulation, also called as Chinese win-win policy, for companies of other countries and states in Europe and North America.

Legal matter [Infrastructure]
We have reviewed related matters discussed in the issues #293 of the 26th of July 2020 over #297 of the 14th of August 2020 to #299 of the 21st of August 2020 and concluded that the SOPR does the so-called management and orchestration plane or space in the whole observable universe. See for example the following fabricated materials:

• The new value architecture: distribtued and dynamic and
• Rethinking Network Architecture, as well as
• The quantificaton of future value

in the online report titled "The Killer App for 5G Networks", 16th of May 2018, which discusses the related parts of our OS and also shows once again why any royalty and regulation of our SOPR concerning our ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) are worth it, and

The application and service plane or space, and the data plane or space have been opened by our SOPR anyway, and we also said that the control plane or space should also be opened (see issue #299 of the 21st of August 2020) for

and simultaneously

Please keep also in mind that orchestration and control are management tasks, specifically in relation to a closed control loop of

but also the other tasks, such as for example

• customer, end user, manufacturer, service provider (utility; enterprise to enterprise), service provider (application; enterprise to end user)

• ComSP, TSP and ISP,
• WebSP and CloudSP

• IaaS, PaaS, Operating system aaS, Network aaS, and Software aaS (SWaaS), Service aaS

• infrastructure (facility, service), technology (system, platform), goods (application), and service not IaaS, PaaS, and SWaaS, etc.

• on-premise, private, public, and hybrid infrastructures or environments owned, used, and managed by the members and licensees of our SOPR,
• shared infrastructure(s) or environment(s) used by all members and licensees of our SOPR and by our SOPR itself, and managed by
  • our SOPR,
  • main contractors, suppliers, and providers of our SOPR, and
  • joint ventures between federal and public authorities and institutes, and our SOPR,

  and

• private or exclusive infrastructure or environment used by our SOPR for all members and licensees of our SOPR and for oru SOPR itself, and managed by
  • our SOPR, and
  • main contractors, suppliers, and providers of our SOPR.

• non-industrial,
• industrial,
• ...,
• non-ICT,
• ICT

• os and OntoCore,
• mSOA,
• aaS,
• spatial computing

We will not make further changes, because we have more than enough to do and we do not want to do so much at all due to other interests, and therefore hope that we can count on the support of other entities, specifically our main contractors, suppliers, and service providers, to accomplish the tasks.

This arrangement has many advantages for every member and licensee of our SOPR, for example we

• providing carrier-grade differentiated network services and ubiquitous coverage,
• unifying heterogeneous radio and networking technologies supporting the existing cellular, WLAN, and satellite technologies, and
• efficiently interworking them with the new radio access access and fixed access networks,

• service management, including planning, orchestrating, resource controlling, result controlling, and monitoring,
• network slicing and
• network access sharing

(see the issues #297 of the 14th of August 2020 and #299 of the 21st of August 2020 once again).

Infrastructure
We have also continued with the realization of the physical facilities of the infrastructure of our SOPR, specifically physical networks for the data plane or data space, or transport layer, by looking for infrastructure providers, network operators, and related OAOSPs (see also the Ontonics Further steps of today below).
While the shared

can be used by all members and licensees free of charge (included in royalties or fees) or at cost price (for special arrangements and realizations and improvements of additional shared items, etc.), we are not sure if the physical facilities, including the

can be used for other reasons by them also free of charge or at cost price.

Further steps
Once again: Ok, Let's Go.

Ontonics Further steps

We would like to share some informations about our interest and related activities since the 29th of August 2020 in taking over the companies

for adding them to our enterprise and building up the observable universewide infrastructure or environment of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) with its subsystems and platforms, access networks and core networks, applications, and services, including management, including orchestration.

Have we promised too much?

14.September.2020

Ontonics Further steps

Since some few months, we have the impression that a first vehicle manufacturer is also interested to become a takeover candidate of our corporation. But this manufacturer is not alone. In addition to it a second vehicle manufacturer is already collaborating with a third vehicle manufacturer, which would have consequences in case of a takeover, a provider of Electronic Commerce (EC) and as a Service (aaS) platforms, a fourth vehicle manufacturer, and other companies are working together on their autonomous vehicles based on our Integrated Wheeled Intelligence (IWI), a sixth vehicle manufacturer and the third manufacturer are talking with each other, which is not for fun despite no deal was confirmed, and a seventh vehicle manufacturer, an eighth vehicle manufacturer, other vehicle manufacturers have or will follow as well, specifically for the reasons of interest, competition, or just fear to become the last one.
And what now? Our intention has always been to build some cool cars and several other vehicles, but not to become the automotive industry.

Howsoever, we continued with examing interesting takeover candidates for

16.September.2020

06:40 and 09:05 UTC+2
SOPR #301

*** Work in progress - MoE and Fitness 2.0 not quite finished ***
Topics
This issue is about recent developments and two older subsystems and platforms related to the following topics:

Legal matter [Superapp]
The foundational goals of our SOPR in relation to opening and licensing our Ontologic System (OS) and our Ontoscope (Os) are guaranteeing

and others.
For reaching our foundational goals and also encouraging diversification among technologies, goods, and services our SOPR provides subsystems and platforms to support freedom of choice, innovation, and competition pro bono publico. For example, we provide the basics, but also make clear that if every member and licensee is doing the same, then our SOPR does it exclusively for all members and licensees.

In the last hours, a very well known hardware and software manufacturer has presented its new

in addition to its new

The latter raises some detail legal questions, which are similar to questions regarding the so-called app stores, and other platforms and services, and also related goods. For example, a music streaming service slammed said new service bundle as anti-competitive.

For sure, a superapp and a comparable platform or service are no loopholes to make parts of our OS and our Os proprietary. For the latter, we already have our SOPR as the only One.
But there are certain basic properties of a technology, good, and service, that every member and licensee of our SOPR must open for all other members and licensees.
At least, the individual services (definition based on science and common sense) with their Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) and comparable interfaces of platforms and services have to be registered at our SOPR to

• network access,
• network slicing,
• service chaining,
• and so on

in particular.
But we are not at the point where we demand that hardware and software based on our Ontologic System (OS) or our Ontoscope (Os) have to be opened to all members and licensees of our SOPR.
Another reason is that we hope for diversification and hence freedom of choice, innovation, and competition pro bono publico. We do not want one original Ontoscope or iDevice, and 100 knockoffs from others.
In this context, we already mentioned the fields of

• Augmented Reality (AR),
• Augmented Virtuality (AV),
• Virtual Reality (VR), and
• Mixed Reality (MR).

and already demanded the affected companies to adapt their technologies, goods, and services by opening them more or in other ways for very good reasons and their own benefits.

IDentity and Access Management System (IDAMS)
"One focus [of the European Commission concerning digitalization] will be on data security. A digital European identity is under discussion, which should ensure that every user can control what happens to his or her data."
In fact,

Marketplace of Everything (MoE)
While Electronic Commerce (EC) platforms, applications, and service only need to hook into our Marketplace of Everything (MoE), raw signals and data, informations, knowledge bases, models, and algorithms are exclusively traded on the Marketplace of Everything (MoE) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), which is one of the conditions for opening and licensing our original and unique works of art titled works of art titled Ontologic System and Ontoscope, and created by C.S. to the public. The negotiation phase has already been finalized since several months.

Another condition is that unrestricted access to raw signals and data has to be granted to our SOPR.

So-called data exchange marketplaces, that enable customers to connect with data from providers to seamlessly discover, access and generate insights from data of providers, Data as a Service (DaaS) ... Data Warehouse as a Service (DWaaS) capability models and similar data marketplaces will be handled accordingly, as we do in for example the fields of

The emphasize does not lay on data exchange, but the chaining, connecting, and integrating of data storage and data exchange under one business plan.
Howsoever, we also made clear that we will examine if affected companies are qualified to support our SOPR in realizing its MoE, which should result in lucrative business activities as well.
The board members and the investors of affected companies do know the facts as well as the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of our SOPR.

Public Library 2.0
For sure, digital libraries containing

are not new. But in the last 20 years, one could make three observations:

This is sufficient for our SOPR to not only start a new project for funding, but a whole subsystem and platform with our new Public Library 2.0. And as the number one in ontologies and ontologics who could be better predestined for this task than our OntoLab and our business unit Ontologics

Fitness 2.0
Over more than 15 years, our OntoLab has

• measures of
  • body functions,
  • vital data, and
  • other basic functions and data,
• basic properties and functionalities of
  • hardware and
  • software,
• data models, and
• algorithms, and also
• activities, and
• routines,

• missing and
• new items

related to the fields of

and

Even better, all systems, platforms, applications, devices, and services based on our

• OntoBot,
• OntoScope, and
• OntoLogger,

work together by the original and unique design respectively Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) of our OS, which is based on our brain-like and cognitive Evoos. In this way, infinitely many possibilities are given, that go far beyond an

For example, properties and functionalities of the fields of

• Artificial Intelligence (AI),
• Machine Learning (ML),
• Computer Vision (CV),
• Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM),
• Cognitive Agent System (CAS),
• Cognitive Computing (CogC),
• Natural Multimodal Processing (NMP),
• Emotional Intelligence (EI),
• Multi-Agent System (MAS),
• Swarm Intelligence (SI) or Swarm Computing (SC),
• Evolutionary Computing (EC),
• etc.

• statistical learning and analysis,
• data mining,
• Big Data Fusion (BDF),
• Big Data Processing (BDP), and
• Big Data Analytics (BDA),

• Augmented Reality (AR),
• Augmented Virtuality (AV), and
• Virtual Reality (VR),

• Social and Societal System (S³),
• Healthcare 4.0,
• OntoBank,

as well as

of the members and licensees of our SOPR and our SOPR itself can be chained, connected, and integrated to yield in advanced and new systems, platforms, applications, devices, and services.

By the way: Technologies, goods, and services of the field of fitness are not eligible for grandfathering by our SOPR in general.

19.September.2020

Ontonics Further steps

We worked on our integration of 2 technologies and 2 specific ways of utilization of one of these technologies, and developed new utilizations of the results.

We also have adapted a technology to produce special items, that are seldom on earth.
As a welcome side effect, the global community becomes independent from the few existing producers. :)

We also developed a new system by integrating two different technologies and a related device (see also the Further steps of the 29th of August 2020). It might become the first realization of its kind.

Furthermore, we noticed that a large vehicle manufacturer has an interest in our Clean Diesel, or :Diesel or :DESL.
We also note that we have an interest in signing three legal documents: One about a legally binding agreement concerning infringements of our rights, related damage compensations, and other steps to create legal peace, one about a licensing contract for our works through our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), and one about a takeover.

In this relation, we also have to say or recall that our Clean Diesel is profoundly different from what experts and other members of the public would expect it to be. In fact, it is a complete concept of technologies (systems, platforms, etc.), goods (devices, vehicles, applications, etc.), and services in case somebody has not followed our related informations publicated some years ago.

20.September.2020

12:40 and 16:04 UTC+2
SOPR #302

*** Proof-reading mode ***
Topics
This issue is about recent developments related to various topics like the following ones:

Legal matter
We make one of our usual recalls for entities that are new or unteachable or both.
Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) keeps the exclusive power of control and management (including orchestration and monitoring) of the

and systems and platforms for

The systems will be operated by members and licensees of our SOPR in the roles of

together with business units of our corporation.

Legal matter [National security]
In relation to the ban of 2 platforms and related applications and services provided by 2 companies with their headquarters situated in the P.R.China

But more important for us is the fact that the overall matter has some connections to and consequences for the way our SOPR acts and regulates in relation to a

In case of an investment in a U.S.American company by an ordinary foreign entity (e.g. a corporation) from a trusted country, also known as trusted partner, already known regulations are executed by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CIFUS), which is overseen by the Treasury Department, and other related federal authorities.
But in cases of

• poses a potential threat to the U.S.American national security, or
• is even prohibted by national laws, regulations, and acts concerning the protection of the U.S.American national security,

increased and more stringent demands and requirements apply.

Interestingly, included in said proposals for solution is a legal framework, which would allow to handle even these cases in a way that satisfies the U.S.American government's national security concerns and complies with related laws.
For these reasons, this legal framework includes the following set of actions:

• host the user data of this global company in the U.S.A. and
• reviews the code of this global company for security.

• be an expert in data security and
• hold a top-secret security clearance, and also
• be responsible for chairing a security committee.

We appreciate the application of this (proposed) set of legal actions in case of an activity related to national security, because it provides the legal basis to simultaneously comply with

which would otherwise not be possible in such a case.
A prominent example is the Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure (JEDI) of the U.S.American Department of Defense (DoD), which has to be implemented and operated by such a joint venture, but not by a contractor like an U.S.American company. :)

Digital rights [Digital properties]
In case raw signals and data are not stored and not available anymore and therefore providing the unrestricted access to them by our SOPR is not possible, the next in the line of raw signals and data, informations (includes Personally Identifiable Informations (PIIs)), knowledge, models, and algorithms has to be taken as substitution to

For the reasons of data protection or privacy, and data security, we think the best way is to provide the unrestricted access to the models and algorithms based on said unavailable and inaccessible raw signals and data.

License Model
In an unofficial note of the 12th of September 2020 we said that we do not wait any longer to protect our goals and properties more aggressively against interferences and other unprofessional and even serious criminal actions against our activities based on illegal

• money printing and zero interest rate policies by central banks and monetary funds,
• dubious funds by governments, and
• venture capital by investors,

specifically

And our SOPR is considering to

• 3% for the performance and reproduction of the Ontologic System Components (OSC), specifically Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (10%, 20%, 30%), and
• 1% for the performance and reproduction of the Ontoscope System Components (OsC), specifically related goods (e.g. chips, network equipment, Ontoscope variants, and other end user devices, robots, and vehicles) (8%),

• 5% for the performance and reproduction of the Ontologic System Components (OSC), specifically Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (15%, 25%, 35%), and
• 1% for the performance and reproduction of the Ontoscope System Components (OsC), specifically related goods (e.g. chips, network equipment, Ontoscope variants, and other end user devices, robots, and vehicles) (9%),

and

to address and counteract the latest and the next unwanted actions listed above.
The other licensee classes would be adjusted.

Further steps
Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is

21.September.2020

Ontonics Further steps

In relation to a report about Vertical Take-Off and Landing vehicles (VTOLs) and related transport services we would like to share some informations about our business plan in the related fields.
Our fleet comprises tens of thousands tried and tested, very quite, efficient, long-range, Clean Diesel capable, and so on VTOLs) only as a starter. Our designated partners and takeovers, and we do not intend to give up our leadership in this market, and with less than 500.000 to 1.000.000 VTOLs each costing at least 200.000 U.S. Dollar in mass produced nobody should have the illusion of leading the market.
Indeed, we guess that no entity takes the risk to make such an investment like we.

In addition, other manufacturers, operators, and service providers all require the allowance to perform and reproduce our Ontologic System (OS) for being able to

which is not the problem due to the Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) terms and conditions established by the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) of our SOPR.
But the licensing contract is connected to a clause in either the out-of-court agreement with C.S. and our corporation, or the AoA and the ToS of our SOPR, which demands to stop any further conduction of unfair business practice, specifically it prohibits any further mimicking of C.S. and our corporation, which will become a problem for undisclosed reasons.

Experiements with another technology pioneered by our business unit Style of Speed have proven that it

But we are not sure if we will research and develop it to mass production due to more promising alternatives.

We would also like to mention that for quite some time, we are also developing our Clean Kerosene, which is similar to our Clean Diesel, but optimized for conventional jet engines. :D

23.September.2020

Ontonics Further steps

A reveiw has shown once again that we are really years ahead with our electric energy storage technology and devices based on it, which for example

Therefore, our business units are

• Vertical Take-Off and Landing vehicles (eVTOLs), as well as
• airliners and spaceships, which for the matter of fun have also been researched and developed as VTOLs and potentially will be constructed as such just right from the start.

For the case our takeover offers for aerospace companies are not successful, though we highly recommend our takeover bids, we would like to submit our interest in the

• production facilities and
• work staff

for the models

By the way: Many chief positions are vacant at our business units.

24.September.2020

14:41, 20:30, and 23:11 UTC+2
SOPR #303

*** Work in progress ***
Topics
This is a special about one of the most important fields, which is digital rights:

Legal matter
We quote a report in relation to a virus warning app based on the Personal Area Network (PAN) technology Bluetooth: "The public health officers in [the F.R.]Germany see only a very small benefit of the Corona-app. Since the data from the app is not automatically forwarded to the health authorities, this instrument in its current form "is not a great help for us in the rapid combating and containment of Corona outbreaks," said the association chairperson of the public health officers [...]. She emphasized that the app plays "virtually no role in the everyday work of the German health authorities". It is "extremely rare" that an app user get in touch with the authorities, because of a corresponding warning. Politicians have decided to put data protection above pandemic protection. "We have to accept this," said the chairwoman of the Federal Association of Doctors of the Public Health Service (FAPHS)==Bundesverbandes der Ärztinnen und Ärzte des öffentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (BVÖGD)."
There are also the needs for

to realize for example a standardized virus monitoring and information system for a whole country and even the whole world, which depicts the development of a pandemic in a community-specific way and presents the related information for example with a simple traffic light system.

But respecting this decision of the government is only one societal, political, and legal aspect, which is only valid for a very exceptional situation. A government has to respect the

• constitute the legal basis of a
  • polity,
  • organization, or
  • other type of entity,

  and

• commonly determine how this entity is to be governed,

and

always and as much as possible.
Therefore, a government has to

• constitutions even in a pandemic and
• national and international laws, regulations, and acts, as well as agreements for
  • state sovereignty,
  • national security,
  • property (e.g. Artwork (AW) and Intellectual Property (IP)), as well as
  • data protection or privacy, and data security,

and

unreservedly.

Specifically in case of a pandemic and related technologies (systems and platforms), goods (applications and devices), and services, our Ontologic System (OS) and our Ontoscope (Os) meet and handle all social, societal, legal, and technical requirements, demands, conditions, and rules, even with

and therefore have to be used to fulfill other legal requirements, demands, conditions, and rules, such as the AoA and the ToS with the LM of our SOPR.

But not only a governments have to respect the various requirements, demands, conditions, and rules, but other entities as well, including our SOPR for sure. This leads to the related sections about the fields of

Digital rights [Data protection and data security]
The federal ministry of interior of the F.R.Germany suggests the introduction of a general citizen number. A related draft bill from this ministry envisages that the tax identification number will be used as the central personal identification number for 51 additional and very different registers. One intention is to minimize the administrative work.
But the scientific service of the Bundestag, which is the parliament of the F.R.Germany, has now voiced its concerns about this plan, because it considers parts of this general citizen number to be constitutionally problematic and writes in its related report that "[i]n the overall picture, the intensity of intervention is to be rated as high" and there are "imponderables" with the planned citizen number, specifically with regard to

The report goes on to say that "no impermissible, all-encompassing 'superregister'" would be created. However, it is problematic that the draft bill does not contain any explicit provision stating that the creation of personality profiles is not permissible. The storage of the number in all connected registers increases the possibility and danger of an unauthorized and hence illegal profile formation. Therefore, increased technical and organizational security measures are necessary.
The deputy parliamentary party leader [...] said that the federal government must ensure clear protection of basic rights and sufficient legal certainty.
The federal commissioner for data protection [...] had already explained in an interview with regard to a possible misuse of data: "With a general citizen number, the state will be able to link personal data very quickly and to complete a comprehensive personality profile: Who am I? What do I do?" This personal picture is subject to evaluation by those who retrieve data. "Misjudgements and misuse can also occur."

As in case with the utilization of

which for example are utilized for the subsystems and platforms of the infrastructure of our SOPR, which

• Distributed System (DS) and also
• Universal Ledger (UL), including for example our Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT),

our OS and our Os are and comprise relatively new high technologies, which

by others and us in particular, that can meet and handle all social, societal, legal, and technical aspects in general to increase its safety and security even beyond what is required in this observable universe.
For non-experts it is some kind of magic, but true as well as tried and tested, as mathematics is for many.

The dangers of a

and also

are given, indeed.
In the same context we have to

Therefore, a very important requirement for many reasons is also to realize it on the basis of the

of our SOPR.

Governance
We already said that the SOPR is open to the public, but also explained when and how transparency is reasonable and provided.
We have

When taken and integrated all together, then the ways of guaranteeing and providing transparence and conducting governance are quite straightforward.
The authorization to act in certain ways depends on the individual action and reflects the analog world. Some examples:

What we would like to emphasize in this context is the fact that virtually nobody has transparency over the Internet and the World Wide Web (WWW) and how it is working in detail. With our OS we get much more raw signals and data, and information, as well as transparency about the infrastructure or environment, that allows us to

than in the past.

Further steps
We would like to recall that we are already on the next steps of humanity's evolution and we have invited everybody to take part in this amazing experience.

25.September.2020

Ontonics Further steps

We were able to improve one of our virus quick tests, which works under 15 minutes and has a precision of at least 96%. Both the test time and precision can be further improved, so that it will very probably work under 5 minutes or even instantly with a precision of at least 99% or even 100%.
Best of all, this solution is also available now, like another test of us.

26.September.2020

Ontonics Further steps

We observed since some months, that airlines are parking, discarding, selling, and even scrapping their aircrafts of the types Boeing 747 and Airbus A380.
We also noted that the available amounts of each model are sufficient for our short- and medium-term plans and activities. As a consequence, the purchase of the Intellectual Properties (IPs) and the related activities are most likely no longer required (see also the Further steps of the 23rd of September 2020).
Due to these reasons, we would like submit our interest and make our offer regarding the purchase of these aircrafts to the actual market values dependening on their conditions. The latter will not be improved for obvious reasons.

Style of Speed Further steps

We have taken a quick look at our stock and selected two different designs, which we want to adapt and integrate into an aircraft of the type Boeing 747 or Airbus A380 for the construction of our first operational prototype.

28.September.2020

Ontonics Further steps

In the last 2 days, we worked on our concept to dump nuclear waste into the Sun. This included the improvement of the costs, the basic procedure, and the utilized technologies to make our concept viable in terms of safety, financing, operation, and maintenance.
One possibility is to launch rockets from our space tower at 100 kilometer altitude or use our space elevator (see the issue Space Elevator #14 of today), which might result in a

Ontonics Space Elevator #14

When thinking about safe and cost effective possibilities to dispose of nuclear waste, we also concluded that one of our space elevators is suitable for the disposal of nuclear waste into the space, ideally into the Sun.

29.September.2020

03:07 UTC+2
SOPR #304

*** Working in progress - better explanation and wording ***
Topics
The cycle rate increases and therefore we share some more informations about the following topics:

Legal matter
Because we are sure that the members and licensees of our SOPR

we hope that it is not too impudent to ask the members and licensees of our SOPR that they also

Outside the P.R.China Chinese goods based on our AWs and further IPs can be sourced exclusively from our 51% Chinese win-win ventures.

Infrastructure [Data center]
We have worked on the realization of the infrastructure of our SOPR, specifically the

Some entities will be impressed about the different results.

Marketplace of Everything (MoE)
The competition between service providers and software application developers has not to take place inside a specific Electronic Commerce (EC) platform or Software as a Service (SWaaS or SaaS) platform, specifically inside an individual app store, but on the level of such platforms.
Therefore, we have no problem with a cut of the revenue an app store provider demands.
But we already gave the friendly recommendation to adapt the business strategies, and also its technologies, goods, and services, because the way some companies handle them as such so-called walled gardens is not legal in several circumstances and due to various reasons. For example, companies can avoid legal issues by allowing other companies to operate app stores and provide other services within their Ontologic System (OS) variants and on related devices, including Ontoscope (Os) variants.

In this context, we would like to recall once again that the Marketplace of Everything (MoE) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is not a direct competitor of EC platforms (e.g. app stores and other types of aaS platforms) hooked into the MoE, but so to say a common denominator, with common interfaces, services, and so on for realizing the goals and upholding the integrity of our SOPR.

{section title also Legal matter or Further steps?!}
Either our Ontologic System (OS) and our Ontoscope (Os) with legal, safe, secure, and centralized governance, and raw signals and data, as well as informations handling on the basis of the infrastructure and Distributed Systems (DSs) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), including the international solutions of the companies Alphabet→Google and Apple, which have to be hooked into the related subsystems and platforms of our SOPR, or otherwise no opening and no licensing of our OS and our OS, as discussed in the last 3 years (see for example the issue SOPR #303 of the 24th of September 2020).
This is now being realized and implemented and we do not intend to change anything.
No further concessions and no further debate. If someone still wants to debate, then she or or should debate with the large companies of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) industrial sector and the governments of the U.S.America and the P.R.China at first and also in a way that is not for their advantages and our disadvantages.
It is that simple.

Healthcare 4.0
We quote a report: "EU countries exchange data of the Corona-Warn[ing]-Apps
This autumn, users of Corona-Warn-Apps in eleven EU countries will be able to anonymously compare their contact data across countries and be warned of possible infections. Other countries are to follow soon. A corresponding interface for smartphones has been active in a first group of countries since the beginning of this week, according to information from the European Commission in Brussels. The gateway is to be connected on October 17 with the data stocks of the respective national Corona warning apps."

How is this anonymous comparison of their contact data across countries done?
How looks the corresponding interface for smartphones Ontoscopes like?

The pandemic will not be forever and despite of this there are still some questions left to be answered, specifically the question why our SOPR is not involved already now, for example for the

After more than 6 months now, the presented arguments and continual evasions are not valid any more.

by all participating entities to avoid decisive measures by our SOPR, though we think it should happen immediately to get a break-free transition done.

Further steps
We have all things together to finish the set of legal documents.

30.September.2020

Ontonics Further steps

We worked a little on the next generation of our electric energy storage device. It is particularly interesting to see how its model works.
This model also allows us to compare the older generation and the newer generation, and we already had the impression that the

We also worked on the integration of another technology to make this technology more safe and secure, because it already makes the storage of much energy possible in this early generation and could be utilized in wrong ways.