Registries of items
The regulation of the revised and extended Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is very simple and clear in relation to managing and controlling a registry, broker, or similar facility for objects, applications, services by demanding that the related technologies, goods, and services of public and federal institutes and authorities, and state-owned companies are put into practice under the exclusive power of control and management of either

but not under the management and control of any other entity.
Consequently, for any other entity the previous option and regulation introduced with the issue #172 of the 27th of March 2019 is restricted with this revised regulation, which is based on the initial regulation and also covers

when utilized together with technologies, goods, and services based on our personal, original and unique, iconic works of art titlted Ontologic System and Ontoscope, and created by C.S. (see also the issue #150 of the 20th of November 2018 for example).

This regulation was also drafted in such a way that the

and the

as much as possible. As far as our rich knowledge and experience reach and we can see, the existing powers and structures seem not be able to handle the inevitable change and therefore some kind of a new power and an extended structure is advantageous for all entities concerned, which can only be our SOPR with its infrastructure for all the many related reasons that were discussed in the past, are discussed here, and will be discussed in the future (also compare with the regulation introduced with the issue #215 of the 6th of August 2019).

Digital rights
In relation to the management of our digital estate, which includes most if not virtually all

we expanded the AoA and the ToS of our SOPR with the following regulation:
A member of our SOPR gets the right to

• file,
• repository,
• data base,
• knowledge base, and
• storage possibility or facility of any other type, including an algorithm,

• license,
• sell,
• buy, and
• trade,

signals, data, information, and knowledge

• private member of our SOPR or
• joint venture with our SOPR

with our OS in our OS respectively in or on our digital estate in any legal way, or

In this relation, we would like to recall that the existing regulations already demand that

In relation to data, others and we have discussed the following approach before, but somehow only now the time has come to put it into practice.
A first SOPR member is entitled to

• administered by the IDentity Access and Management System (IDAMS) of our Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV),
• used for getting access to the rings and the assigned ID spaces of the IDAMS, and
• connected with data and knowledge hold by said first SOPR member,

• capturing,
• collecting,
• processing,
• storing,
• utilizing,
• commercializing, specifically
  • licensing,
  • selling,
  • buying, and
  • trading,
• sharing, and
• handling in any other way

of data and knowledge connected with an account owned by said first SOPR member,

One specific range of these OAOS is related to the field of marketing and its subfields

and its parts

As we already said in the issue #221 of the 20th of August 2019, "[...] a SOPR member that wants to place an advertisement in our OS, Os, ON, OW, OV, or OAOS, would have to get in touch with our SOPR directly but not anymore with another company."

Diverses
The revised versions of the AoA and the ToS with the LM of our SOPR provide immense and impressive benefits to the community and the SOPR.
These applaudable benefits to the community include:

all pro bono publico==for the public good.

These appreciable benefits to our SOPR include:

Please keep in mind that

• are based on the international laws and the ways they are put into practice,
• reflect legal aspects of the business strategies of large companies, and
• will come into effect on the 1st of January 2020,

• movements based on our Ontologic System Components (OSC) and our Ontoscope Components (OsC), as well as
• design elements based on our Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS)

are mandatory (see the issue #223 of the 24th of August 2019),

What happens in OntoLand, stays in OntoLand.

05.September.2019
SOPR #227
In this issue we continue with the topics:

Legal matter
We make, so to say, a provision freeze in relation to the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), because we

All in all, we think that we have drafted a very attractive revised agreement. Some might call it a knavery, but we call it a true stroke of genius and masterstroke to

Infrastructure

Due to the reason that we have a

• common or social data,
• common or social knowledge, and
• common sense knowledge,

which has to be made available pro bono publico==for the public good as part of for example a data index,

• data,
• knowledge, and
• common sense,

which should be made available as part of for example a data index, as well as

• persons,
• objects,
• applications,
• devices,
• vehicles,
• services, and
• other items,

which should be made availableas part of for example a service index, and

• data index,
• service index,
• etc.,

which should be made available as part of the infrastructure of our SOPR, it does not matter (anymore) in the end which common systems, platforms, etc. based on them are utilized as long as the related works or tasks for the management and operation of the infrastructure are distributed among the eligible SOPR members in a Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) manner.

For a management or operation task we pay a service provider a

Consequently, we are

for the infrastructure of our SOPR to service providers (see the issues #150 of the 20th of November 2018, #217 of the 11th of August 2019, and #222 of the 23rd of August 2019).

Further steps
We are trying to catch up some time in the next weeks. Preliminary versions of the legal matter should be available for preview As Quick As Possible (AQAP), hopefully in 5 weeks.

07.September.2019

04:52, 09:01, and 21:58 UTC+2
SOPR #228

*** Work in progress - better order and wording, some links missing ***
Provision freeze does not mean that we have gone to sleep. The topics of this issue are:

Infrastructure
One foundational demand is that data and knowledge are

Members of our SOPR handle the data and knowledge, which are captured and generated with their technologies (e.g. systems and platforms), goods (e.g. applications, devices, and vehicles), and services, but not with the infrastructure of our SOPR. We think that this is fine.

In all cases we have our OS and hence entities are subject to the transition process by which we will take our Intellectual Properties (IPs) back, because there is absolutely no reason to make any presents. Quite contrary, many entities owe as a lot and should be more than very happy with our proposals, submissions, agreement(s), and contracts. Therefore, the main question is how to proceed.

We already said that we will begin with the IDentity Access and Management System (IDAMS) (see also the issue #217 of the 11th of August 2019) and surely it does not matter what an entity did after we declared this in relation to our further steps and the masterplan in the issues ... of the ... and ... of the ...

In general, we intend to use their Grid, Cloud, and Edge Computing (GCEC) systems, platforms, applications, and services anyway for the

of the infrastructure of our SOPR, as made clear in former issues, such as for example the issues #217 of the 11th of August 2019 and ... of the ....
In particular, we submit, so to say, as part of the transition process the following steps of our SOPR:

• 2025 or up to 5 years with granting the full access to own data and knowledge for own use, and additional Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) terms, as well as customary conditions,
• 2030 or up to 10 years with granting the full access to own data and knowledge for own use, (*)
• 2035 or up to 15 years, or
• 2040 or up to 20 years with granting other FRAND terms and conditions.

We already said as well that we will continue with the standardization and provisioning of the Multimodal User Interface (MUI) and surely it does not matter what an entity did after we declared this in relation to the further steps and the masterplan in the issues ... of the ... and ... of the ...
After Alphabet (Google) throw it away for nothing, though it would change the general advancement and transition process, we are left with Apple Siri, Amazon Alexa, Microsoft Cortana, and Samsung Bixby. It is obviouse and doubtless that

Also note that while Grid Computing (GC), Cloud Computing of the first generation (CC 1.0), Cloud Computing of the second generation (CC 2.0), and related technologies, goods, and services are handled by our provision of grandfathering, but only to some extent due to the reasons that they

Cloud Computing of the second generation (CC 2.0), Cloud Computing of the third generation (CC 3.0), edge computing, hybrids (e.g. fog computing and multi-clouds), and other system architectures for computing based on our Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) are not handled by our provision of grandfathering.
In an analogous manner, single elements of the MUI are handled but not their integration.

In general, we intend to use their GCEC systems, platforms, and services anyway for the

of the infrastructure of our SOPR, as made clear in former issues, such as for example the issues #217 of the 11th of August 2019 and ... of the ....
In particular, we submit, so to say, as part of the transition process the following steps of our SOPR:

• 2025 or up to 5 years with granting the full access to own data and knowledge for own use, and additional Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) terms, as well as customary conditions,
• 2030 or up to 10 years with granting the full access to own data and knowledge for own use, (*)
• 2035 or up to 15 years, or
• 2040 or up to 20 years with granting other FRAND terms and conditions.

We would like to recall, that we will proceed in the same way with:

• Artificial Intelligence (AI),
• Machine Learning (ML),
• Computer Vision (CV),
• Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM),
• Cognitive Computing (CogC),
• Emotional Intelligence (EI),
• Multi-Agent System (MAS),
• Swarm Intelligence (SI) or Swarm Computing (SC),
• Evolutionary Computing (EC),
• etc.,

• goods,
• applications and Applications Programming Interfaces (APIs),
• data,
• knowledge,
• algorithms, and
• services,

• Smart Urban System (SUS),
• industrial platform,
• Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT),
• Industry 4.0 and 5.0,
• Medicine 4.0 and 5.0, and
• Healthcare 4.0 and 5.0,

Needless to say,

are huge competitve advantages for every participating entity, specifically when there is so much work to do.

Other projects
The electric energy storage device, which is supported by the SOPR as one of its other projects, has become one of the 10 winners included in the Blitz Fund I. More informations are given in the news Ontonics Blitz Fund I #3 of today.

Diverses
For sure, we also love families and competition. But we love law and order as well, because no family and no competition works without them, incomprehensibly.

09:01 and 29:39 UTC+2
Ontonics Blitz Fund I #3

*** Work in progress - some better wording required ***
Not surprisingly, our newest electric energy storage device, which was mentioned in the Ontonics Further steps of the 8th, 12th, 13th, 22nd, and 24th of July 2019, is one of the 10 winners included in the Blitz Fund I.
As announced in the Ontonics Further steps of the 24th of July 2019, the construction of the first 5 production plants is planned in the U.S.A., P.R.China, E.U., Japan, and Korea.

In relation to its utilization in electric cars we prefer

due to the reasons that

• rented, bought, or exchanged at any place, like for example at a retailer or a vending machine, and
• utilized for virtually everything.

We also would like to give the additional informations that a substitution of the whole battery of an Electric Sports Car™ (ESC), such as for example our pioneering models RE, Pan, and Can of our business unit Style of Speed, would allow to travel from the east coast to the west coast in the U.S.A. without a recharge.

09.September.2019
Comment of the Day
Powerbottle™
Powercan™
Powerkeg™

Ontonics Further steps
We would like to show the direction of the designs of our PowerBottle™ and PowerCan™, which are the upcoming international and universal form factors for our newest electric energy storage device with larger dimensions and higher capacities.
As one might have already guessed correctly by looking at the images the

• inspired by common cylindrical batteries and
• made of stainless steel, aluminum, or a suitable alloy, and have optional sheathings of other materials like rubber for example,

We hope that they are less expensive to produce and more protective against mechanical impacts than any other alternatives.

We have also developed a connection, which is

• High-Voltage Safety Lock (HVSL) connectors,
• Combined Charging Systems (CCSs), specifically
  • Type 1 based Combo 1 and
  • Type 2 based Combo 2,

  and

• Charge de MOve (CHAdeMO) connector system

for Electric Vehicles (EVs) (see the related materials of the manufacturers, CHAdeMO Alliance, and SAE International, and the standards of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)), though we are happy with none of them, because we

As can be seen, neither

© :( and :(

In addition, we are drafting PowerKeg™ registration regulations, which are concerning

Btw.: We got a little smile when we looked at the funny match with the model Can of our business unit Style of Speed.

11.September.2019

06:22, 11:19, and 17:02 UTC+2
SOPR #229

*** Proof-reading mode ***
This issue is more of technical nature in relation to the topics:

IDentity Access and Management System (IDAMS)
In relation to our IDentity Access and Management System (IDAMS) connected with data and knowledge we thought about the possibility that it gets an own standard menu point, like for example File, Edit, and Help, which could be

• is based on data and knowledge, or
• could be based on data and knowledge,

• an abstracted Vitruvian, like the logo of Softbionics (SB), or
• the eyes and mouth of a Lego minifigure, like the logo of Microsoft Hello. :)

This menu point includes at least the related submenu points titled

• Configure
• [Other Comfort Functions (e.g. Authentication, Certificate, Credential, etc.)]
• New
• Move
• Delete
• Copy
• Paste
• Import
• Export
• [Other Comfort Functions]

and

• Capture
  • Time
  • Space
  • Topic [or Theme]
  • Provenance [or Context]
  • Event
  • Causality
  • Person
  • Object
  • Sensor
  • [Other Comfort Functions]
• Collect
  • [Other Comfort Functions]
• Process
  • [Other Comfort Functions]
• Store
  • File
  • Repository
  • Data Base
  • Knowledge Base
  • Other Storage
• Utilize
  • Time
  • Space
  • Topic [or Theme]
  • Provenance [or Context]
  • Event
  • Causality
  • Person
  • Object
  • Actuator
  • [Other Comfort Functions]
• Commerce
  • License
  • Sell
  • Buy
  • Trade
• Share
  • Person
  • Location
  • System
  • Platform
  • Application
  • Device
  • Vehicle
  • Service
  • [Other Comfort Functions]
• [Other Handles]

The default configurations of Accounts and Bases are the actual configurations.
We might add functions that

• overall configurations and
• fees

for OAOS and

• their Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA) or Personal Intelligent Assistant (PIA), and
• our SOPR.

Working with this matter should become a commen task for users. For this reason, they could get complete

about

Brain Machine Interface (BMI)
Our Ontologic System (OS) and our Ontoscope (Os) are directly connected with the fields of

and including all basic functionalities.
As can be seen with the referenced content, we have already made basic considerations before the official start of our OS.

Honestly, we do not think that

13.September.2019
Ontonics Further steps
We have adapated the solution mentioned in the Further steps of the 7th of November 2018 for the development of our first antibiotics.
Besides the healing effect we are also very interested in the confirmation that we are really able to trick out viruses and bacterias in this way or if we have to try one of our alternative approaches.

14.September.2019
OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps
We continued the work on our integration of the

• Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA),
• strong authentication, and
• reliance authentication,

• quantum cryptography (quantum physics and special relativity),
• blockchain technique,
• Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) protocols, and
• Byzantine-Resilient Replication (BRR) method,

of or our Ontologic System (OS) and our Ontoscope (Os) with the

Paying with our regulated and unregulated public digital currencies OntoCoin and OntoTaler as well as other digital currencies based on our Quantum Coin (Qoin) of our Ontologic Bank (OntoBank) is just becoming a matter of

Batteries and XML (see the message format of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) ISO 20022 XML) are always included.

In this relation, we would like to recall that our Ontoscope has become the industry standard, which has legal implications

17.September.2019

12:42 UTC+2
SOPR #230

*** Proof-reading mode ***
In this issue we have topics about some basics:

Infrastructure
Sadly, we can give no more details about our

than the ones below at this time, because too many clowns are performing a too bad show.

We are working on some details of the system architecture of our data centers, which are a part of the foundation of the infrastructure of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) respectively a part of the backbone of our New Reality (NR), evolution, and civilization. :D

We were able to extend our technological foundation with external expertise and right of use for mobile network technology, specifically fifth generation cellular network technology (abbreviated as 5G). This allows us to realize our infrastructure of our SOPR in a much better way, specifically in the fields of

We expect that SOPR members, specifically service providers in these fields, will follow us by adapting the related parts of our integrating Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) on the basis of our Ontologic System Components (OSC), Ontoscope Components (OsC), and Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS).

Universal ledger
We are fairly far ahead with the realization of our universal ledger. The main problems are that we

but they do not impose any delays.

We would like to recall some prominent systems, platforms, applications, and services, which are based on a blockchain or a distributed ledger or both, and are integrated respectively put on top of our universal ledger:

• Economic IDentity (EcoID) system (see the Investigations::Multimedia, AI and KM of the 19th of March 2018) and
• Known Traveller Digital Identity (KTDI) system (see the Investigations::Multimedia, AI and KM of the 24th of March 2018),

• Personal Data Safe System (PDSS), which for example is utilized as a
  • Electronic Health Record (EHR) or Electronic Patient Record (EPR),
• Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS),

and

• payment system and
• digital base money (see also the section Public digital currency).

Public digital currency
Yes, it is true, the world gets a common regulated public digital currency, which is

At least the European Union (EU) will begin with its introduction and we will directly introduce it in those states in America, Australia, Asia, Africa, and Alsewhere as well, that are not on board just right from the start. As far as we can see, all member states of the Group of Seven (G7) organization are moving in this direction as well, which includes the U.S.A. and Canada, and we expect that at least the other Five Eyes member states will join up swiftly.

Diverses
Our Ontoscope was chosen by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) industry as new standard, finally. We have seen this choosing before by the vehicle industry in relation to the Ontoscope as well but also with other works of us.

18.September.2019

20:32 UTC+2
SOPR #231

*** Work in progress - data sharing not ready and might be (re)moved ***
We would like to share some more information about the topic:

Legal matter
We continued with our considerations about the matters regarding

from the points of view of

Specifically, we are interested in the answers of the questions if our provisions included in the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) with the License Model of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) are already fair and reasonable as well as sufficient in respect of the rights and core principles of

The related laws demand that an entity cannot retain

Such an item also includes a technology, good, and service in whole or in part, which on first sight has no causal link with our Ontologic System (OS) but was later proven in a holistic approach to be taken from our Ontologic System (OS) and its integrating Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) as part of conducting an illegal strategy and method based on segmentation and simulation of an ordinary technological progress.
Therefore, said item has to be either

whereby always damage compensations are due.

Prominent examples for Ontologic System Components (OSC) are

• Fault-Tolerant, Reliable, and Trustworthy Distributed Systems (FTRTDSs),
• blackboard systems,
• Grid, Cloud, and Edge Computing Systems (GCECSs), and
• multi-cloud computing systems, dynamic federation systems, and service meshing systems,

• Augmented Reality Environments (AREs),
• Virtual Reality Environments (VREs), and
• Mixed Reality Environments (MREs),

• Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and
• Industry 4.0 and 5.0,

• Artificial Intelligence (AI),
• Machine Learning (ML),
• Computer Vision (CV),
• Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM),
• Cognitive Vision (CogV),
• Cognitive Agent System (CAS),
• Cognitive Computing (CogC),
• Emotional Intelligence (EI),
• Multi-Agent System (MAS),
• Swarm Intelligence (SI) or Swarm Computing (SC),
• Evolutionary Computing (EC),
• etc.,

• Service-Oriented Computing of the second generation (SOC 2.0) based on the integration of Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) with Autonomic Computing (AC) and SWWW,

as well as Ontoscope Components (OsC) included in goods (e.g. devices and vehicles), such as for example

• processors,
• cameras, and
• white ware,

Due to the reason that

are already regulated by the AoA and the ToS with the LM of our SOPR, ...
But the

...
But no full access to knowledge generated from raw data by an entity and no allowance for commercialization of raw data and raw data streams.
#223 of the 24th of August 2019 and #225 of the 29th of August 2019

The regulation about cross licensing of copyrighted or patented works, which are based on our OS or our Os, as introduced in the issue #224 of the 25th of August 2019,

19.September.2019

05:36, 07:24, 16:28, and 22:05 UTC+2
SOPR #232

*** Proof-reading mode ***

In this issue we have two interesting topics related to ledgers:

Legal matter
Once again, we would like to make one of our monthly recall of known legal matter, requiremens, and recommendations:

• work of art titled Ontologic System and created by C.S.,
• digital rights, and
• royalty collecting Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) of the business unit Ontonics of our corporation.

• performance of the work of art titled Ontologic System and created by C.S. with a hardware or a software, and
• reproduction of the work of art titled Ontologic System and created by C.S. as a hardware or a software

under a license not authorized by our SOPR is not allowed.
A performance with or a reproduction as a proprietary and not for free software with open or human-readable source code under a license authorized by our SOPR is allowed.

• mimicking,
• exploiting the neutrality,
• disturbing the goals and even threatening the integrity, and
• controlling and managing the infrastructure

of our SOPR is allowed.

• added with the related parts of the Ontologic System (OS) what N. Szabo and others missed before and
• already showed that Bitcoin is merely an illegal Ontologic Application (OA) and Ethereum is merely an illegal plagiarism.

• theoretically and
• even practically with some scams in relation to the decentralized cryptocurrencies Bitcoin and Ether.

In fact, some more basic properties of our Ontologic System are required for providing safety, like

• a validated and verified runtime environment or
• our universal ledger based on
  • our network of telescopes or
  • quantum computing including special relativity or
  • both.

• has one of the legal status unregulated centralized, unregulated decentralized, or regulated, and
• must not be based on cryptography respectively be a cryptocurrency.

Obviously, a cryptocurrency must not be an unregulated decentralized digital currency in general.
Correspondingly, the proposed e-Euro is either a regulated

in particular.

• is issued and regulated by a central bank,
• is universally accessible, and
• guarantees safety and anonymity of its users

within the limits of the related laws.

Federal ledger
An interesting exemplary precedent case in this relation is the so-called Bundes-Blockchain==Federal Blockchain, which raises the question who owns, controlls, manages, and operates it.
In general, the case is different to the case of a (digital) currency, which interferes with the (digital or cybernetical) sovereignty of a state.
In particular, the case is comparable with the cases of the Deutsche Post==German Mail, Deutsche Telekom==German Telecom, and Deutsche Bahn==German Rail, but differs from these cases insofar that there exists no public and federal institution and authority, and a state-owned company in the beginning, which will be privatized by a related special law in the future, but already a private entity respectively business unit or corporation just right from the start.

Indeed, this private business unit or corporation called by us Deutsche Blockkette==German Blockchain, or better, Deutsches Hauptbuch==German Ledger or Deutsche Buchhaltung==German Accounting, German Bookkeeping, German Accounts Department, German Bookkeeping Agency, and so on could be incorporated into a Kommunales Gebietsrechenzentrum (KGRZ)==municipal regional computing center or local authority regional computing center.
But due to the reasons that

• does not exist before the publication of our OS,
• is controlling and managing a part of the infrastructure of our SOPR,

and

said Bundes-Blockchain==Federal Blockchain, Bundeshauptbuch==Federal Ledger, or Deutsches Hauptbuch==German Ledger is a part of our SOPR and eventually a business unit of our corporation.
But indeed,

But the existence of this interface does not change the overall situation at least when this ledger is privately controlled, managed, and operated just right from the start.

Nevertheles, a Bundes-Blockchain==Federal Blockchain can be operated by municipal regional computing centers and comparable public and federal institutes and authorities, and state-owned companies if the requirements of

• Bundeshauptbuch==Federal Ledger or Deutsches Hauptbuch==German Ledge for the hook into our universal ledger,
• Ontologic Bank (OntoBank) for a digital currency, and
• related business unit for the full access to data and the handling of said data,

and

are met by each participating entity within the limits of the related laws.

In the same way, it works in all other cases, for example in relation to

One cannot simply declare a part of our Ontologic System, specifically a part of the infrastructure and the platforms of our SOPR, as a public, federal, or state-owned item and then put it under the control and management of a public and federal institution and authority, or a state-owned company.

22.September.2019
Ontonics Further steps
We are thinking about the European locations for the aerospace plants of our business unit Style of Speed (see also the related Style of Speed Further steps of the 24th of July 2019) and have two general considerations:

The locations are complementing our aircraft plants in the U.S.A. and the P.R.China (P.R.C.).

We also made related considerations about

Moreover, we developed a system with a related device, which is not a revolutionary solution but solves a practical problem of millions of people worldwide, which again is not a huge problem but makes a specific time in life much more enjoyable.

23.September.2019
Preliminary investigation of pharmaceutical industry started
We have begun with the preliminary investigation of tissue agnostic or tumor agnostic drugs, which are

This raises the question if their foundational concept, as well as research and development is based on our work of art titled Ontologic System and created by C.S., which is our revolutionary thing

24.September.2019
Preliminary investigation of Linux Foundation started
We had to start the next preliminary investigation of the Linux Foundation in relation to the framework for the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) called EdgeX Foundry and hosted by the Linux Foundation. The first resulted is: EdgeX Foundry is based on the

• Project Haystack with its dynamic homoiconic general graph programming language with native support for the Resource Description Framework (RDF) and
• Schema.org

This composition, design, or system architecture is already a sufficient evidence for showing a causal link with our Ontologic System (OS). In fact, no new original and unique work was created in this way but merely the related part of our OS was described in other words respectively edited respectively copied, as usual.
Beside these elements and their integration, that framework also includes the

in addition to

which provides more evidence that proves our claim.

At this point, one can see various aspects once again, such as the

• abuse of market power,
• illegal agreements and conspiracies against C.S. and our corporation,
• market manipulations, as well as
• conductions of other particularly serious frauds.

19:38 and 24:44 UTC+2
SOPR #233

*** Sketching mode - harmonization with former issues required ***
topics:

Infrastructure
Besides the suggestion discussed once again in the issue SOPR #228 of the 7th of September 2019 we are also considering as further options the

In accordance with the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) of our SOPR grandfathering is granted for the businesses activities that we have not focused on.
We can assure that only some very few cases exist that are covered by our provision of grandfathering.

parts of the OS that were already reproduced without allowance
Due to the applied strategies and methods (sidestep or circumvention by copying in parts, segments, ...) a holistic approach concludes that the entities involved made an agreement and reached/came to the common understanding, that they get the controll over the works, performances, and achievements of C.S. and our corporation in this way.

Example for dedicated main contractors, suppliers, and providers: Integration of

becomes platform for all members of our SOPR and former controlling entity gets provision for management and operation of it or other works or both.

Data democracy
Data democracy is not easy with regard to business strategies, models, and structures based on user data. The problem of our SOPR is to balance the interests of

Data sharing
At first, we would like to recall that not all

are owned by entities, and when owned by C.S. they are (suggested to be) merely licensed to other entities by our SOPR.
specifically every part of the OS and the infrastructure of our SOPR. Therefore digital estate, data mines and wells, and handling raw data and knowledge and SoftBionic (SB) algorithms generated on the basis of said data ...

prominent example

Diverses
We do not demand this action but we hope that SOPR members honor the right to be forgotten of any other SOPR members worldwide.

27.September.2019

20:30 and 20:57 UTC+2
SOPR #234

*** Working in progress - summary or reduction of prior matter and focus on decisions ***
We refined some legal matter and made two decison in relation to the listed topics:

Electronic Commerce (EC),

Joint ventures
We have refined the regulations related to joint ventures established by public and federal institutes and authorities, and state-owned companies as one group of joint partners and our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), Ontonics, and other business units of our corporation as other group of joint partners in the following ways:

all as extensive as allowed by law.

IDentity Access and Management System (IDAMS)
integration of existing standard technologies (e.g. systems and platforms), goods (e.g. applications and devices), and services
SOPR members can stop with competition on the basis of their individual IDAMS and instead use their resources for other business activities, because

• members of the SOPR commissioned by the SOPR (see also the issue ),
• joint ventures established by members of the SOPR as one group of joint partners and our SOPR, Ontonics, and other business units of our corporation as other group of joint partners, or
• our SOPR alone,

and

• public and federal institutes and authorities, and state-owned companies, and
• joint ventures established by public and federal institutes and authorities, and state-owned companies as one group of joint partners and our SOPR, Ontonics, and other business units of our corporation as other group of joint partners,

all as extensive as allowed by law.

Multimodal User Interface (MUI)
The integration of Amazon Alexa and Microsoft Cortana respectively voice-based Multi-Agent System (MAS) will be a basic part of the SOPR infrastructure, controlled and managed by the SOPR, and operated by

We already suggested to take Amazon Alexa as basis respectively Natural Language Processing (NLP) part and appoint the related business units of Amazon or an established interest group that handed over its existing item as dedicated main contractor and provider.
Apple Siri, Samsung Bixby, and other (designated) SOPR members have to hook their

voice-based systems, etc. into the systems and platforms of our SOPR and register their services in the common service index and provide interfaces for their services as well.
Our movements have standard Natural Multimodal Processing (NMP) functionality, including Natural Language Processing (NLP) functionality, of the OntoBot (OB) component for

operation.
SOPR members can continue with the competition on the basis of their individual technologies (e.g. systems and platforms), goods (e.g. applications and devices), and services.

Grid, Cloud, and Edge Computing System (GCECS)
The

respectively Service-Oriented Computing (SOC) platforms will be a basic part of the infrastructure of the SOPR, kept under the power of control and managed by the SOPR, and {only operated or also managed?} operated by

We already suggested to appoint related business units of Microsoft and Oracle, or an established interest group that handed over its existing item as dedicated main contractor and provider.
Amazon AWS, IBM, Alibaba GCEC platforms, and other (designated) SOPR members have to

Our OS movements have standard GCEC functionality of the OntoNet (ON) component for operation.
SOPR members can continue with the competition on the basis of their individual technologies (e.g. systems and platforms), goods (e.g. applications and devices), and services.

Virtual Globe (VG)
The integration of Virtual Globes (VGs) will be a basic part of the SOPR infrastructure, controlled and managed by the SOPR, and operated by

Here Technologies, Microsoft Maps (based on Here Technologies), and other (designated) SOPR members have to hook into the Ontologic uniVerse (OV) platform of our SOPR.
SOPR members can continue with competition on the basis of their individual technologies (e.g. systems, environments, and platforms), goods (e.g. contents, applications, and devices), and services.

E-Commerce (EC)
The integration of EC platforms or marketplaces will be a basic part of the SOPR infrastructure, ...
Amazon, Alibaba, Walmart, Lidl EC platforms, and other (designated) SOPR members have to hook into the universal marketplace of our SOPR.
SOPR members can continue with competition on the basis of their individual technologies (e.g. systems and platforms), goods (e.g. applications and devices), and services.

Streaming
...
music, television or video, gaming, etc. streaming platforms have to hook into the Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV) platforms of our SOPR.
SOPR members can continue with competition on the basis of their individual technologies (e.g. systems and platforms), goods (e.g. contents, applications, and devices), and services.