 |
|
Home → News 2020 June
|
04.June.2020
06.June.2020
12.June.2020
Style of Speed Further steps
We made a quick doodle of the conversion of the model 911 respectively 992 of the marque Porsche with the rear lights of the concept car Mission E respectively the model Taycan of the marque Porsche, which is basically the model Pan of our business unit Style of Speed (SoS), including the illuminated name of the manufacturer.
© :I, :I, and Style of Speed
More coming in the not so far away future.
13.June.2020
18:52 and 19:13 UTC+2
Style of Speed Further steps
We made some more quick doodles of a conversion of the model 911 respectively 992 of the marque Porsche with the diffusor of the model 488 Pista of the manufacturer Ferrari and the rear wing of the model Divo of the marque Bugatti.
The conversion of the Porsche 911 with the rear wing of the Bugatti Divo was already started in November 2018.
© :I, :I, :I, :I, and Style of Speed
We also made some doodles of a conversion based on the models Huracan Performante and Evo of the marque Lamborghini on the 28th of January 2019.
© :I, :I, :I, and Style of Speed
We also made some doodles of a conversion based on the models Aventador S and Centenario of the marque Lamborghini on the 28th of January 2019.
© :I, :I, :I, and Style of Speed
15.June.2020
14:24 UTC+2
title?
We have the strategies of the different actors
- slavish imitation or mimicry respectively reflection,
- interference,
- harrassment,
- extortion,
- withholding of basic rights, especially personal rights and copyrights,
- etc.
by
- lobbyism,
- agreement,
- collaboration,
- conspiracy,
- establishment of research projects,
- start-ups,
- standards or norms,
- Free and Open Source Hardware and Software (FOSHS),
- etc.,
- Articles of Association (AoA), or charter or statute(s) of society, and
- Terms of Services (ToS),
and will enforce our rights, terms, and conditions in court if another party is still not teachable, insightful, and (if at all demanded by us) willing to compromise.
The decision or position of governments and other groups in society lacks any legal, scientifical, and technological basis:
But
The warning application with decentralized data storage on the devices of the end users is an unauthorized modification of the corresponding parts of our Ontological System (OS) just like the other so-called Corona applications or Corona warning applications, which are not based on our Healthcare 4.0 subsystem of the infrastructure of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR).
Furthermore, according to the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Use (ToS) of our SOPR, Personally Identifiable Informations (PIIs) must be provided as anonymized raw signals and data to our SOPR for further handling, which may include centralized or decentralized data storage and transmission in real time.
We were not asked, although we have been known for more than 2 decades now and also know our SOPR. Instead, the launch of our SOPR infrastructure continued to be foiled by all external actors and misled the public by imitating, among other things, both the infrastructure with its facilities, subsystems and platforms, it like economic system and the activities of our SOPR.
The so-called corona app or more precisely corona warning application is therefore arbitrary and ideological and also illegal in one way or another. One does not need, one cannot, and one should not be proud of it.
Moreover, in the past it has always been shown that one follows a strategy and try to sound out their possibilities far beyond the legal and create loopholes.
That is why we will not simply accept such an approach.
illegal practices by governments, scientific institutions and private companies
We ask again:
Titel?
durch
und werden unsere Rechte, Forderungen und Bedingungen gerichtlich durchsetzen, falls die Gegenseite weiterhin nicht belehrbar, einsichtig und (falls überhaupt von unserer Seite gefordert) kompromissbereit ist.
Der Entscheidung beziehungsweise der Position von Regierungen als auch anderer Gruppen der Gesellschaft fehlt jegliche rechtliche, wissenschaftliche und technologische Grundlage:
Aber
Die Warnapplikation mit dezentraler Datenspeicherung auf den Geräten der Endnutzer ist eine unautorisierte Modifikation der entsprechenden Teile von unserem Ontologischen System (OS) genauso wie die anderen sogenannte Corona-Applikationen oder Corona-Warnapplikation, die nicht auf unserem Gesundheitswesen 4.0 Untersystem der Infrastruktur von unserer SOPR basieren.
Die sogenannte Corona-App oder genauer Corona-Warnapplikation ist somit willkürlich und ideologiebehaftet sowie so oder so illegal. Darauf braucht man nicht, kann man nicht und sollte man auch nicht stoz zu sein.
illegale Praktiken seitens Regierungen, wissenschaftlichen Einrichtung und privaten Unternehmen
Die Rechte von C.S. sind sakrosant.
Wir fragen ein weiteres Mal:
*** Proof-reading mode - maybe some links missing ***
Legal matter [standards]
but also
Now, the activities are focusing on the facilities, systems and platforms of the infrastructure of our SOPR, which are required for realizing and operating our Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV), specifically the fields of
(keywords SoftBionic operating system-level virtualization and network virtualization, Software-Defined Networking (SDN), Network Functions Virtualization (NFV), and carrier cloud, or simply Ontologic Networking; see also The Proposal about our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and the related Clarifications and Further steps of the {dates missing} ... January 2020 for example).
Before, arguments were only given on the basis of national companies, now they are given on the basis of international companies.
Indeed, standards make sense, and our royalties should be set to a height that we are able to take part as an active and leading entity in every effort and activity of standardization, which affects our
But wait a moment. We do already have our SOPR, which is the place where said standards should be discussed, developed, drafted, decidedrevised, and revised .
In this regard, it is not comprehensible that U.S.American authorities and companies claim that they have disadvantages, specifically in the fields of mobile communication technology and SB (AI, ML, etc.), if they are not allowed to work together with companies listed on the so-called entity list, specifically the company Huawei, even not allowed to develop and revise standards.
anyway.
Therefore, our SOPR will
every standard, that affects our rights and properties, specifically when it modifies our OS without our involvement, collaboration, and allowance.
At the end we would like to share the informatin that in a recent conversation with a shareholder we came to the conclusion once again, that we have the rights and therefore set the terms and conditions, no matter what others do illegally or even seriously criminally. And we said that our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) handles our Ontologic System (OS) with its ... and its infrastructure and our digital property as discussed and explained.
Since some week, we are observing the attempt by a manufacturer of electric vehicles, one of its battery suppliers, and the media to push a nonsense because outdated battery, which is said to be the first million mile battery.
Our business unit Style of Speed is even designing a purely electric aerospaceplane already besides the Vertical Take-Off and Landing (VTOL) airliners and VTOL Personal Aerial Vehicles (PAVs), which are already ready for mass production.
It is better for every manufacturer of mobile devices and vehicles to pay our damage compensations, become a member of our SOPR, and pay our royalties, or simply said to collaborate with us.
In the last days, we have begun with the design of a purely electric aerospaceplane on the basis of our already developed
which are already ready for mass production.
Oh, yes, do not forget to mention: It is reusable and most potentially will also have VTOL capability with its first generation as well. What else?
*** Work in progress - better wording, links missing ***
Legal matter
In this relation, we have to give the reminder that in our Ontological System (OS) with its Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV) we have ID spaces assigned to each country or sovereign state to meat their demand for individual cyber sovereignty. As a consequence, an entity that is acting in a specific ID space has a Virtual Permanent Establishment (VPE) in said ID space. This can then be used for truly fair taxation purposes.
Digital rights [signals and data properties]
of a single member or licensee due to the simply reason that it is our work of art and our SOPR is the only SOPR.
At this point, we think it is a good reminder to note once again that the compromise between C.S. and the worldwide community already is that we are opening our OS for everybody and allowing respectively licensing the performance and the reproduction of certain Ontologic System Components (OSC) and Ontoscope Components (OsC), and also of Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) required under Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) terms and conditions.
License Model (LM)
Due to national and international laws, regulations, and acts, as well as agreements, a relationship with another entity can never be on an equal footing or level-playing field in general, because C.S. always has the last word in relation to any modification of our OS.
and
and
But there is comprehensible demand for a broader opening and related modification of our OS, which demands higher royalties. Nevertheless, the actions of large companies of the ICT industrial sector on the one side and the actions of the market regulators in the U.S.A. and the European Union (EU) on the other side show us, that our SOPR does not act wrongly.
For a single entity of any licensee class the following equalities concerning connections or integrations on the level of software processes or business processes are given:
A participation in a company is considered as a business process. The overall revenue will be calculated pro rata==proportionately.
We also found some more important aspects in addition to the ones already listed in the issues #286 of the 4th of May 2020 and #287 of the 25th of May 2020, that are relevant for drafting a new License Model (LM).
For all companies of the ICT industrial sector licensee class the following royalties are proposed:
The revenue or profit progression will be adjusted in correspondence with the key interest rates or base rates, and inflation rates, if they will increase at all.
Just because we can, we have slightly revised, finetuned, and expanded the business plans of our Superbolts™
of our 1 trillion USD fund
which comprises the
to increase the impact of our uncomparable Blitz style even more when entering and redefining the competition in market sectors and whole markets.
The Superbolt #1 Superstructure could improve and strengthen its position by an unexpected development and will do so in the next future by organic growth.
As a consequence of the expansion of its business field, we renamed the Superbolt #4 Electric Storage System (ESS) to Electric Power (EP).
The Superbolt #6 N.N. could also develop considerably by an unexpected development.
100% of all handheld devices are
We think that our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is in an excellent position for
*** Work in progress - link missing ***
Legal matter [modification]
then our SOPR is allowed to
(see the issue #... of the ...).
simultaneously pro bono publico==for the public good.
This regulation also applies to network and communication services based on for example Software-Defined Networking (SDN), Network Functions Virtualization (NFV), and related standards and groupings.
Finally, we would also like to give the recommendation once again, that entities should focus on their technologies, goods, and services, but not on copying our OS and mimicking our SOPR.
Digital rights [signals and data properties]
then antitrust intervention
to prevent the abuse of market power.
We are examining the overall legal situation in relation to three points:
either way, and are allowed to handle them all together for exploiting and monetizing our ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs), and providing and licensing our technologies, goods, and services.
IDentity Access and Management System (IDAMS)
We are sure that other companies, specifically
with their technologies, goods, and services of the so-called field of Grid, Cloud, Edge, and Fog Computing (GCEFC) and networking included in our field of Ontologic Computing (OC), agree to a similar consensus or even this distributed or hybrid solution based on our IDAMS.
Our OC and hence ON, OW, and OV have such comparable services that are based on
(see also the Virtual Object System (VOS) and the explanations given in relation to our OS variants OntoLix and OntoLinux) besides the many other properties and functionalities related to Distributed Systems (DSs), but is still downward compatible with AD, the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP), and other legacy protocols and services.
which is the central system where the other systems have to be hooked into respectively connected to.
that
Eventually, Microsoft has to utilize the same like Amazon, Dell, and all the other companies, that is some kind of an AD connector or proxy linked to our (OS) core.
We are pleased to submit our offer for the Palazzo Farnese in Rome, Italy:
*** Work in progress - better wording ***
Legal matter [joint ventures]
Indeed, a state must be capable of acting.
fitted into a long-time strategy by government of using infrastructure projects to secure de facto appropriation, incorporation, or expropriation of property and sovereignty.
This is the case with the infrastructure of our SOPR as well.
But we have observed that a strategy of governments for undermining the political neutrality and independence, and also the sovereignty of our SOPR include
that match their goals and protect their integrities, and eventually keep up their structures of power.
A possible measure against such activities could be an expansion of the clause included in the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS), which regulates the establishment of joint ventures between federal and public authorities and institutes, and State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) with our SOPR, Ontonics, and other business unit of our corporation, so that related companies would be approved only as a joint venture partner of our SOPR, Ontonics, and other business unit of our corporation, not only SOEs, but also enterprises in which governments merely hold shares and interests.
If this measure will not solve the issues, then an introduction of a new clause in the AoA and the ToS might be required, so that related companies would
We also said recently, that the issues related to the so-called Corona apps in the European Union (EU) and at other places on planet Earth are still under investigation.
License Model (LM) [discounts]
In relation to our aerial vehicles and air transport services we have three options now:
The same considerations hold for some of our Superbolts included in the Blitz Fund I.
Things are becoming interesting with over 20 megafactories and terafactories having an investment volume of at least 150 billion U.S. Dollar and with most of them already being in the location and construction planning phases.
Law on impossible expropriation was avoided just like other legislations
Wir haben die Strategien sowie zugehörigen Methoden und Aktivitäten der verschiedenen Akteure
Des Weiteren sind gemäß unserer Gesellschaftsstatuten und Nutzungsbedingungen Persönlich Identifizierbare Informationen (PIIn) als annoymisierte Rohsignale und -daten unserer SOPR für die weitere Handhabung zur Verfügung zu stellen, die gegebenenfalls auch eine zentrale oder dezentrale Datenspeicherung und eine Übertragung in Echtzeit sein kann.
Wir wurden nicht gefragt, obwohl man seit mittlerweile mehr als 2 Jahrzehnten Bescheid weiß und auch unsere SOPR kennt. Stattdessen wurde der Start von unserer SOPR-Infrastruktur von allen externen Akteuren weiterhin vereitelt und die Öffentlichkeit in die Irre geführt, indem unter anderem sowohl die Infrastrukur mit ihren Einrichtungen, Untersystemen und Plattformen, sie wie Wirtschaftssystem als auch die Aktivitäten unserer SOPR immitiert wurden.
Außerdem hat es sich in der Vergangenheit immer gezeigt, dass man einer Strategie folgt und versucht seine Möglichkeiten weit über das Legale hinweg auszuloten und Schlupflöcher zu schaffen.
Deshalb werden wir solch eine Vorgehensweise nicht einfach hinnehmen.
Gesetz zu einer unmöglichen Enteignung wurde vermieden genauso wie andere Gesetzgebungen
Die entsprechenden Punkte im sogenannten Zukunftspaket des Konjunkturprogramms der Regierung der B.R.D. stärkt insbesondere U.S.Amerikanische Lobbyisten und Unternehmen, da man deren illegalen Strategien folgt und unterstützt. Es sind aber auch diejenigen Unternehmen, die man durch die Europäische Komission bekämpft. Auf der einen Seite stärkt man und auf der anderen Seite schwächt man andere Akteure, aber beides macht man zum Nachteil von C.S. und unserem Unternehmen.
16.June.2020
09:52 and 11:01 UTC+2
SOPR #288
Topic
This issue is about the topic:
Once again, U.S.American, P.R.Chinese, and European entities alone and together are trying to get more power of control over our Ontologic System (OS) and our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) on the basis of standards.
We already discussed such activities in relation to the fields of Cyber-Physical System (CPS), Internet of Things (IoT), and Networked Embedded System (NES), specifically with the
As explained in general above, Huawei is one of the largest companies in the field of telecommunications equirpement, but it is not the competence in our OS at all. So if there would be a disadvantage at all, then this would have been a consequence due to the decision making of our SOPR. But we have not made any decision apart from what is in the
And U.S.American, P.R.Chinese, and European companies have to work out standards together with our SOPR, but not merely with each other.
17.June.2020
18.June.2020
00:00 and 01:10 UTC+2
Ontonics Further steps
Honestly, the aspect of lifespan was never a point of consideration for us as is the case to measure it in miles. But if we would follow this kind of unserious marketing, then our estimation results in a lifespan of at least 38.500.000 to 77.000.000 miles for our battery. But in contrast to other entities, we are serious, measure and communicate the really important properties, and can tell the public that our battery has a cycle durability of several tens of thousands of cycles, besides its excellent specific energy and energy density, as well as all the other much better quantities and qualities.
So eat this and our dust. :þ
00:00, 01:10, and 11:30 UTC+2
Style of Speed Further steps
While electric propulsion systems are not new in the aeronautics industry and the space industry, and have proven to be practicable in space, a pure electric airliner in the aviation industry and for sure an aerospaceplane in the aerospace industry are beyond state of the art, but not beyond our magic works of art. Believe us when we say that they are really fascinating things far beyond firework rockets and similar retrograde technologies of the last century.
19.June.2020
14:23 and 22:00 UTC+2
SOPR #289
Topics:
At first, we would like to quote a document about Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) and Digital Sales/Services Taxes (DSTs) introduced or proposed by countries that "the problem of beps easily catches the imagination, particularly given the attention that has attached to several distasteful anecdotes of crass tax avoidance. The empirical evidence is quite consistent with beps being a real phenomenon, but one that is notably small in magnitude and unlikely to undermine the sustainability of government finance."
As with the registration of services and their interfaces (e.g. Application Programming Interface (API)), the unrestricted access to raw signals and data guarantees interoperability and overall benefit for all members and licensees. The question, if said unrestricted access to raw signals and data can be exploited by our SOPR for own commercial activities is being answered in the cases of the companies Amazon, Apple, and Co. vs. market regulators.
But more important is the point that the interest of our SOPR is not to compete with members and licensees on this basis or any other basis at all, or to compete at all, but to provide more benefit for everybody that otherwise would not be realized due to an
All these activities related to the subjects of BEPS and DST suggest that a further differentiation of the License Model (LM) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is the right way to do.
In addition, the cases of the largest company of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) industrial sector show once again that a monopoly is only unlawfull, if an entity exploits its dominant position as the gatekeeper to its walled garden. In this regard, our SOPR does not act wrong with the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS), which allow only selling applications and providing services, which are not classified as
Contra aspects against 17% and 27%, or higher royalties
20.June.2020
21.June.2020
20:00 UTC+2
Ontonics Blitz Fund I #8
22.June.2020
13:50 UTC+2
Around 85% of all handheld devices Ontoscopes
23.June.2020
24.June.2020
04:22 and 19:22 UTC+2
SOPR #290
Topics:
In the issue #288 of the 16th of June 2020 we missed to point out that the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) include the clause that in case companies do not differentiate in a specific field on the basis of Ontologic System Components (OSC) and our Ontoscope Components (OsC), and Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) anymore, for example by
At this point, one can see once again
The Federal Court of Justice (FCJ)==BundesGerichtsHof (BGH), which is the highest court in the F.R.Germany, has judged in the case market regulator vs. Facebook, which is already going on since around 3 years and should be considered as a guideline for the legislation of the European Union (EU) and other countries worldwide following the member states of the EU, that social networking platforms, whereby for example YouTube, Twitter, and Snapchat, and also LinkedIn and Xingare are not viewed as such platforms by the market regulator, are not allowed to amalgamate Personally Identifiable Informations (PIIs) or personal data collected on own or others platforms, single webpages, and other sources to an overall personal profile or Personally Identifiable Profile (PIP), for example on a single user account, without consent by a user. In addition, the consent must be given voluntarily respectively unconditionally.
It is important to note, that at the side line the question has been answered if the market regulator is allowed at all to make a decision about a matter, which is also related to data protection or privacy. The court answered this with a clear Yes, because
The latter corresponds exactly with the views and investigations of the market regulators of the European Commission (EC), who also clearly say that data is an
If we are not allowed to do as said in the point before by the market regulators in the F.R.Germany and most potentially in the whole EU, then our License Model (LM) requires the next revision to compensate all economic losses.
We see a certain consensus between the companies Microsoft, Amazon, Dell→VMware, and Oracle in relation to the
Furthermore, the infrastructure of our SOPR already has a corresponding IDentity Access and Management System (IDAMS) with
The reasons for the latter are quite simple, we also have our
Which company will provide the related services for all members and licensees of our SOPR in the end depends on the takeovers realized by our business unit Ontonics or other developments of our corporation.
26.June.2020
29.June.2020
00:30 UTC+2
King Smiley Further steps
30.June.2020
01:00 UTC+2
SOPR #291
Topics:
"In the fight against the virus, it does not help if figures are falsified or not collected at all to make one's own regime look better. And it is unscrupulous when elected governments abuse the fight against the virus to further reduce civil liberties and seek to cement their own power," said the federal president (not to be confused with the chancellor) of the F.R.Germany.
We would like to add, that the fight and the abuse are not only related to a virus and a pandemics, but more general.
a long-term government strategy to use infrastructure projects to ensure de facto appropriation, incorporation or expropriation of property and sovereignty
We would like to recall as well that discounts are not a matter of course.
01:38 and 23:29 UTC+2
Ontonics Further steps
In this context, we have heard that governments around the world are interested in locating production plants and securing workforces, which exactly matches our options.