are unable to solve the climate issue, but instead are only destroying more and increasing the chaos eventually.
Despite the negative exprierences we have made since 2 decades now; we concluded that it is time to demonstrate true leadership and competence in this field as well. Accordingly, we would like to give a little more information about our

Not surprisingly, the concept of weather control is not new, as can be seen below with the short summary of the better known concepts in relation to weather control and geoengineering.

• reflective aerosols,
• space mirrors,
  • physical and
  • artificial by laser,
• plasma clouds by terrestial or orbital ionospheric heater, and
• artificial auroras,
• cloud seeding,
• noctilucent or night-glowing cloud generation,
• desert greening, and
• genetically engineered paler crops.

• forestation,
• carbon dioxide capture form
  • air and
  • fossil fuels,
• carbon dioxide sequestration by
  • ocean iron fertilization and
  • engineered microbes.

• cloud ionization for making rain.

But all these proposed concepts are not solving the foundational problems, if they are doable at all, but merely shift them to the next ones, as usual for human kind.
What we have done so far comprises the following actions among many other activities:

• managing, financing, operating, and commercializing the activities and assets of our SWC and
• by the Blitz Fund I, which again is managed by our Hightech Office Ontonics as well.

One basic element of our WCS can be described as a giant refrigerator, but the annoying problems are that we have not found out how to let it snow

But at least we do know how to make much ice. :)

Thus, one of our goals should be clear, but we will not go further into the details due to unwanted interferences. So let us see in the next future how important words and not only works truly are when all of our special experts suddenly know and tell the rest of the world what to do once again.

02.December.2019

Comment of the Day

"Electricity is like bandwidth. One can never have enough of it.", [C.S., sometimes]

Ontonics Further steps

We concluded that separating the business units concerned with the field of Grid, Cloud, and Edge Computing (GCEC) as well as fog computing respectively essential elements of our Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV) from the other business units of our takeover candidates and taking over only these separated business units, as we already suggested before with the Amazon Web Services (AWS) business unit of the company Amazon, might be a favourable option.
In this relation, we would like to recall or make clear that the field of the so-called fog computing and other hybrid paradigms of computer networks and distributed systems are

though a white knight action still belongs to the favoured options.

The takeover offers for

and the $1 bet of

remain untouched.

Please note that the remaining tasks as well as technologies, goods, and services of the fields of Cyber-Physical System (CPS), Internet of Things (IoT), and Networked Embedded System (NES), including

for the construction as well as management and operation of the infrastructure of our managing and collecting societies would still remain for commissioning among dedicated main contractors, suppliers, and providers.

03.December.2019

Comment of the Day

Greta air™
By the way: We suggest to call our airline Greta Air, because we fly with clean hydrocarbons. And we see a business opportunity and advantage with our fierce low-price air force in the short-haul flight market, too.

09:18 UTC+1
SOPR #256

*** Work in progress ***
Topics
This issue is basically about reviews related to these topics:

Due dates
We reviewed the due dates and concluded that we

• a non-aggression agreement and
• other social, political, legal, and economical circumstances,

Transition process [Infrastructure]
For sure, we are eager to keep our commitments, specifically in relation to

but we do not accept that the

will become a never-ending story.
Therefore, we have reviewed our related statements and are more and more prefering to take over the business units for Grid, Cloud, and Edge Computing (GCEC) of other companies or the whole companies As Soon As Possible (ASAP) Or Even Better Immediately (OEBI) and not in the next 10 to 20 years as part of the

(see the issues #148 of the 7th of November 2018, #228 of the 7th of September 2019, and #231 of the 18th of September 2019, and also the related Further steps of the 26th of March 2019).
Potentially, shortening the periods and setting earlier deadlines of the transition process might be a solution, though this also depends on legal experts and their final decisions.

Digital rights
We noted that companies are adapting to the new laws, acts, and regulations, as well as agreements concerning data privacy and digital rights. We are not sure why suddenly companies with headquarters in the U.S.A. are presenting themselves as the protectors of user privacy after they destroyed privacy in more than the last 2 decades.
We will observe the situation and see if it is done for

But we are already absolutely sure that this will not change the

• Ontologic System (OS) ArtWork (AW) rights,
• other Intellectual Property (IP) rights, and
• other property rights given by the
  • legal scope of our digital rights, digital interest, digital property, or digital estate,
  • legal scope of our Ontologic System (OS),
  • domain of our New Reality (NR) respectively
  • sovereign space of our OntoVerse (OV), also known as OntoLand (OL).

04.December.2019

Clarification

Luckily, our Ontologic System (OS) with its

is neither Marti nor SWIFT.
But if one takes a look at the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) with its messaging service, then she or he might get a vague notion or even an understanding about a small fraction of what makes our OS and also our managing and collecting, like for example the

with their infrastructure, including

such incredibly ingenious masterpieces of civilization.
Is not it? :)

06.December.2019

Comment of the Day

Run Greta Run!
Fly Greta Fly!
See also the Comment of the Day of the 3rd of December 2019.

Ontonics Further steps

We concluded that the estimation of the enterprise value of the company IBM is much too high and must be corrected to 30% (52.5 bn USD) or even less, because our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) has blacklisted it, which means it

(see also the Further steps of the 4th of November 2019).

00:06 and 11:26 UTC+1
SOPR #257

*** Work in progress ***
Topics
In this issue we have these topics as subject matter for discussion:

Legal matter
The overall situation becomes more and more clear with every Planck time in relation to social, political, legal, technological, and economical circumstances.
With the aid of the way entities are acting we could sharpen the white, yellow, and red line that constitute the limits of the

We are considering to keep under the power of control and management our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) exclusively the rest of the technologies, goods, and services related to the fields of

• Fault-Tolerant, Reliable, and Trustworthy Distributed System (FTRTDS), including
  • blockchain-based system,
  • Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) of us (used illegally for Bitcoin, Ethereum, etc.), and
  • other digital and virtual ledger technologies,
• blackboard system, including
  • system of loosely-coupled applications and services,
  • tuple space, and
  • Linda like system,
• Grid, Cloud, and Edge Computing System (GCECS),
• multi-cloud computing system, dynamic federation system, and service meshing system with registry, broker, or similar facility for objects, signals, data, applications, services, etc., and
• mobile communications standard or mobile network of the next generations,

• Smart Urban System (SUS),
• Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT),
• Industry 4.0 and 5.0,
• Medicine 4.0 and 5.0, and
• Healthcare 4.0 and 5.0,

including Semantic Reality (SemR), Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR), Mixed Reality (MR), Synthetic Reality (SR), cloud computing systems and platforms of the second generation, after movements for OSC and edge computing have already become exclusive due to no allowance for subON, subOW, and subOV, and also registries, etc..
We are also considering to act in the same way with our platforms for SoftBionics (SB), including

Exclusion of IBM
Since January 2019, we noted that the company IBM has not changed its strategy and attitude, specifically with core elements of our Ontologic System and related technologies, goods, and services, that were presented in the last months as own creations and inventions.
Therefore, we had no other choice than to blacklist ... IBM, as announced in the issue #241 of the 29th of October 2019
now blacklisted due to Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) as well as guaranteeing fairness amoung all SOPR members

Exclusion of Huawei
We have already announced such an action in the last months. But latest developments may suggest that we reached a point, where we have to act in accordance with the provisions included in the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) of our SORP.
Therefore, with the next serious attempt of Huawei to disturb the goals and even threaten the integrity of our SOPR we will put the company on our blacklist.

Further steps
Since some weeks, we are spending virtually all of our time for the SOPR and bringing all matter together. Still missing but solidifying is the matter concerning (data) privacy and digital rights.
Specifically interesting is the public discussion about SoftBionics (SB) in the P.R.China, specifically Machine Learning (ML) and Computer Vision (CV) utilized for facial recognition. In fact, our friends in the P.R.China are not so happy with its massive deployment in public and private environments.
Not so interesting but nevertheless important to note and observe is the assimilation of the health records or patient records conducted by some companies of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) industrial sector since some time. No matter how it works out in the end, the SOPR gets full access to the raw data either through the governments, the healthcare sector, or the ICT industrial sector.

07.December.2019

Comment of the Day

Greta battery™
Greta power™
Troll power™
Smørrebøttery™
Smørrebøtteri™

Ontonics Further steps

In the last days, we continued our work in the field of facial recognition technology and approached it by considering all demands:
On the one hand, there are the

to realize and protect

On the other hand, there are the

to realize and enable

• security agencies and
• law enforcement agencies.

We were also considering the insights and the expertises gained with our

• Economic IDentity (EcoID) system and
• Known Traveller Digital Identity (KTDI) system,

and

SOPR #258

Topic
This is an espresso issue meaning very small but highly concentrated in relation to this topic:

Transition process [Infrastructure]
We suggest to integrate the transition process and the takeover process into a fluent transition process with the goal to avoid further confusions and disturbances, and overall chaos eventually.

In the course of such a fluent transition process the takeover price would be payed as the costs of services provided for our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR). Accordingly, the ownership of shares would change in the transition process as part of the takeover process simultaneously taking place as the fluent transition process. When the profit made with a service equals the takeover price, then the change of ownership is accomplished. (Quid pro quo)²
For sure, an implication of such a fluent transition process is that the commissioning of a related service task stops with the completion of the takeover as well and the service task is done under own power of control and management of our SOPR from then on. But we are always looking for other

08.December.2019

Comment of the Day

"Give the Hungry Artist more bananas.", [C.S., Today]
What a performance by the comedian, which was even better than smashing the vases of that other vitriolic contemporary anti-artist Ai Autsch Weia Weiwei.

And for everybody who is not an expert in the legal matter related to the copyright we would like to recall once again the essential point: The copyright is not protecting an idea, but a personal, original and unique, characteristic expression of an idea and intellectual creation of a creator.
A banana is not an idea but a composition or arrangement of a banana with a duct tape at a wall might be an original and unique expression of an idea if and only if it is a personal intellectual creation and has not been presented before.
By the way: We might have seen this expression of an idea somewhere some years ago already (maybe with a black duct tape).

Banane=KAPITAL==Banana=CAPITAL

10.December.2019

Comment of the Day

Hoverium™
Powerium™
Flexium™
Paperium™

11.December.2019

Ontonics Further steps

We worked on some different and unconnected technologies and their integrations. Besides their improved generations and versions their greater possibilities and flexibilities of utilization are among the most interesting results.

21:17 UTC+1
Just for the record, the green one

*** Work in progress ***
We got the first information about the so-called European Green Deal. The key points are the following:

• modernization and transformation of infrastructure and industry to cleaner
  • energy supply,
  • industry,
  • agriculture,
  • traffic, and
  • buildings,
• CO2 trading,
• CO2 taxation of imported goods,
• reforestation,
• transformation of the European Investment Bank into a climate bank,
• just-transition fund about 100 billion Euro,

• 4 * 260 = 1.04 tn Euro,
• 7 * 260 = 1.82 tn Euro, and
• 10 * 260 = 2.6 tn Euro

Honestly, virtually all of these points are not new. In fact, the European Green Deal reminds us of the failed political program presented by the F.R.German government around 8 or 10 years ago. The only difference between the past and the present is that an incompetent and rude Swede is screaming around and threatening everybody who rejects to act as demanded.

We also already raised the question about its financing from both directions:

We also see statements about similar increased investments in infrastructure and economy everywhere, like for example in the countries Japan and Saudi Arabia.

But despite the media and others are still hyping the Greta nonsense, we have already counteracted against the next attempt to reduce our influence and power by presenting the G20 member states, specifically the Five Eyes member states, the European Union member states, the BRICKS member states, and Saudi Arabia, and others a much more interesting alternative also based on sciences but also on real technologies.

For avoiding

by governments and other entities we highly recommend that the G20 member states, the Five Eyes member states, the European Union member states, the BRICKS member states, and others, invest in our Blitz Fund instead of setting up parallel development as well as modernization and transition programs, which merely copy our corporation with its projects and funds, and pursue the goal to steal our ArtWorks (AWs) and other Intellectual Properties (IPs), disturb our goals and threaten our integrity.

By the way: Suddenly, flying is possible in an environmental friendly and commercial viably way again.

12.December.2019

05:33, 17:09, and 18:37 UTC+1
More evidences Cisco Systems and Rakuten mimicking C.S. and C.S. GmbH

*** Work in progress - better explanation and wording ***
No way under their power of control and management of our

cloud computing mobile computing networking, also called by them cloud native or cloud-based (5G) networking, and carrier-grade telecommunications service provider cloud (telco cloud), because it is nothing else than an essential part of our original and unique Ontologic Net (ON), which is an essential part of our all encompassing Ontologic System (OS) since its start in the end of October 2006, which was created by C.S., and was proven by us to have even not copied with one of those other plagiarisms about a future of the Internet, a future Internet, or a new Internet respectively our successor of the Internet.
The ON is under the power of control and management of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR).

By the way: The subsidiary Cisco→Meraki was based on a mesh network project, which again is based on the Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) protocol IEEE 802.11 b/g and called Roofnet, but not on a smart camera, a real-time camera, or a 3D camera, and also not on embedded SoftBionics (SB), including Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Computer Vision (CV), Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM), and so on, that are an essential part of our original and unique, iconic work of art titled Ontoscope and created by C.S. as well, like our successor of the Internet, which is called Ontologic Net (ON) but is not called the future of the Internet, the future Internet, or the new Internet, as part of our all encompassing Ontologic System (OS) since its start in the end of October 2006, which was created by C.S. as well but was not envisioned, created, or invented by Cisco Systems at all.

We also noticed that the companies Alphabet→Google, Microsoft, Comcast, AT&T, Facebook, and Disney Studios were on the dais, which looks even more like an obvious conspiracy, confusion of the public, as well as manipulation of the markets.
Indeed, we must be more cautious with our statements, because Ontonics→Alphabet→Google and Ontonics→ Microsoft in whole or in part or both.

There is no legal loophole since many years anymore and all those serious criminal tricks do not work but can be backtracked until the year 2007 and in some cases even further into the past.
Simple marketing, copying, or even stealing our AWs and other IPs does not work.

Even Cisco Systems and Rakuten as well as their customers have to

• cease and desist any presentation of our Ontologic System (OS) and our Ontoscope (Os) in whole or in part as an own vision, creation, invention, and so on to another public or private entity, and
• pay a royalty as fair fee or share,

when they wish to utilize our ArtWorks (AWs) and other Intellectual Properties (IPs) legally.

You can trust us that we are the Hightech Competence and we do have our comprehensive set of rights and capabilities to get our rights.

14.December.2019

Ontonics Further steps

We took a quick look in our stock and selected three technologies for making our Polish polish ready for climate shine. The overall strategy with its partially integrated projects and other related projects is ideal for

• our jewels are respected and
• their jewels transition into our pockets,

  which leads us to the

• agreements of our managing and collecting societies as well as
• takeovers of subsidiaries and companies, like
  • Volkswagen respectively Porsche SE (80 or 100% has to be discussed),
  • Atos, and
  • Grid, Cloud, and Edge Computing (GCEC) technologies, goods, and services of the listed (European) companies

  under our Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) terms and conditions,

and

When they are in our pockets as part of phase 1 and phase 2, then we can move on to our green deal and other deals as part of phase 3.

Sadly, our initiative is just much too beautiful that we cannot talk about it in detail and in public due to unwanted interferences (e.g. press, politics, cliquism, extremism, etc., etc., etc.). As we said, others will join up or will stand at the sideline watching how the others cash up.

We highly recommend to stop that gambling and blocking. It will cost the planet Earth at least another 10 to 13 years. As we said, not being nice becomes unsustainable expensive.
We also highly recommend to reject any funding of power plants based on nuclear fission and facilities based on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS).

16.December.2019

Comment of the Day

"This cup of coffee for a 'pig' is just another little flag. It's another tiny symptom and a nearly indiscernible shout from a contemptuous, roaring and riotous segment of a misanthropic society that vilifies those who stand for what's right and glorifies the very people who would usher in the destruction of the social fabric.", [Chief Johnny O'Mara, December 2019]

17.December.2019

04:42, 09:10, 12:52, and 29:55 UTC+1
SOPR #259

*** Work in progress - LM and infrastructure not ready ***
Topics
The topics of this issue are once again:

Legal matter
For addressing the competition law or antitrust law we draw the white, yellow, or red line respectively distinguish between

versus

or

versus

This does not mean in general that there

But like in the case of our provision of grandfathering respectively non-aggression agreement (see the issue #243 of the 3rd of November 2019), this does not have a broad effect, if at all, because only some few elements disclosed in prior art are interesting and in the scope of this provision. Over the years, we got the impression that there is consent about this matter (see also the Clarification of the 13th of November 2019 and the issues #193 of the 13th of June 2019, #228 of the 7th of September 2019, #233 of the 24th of September 2019, and #256 of the 3rd of December 2019).

In accordance with this distinction between these two classes the activities and facilities of our SOPR, including its infrastructure with its facilities, as well as systems, platforms, and services are viewed as exclusive.
Other infrastructures and platforms of our Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV) are viewed as either competitive or exclusive depending on their purposes and their fields of operation and utilization.

The competition law or antitrust law, and our promise of trust demands the elimination of any

• society membership,
• system access,
• licensing, or
• administrative approvals,

and

But this and other regulations are void when it comes to the restoration of our rights. Therefore, it is legal when we demand such transfers as part of a damage compensation, initial situation restoration, and property transition.

Our already unbelievably great success story continues. The convergence of information technology and (tele)communications technology is progressing not only by the designation of their common field of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) but also on the foundational technological level by following our works of art titled Ontologic System and Ontoscope.
Leading ICT companies have chosen our integration of fields, like for example Grid, Cloud, and Edge Computing (GCEC),

also known as the field of fog computing, and

by other entities as the

as clearly said and not expected otherwise by us 13 years ago. Please note that this convergence is not an ordinary technological progress, because

But despite

were presented, the problem is that these parts of CPS, IoT, and NES, and also MCS, UbiCS, and GCECS, inclusive mobile computing, are parts of the infrastructure, other systems, platforms, and services of our SOPR, that are kept under the power of control and managed by our SOPR, but usually managed and operated by telecoms or telcos. And as is the case with GCECS we do not intend to give this up. At the moment, the only solution seems to be that telecoms or telcos with their assets become contractors, suppliers, and providers of our SOPR. For Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and the related business units of TSPs the situation is easier to handle.

License Model (LM)

The guiding ideas for the latest revision of our License Model (LM) are to

In the case that

• double damage compensation for the copyright infringement and other infringements (for the last 3 years retroactive respectivley the 3 years 2017 to 2019),
• share of up to 100% of the earning or profit generated illegally (since due dates until 31st of December 2019),
• single damage compensation as admission fee or for the harm of the moral integrity of C.S. (since due dates until 31st of December 2016),
• royalty according to the LM (since 1st of January 2020),
• digitals rights, including full access to raw signals and data (since due dates),
• Ontologic Economic System (OES),
• infrastructure, including systems, platforms, and services of our SOPR as part of the infrastructures, including systems, platforms, and services of our ON, OW, and OV exclusive, like for example
  • IDentity Access and Management System (IDAMS),
  • Base Management System (BMS),
  • Ontologic Financial System (OFinS),
  • Electronic Commerce System (ECS),
  • Marketplace for Everything System (MfES),
  • etc.,
• cross licensing,
• transition process, specifically return or handover, and takeover of infringing Intellectual Properties (IPs), technologies, goods, and services in fields, like for example
  • Distributed System (DS),
  • Cyber-Physical System (CPS), Internet of Things (IoT), and Networked Embedded System (NES),
  • Ubiquitous Computing System (UCS or UbiCS),
  • Autonomous System (AS) and Robotic System (RS),
  • SoftBionics (SB),
  • Data Science and Analytics (DSA) and Big Data Processing (BDP),
  • etc.,

then we ask as the royalty for the performance of our Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) a

• Non-industrial sectors without Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
  • 0.75 to 9.50%
• Public and federal institutes, State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) without ICT
  • 2.00 to 10.75%
• Public and federal institutes, SOEs with ICT, non-industrial sectors with ICT, and industrial non-ICT sectors without ICT
  • 3.25 to 12.00%
• Industrial non-ICT sectors (e.g. physics, chemistry, biology engineering) with ICT
  • 4.50 to 13.25%
• Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector
  • 5.75 to 14.50%

If our agreement is not signed at its first submission, then we ask as the royalty a share according to the actual LM, which would be 5.75% + 1.25% = 7.00% of the overall revenue generated with the performance of our OAOS with 6 discounts granted in the case of the ICT sector, in addition to our FRANDAC terms and conditions.

Transition process [Infrastructure]
transition process

(see also the issues ... and #256 of the 3rd of December 2019 and #258 of the 7th of December 2019)

Further steps
In the last days, we referred to 3 phases in relation to various activities but missed to clearly define them.

• formal
  • agreement, or
  • charge and injunction
• organizational
  • ...
• structural
  • infrastructure, including
    • facilities,
    • technologies (e.g. systems, environments, and platforms),
    • goods (e.g. contents, software, applications, hardware, devices, robots, vehicles), and
    • services (e.g. as a Service (aaS), Data as a Service (DaaS))

• organizational
  • comissioning of works and services to contractors, suppliers, and providers
• structural
  • transition process, and
  • takeover,
• projected duration 2020 - 2025

• formal
  • next agreements, deals, collaborations, and joint projects
• structural
  • ...
• organizational
  • ...
• projected duration 2020 - 2025

18.December.2019

17:30 and 27:00 UTC+1
Clarification

*** Revision - ONoT, OntoHome, OWoT, OVoT ***
As a matter of fact, proprietary alliances and standards in the fields of Cyber-Physical System (CPS), Internet of Things (IoT), and Networked Embedded System (NES), and also Ubiquitous Computing System (UbiCS) never worked and there was only one approach in the last 20 years in these fields, which was really interesting, though this was only the case, because it was based on our research and development related to our original and unique, iconic works of art titled Ontologic System and Ontoscope, and created by C.S.. But with all the other technologies, goods, and services added by us as well when creating our Ontologic System and our Ontoscope, this part of our works is isolated and insufficient to fulfill the demands of the customers when taken alone. For example, most of the compositions and integrations of the fields of

• Fault-Tolerant, Reliable, and Trustworthy Distributed System (FTRTDS), including
  • blockchain-based system,
  • Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) of us, and
  • other digital and virtual ledger technologies,
• blackboard system, including
  • system of loosely-coupled applications and services,
  • tuple space, and
  • Linda like system,
• Grid, Cloud, and Edge Computing System (GCECS) and fog computing system,
• multi-cloud computing system, dynamic federation system, and service meshing system, and
• mobile computing system,

• Cyber-Physical System (CPS), Internet of Things (IoT), and Networked Embedded System (NES), including
  • OntoHome System (OHS), including
    • Smart Home System (SHS),
  • Smart Urban System (SUS),
  • Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT),
  • Industry 4.0 and 5.0,
  • Medicine 4.0 and 5.0,
  • Healthcare 4.0 and 5.0,
  • etc.,

• Semantic Web of Things (SWoT),

• Artificial Intelligence (AI),
• Machine Learning (ML),
• Computer Vision (CV),
• Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM),
• Cognitive Vision (CogV),
• Cognitive Agent System (CAS),
• Cognitive Computing (CogC),
• Natural Multimodal Processing (NMP),
• Emotional Intelligence (EI),
• Multi-Agent System (MAS),
• Swarm Intelligence (SI) or Swarm Computing (SC),
• Evolutionary Computing (EC),
• etc..

and

as part of our

• Ontologic Net of Things (ONoT), including
  • OntoHome System (OHS),
• Ontologic Web (OW), including
  • Semantic Web (SW), and
  • Ontologic Web of Things (OWoT), including
    • Semantic Web of Things (SWoT),

  and

• Ontologic uniVerse (OV), including
  • Ontologic uniVerse of Things (OVoT),

are just missing.
But there are much more important aspects to be considered.
Eventually, the only alliance and related standards and interfaces for systems, platforms, devices, and services in the field of the Internet of Things (IoT) that really works are given with our Ontologic System and our Ontoscope, and also our related managing and collecting societies, like for example the

(see the Ontologic Net Further steps of the 5th of January 2017 and 20th of October 2017, and also the Roboticle Further steps of the 6th of January 2017, Clarification of the 11th and 16th of January 2018, and the Ontonics Further steps of the 15th of January 2018, as well as the Clarification of the 4th of December 2019 and the issue SOPR #259 of the 17th of December 2019), which are supported, managed, and operated by the (potential and designated) members of our managing and collecting societies, our Hightech Office Ontonics, and other business units of our corporation, that are leading enterprises in their respective fields of business.

Therefore, we can only highly recommend every company to become a member of our SOPR for social, political, legal, technological, and economical reasons.

19.December.2019

Picture of the Day

Trumpies

© Police Osnabrück, F.R.G.

Now we do know that the correct statement is not Trump on ecstasy, but Trump in ecstasy. It is an invention coming from The Netherlands and is delivered worldwide with a 24 hours guarantee. Maybe Nancy P. wants to taste one. :D

10:00 UTC+1
More evidences Amazon, Apple, and Alphabet mimicking C.S. and C.S. GmbH

*** Revision - ONoT and OntoHome ***
Honestly, we are not sure about the true motivation behind the Internet of Things (IoT) alliance or being more precise Connected Home over [Internet Protocol (]IP[)] alliance of the companies Amazon, Apple, and Alphabet→Google, and also the Zigbee Alliance (Samsung, IKEA, et al.) (see also the Clarification of the 18th of December 2019 (yesterday)).

• infrastructure,
• Ontologic Net (ON), including
  • Ontologic Net of Things (ONoT) (system standards and interfaces) (see the Ontologic Net Further steps of the 5th of January 2017 and 20th of October 2017, and also the Roboticle Further steps of the 6th of January 2017, Clarification of the 11th and 16th of January 2018, and the Ontonics Further steps of the 15th of January 2018), including
    • OntoHome System (OHS),
• Grid, Cloud, and Edge Computing Systems (GCECSs),
• voice-based systems, chatbots, and virtual assistants, as well as a moderator system for these systems,
• compatibility with the Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction End-User License Agreement (SOPR-EULA),
• full access to raw signals and data,
• hand over of specific items for their cost prices,
• take over of specific business units, subsidiaries, and whole companies,
• etc.

are mandatory for the members of our SOPR and are kept under the power of control and managed by our SOPR and .

We also would like to note the following points:

• Distributed System (DS),
  • Fault-Tolerant, Reliable, and Trustworthy Distributed System (FTRTDS), including
    • blockchain-based system,
    • Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) of us, and
    • other digital and virtual ledger technologies,
  • blackboard system, including
    • system of loosely-coupled applications and services,
    • tuple space, and
    • Linda like system,
  • Grid, Cloud, and Edge Computing System (GCECS) and fog computing system,
  • multi-cloud computing system, dynamic federation system, and service meshing system with registry, broker, or similar facility for objects, signals, data, applications, services, etc., and
  • mobile communications standard or mobile network of the next generations,
• Ontologic Net (ON)
  • Cyber-Physical System (CPS), Internet of Things (IoT), and Networked Embedded System (NES), including
    • OntoHome System (OHS)
      • Smart Home Systems (SHSs),
    • Smart Urban System (SUS),
    • Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT),
    • Industry 4.0 and 5.0,
    • Medicine 4.0 and 5.0,
    • Healthcare 4.0 and 5.0,
    • etc.,
• Ubiquitous Computing System (UCS or UbiCS),
• Autonomous System (AS) and Robotic System (RS),
• SoftBionic Computing System (SBCS) based on
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI),
  • Machine Learning (ML),
  • Computer Vision (CV),
  • Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM),
  • Cognitive Vision (CogV),
  • Cognitive Agent System (CAS),
  • Cognitive Computing (CogC),
  • Natural Multimodal Processing (NMP),
  • Emotional Intelligence (EI),
  • Multi-Agent System (MAS),
  • Swarm Intelligence (SI) or Swarm Computing (SC) (see for example the Investigations::Multimedia, AI and KM of the 29th of November 2019),
  • Evolutionary Computing (EC),
  • etc..
• ...

• 1.4 billion or (much) more handheld Ontoscopes wrongly called smartphone,
• millions of intelliTablets wrongly called tablet computers and hybrids of notebooks, laptops, and tablets,
• millions of stationary Ontoscopes wrongly called smart TVs,
• millions of wristworn Ontoscopes wrongly called smartwatches,
• millions of headworn and headmounted Ontoscopes, also wrongly called smartglasses, Head-Mounted Displays (HMDs), and so on,
• millions of iRaiments wrongly called smartwear and so on,
• millions of wheeled Ontoscopes or Ontoscopes on Wheels wrongly called connected automobiles and smart cars,
• 1.4 billion or (much) more ONoT devices and machines wrongly called CPS, IoT, and NES devices and machines

Hopefully, the matter is not in need of further explanation, elaboration, and discussion. *<:o)

21.December.2019

Copyright situation is clear

There is no need for discussion in relation to the field of the so-called connected home over IP and the work of art titled Ontologic System or OS, and created by C.S..

On the one side, our Ontologic System (OS) has a

On the other side, the connected home over IP is a part of our OS, including our

• voice-based systems,
• chatbots, and
• virtual assistants,

• Ontologic Net of Things (ONoT), including
  • CPS, IoT, and NES, including,
    • OntoHome, including
      • smarthome,
  • UbiCS, and
  • connected car,

Therefore, we got sufficient and substantial significant evidence that show a causal link with the original work of art in the same context by the plagiarism.

The

do not avoid a causal link with an original and do not work in other illegal ways.
Quite contrary, by

But there also are all of the other

By the way: Once again, if an entity wants to avoid that it has to label her, his, its technologies, goods, and services with

then said entity has to acknowledge the copyright protection of all works of art included in the oeuvre of C.S. and sign the agreement of our managing and collecting societies unreservedly.

In this sense 'More Lametta" is copyrighted.
Nice try.

Style of Speed Further steps

We integrated an improvement of others and an improvement of us for a new variant of one of our new rotors.
While doing so, we concluded that we have not exploited a specific feature of this one rotor as much as it possible.
Both development steps make our solution even more efficient than it already is (see also the Further steps of the 29th of November 2019) and we have not begun with adding other new developments and improvements.
In the next step we will sort out the best one variants of them for the differnent fields of utilization.

22.December.2019

13:11 UTC+1
Website update

*** Work in progress - maybe one message missing ***
Basically, our

Correspondingly, our

are the successors of the fields of

respectively our ONoT, OWoT, and OVoT constitute the CPS, IoT, and NES, and also UbiCS of both generations 1.0 and 2.0, and

As announced, we have corrected some few inconsistent found in the following messages on our website:

24.December.2019

13:53 UTC+1
Clarification or
Investigations::Multimedia, AI and KM

*** Work in progress ***

But we were able to work out and give some additional explanations that potentially support a better understanding of the matter and the issue.
In the following, we quote some webpages of an online encyclopedia, which is known to be edited in a way that should mislead the public, and (once again) some webpages of other entities related to these fields of CPS, IoT, and NES.

At first, we quote an online encyclopedia about the subject cloud computing: "The availability of high-capacity networks, low-cost computers and storage devices as well as the widespread adoption of hardware virtualization, service-oriented architecture and autonomic and utility computing has led to growth in cloud computing."

Comment
Note that the decisive factors of widespread adoption and growth are all included in our OS, which shows once again that our work or art is the true driving force in this field as well.
Also note that the leading Cloud Service Providers (CSPs) are neither pioneers nor proponents of ontology-based, ontology-oriented, and ontologic systems used for the fields of CPS, IoT, and NES, including Industry 4.0.

We quote an online encyclopedia about the subject Internet of Things (IoT): "The Internet of Things (IoT) is a system of interrelated computing devices, mechanical and digital machines, objects, animals or people that are provided with unique identifiers (UIDs) and the ability to transfer data over a network without requiring human-to-human or human-to-computer interaction.[1][2][3][4]
The definition of the Internet of Things has evolved due to the convergence of multiple technologies, real-time analytics, machine learning, commodity sensors, and embedded systems.
[...]
[...] Mark Weiser's 1991 paper on ubiquitous computing, "The Computer of the 21st Century", as well as academic venues such as UbiComp and PerCom produced the contemporary vision of the IoT.[7][8 [The Computer for the 21st Century[,1991]]] In 1994, Reza Raji described the concept in IEEE Spectrum as "[moving] small packets of data to a large set of nodes, so as to integrate and automate everything from home appliances to entire factories".[9 [Smart networks for control[, 1994]]]
[...]
[...] At that point, he viewed radio-frequency identification (RFID) as essential to the Internet of things,[13 [Why a Universal RFID Infrastructure Would Be a Good Thing[, 2002]]] which would allow computers to manage all individual things.[14 [A World of Smart Objects[, 2002]]][15][16]
[...]
In vehicular communication systems, vehicle-to-everything communication (V2X), consists of three main components: vehicle to vehicle communication (V2V), vehicle to infrastructure communication (V2I) and vehicle to pedestrian communications (V2P). V2X is the first step to autonomous driving and connected road infrastructure.
[...]
The IoT can realize the seamless integration of various manufacturing devices equipped with sensing, identification, processing, communication, actuation, and networking capabilities. Based on such a highly integrated smart cyber-physical space, it opens the door to create whole new business and market opportunities for manufacturing.[57 [2018]]
[...]
Digital control systems [(DCSs)] to automate process controls, operator tools and service information systems to optimize plant safety and security are within the purview of the IoT.[59 [2013]]
[...]
Industrial big data analytics will play a vital role in manufacturing asset predictive maintenance, although that is not the only capability of industrial big data.[63 [2015]][64] Cyber-physical systems (CPS) is the core technology of industrial big data and it will be an interface between human and the cyber world. Cyber-physical systems can be designed by following the 5C (connection, conversion, cyber, cognition, configuration) architecture,[62 [A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems[, 2015]]] and it will transform the collected data into actionable information, and eventually interfere with the physical assets to optimize processes.
An IoT-enabled intelligent system of such cases was proposed in 2001 and later demonstrated in 2014 by the National Science Foundation Industry/University Collaborative Research Center for Intelligent Maintenance Systems (IMS) at the University of Cincinnati on a bandsaw machine in IMTS 2014 in Chicago.[65][66 [E-manufacturing - fundamental, tools, and transformation. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. Leadership of the Future in Manufacturing. [2003]]][67]"

Comment
Note our acronyms Ubiquitous Computing (UbiC) or Pervasive Computing (PerC).
We also referenced M. Weiser and UbiC and PerC.
Furthermore, the fields of

were not included in the fields of Ubiquitous Computing of the first generation (UbiC 1.0) Internet of Things of the first generation (IoT 1.0), but came with our fields of Ubiquitous Computing of the second generation (UbiC 2.0), Cyber-Physical System of the second generation (CPS 2.0), Internet of Things of the second generation (IoT 2.0), and Networked Embedded System of the second generation (NES 2.0), including the fields of Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and Industry 5.0, including the field of Industry 4.0.
The same holds for animals or people, that are not considered as things in this context, but are also being provided with Unique IDentifiers (UIDs). In fact, this is a feature of our OS.
Also note the time break or time gap between the year 2001, when a rudimentary DCS was presented, and the year 2014, when the plagiarism Industry 4.0 was presented, all the other inconsistencies and bendings of time and space, and the attempt of the National Science Foundation (NSF) to steal our OS in this field as well, as we have documented before in relation to for example the Semantic (World Wide) Web (SWWW) and the field of Grid, Cloud, and Edge Computing (GCEC). Obviously, there was an or more events in this context and at least one of these events was the start of our OS, as we have shown before multiple times and here once again.

From a webpage titled "SCADA: Network Embedded Control for Cyber Physical Systems: November 8 & 9, 2006 of the Team for Research in Ubiquitous Secure Technologies (TRUST) sponsored by National Information Technology Research and Development (NITRD)" we got the following information: "The nation's critical physical infrastructure depends crucially on SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) and DCS (Digital Control Systems). Power networks, oil, gas, and water networks, chemical process control, transportation networks, the heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems of buildings depend critically on the sensing, monitoring, gathering, and control of information from distributed sensing devices. It is clear that these devices have been deployed in ad-hoc fashion in our infrastructures and are widely used in a number of different kinds of applications including economic load dispatch, security monitoring, regulation of climate and other such functions. As our use of ubiquitous computing and communication devices has increased, we have gradually built greater functionality into our SCADA/DCS systems. The by-product of these technological advances has been a lack of planned deployment of what we may refer to as high confidence devices and software. These are Devices and Networked Systems that are:
1. Correct by construction and which can be reprogrammed on the fly based on the functionality that is expected of them.
2. Fault tolerant, such that they are able to resist catastrophic failure under certain kinds of faults and mis-configurations and are able to reconfigure themselves to degrade gracefully under faulty conditions.
3. Resistant to information attack, such that they have defense-in-depth features which allow them to resist attack by determined hackers, hacktivisits, and possibly even nation-states.
Beyond SCADA: Cyber Physical Systems Meeting (HCSS-NEC4CPS) was held on November 8 & 9, 2006 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. This meeting was sponsored by the National Information Technology Research and Development (NITRD) Program's High Confidence Systems and Software (HCSS) Coordinating Group (CG), the National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the National Security Agency. This series of meetings facilitated the roadmapping process for the research agenda in the area of Networked Embedded Control Systems. This meeting was organized by Carnegie Mellon University and University of California, Berkeley.
[...]
"National Workshop on Beyond SCADA: Networked Embedded Control for Cyber-Physical Systems (NEC4CPS): Research Strategies and Roadmap," by Bruce Krogh, Marija Ilic, and S. Shankar Sastry. (7/16/2007)"

Comment
Note, that there was only the orientation phase for planning of the research and development in accordance with our activities. But there was no

• Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT),

• Ontologic Net (ON) and Ontologic Net of Things (ONoT),
• Ontologic Web (OW) and Ontologic Web of Things (OWoT), and
• Ontologic uniVerse (OV) and Ontologic uniVerse of Things (OVoT)

is wrongly called, and

by the way.
Also note, The Proposal about our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) based on reflection and modelled after a brain is from December 1999.
At that time, it was also known by spying and hacking that C.S. studied Evolutionary Computing (EC) and verification of systems on the highest level.
Note that the first version of the website of our OS OntoLinux was publicated on the 29th of October 2006 and only made official on the 9th of November 2006.

We quote an online encyclopedia about the subject Intelligent Maintenance System (IMS): "An intelligent maintenance system (IMS) is a system that utilizes collected data from machinery in order to predict and prevent potential failures in them.
[...]
Reconfigurable prognostics platform
An intelligent maintenance system should have the flexibility of being reconfigured for different platforms and software languages. The platforms are divided into three categories: stand-alone, embedded and cloud-based. RPP is a designed platform that can be used for health assessment and performance prediction. RPP can be installed on equipment and is capable of converting the data to information related to the performance. Such information can then be integrated into an asset management system proper maintenance decision-making.[8 [Design of a reconfigurable prognostics platform for machine tools. Expert Systems with Applications. [2009]]]"

Comment
Note that the multiparadigmatic property and cloud, edge, and fog computing were not parts of CPS and hence not parts of DCS and IMS and also PMS as is the case with many other features of our OS.
Also note, that our OS includes predictive Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS), including Autonomous Systems (ASs) and Robotic Systems (RSs), and production or manufacturing.

We quote an online encyclopedia about the subject industrial artificial intelligence: "The concept of artificial intelligence was initially proposed in the 1940s,[3] and the idea of improving productivity and gaining insights through smart analytics and modelling is not new. Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge-Based systems have been an active research branch of artificial intelligence for the entire product life cycle for product design, production planning, distribution, and field services.[4 [Industrial Applications of Artificial Intelligence. Robotics. [1986]]] E-manufacturing systems[5][6 [Watchdog Agent - an infotronics-based prognostics approach for product performance degradation assessment and prediction[. 2003]]] and e-factories[7] did not use the term "AI," but they scale up modeling of engineering systems to enable complete integration of elements in the manufacturing eco-system for smart operation management. Cloud [Computing of the second generation (CC 2.0)] service platforms widely embed the artificial intelligent technologies.[8][9] Cybermanufacturing systems also apply predictive analytics and cyber-physical modeling to address the gap between production and machine health for optimized productivity.[10][11 [Introduction to cyber manufacturing[. 2016]]]
[...]
A unified architecture for industrial AI includes four major categories,[12 [Industrial Artificial Intelligence[. 2019]]][13 [Industrial Artificial Intelligence for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems[. 2018]]] namely 1) Data Technology 2) Platform Technology, 3) Analytic Technology, and 4) Operation Technology. Incorporation of these core functionalities guarantees the successful implementation of Industrial AI and would lead to enormous benefits that didn't exist before. [Bingo!!!]
[...]
Industrial AI can be embedded to existing products or services to make them more effective, reliable, safer, and to enhance their longevity.[15 [Cognitive technologies: The real opportunities for business[. 2015]]] The automotive industry, for example, uses computer vision to avoid accidents and enable vehicles to stay in lane, facilitating safer driving. In manufacturing, one example is the prediction of blade life for self-aware band saw machines, so that users will be able to rely on evidence of degradation rather than experience, which is safer, will extend blade life, and build up blade usage profile to help blade selection.[16][17 [A Unified Framework and Platform for Designing of Cloud-Based Machine Health Monitoring and Manufacturing Systems[. 2015]]
Industrial AI can create new products and novel business models.[15] Predix by General Electric is a Cloud [Computing 2.0 platform] that serves as an industrial operating system for narrow AI application development.[8]"

Comment
Note that this unified architecture is a part of the Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) of our OS, obviously and doubtlessly.
Also note that one of the leading IMS centers did not utilize AI due to the reason that nobody wanted to take the risk with a field that failed two times before until we came with our OS, as we always explain. And about the utilization of cognitive technologies we even do not discuss at all, because the origin is even more crystal clear. This shows once again the time break or time gap between the years 2001 and 2014 on the one hand and the originality and uniqueness of our OS on the other hand.
Also note that we got the CC 2.0 platform of General Electric is indeed a plagiarism based on an essential part of our OS as we always knew. But now we got the proof, too.

We quote an online encyclopedia about the subject CPS: "CPS is also similar to the Internet of Things (IoT), sharing the same basic architecture; nevertheless, CPS presents a higher combination and coordination between physical and computational elements.[6]
[...]
In industry domain, the cyber-physical systems empowered by Cloud technologies have led to novel approaches[22 [2014]][23 [Cloud-Based Design and Manufacturing: A New Paradigm in Digital Manufacturing and Design Innovation. Computer-Aided Design. [2014]][24 [2014]] that paved the path to Industry 4.0 as the European Commission IMC-AESOP project with partners such as Schneider Electric, SAP, Honeywell, Microsoft etc. demonstrated. [Bingo!!!]
Cyber-physical models for future manufacturing - With the motivation a cyber-physical system, a "coupled-model" approach was developed.[25 [Recent Advances and Trends of Cyber-Physical Systems and Big Data Analytics in Industrial Informatics[, 2014]]] The coupled model is a digital twin of the real machine that operates in the cloud platform and simulates the health condition with an integrated knowledge from both data driven analytical algorithms as well as other available physical knowledge. The coupled model first constructs a digital image from the early design stage. System information and physical knowledge are logged during product design, based on which a simulation model is built as a reference for future analysis. Initial parameters may be statistically generalized and they can be tuned using data from testing or the manufacturing process using parameter estimation. The simulation model can be considered as a mirrored image of the real machine, which is able to continuously record and track machine condition during the later utilization stage. Finally, with ubiquitous connectivity offered by cloud computing technology, the coupled model also provides better accessibility of machine condition for factory managers in cases where physical access to actual equipment or machine data is limited. These features pave the way toward implementing cyber manufacturing.[26 [Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment[. 2013]]][27] [Bingo!!!]
[...]
Designing and deploying a cyber-physical production system can be done based on the 5C architecture (connection, conversion, cyber, cognition, and configuration).[29] In the "Connection" level, devices can be designed to self-connect and self-sensing for its behavior. In the "Conversion" level, data from self-connected devices and sensors are measuring the features of critical issues with self-aware capabilities, machines can use the self-aware information to self-predict its potential issues. The established "twin" in the cyber space can perform self-compare for peer-to-peer performance for further synthesis. In the "Cognition" level, the outcomes of self-assessment and self-evaluation will be presented to users based on an "infographic" meaning to show the content and context of the potential issues. In the "Configuration" level, the machine or production system can be reconfigured based on the priority and risk criteria to achieve resilient performance.[30 [A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems[, 2015]]]
The original twin model idea came from,[31 [Teleservice engineering in manufacturing: challenges and opportunities[. 1998]]] in which a physical operation was coupled with a virtual operation by means of an intelligent reasoning agent. The detailed version of this concept is presented in.[32 [Analysis of machine degradation using a neural network based pattern discrimination model[. 1993]]].]"

Comment
First of all, we have to mention that a physical operation was coupled with virtual operation by means of model-based reasoning kernel in the field of immobile robot (immobot) or Model-Based Autonomous System (MBAS) in 1996 already, but this is not called a twin model, because it is only related to the functional and operational model of a robot.

Note all the terms beginning with "self-" in all layers of the 5C architecture creating a causal link with our OS.
Also note that the mirror world was added to CPS later. But this addition is wrong in the context of CPS, because the mirror world has only the capability for unidirectional flow of raw signals and data, informations, and actions from the real world into the virtual world.
Also note that cloud computing was added to CPS later and because CPS is also similar to the Internet of Things (IoT), sharing the same basic architecture the same holds of UbiCS, NES, and IoT as well.
Also note that the last statement is not correct, because the

• ontologies, and
• new paradigms and approaches for analysis, such as intelligent analytics, instead of statistical process control or other traditional statistical analysis techniques.

Also note the transformation from a predictive maintanence system as part of an Intelligent Maintenance System (IMS) to a Predictive Manufacturing System (PMS) by our OS comprising the field of the Industry 4.0.

We quote an online encyclopedia about the subject digital twin: "Digital twins integrate internet of things, artificial intelligence, machine learning and software analytics with spatial network graphs[9] to create living digital simulation models that update and change as their physical counterparts change. A digital twin continuously learns and updates itself from multiple sources to represent its near real-time status, working condition or position. This learning system, learns from itself, using sensor data that conveys various aspects of its operating condition; from human experts, such as engineers with deep and relevant industry domain knowledge; from other similar machines; from other similar fleets of machines; and from the larger systems and environment of which it may be a part. A digital twin also integrates historical data from past machine usage to factor into its digital model. [...] The digital twin is also a component of the Cyber-physical system concept."

Comment
Obviously, there are two generations of twin model or digital twin and here we have our Digital Twin of the second generation (DT 2.0), which is based on our OS.
Also note at this point that our twin model or Digital Twin has also the capability for bidirectional flow of raw signals and data, informations, and actions between the real and virtual worlds, because it is based on our Calibre/Caliber. This also shows the difference between a mirror world with its unidirectional capabilities and our Ontoverse (Ov) with its bidirectional capabilities.

From a webpage titled "An NSF Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems was held on October 16 and 17[, 2006]" we got the following information about that highly suspicious event: "Welcome to the home-page of the proposed NSF research initiative on Cyber-Physical Systems.
[...]
The cyber-bio interface can be defined by answers to four fundamentally symmetrical questions.
1. Can biological systems operationalize certain aspects of cyber systems so that we can understand and design advanced biological systems?
2. Can biological systems operationalize certain aspects of cyber systems so that we can understand and design advanced cyber systems?
3. Can cyber systems operationalize certain aspects of biological systems so that we can understand and design advanced biological systems?
4. Can cyber systems operationalize certain aspects of biological systems so that we can understand and design advanced cyber systems?
Examples from the research program of the relatively newly anointed "synthetic biology" which has come to dominate thinking about question 1, will be briefly discussed. We will argue that solutions to question 2 have not yet lived up to expectations. Research on question 3 is emerging and has found a focus in many nano-bio programs and medical devices and surveillance programs. We will pay special attention to question 4 where new results will be discussed and a more complete research agenda will be suggested."

Comment
Note, we got the domain for our the website of our project titled SoftBionics (SB), that is self-explanatory. SB became later a business unit of our corporation and together with our other project and business unit Roboticle and The Proposal about our reflective operating system Evoos another foundation of our OS, which also mentions this nano-bio and cyber-bio interface.
Also note, that there is no generalization on the basis of for example the fields of

Furthermore, the quoted webpage of one of the organizing entity, the Carnegie Mellon University, about that workshop publicated around the 12th of September 2006 has not been updated before the 25th of March 2007. We would expect that it would take 6 days but not 6 months.
Note that the event was merely about the proposed NSF research initiative on Cyber-Physical Systems. As we mentioned above, they have only stolen what they saw at that time but had not strategy or plan for the overall endeavour respectively our OS, as proven by the workshops that were done to find out how a research initiative could look like at all. Too bad that we already had our OS ready months before and publicated it 13 days later.
Eventually, what we see here is only the failed attempt to

Our view is further emphasized by the dates of those publications, which are 5 to 9 or even more years older than our OS.
Also note that this cyber-biological interface or field of cyber-biological system does not match with what the field of CPS was at that time, which was about DCS and SCADA, and also rudimentary IMS. This is another suspicious break or gap that can only be explained with espionage of our creation, research and development.

Also, some points have become very clear once again:

• legal scope of our digital rights, digital interest, digital property, or digital estate,
• legal scope of our Ontologic System (OS),
• domain of our New Reality (NR) respectively
• sovereign space of our OntoVerse (OV), also known as OntoLand (OL).

• are not included in said legal scope, domain, respectively sovereign space or
• are based on the still tried but failed illegal tricks of segmentation and separation of our OS

cannot avoid to be in the

eventually or even anymore.

In this context, we also often mention that nobody has viewed the Internet and the World Wide Web (WWW) themselves as a CPS, IoT, and NES, and even not the reality-based view respectively Calibre/Caliber, OntoVerse (OV), and New Reality (NR), all the other Reality Environments (REs), and all the many other original and unique properties and parts of our OS.

• utilizing (big) data science, enabling complex hardware and software systems, specifically Distributed Systems (DSs), including
  • Fault-Tolerant, Reliable, and Trustworthy Distributed Systems (FTRTDSs), including
    • blockchain-based systems,
    • Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) of us, and
    • other digital and virtual ledger technologies,
  • blackboard systems, including
    • systems of loosely-coupled applications and services,
    • tuple spaces, and
    • Linda like systems,
  • Grid, Cloud, and Edge Computing Systems (GCECSs) and fog computing systems,
  • multi-cloud computing systems, dynamic federation systems, and service meshing systems, and
  • mobile communications standard or mobile network of the next generations,

  or

• providing innovative services.

And these are only some few points of the many points where the fine line is drawn.

We have seen and documented the same suspicious activities in for example the fields of

• Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) and
• NATO Architecture Framework (NAF), which is directly related to the DoDAF.

But we have integrated the foundations of such AFs with CPS, IoT, and NES, and also UbiCS, and much more long before them and presented the essence as our iconic work of art titled Ontologic System at the same time, when they even have not know at all what it is all about but only stolen what we do without knowing what they are stealing, which proves that the OS was unforeseeable and unexpected, and therefore is an original and unique work or art, which again shows why it is protected by the copyright besides the many other facts shown by us before.

We also made clear that

• Grid, Cloud, and Edge Computing Systems (GCECSs) for operating our
  • voice-based systems and illegal integrationsIntelligent/Cognitive User Interface and Intelligent/Cognitive Personal Agent, and
  • IoT systems, platforms, and hubs,
• IDentity Access and Management Systems (IDAMSs), and
• Financial Systems (FinSs),

done by affected SOPR members for the cost prices balanced with outstanding royalties for us and fees for the tasks accomplished by our contractors, suppliers, and providers, and

By the way:

• CPS, IoT, and NES, and also UbiCS are not realized only over the Internet Protocol (IP) but over multiple communication mechanisms and related protocols on the one hand but
• our Ontologic Net (ON) and Ontologic Net of Things (ONoT) on the other hand.

26.December.2019

13:46 UTC+1
SOPR #260

*** Work in progress - complete wording missing Revision - exclusions ***
Topics
This issue is about bringing order in relation to the topics listed below:

Legal matter
Entities can prove their commitment and nice intention and show what the term to be nice truly means for them in around 2 months by signing our contracts respectively legally binding agreements for the

• Grid, Cloud, and Edge Computing Systems (GCECSs)
• voice-based systems,
• Intelligent Personal Assistants (IPAs)

under our Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) terms and conditions, including the corrected enterprise values, outstanding royalties and other fees, and ...

The Grid, Cloud, and Edge Computing Systems (GCECSs) will be collected as well as the other business units, subsidiaries, and companies already named or we take the other path, which leads to the same goal.
We are also thinking about equal actions in relation to other companies like chip makers, embedded system makers, etc..

Exclusion of Amazon
The facts in relation to ... systems are that

• copying parts of our OS, our Os, and our OAOS,
• applying the same illegal trick of segmentation and separation to simulated an ordinary technological progress, or use or benefit for the society,
• mimicking our SOPR,
• harming freedom of choice, innovation, and competition, as seen before in the cases of XML, the Semantic (World Wide) Web (SWWW) two times, tablet computer, and much more, and now with Multimodal User Interfaces (MUIs), virtual assistants and Intelligent Personal Assistants (IPAs), Distributed Systems (DSs), specifically Grid, Cloud, and Edge Computing Systems (GCECSs), CPSs, IoT, and NESs, Autonomous Systems (ASs) and Robotic Systems (RSs), as well as aerospace, and eventually even our OS, and
• disrespecting our rights, competences, and regulations, and
• investigated by virtually all states of the U.S.A,

• said that we have an old standard and
• presented the foundational Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) and the basic architectures of the ON, OW, and OV with the ONoT, OWoT, and OVoT,

• ...
• Ontologic Net of Things (ONoT),
• ... as well as
• ...

• secured by our Fault-Tolerant, Reliable, and Trustworthy Distributed System (FTRTDS), including
  • blockchain-based system,
  • Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) of us, and
  • other digital and virtual ledger technologies,
• provided by our infrastructure, and
• supported by American, European, and Australian governments, as far as we can see.

So the question is: For What It's Worth (FWIW) that Amazon insists on an already retrograde, totally obsolete and unacceptable IoT thing?
Amazon and other entities can simply add a button labelled ... for example to the User Interfaces (UIs) or an interface to the SOPR services of their platforms and apps, et voilà there it is. Indeed, this is the only viable way to really

pro bono==for the public good.

But latest developments may suggest that our initial decision seemed not so incorrect.
We are also observing relevant political decisions of lawmakers in the U.S.A. and Europe to the advantage of Amazon and to the disadvantage of collaborating companies, which would equal interferences with our SOPR, which again are not allowed.

If the obsolete alliance called Connected Home over IP is established to disturb the goals and even threaten the integrity of our SOPR, then the AoA and the ToS of our SOPR demand to put the company Amazon on the blacklist of our SOPR.
Because the company Alphabet (Google) is banned for life and members of our SOPR are not allowed to work with a blacklisted or banned entity on the basis of our OS and our Os and our OAOS that alliance is already infringing the AoA and the ToS of our SOPR.

We have already announced such an action in the last months. But latest developments may suggest that we reached a point, where we have to act in accordance with the provisions included in the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) of our SORP.
Therefore, with the next serious attempt of Amazon to disturb the goals and even threaten the integrity of our SOPR we will put the company on our blacklist.
Needless to say, Amazon is not eligible anymore for becoming a dedicated main contractor and provider of our infrastructure and we will not think about that matter again until Amazon has fulfilled all of our demands, including

But we already guess that it will be too late for the company due to our selection of alternatives.
In addition, this also has further implications with the takeover of its implementations of our cloud computing and voice-based systems and Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA).

Exclusion of Apple
The latest developments may suggest that we reached a point, where we have to act in accordance with the provisions included in the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) of our SORP.
Therefore, with the next serious attempt of Apple to question our competences and disturb the goals and even threaten the integrity of our SOPR we will put the company on our blacklist.
See also the sections related to the potential exclusion of the company Amazon above and the company Samsung and the Zigbee Alliance below.

Exclusion of Samsung
We have already announced such an action in the last months. But latest developments may suggest that we reached a point, where we have to act in accordance with the provisions included in the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) of our SORP.
Therefore, with the next serious attempt of Samsung to disturb the goals and even threaten the integrity of our SOPR we will put the company on our blacklist.
See also the sections related to the potential exclusions of the companies Amazon and Apple above and the Zigbee Alliance below.

Exclusion of Zigbee Alliance
We have already announced such an action in the last months. But latest developments may suggest that we reached a point, where we have to act in accordance with the provisions included in the AoA and the ToS of our SORP.
Therefore, with the next serious attempt of the Zigbee Alliance to disturb the goals and even threaten the integrity of our SOPR we will put the company on our blacklist.
Please note that this exclusion would affect all shareholders and supporting entities of the Zigbee Alliance, including Samsung again, and also NXP Semiconductors, IKEA, Philips, as well as some more companies.
See also the sections related to the potential exclusions of the companies Amazon, Apple, and Samsung above.

Further steps
Indeed, there is a little chaos, confusion, and disturbance, but nothing of them is a problem at all.
We are merely very busy with administrative tasks, formal issues, and matter in specific areas, like for example

• industry, specifically
  • engineering and manufacturing,
  • Communications Service Provider (CSP), specifically Telecommunications Service Provider (TSP or telco) / telecommunications company (telco) and Internet Service Provider (ISP),
• connected home,
• connected car,

• managing and collecting societies, specifically our
  • Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR),
  • Society for Superstructure Utilization and Management (SSUM), and
  • Society for Weather Control (SWC),

  and also

• ON, OW, and OV,

specifically in compliance with the laws.

27.December.2019

12:08 and 19:46 UTC+1
More evidences Robert Bosch mimicking C.S. and C.S. GmbH

*** Work in progress - some better explanation and wording ***
The company Robert Bosch has presented its (newest version of an) interior monitor system. We quote a related report by a publisher, that is specialized on misleading the public by holding back important information: "Distraction [...] factors in up to 30% of road crashes, while fatigue is involved in up to 20%, according to the European Commission.
This is why, as of 2022, new safety technologies will become mandatory in new European vehicles, including "a warning of driver drowsiness and distraction."
Bosch, the German engineering and technology company, is positioning itself to be one of the main providers of this technology, announcing in December that it has developed an interior monitoring system that detects drowsy and distracted drivers.
The technology, which will be built into new cars from 2022, uses cameras and artificial intelligence (AI) to detect when a driver's eyelids are getting heavy, or when they are distracted from looking at a phone or turning towards another passenger.
The algorithm - trained using recordings of real driving situations - makes a judgment on the driver's fatigue depending on their eyelid position and eye-blink rate.
"Based on all this information, it can recognize if you're getting tired because the frequency of your eyelids opening and closing gets much slower," Annett Fischer, spokesperson for the Bosch interior monitor system, tells CNN Business.
The system can then alert drivers, recommending a break if they are tired, or even reacting by reducing the speed of the vehicle.
The form of the alert - whether it's sound, light, slowing down or even a vibrating steering wheel - will depend on the automaker's wishes, as they will adapt the system according to their brand and their consumers, Fischer explains.
[...]
Bosch is not the first developer in the field. Australia-based company Seeing Machines debuted its driver monitoring technology in the 2018 Cadillac CT6, and the Swedish company Smart Eye Automotive Solutions has developed a system for Geely, one of China's biggest carmakers.
[...]
Another concern is privacy, as the camera-based driver monitoring systems gather large amounts of personal data on the driver and passengers.
According to Bosch, data collected by its system would only be evaluated by software in the car itself, and will neither be saved nor passed onto Bosch or third parties.
Fischer adds that if the automaker wanted to store any kind of data from the driver, they would have to receive consent from them first.
Curtis believes that transparency is essential to consumer trust. He encourages automakers to explain clearly how the technology works, how the data is used and how long it is stored for."

Obviously, the functionality is an Ontologic Application (OA) and based on an Active Camera and other Active Components of our business unit Style of Speed for realizing an Active Interior. Therefore, such an interior monitor system is based on our Ontologic System and our Ontoscope.
In accordance with the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR)

are due as royalties.

In addition, the statement about handling of signals and data might be misleading.
In accordance with the AoA and the ToS also demands that members of our SOPR independent of their roles as end entity as a manufacturer or an end user, give consent for handling their signals and data.

In accordance with the AoA and the ToS with the LM of our SOPR an

are due as royalites for using our other property rights given by the

specifically for handling signals and data.
The raw signals and data will be

in a legal way, exactly like for example the data about the locations and movements position are legally handled by Telecommunications Service Providers (TSPs) since many years.

No entity, even not a government or a state union, has the right to make decisions how we handle signals and data in our legal scope, domain, or sovereign space besides the laws, acts, and regulations, as well as agreements concerning data privacy and digital rights being effective.
If the European Commission (EC) makes mandatory that a part of our OS or our Os or both is installed in new vehicles, then it has to

or otherwise it would have to formally expropriate C.S. from the related ArtWorks (AWs) and Intellectual Properties (IPs) officially, and pay a reasonable and customary compensation either nonrecurring or recurring as long as our properties are utilized, though that will not become effective because such an expropriation is not possible in a democracy.

The same holds for other companies, like for example Seeing Machines and Smart Eye Automotive Solutions, and for other areas, like for example the field of Industry 4.0.

28.December.2019

08:45, 14:41, 23:32, and 24:30 UTC+1
SOPR #261

*** Working in progress - complete wording missing ***
Topics

Legal matter

We had to notice that the European Commission (EC) has made more decisions, that

In fact, the EC cannot

for which none of them got the property rights, use rights, or any other kind of allowance from us.
Therefore, we had no other choice than to apply the related provisions included in the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) with its License Model (LM) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and withdraw one discount for all member states of the European Union (EU).

If the member states of the EU and the EC still refuse to comply with their own constitutions and laws, then we will take more measures to restore their constitutions and laws, our rights, and eventually the order for everybody.
Please become serious, because

License Model (LM)

In the last days, we continued with our considerations about the royalties for handling signals and data [data, information, and knowledge] in the legal scope of our ArtWorks (AWs) and Intellectual Properties (IPs) as part of the data-driven LM.

In the issue ... of the ... we suggested an individual customary licensing, but a more uniform regulation seems to be more appropriated and appreciated.
In this respect, we have to consider at least the following points:

Prominent examples for the discussion and the final regulation are

In these cases we can already see that their technologies, goods, and services are becoming more and more OSC, OsC, and Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) in the course of the transition process respectively the extraordinary technological progress created by us (see also the issue #259 of the 17th of December 2019). Correspondingly, the legal scope of their digital rights, digital interests, digital properties, or digital estates is decreasing due to the inherent shift to our digital rights, digital interest, digital property, or digital estate.
According to our credo "All or nothing at all. Now and not in the future." we handle the matter beginning with the 1st of January 2020, which is in accordance with the regulations of the compensations for the damages incurred.
Or said in other words, the SOPR will act as if the transition process has already happened despite it will take some more years.

Payments to the lessor typically take three forms: (lease) bonus, rental, and royalties, as negotiated between the parties.

A farmout agreement is between one company that owns a lease, and another company that wishes to drill or mine the digital property. The company wishing to drill or mine, called the farmee, provides drilling or mining services in exchange for a percentage of ownership of that lease owned by the farmor.
In the ICT industry, a farmout agreement is an agreement entered into by the owner of one or more digital leases, called the farmor, and another company who wishes to obtain a percentage of ownership of that lease or leases in exchange for providing services, called the farmee. The typical services described in farmout agreements is the drilling of one or more signal or data or both wells. A farmout agreement differs from a conventional transaction between two signal and data lessees, because the primary consideration is the rendering of services, rather than the simple exchange of money.
Farmout agreements typically provide that the farmor will assign the defined quantum of interest in the lease(s) to the farmee upon the farmee finishing:

Farmout Agreements are the second most commonly negotiated agreements in the ICT industry, behind the signal and data lease. For the farmor, the reasons for entering into a farmout agreement include obtaining production, sharing risk, and obtaining social, technological, economical, and operational information. Farmees often enter into farmout agreements, because they wish to obtain a space position, need to utilize underutilized personnel, need to share risks, or because they desire to obtain social, technological, economical, and operational information.

In some cases, signals and data rights or digital property rights or leases in a drilling or mining, gathering/capturing, processing, transforming, or creating unit are held by more than one company or person who wish to participate in drilling or mining, gathering/capturing, processing, transformation, creation, and production. In such cases, the various interests sign a Joint Operating Agreement, a contract entered into by two or more ownership or leasehold co-tenants to jointly explore and develop the signals and data property, including operations, voting mechanisms, subsequent operations, risk-sharing, indemnities and exculpatory provisions, revenue allocation, title examination and title issues, and future acquisitions and divestitures in the contract area. One company is designated as the operator, and operates the property on a day-to-day basis.
There are various terms describing ownership interests in a signal or data well. An interest signifying a duty to pay expenses is called:

Interests in receiving income include:

Correspondingly, we would like to submit the following section about terms and conditions related to our digitial rights, digital property, or digital estate to our LM:

• damage compensation,
• admission fee,
• fixed fee and relative share for the reproduction of our OSC and our OsC, and
• relative share for the performance of our OAOS,

• fixed fee and relative share for the reproduction of our OSC and our OsC, and
• relative share for the performance of our OAOS,

• real-time transferred raw signals and data, and
• accumulated or stored raw signals and data,

because paid by SOPR,

• captured or handled on the basis of our OSC, OsC, or OAOS,
• saved or passed onto third entities, or
• traded on the MfE of our SOPR,

The alternative is no use respectively lease of our digital/data rights or digital properties at all.
Please mind but not confuse the differences between the

The important point to mention here is that we do not own only a platform, like for example an Electronic Commerce (EC), online marketplace, societal network, and cloud computing or as a Service (aaS) platform, but the system, on which the platforms are operated as well.

All together, a performance of one of our OAOS can result in a royalty of up to 5.75% + 8.75% = 14.50% without all discounts granted and depending on a related business activity. This is for example the case for Communications Service Providers (CSPs or ComSPs), like for example a TSP, an ISP, and a Web Service Provider (WSP), Cloud Service Providers (CSPs or ClSPs) respectively providers of something as a Service (aaS), or other application or service providers, that provide their services by utilizing our properties in the legal scope of our properties.
But our reviews show that this is the right way to handle the matter, because

which both are pro bono publico==for the public good, benefit, or interest.

Digital rights
A comprehensible concern is that even if personal data is passed onto third parties in an anonymous or other legal way, then it might still be possible to restore the personal data again.
But this is a concern based on technical incompetence. In fact, we have a range of techniques, that are developed for exactly such use cases and provide us the guarantee that the personal, social and societal, legal, and economical matters are kept separated, but the full potential and huge synergy of our OS can be unleashed.
For sure, we will not give any details about these techniques and how we have them integrated as parts of our OS, our Os, and our OAOS, at least at this time for the usual and know reasons of foul play and fraud.

Further steps
We wish everybody a healthy and successful start into the new year. :)

30.December.2019

King Smiley Further steps

We looked at one of our projects in Paris, the real one in the F.R., and concluded that the reconstruction of the Palais des Tuileries might not be in the interest of everybody and to be honest it would be too small for a palais for C.S. and a public area, like for example a museum.
But potentially our alternative idea is more convincing, which comprises the extension of the wings of the Louvre on the areas of the

Potentially, a tower would be fine as well, which could be called Tour des Tuileries==Tuileries Tower or Tour du Louvre==Louvre Tower for example. We heard that there is a lack of such tall constructions in the French capital.

Faites votre jeu, s'il vous plaît.

31.December.2019

King Smiley Further steps

We designed a new tower for the area of the Jardin des Tuileries in Paris, which is called Tour des Tuileries==Tuileries Tower or Tour du Louvre==Louvre Tower, is around 500 meters high or higher, keeps the Axe Historique or Voie Royale (from La Défense to Palais des Tuileries) intact, and is quite attractive, mildly said. In fact, it is beaucoup plus jollie than the other ones and as a matter of fact we expect that many will reject our suggestion in general and our architecture in particular, as it was the case with the one-off Eiffel Tower, which was only constructed for the World's Fair of the year 1889 and has a height of 324 meters, but the many others will adore it just right from the start, most potentially even more than the other towers.