02.December.2017
Ontonics Further steps
We worked on a system of us and developed variants that incorporate (a new variant of) a new module, which is a revolution in the related fields inclusive the next generation in electric energy storage (see also the related Further steps).

We also developed a special variant of these system variants.

We also worked on several utilizations of said systems, which will shape the next future in the related fields due to their incredibly high performances and many other advantages in comparison to the prior systems and utilizations.

Ontoscope Further steps
Now it is getting serious with our OOO (see the Further steps of the 11th of July 2014 and 1st of October 2014).
But we are not sure if we should present our rigid model with a runtime of 30 time units (days not hours) at first or directly put the battery into the OOO.

Style of Speed Further steps
Just for style, speed, and fun we added a performance option to the 9x9 model mentioned in the Further steps of the 18th of November 2017 (see also the informations about our demonstrator of a related technology given in the Further steps of the 17th of May 2017). We concluded that it

Investigations::Multimedia, AI and KM

To make the matter clear: The report would be proper if it would not have been fabricated to damage the reputation of C.S. and our corporation, as can be seen with the references to Iron Man, wearable computers and suits of our business unit iRaiment, as well as the fields of bionics.

We also remind entities that using an exoskeleton operated by our Ontologic System (OS) or together with an Ontologic Application (OA) or an Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV) Service (OOOS) in the fields of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), Internet of Things (IoT), and Networked Embedded Systems (NES) requires licensing by our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR).

03.December.2017
Clarfication
In relation with activities of other entities we have to make crystal clear that all additional

in the subsequent years after the initial start of our Ontologic System (OS) in the year 2006, comprise

• we used for the synthesis and the creation of our Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) and
• connect single properties and elements of our OS whereas the OSA connects all of them respectively is the integrating system architecture that integrates all these single properties and elements as well as their intermediate connections in one,

and

That said, no new matter has been added and will be added by the related website updates, further steps, and clarifications in the past, present, and future in this way, and hence no loophole to pervert facts, the timeline, etc. is provided to fraudulent entities in this way.

SOPR #66
We announced to present the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) at the end of the month November 2017. But sadly to say we were unable to keep this date because we have much more other administrative tasks to do. In addition, we learned about the latest activities of the alliance that flocked around the Here Technologies consortium on the one side and the related (re)actions of the alliance of the other entities, specifically the ones in the Silicon Valley.
The main problem that we have with those activities is not the subject matter itself respectively the various copies of our Ontologic System (OS), Ontoscope (Os), and Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS), but the ways how the plagiarisms and the infringements of our rights have been conducted, which shows a mindset and speaks a language that suggests to break up the whole process and file the lawsuits would be the better option.

Nevertheless, we sighted our comments made in relation with the SOPR.

SOPR #67
We have a new member of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR):

• Ontologic System
  • Calibre/Caliber,
  • OntoBot,
  • OntoScope,
  • OntoGlobe, and
  • OntoEarth,
• Ontologic Application
  • SoftBionics (Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Computer Vision (CV), etc.) and
  • Cyber-Physical Systems 2.0 (CPS) and Internet of Things 2.0 (IoT 2.0),

  and

• Ontologic Web service
  • mobility

have been shown to be an Ontologic System (OS) in part and Ontologic Applications (OA) and Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV) Services (OAOOOS) as well.
We see at least the Dubai Road and Transport Authority's Enterprise Command and Control Center, which

• is known as "The Cave" (compare with CAVE Automatic Virtual Environment (CAVE)) and
• integrates existing and future modes of transport into its computer modeling for
  • testing exactly how Dubai's transport network will cope with increasingly diverse demands and
  • being able to analyze such data

    to

  • predict the traffic today and
  • reflect reality potentially eventually,

and

The convicting evidence is a software for vehicles, which uses a combination of citywide sensors such as the CCTV cameras and onboard computers to anticipate (synonym for to predict) erratic driver behavior and other hazards and to notify nearby drivers, and hence comprises the two following elements connected with each other:

• OntoBot software component and

• Cyber-Physical Systems 2.0 (CPS 2.0).

For sure, the copyright is an internationally accepted right and entities have to obey international laws as well even in mainland United Arab Emirates and therefore using our OS and performing our ontologic works requires licensing in accordance with the Terms of Service (ToS) of our SOPR by the government of the U.A.E. and any other entity as well. This means for each access device and access point a fee and a share of the overall revenue generated with each performance of our ontologic works.
Entities from the U.A.E. are invited to become members of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR).

SOPR #68
We are not sure if we will

• Google Maps, Google Earth, Google Street View,
• Microsoft Street Slide, and
• HERE maps,

the basis for collaboration already is our ON, OW, and OV managed on the ground of the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) as well as guidelines and interfaces of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), and

In accordance with the

we have to demand the

that is due from all shareholders, partners, and customers of Here Technologies, as well as

Investigations::Multimedia, AI and KM

"[...] spatio temporal store engine [...] [See the Ontologic File System (OntoFS) software component based on the OntoBase software component of our Ontologic System (OS). A developer of the embedded relational database management system SQLite, which is referenced on the webpage of the OntoBase, has acknowledged this claim of us as well. We also referenced SQLite because it implements R-tree indexes and geometry types used for spatial access methods and time-domain range look-ups, as used to manage spatial data and geographical coordinates, specifically in relation with navigation systems and Geographic Information Systems (GISs) (see also the related OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 1st of June 2016).]",
"Spatio Temporal Data: Here's Reality Index Connected World Services [As long as the products and services were only related with online maps and navigation everything was okay. But then it added the fields of augmented reality, connected car, and autonomous car, and also parts of the Hyper Connectivity frameworks, services, and solutions of Style of Speed. Now, we can see that it added even the field of connected world and in this way changed its business strategy from online maps and navigation to our Ontologic System (OS), Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV). See also our Caliber/Calibre and the OntoBase software component of our OS once again.]",
"How the Reality Index mixes philosophy with map-making [Bingo!!! We can only point once again to the website of our Ontologic Systems (OSs) OntoLix and OntoLinux, the Caliber/Calibre, the OntoGlobe, OntoEarth, and OntoVerse software components, and the sections Geography and Earth Simulation/Virtual Globe of the webpage Links to Software.]",
"[...] the Here CEO, describes the Reality Index as an attempt as "capturing and organizing real life as you live it," taking into account the human experience. [The term organizing is a synonym for the term managing, and the term human experience is a synonym for the term emotion in this context. Obviously, we have here another essential part of our OS, as can be seen with the contents of the webpage Overview for example.]",
"Creating a digital representation of reality [That is nothing else than a part of our Ontologic uniVerse (OV) or Ontoverse.]",
"We’re pushing the boundaries beyond roads - to mountains and oceans and including data from drones, sensors, connected cars, cameras and chips. [All data sources were listed on our websites of Ontonics, OntoLinux, and Style of Speed many years before and mentioned in the same context. See also the Clarification of the 1st of April 2011.],
"We consider the human experience, understanding the behavior and relationships between people, places and things. [This also reminds us of the Integrating Architecture and the Caliber/Calibre of our OS. In addition, the term relationships points to semantic techniques, which are also used in the same field of map mapping and navigation on the one hand and on the other hand referenced in the section Semantic (World Wide) Web of the webpage Links to Software for example.]",
"By linking these location factors together, we are creating an index to organize us through place and time to create the world’s first digital representation of the physical world. [See once again the Ontologic uniVerse (OV) based on the Caliber/Calibre.]",
"Key components for developing a digital reality [See the webpage Components of our OSs OntoLix and OntoLinux and the sections Semantic (World Wide) Web, Earth Simulation/Virtual Globe, and Geography of the webpage Links to Software once again.]",
"Developers will have access to more than location data, as the Reality Index will use machine learning to identify patterns and insights for unique app solutions. [See once again the section Softbionics and Artificial Intelligence 3 of the webpage Terms of the 21st Century and the original and unique composition or combination of the OntoBot, OntoBase, and Ontologic File System (OntoFS) software components with the OntoGlobe and OntoEarth software components in accordance with our Ontologic System Architecture (OSA). See also the sections Geography and Earth Simulation/Virtual Globe of the webpage Links to Software once again.]",
"Integrate disparate data [See the section Semantic (World Wide) Web of the webpage Links to Software and the section Symbolic Artificial Intelligence (AI 1) of the webpageLiterature, as well as the webpage Integrated Data Architecture and Data Fusion of the website of Style of Speed for example, that are integrated with the OS components in accordance with the overall Integrating Architecture of our OS.]",
"Understanding users [See the Ontologic Applications.]",
"Using Natural Language Understanding and Natural Language Processing, the Reality Index will understand and learn the relationships between objects, no matter how users talk about them. [See the sections Semantic (World Wide) Web, Semantic File/Storage System, Natural Language Processing (NLP), and Intelligent/Cognitive Agent of the webpage Links to Software, specifically for the works that are related with the subfield of the fields of Softbionics and Artificial Intelligence 3 called Common Sense Computing (CSC), and for example the Semantic Network Processing System (SNePS): A Logic for Natural Language Understanding and Common Sense Reasoning, which we have referenced in the section Symbolic Artificial Intelligence (AI 1) of the webpage Literature. In this relation, we have to refer to the Clarification of today.]",
"The HERE Map Engineering team deepens AI expertise [Guess why?]",
"HERE maps form the backbone of our emerging Reality Index and are a foundational component for the ecosystem we are building around the Open Location Platform. [Being more precise, the emerging Reality Index is a copy of an essential part of our OS and the Open Location Platform is a copy of an essential part of our Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV) the consortium is building around C.S. and our corporation without having any legal rights and allowance of us.]",
"How Reality Index mixes philosophy with map-making [We already commented this statement above, but have to add that it is even a rude impudence to imitate C.S. and an outrageous attempt to snatch our Intellectual Properties (IPs), whereby it does not help the consortium to reference in this relation Immanuel Kant's arguments, that the human mind creates the structure of human experience, that space and time are forms of human sensibility, and that the world as it is "in-itself" is independent of man's concepts of it, but only constitutes another evidence for the deliberately conducted deception of the public about the true origin of our works, because C.S. has connected the real, physical, digital, and virtual dots, or being more precise, integrated the real or physical and the virtual spaces, environments, worlds, and universes with our original and unique works of art titled Ontologic System and Ontoscope in a way never done before.]",
"Locating where we, and everything else in the world is [are], is something that HERE can empathise with, but the parallels between the philosophical world and what HERE does don’t end there. [Besides the clear evidence for the infringements of the copyright and other rights of C.S. and our corporation, including the conduction of unfair business practices such as the exploitation of our reputation and goodwill, which is even conducted in an orchestrated way by the shareholders, partners, and customers of the company, this statement suggests that the consortium even claims our field of Ontonics for itself and has already planned to take more of our original and unique ontologic works.]", and
"Innovation [...] Sensoris [...] untapped vehicle sensor data [...] [Here we get out of first hand the proof that the AutoSemantic extension and other related features are original and unique properties of our OS, because the company and in this way all its shareholders, partners, and customers present this sensor data standard to handle before untapped vehicle sensor data as a recent innovation, which implies that they came up with it years after us respectively copied it from us. This statement has also consequences in regard to everything else that all entities related with the company Here Technologies have copied from our websites of Ontonics, OntoLinux, and Style of Speed, like for example the (sensor) data fusion in real-time, the predictive or "anticipatory data and sensor support" called "electronic horizon" (see the first quote once again), and the various cloud computing based solutions of the Hyper Connectivity (see the related quotes once again).]".

On an online video platform we watched the video, that is titled "Here Reality Index" and was uploaded on the 5th of September 2017. We repeat the explanations given by an off-voice and make comments inbetween. "Imagine if everything in the world was mapped out. A constant string of data captured and organized in real-time [(shown is a hurricane as seen from space with an overlaid dynamic grid and a satellite referencing our Superstructure and Weather Control System (WCS); see the related issues Superstructure #11 of the 7th of August 2017 and Superstructure #16 of the 15th of August 2017)] creating a digital representation of reality with self-healing and self-forming map content [(see for example the section Basic Properties of the webpage Overview once again, which apply for all components of our Ontologic System including the OntoGlobe and OntoEarth software components)] and built-in machine learning [(shown is a humanoid robot with modern design; see the section Softbionics and Artificial Intelligence 3 once again)] so that we can uncover new insights that generate vast improvements for society as a whole. Like data agnostic networks [(see the sections Semantic (World Wide) Web and Network Technology of the webpage Links to Software, and the OntoNet and OntoWeb software components, which provide the foundation for our Ontologic Net (ON) and Ontologic Web (OW), and the webpage Distributed Computing of the website of Style of Speed)] that combine resources from thousands of partners all across the globe [(shown is the transportation of containers and car chassis with virtual routing slips floating in air as part of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS))] or empowering our surroundings with location data [(shown is a triangulated grid in the sky referencing our Superstructure, and the OntoGlobe and OntoEarth software components once again; see the issues Superstructure #14 of the 7th of August 2017 and Superstructure #16 of the 15th of August 2017 once again and also the issue Superstructure #17 of the 14th of October 2017)] finding new ways to make us safer [(shown is an Augmented Reality (AR) application displayed on a windscreen of a car; see also the webpage Overview, the OntoScope software component, and the section Mixed Reality of the webpage Links to Software of the website of; see also the Space@Car environment of Style of Speed)] by knowing where the dangers are long before we do [(this references the predictive property of our OS; see the Ontologic Applications)]. This up to date information will give us a greater sense of freedom and help us route dynamic an efficient path for all our [...(?)] [(shown is a swarm of delivery drones)]. Unique path that make deliveries reach us faster no matter where we are, bringing people closer than ever before. Location intelligence that helps humanity find its way enabling millions of people to take the safest and most efficient routes through increasingly complex cities. This index of everything is inspiring the thinkers of today and tomorrow to create new technologies that can be used to bring [countless(?)] opportunities to everyone [(shown is a boy watching the Earth displayed on a holographic display that reminds us of the display of the Earth displayed on the holographic display of the indentity disc shown in the movie Tron Legacy shown in the Original vs. Inspiration of the 2nd of July 2016)]. We are building it now. We are making the Reality Index."].

We also noted that the consortium publicated a news in relation with a consumer electronics summit taking place in the year 2018 wherein it encourages visitors "to experience our vision of an autonomous future and the products that shape it" and hence still claims our vision, which was created and presented by C.S. around 10 years ago, for itself.

Style of Speed Further steps
Somehow we had to do this, specifically after we found somebody, who mentioned it would look like a hovercar, while we were already working on the original image.

© :( and Style of Speed

04.December.2017
Clarfication
When

we came back to the potential argument of an ordinary technological progress in relation with

Before, we already argued that in the case all entities came to the same solution then this is a proof for the uniqueness of this solution by definition.
We also argued that even in this specific case and in other cases our ontologic works are still protected by the copyright despite the potential counterargument that no other technological progress would have been possible (see once again the Clarification of the 3rd of November 2017).

Now, we approached this argument of an ordinary technological progress from another point of view and argue on the basis of our observations, investigations, and clarifications. In fact, all operating system manufacturers, all vehicle manufacturers, and all other entities approached our Ontologic System (OS) with its Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV), and Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS), and our Ontoscope (Os) from different directions by taking our ontologic works and attempting to make parts of them proprietary, and came to the same solution.
Our standpoint is that such a progress where different entities apply different strategies and choose different ways to approach and arrive at the same solution is not common, definitely, and therefore this is not an argument for an ordinary technological progress but in total contrast a proof that our ontologic works are the source, guiding light, or attractor for all these entities and therefore original and unique.

Style of Speed Further steps
Just for fun we optimized our models RSR (see the Further steps of the 4th of March 2015 and 21st of November 2016) and Modern (see the Further steps of the 17th of September 2015 and 02.December.2017) of the 9x9 series in three ways:

that we have integrated in one system.

In this way, the performance of our original and unique conversions has increased once again as it is the case with the performance gap between the original RSR of us and the plagiarism of the factory, as well as our other original.

05.December.2017
Ontonics Further steps
We are looking in our stocks for our old standard for the fields of Cyber-Physical System 2.0 (CPS 2.0), Internet of Things 2.0 (IoT 2.0), and Networked Embedded System 2.0 (NES 2.0),

• CPS 1.0, IoT 1.0, and NES 1.0, as well as
• Industry 4.0,

and

See also the issue SOPR #69 of today below and the Ontologic Net Further steps of the 5th of January 2017 and 20th of October 2017.

SOPR #69
We have heard that companies Google, Apple, Samsung, LG Electronics, Sony, Whirlpool, De'Longhi, Amazon, and others, which are economically active in the related fields, combine the field of the Internet of Things 2.0 (IoT 2.0) and the fields of major appliances, small appliances, and consumer electronics.
Luckily, our

• Ontologic Net (ON) with its
  • Ontologic Net of Things (ONoT) with its
    • OntoHome system,
• Ontologic Web (OW), and
• Ontologic uniVerse (OV),

and also

already include the fields of the Internet of Everything (IoE), Cyber-Physical System (CPS), Internet of Things (IoT), and Networked Embedded System (NES) (see also the Ontologic Net Further steps of the 5th of January 2017 and 20th of October 2017).

By the way: The IoT 1.0 was yesterday around the year 2002 and is gone like the Cyber-Physical System 1.0 (CPS 1.0) and Networked Embedded System 1.0 (NES 1.0), because in the end they all are based on a part of our OS, executed on a variant of our OS, or connected with our OS.

SOPR #70
We are working on our new standard for integrating the various virtual globes of external entities, such as

into our OntoGlobe and OntoEarth of Ontologics and our Superstructure of Ontonics (see for example the Clarification of the 1st of April 2011, the Ontologic Web Further steps of the 9th of December 2016, the issues Superstructure #14 of the 7th of August 2017 and Superstructure #16 of the 15th of August 2017, the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 23rd of September 2017, and the Ontonics Further steps of the 6th of October 2017).

Specifically interesting for us is the question which data should be shared as public data, though this is a decision that the Steering Committees should make.

At this point it can be seen how advantageous our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) truly is, because none of the named entities were, is, and will be able alone or in collaboration with others to provide such a common platform, specifically in a legal way.

SOPR #71
We will publicate comments related with our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) not under the comment headline Oh, what ...? anymore but use the headline SOPR #[number of issue].

SOPR #72
We have new members of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR):

• Ontologic Application
  • Augmented Reality (AR)

• Ontologic Application
  • Augmented Reality (AR)

• Ontologic Application
  • Augmented Reality (AR)
• Ontologic Web Service
  • Augmented Reality (AR)

have been shown to be at least Ontologic Applications (OA) as well, because they run on the systems based on the operating system functionality and other functionalities of our Ontologic System Components (OSC) and called Google Android with ARcore and Apple iOS with ARtoolkit.

We demand the media (inclusive the fake news leaders) to report about the true legal situation in relation with our ontologic works and our SOPR instead of continuing with their fraudulent activities, because otherwise we will hold them accountable at the courts for the chaos created in this way and for all other infringements of our rights, which equals insolvency eventually because none of them can afford the damages.

This is no joke. We have gained competences in more than 25 years in all related fields and correspondingly have become highly specialized in this way if not to say we are the worldwide authority. Our legal team has warmed up a little already and is increasing the legal pressure continously since the beginning of this year, while prosecutors worldwide are already stamping with their feeds.
The fun is over or begins depending on the individual behavior. For everyone. Definitely.

SOPR #73
In the issue #65 of the 2nd of December 2017 we sketched a new rule for the case that our ontologic works are presented as own visions and innovations, which

• viewed from the legal point of view and
• for our taste,

and

C Membership
[...]

• misleadd the public about the true origin of our works or
• question, reduce, or/and even degrade the
  • competence,
  • independence,
  • neutrality,
  • integrity, or/and
  • legal rights

  of the SOPR

said SOPR member will be

C.y.z In the case that a SOPR member has cured an issue of misconduction that let to a downgrade, this downgrade can be lifted by one grade at a time upon request of

• C.y.z.1 the Supervisior,
• C.y.z.2 a Steering Committee, or
• C.y.z.3 a downgraded SOPR member.

Style of Speed Further steps
While reviewing the last developments in relation with our spare time respectively roadable old-timer projects, the 9x9 and 91x series (see the Further steps of the 17th of September 2015, 18th of November 2017, and 2nd and 4th of December 2017), we found out how to improve the basic technology even more. This thing is even more incredibly quicker on all kinds of tracks, even with curves, as we had to realize once again (see the related Further steps of the 17th of May 2017 as well).

We concluded that it

10.December.2017
Ontonics Further steps
We continued the work on one of our technologies with the focus laid on making the last decisions about the configuration, optimization, production process, utilization, and also product range.

12.December.2017
Clarification
At this point, we would like to explain in some more detail the connection between

• Artificial Intelligence (AI),
• Machine Learning (ML),
• Swarm Intelligence (SI),
• Computer Vision (CV),
• Natural Multimodal Processing (NMP)
  • Natural Language Processing (NLP),
  • Natural Image Processing (NIP) or Natural Vision Processing (NVP),
  • etc.,
• Common Sense Computing (CSC),
• Affective Computing (AffC) and Emotive Computing (EmoC),
• Cognitive Multi-Agent System (CMAS),
• Evolutionary Computing (EC),
• and other subfields,

From an online encyclopedia we got the following explanations:
"[CV] seeks to automate tasks that the human visual system can do [and therefore] studies and describes the processes implemented in software and hardware behind artificial vision systems. Interdisciplinary exchange between biological vision and computer vision has proven fruitful for both fields". See the

This already shows

"[Furthermore, AI] and [CV] share many topics such as pattern recognition and learning techniques. Areas of AI deal with autonomous planning or deliberation for robotical systems to [get a detailed understanding of] an environment[, which] is required to navigate through [it]. Information about the environment could be provided by a [CV] system, acting as a vision sensor and providing high-level information about the environment and the robot. Consequently, [CV] is sometimes seen as a part of the [AI] field [in particular] or the computer science field in general."
Besides this, "feature-based methods [of CV are] used in conjunction with [ML] techniques and complex optimization frameworks".
As we made also clear by the

• an immobile robot (immobot) and
• a mobile phone,

and

• robot, specifically our Os powered by our OS, or
• cyborg, specifically the cybernetic reflection or self-portrait of C.S.,

specifically CV functions are used together with AI and ML. This shows once again that the CV software is included in SB but also shows the direct connection between the fields of AI, CV, and robotics, and because we already have the direct connections between the

we get as a very simple implication the direct connection between robotics and SB as well, or said in other words, everything is tightly connected with each other somehow.

Investigations::Multimedia, AI and KM

13.December.2017
Investigations::Multimedia

The following quoted contents were taken from a webpage about "future challenges [...,] projects" and "various ideas", that "is meant as source of inspiration for individuals who are interested in getting involved with the project and for students who want to base their student research projects". Besides motivating third parties to infringe our rights as well, it has also become apparent that the management of that company but also researchers of universities (e.g. Technical University Munich, University Berlin, and University Dresden) still confuse a work created by an artist, research conducted by a corporation, and research conducted by e.g. a university, and do not understand the legal implications, specifically in respect to the copyright. Nevertheless, the contents has been copied from our websites and publicated on the website of that company on the one hand and on the other hand the analysis of this webpage shows that most of the listed items are related with the informations publicated by us in the last months, such as for example the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 29th of August 2017 and about the related OntoCore software component, and the informations about our Ontologic Net (ON) and the related OntoNet software component. See also for example the Clarfication of the 3rd of December 2017 to learn why that latest extension of that strategy does not work and will not change the legal sitiuation.
"[...] set of tools for encryption and key management [...] For many forthcoming application scenarios of Genode such as package management and email communication, [the set of tools] is crucial. Hence, it should be ported to Genode. Such a port may leverage Genode's fine-grained component architecture to strongly separate network-exposed functionality, the storage of key material, and the cryptographic functions. [At first we wondered about the reasons why this set of tools is listed on this webpage at all, which suggests a relation with our OntoCore and also OntoNet software components due to the focus of this webpage, and why the utilization of this set of tools is emphasized. But we already saw that an email is a message, and the set of tools is used for signing and encrypting the message, and the relation with networking is also obvious. In addition, on this webpage is also listed a Peer-to-Peer (P2P) computing respectively distributed computing platform (see the comment to the quote made below). Furthermore, on the webpage of the OntoCore software component, which obviously belongs to the items that are in the focus of the latest copying activity, the operating system Barrelfish is mentioned, that uses message-based rather than shared-data communication, and the operating system Singularity is mentioned, that uses "Contract-based channels (CBCs) for communication [to] enable fast, verifiable message-based communication between processes", and under point 13. we also suggest the OntoCore feature of "message-based system rather than shared-data communication (see Barrelfish) over CBCs for example". When we take all observations together, then we can see how all makes sense. But here the issue does not end, because we also have the emphasizing of the point of the identity management (see for example the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps and Ontologic Net Further steps of the 5th of July 2017, the Clarification of the 29th of July 2017, and the Ontonics Further steps of the 10th of September 2017 and 6th of October 2017).]",
"VNC server implementing Genode's framebuffer session interface [...] By implementing the Framebuffer and Input interfaces with a VNC server implementation, all graphical workloads of Genode would become available over the network. [See the OntoGraphics software component of our OS.]",
"[safe Peer-to-Peer (P2P) computing network] "It is a peer-to-peer communication and storage network that does not depend on single point of failure or control. It is intriguing to explore the opportunity of integrating support for the [safe P2P network] not merely as an application but integrated in the operating system, i.e., in the form of Genode components or a set of Genode VFS plugins. [Bingo!!! Obviously, we have here the distributed computing paradigm and once again the related works listed in the section Network Technology of the webpage Links to Software and the section Boot to Web (B2W) of the Innovation-Pipeline of Ontonics that includes our Cloud Operating Systems (COSs). In addition, the referenced P2P computing network or distributed computing platform is related with our Ontologic Net (see once again the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps and Ontologic Net Further steps of the 5th of July 2017 and the Clarification of the 29th of July 2017).]",
"Tiled window manager [We discussed this specific issue related with our Modern User Interface (Modern UI) already in relation with the Modern UI of the company Microsoft. See the related OntoLab and OntoLinux Further steps of the 25th of October 2012 and 9th of February 2013. See also our HomeChannel computing paradigm, which is based on the Modern UI and the optional support of a markup language. Also note that we are observing the referenced P2P platform since quite some time and we are sure that it either has already infringed our rights or will infringe our rights as well (see once again the Ontologic Net Further steps of the 5th of July 2017 and the Clarification of the 29th of July 2017).]",
"Interactive sound switchbox [...] One special case of this scenario is a chain of audio filters with each using the Audio_out session interface for both roles client and server. Combined with the [...] GUI server and Genode's support for real-time priorities, this base techniques enable the creation of flexible audio mixer / switchboard applications [...]. The goal of this project is to create a showcase implementation demonstrating the feasibility for creating high-quality audio applications [...]. [We do not think that this is the true goal but to copy our OS. See the Pure Data interactive visual dataflow programming language referenced on the webpage of the OntoBlender software component of our OS.],
"Graphical on-target IPC tracing tool [...] [See the OntoScope software component and the sections Formal Modeling, Formal Verification, Software Development Tool, and Visualization of the webpage Links to Software, as well as the related feature of the visual analyzation of the performance and reliability of the High-technology Operating System (HOS) respectively the whole Ontologic System (OS) listed in the section Feature-List #1 of the related webpage of our OS OntoLinux, and also keep in mind that our OS is reflective and all its components as well as all referenced works are working together as part of the OSA, that integrates all in one.]",
"Application frameworks and runtime environments [The related section of the webpage of the investigated website lists various programming languages that when taken together is a plagiarism of the multilingual and multiparadigmatic properties of our Ontologic(-Oriented) (OO 3) paradigm and our Ontologic System Architecture (OSA). See also the OntoBot software component that already has most of the copied features.]",
"Rust is a low-level systems programming language that ensures memory safety without employing a garbage collector. It thereby challenges C++ as the go-to programming language for high-performance and low-level code. Since [2016], Genode supports the use of the Rust programming language within components. [It does not matter since when this programming language is supported, because we also have C-- and Linear Temporal Logic (LTL), and no garbage if required. See also the related informatins given in the OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update of the 29.May.2016 and the Clarification #2 of the 5th of June 2016.]",
"Android's ART VM natively on Genode [] ART is a Java virtual machine that is used for executing applications on Android. By running ART directly on Genode, the Linux kernel could be removed from the trusted computing base of Android [...] [In the end, this is still a system based on the Linux kernel in general and nothing else than our OS variant called OntoDroid in particular, that we mentioned the first time in the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 4th of March 2013.]",
"Runtime for the D programming language [] The D systems programming language was designed to overcome many gripes that exists with C++. In particular, it introduces a sane syntax for meta programming, supports unit tests, and contract-based programming. [See once again the OSA and the OntoCore software component of our OS.]",
"Using Haskell as systems-development language [] The goal of this project is the application of functional programming i.e., Haskell, for the implementation of low-level Genode components. Implementing critical functionalities in such a high-level language instead of a classical systems language such as C or C++ would pave the way towards analyzing such components with formal methods. [...] A more recent development is [a Virtual Machine (VM) or] a light-weight OS runtime for Xen that is based on Haskell. [Bingo!!! See once again the OSA and the OntoBot software component as well as the related works referenced in the sections Exotic Operating System and Formal Verification of the webpage Links to Software and the related note about a separation kernel given in the OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update of the 1st of June 2016.]",
"Platforms [The related section also includes only items that are related with our OS, specifically with our OntoCore software component. Interestingly, all these items are related with the content publicated in the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 29th of August 2017.],
"Microkernelizing Linux [...] so far, we have not enabled the use of these device drivers on Linux as base platform. The goal of this project is the systematic replacement of in-kernel Linux device drivers by Genode processes running in user space, effectively reducing the Linux kernel to a runtime for Genode's core process. [We also found a related email on the mailing list dated 2017-10-17 that mentions the term "microkernelizing" in relation with a "base Linux core". Bingo!!! See the OntoL4 and OntoCore software components of our OS as well as the related comments to the quotes made before. Suddenly, the Rump Kernels approach is not enough anymore, because the plagiarists thought that we have taken the bare bone or bare metal apporach in this relation also called the bare Linux platform. The truth is, as already made clear in the comment to the quote about device drivers given above, that we have described all related variants explicitly or implicitly and in this way defined the complete general approach including OS-less or kernel-less runtime system or operating system, microkernel, and exokernel with one or more device drivers extracted from a monolithic operating system, as well as the so-called anykernel, so that in the end it does not matter what other have thought or stolen. Also interesting to mention in this relation is the fact that there is not much left of what made that operating system unique and useful.]",
"But a further motivation is the fact that [a specific microkernel] does not follow the classical L4 road, providing a kernel API that comes with an own terminology and different kernel primitives. [We have to guess that this was said in relation with our statement "OntoL4 microkernel or OntoS1 microkernel of our OS" and our OntoCore, which both suggest such a move on our side as well on the one hand and on the other hand that the future challenges seem to be more a preparation for stealing of more features of our OS in the future.]",
"Support for the XNU kernel (Darwin) [Bingo!!! See our OS OntoLix.]",
"Linux process containers [] [Bingo!!! See once again our OS OntoLix.]", and
"The goal of this project is to create a holistic design of the whole chain of audio processing, taking thread-scheduling into account. A particular challenge is the mixed output of real-time (small buffer, low latency) and non-real-time (larger buffer to compensate jitter, higher latency) audio sources. [See once again the sections Basic Properties and Integrating Architecture of the webpage Overview.].

We found the following quotes on a referenced webpage that contains a personal porting wishlist of a developer or even a shareholder of the company.
"FUSE (Spectrum) (SDL) [See the Ontologic File System (OntoFS) software component and the webpage Components of our OS once again.]",
"ioQuake3 (SDL + OpenGL) [See the OntoGraphics software component of our OS.]",
"RBDOOM-3-BFG (SDL + OpenGL) [See the OntoGraphics software component of our OS.]",
"SDL2 [See the OntoGraphics software component of our OS.]",
"Yamagi Quake II (SDL2 + OpenGL) [See the OntoGraphics software component of our OS.]",
"Blender [Bingo!!! See once again the OntoBlender software component."], and
"Wings3D (Erlang) [The programming language Erlang is contract-based. See the OntoCore software component of our OS once again.]".

Eventually, with that last act of copying we got the undeniable proof of the causal link, which was already given with the combination of the L4 microkernel, specifically a formally verified L4 microkernel, and the Rump kernel approach, and in this way sufficient evidences and legal matter to prove that the company has infringed our

• OntoCore and also
• OntoNet,

and

all the years and we even guess that it has been founded solely for this goal.
Finally, it has become very obvious what the true intentions of that company were all the time, are, and most potentially will be, and that the responsible persons are not so clever and nice as they tried to sell the rest of the world.
Now, we are already waiting for the day when they will give up even a very basic property of that plagiarism to find out only that everything else already exists since many years, like for example our original and unique composition of an L4 microkernel with an exokernel-based or microkernelized Linux or (BSD) Unix operating system. Busted and convicted!!!

Proper licensing by our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is required for each reproduction of our Ontologic System in the variant Genode OS (fee and share of the overall revenue generated with the performance of the Genode OS).
This licensing by our SOPR applies only for the variant of Genode OS with a commercial license. Any other reproduction and performance of our OS, OA, and any other ontologic work through the Genode OS is illegal.

14.December.2017
Clarification
In the last past we have seen once again infringements of our copyright by deliberately misleading the public about the true origin of the general learning by doing capability of the OntoBot software component and the related special Ontologic Applications of our original and unique work of art titled Ontologic System that

field of SoftBionics (SB), including Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Computer Vision (CV), etc., and
• Zero Ontology

and

• playing with an initial
  • axiomatic system or
  • set of rules of an arbitrary system,

  or

• watching videos, as described in relation with the Active Components, such as for example the Active Trac, and the AutoBrain of Style of Speed.

By the way: Conducting quality control with digital cameras, SB (AI, ML, or/and CV), and specifically Machine Visions (MV) is doing virtually every larger company since decades.

16.December.2017
Investigations::Multimedia, AI and KM
*** Work in progress - some minor updates and intention of single developer missing ***

In the referenced slide of the developer's presentation, that seems to be from the year 2013, we found the following informations: "L4 family micro-kernel, realtime OS**
[...]

• the (ARM) C code implements an executable Haskell model [As far as we do know, the code only represents a mathematical model of a microkernel but does not implement an abstract machine that executes a Haskell model, specifically no abstract machine for functional, logic, and even higher-order logic programming and hence constraint programming, concurrent constraint logic programming, and so on. Do not be confused by that phrase, because this is a wording that has been chosen to make the description of this specific formally verified L4 microkernel variant sound similar like the descriptions of the related parts of our Ontologic Systems (OSs) such as OntoLix and OntoLinux, and to give the misleading suggestion that features of our OS were included in this L4 microkernel variant just right from its start to prepare the following added functionality of our OS, specifically the reflective and dynamic capability management.]
• the Haskell model implements a high level specification [See the comment above.]

Capability Allocation Problem

Capability Deallocation Problem

Capability Alloc / Dealloc

We make it short:

• First-Order Logic (FOL),
• Higher-Order Logic (HOL), specifically the logic programming language Prolog, which both include constraint programming used for implementing constraint solvers, and also
• stable model semantics, specifically the answer set solver smodels, whereby answer set sovlers are programs for generating stable models and constraints play an important role in answer set programming based on the stable model semantics (see the webpage Components),

and

which are all integrated by our Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) (see the section Integrating Architecture of the webpage Overview once again).

As in the case of the Genode OS (see the Investigations::Multimedia of the 13th of December 2017), which is no surprise at all because they worked together against C.S. and our corporation even in an orchestrated way,

• capability-based microkernels and operrating systems integrated with them in general and
• this specific formally verified microkernel in particular,

that are related with the

• missing dynamic at runtime and
• missing management of the capabilities of system parts and their relations,

But that is not the way it works and therefore we will not tolerate any further disturbance of our activities from the responsible persons and other entities anymore.

At this point, we would like to make clear once again that we do not claim for everything, such as for example what has to be declared as an ordinary technological progress, or more than what C.S. is entitled to. But

We have discussed the subject matter to a large extent in the recent years and only pointed to an issue when

Most cases are different: In some cases more evidences are required, in other cases only one evidence is sufficient, in some cases it takes a longer periode of time, in other cases the legal situation is obvious and recognized instantly.

At least correct referencing of our ontologic works is required in scientific research when discussing them.
Proper licensing of our ontologic works is required otherwise, for example when copying, editing, changing, or/and performing them.

18.December.2017
Style of Speed Further steps
We worked on the older basic aerial vehicle platform mentioned in the Further steps of the 27th of November 2017, and improved and designed it once again. It is getting interesting for a product.

19.December.2017
Ontonics Further steps
We looked at:

as well as

in relation with our

• Castle in the Cloud,
• School in the Cloud,
• Managed Peer-to-Peer (MP2P) computing, and
• Channel Computing,

and also

as well as

In general:

• Distributed Hash Table (DHT),
• blockchain-based protocol Bitcoin for handling the register of users and the accesses, and verifying the users' names and the messages, and
• communication protocol for P2P file sharing BitTorrent (see the Feature-List of our OS).

Oh, we are so far ahead already.

OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps
We are also looking at the data structure called eXtensible Array (XArray), that performs better than a hash-based data structure when hashing the object and using the hash as the index and was introduced to the Linux kernel recently. But we are looking at the possibility that it is already included as one of the combinations of the elements listed on the webpage of the OntoBase software component, like for example the R-tree indexes of the embedded relational database management system SQLite with other elements (see also the related OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 1st of June 2016).

Specifically interesting for us is the answer to the question if it could be used advantageously as an substitute for a Distributed Hash Table (DHT).

20.December.2017
Clarification #1
Commonly, a File System (FS) is also structured as a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) and in the Feature-list #5 of our Ontologic System (OS) the processing pipeline of an abstract machine, virtual machine, or operating system by graph rewriting based on a DAG is also included, and we also discussed the generalization of the blockchain technique by a DAG already in relation with the OntoBase software component in the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps, Ontologic Net Further steps, and Ontologic Web Further steps of the 5th of July 2017.

In addition to the functionalities of the OntoBase provided by our integrating Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) to all other components of our OS, our OntoLedger software component also includes the approach of finding consensus in Multi-Agent Systems (MASs) through the holonic OntoBot software component.
In this respect, it should be relatively easy to

• versioning,
• fault tolerance and high-availability,
• replication, and
• distribution,

and show that such a generalization of the blockchain technique is based on a DAG.

Clarification #2
The IPRFID/IPNFC and SecureRFID/NFC networked embedded technologies are included in the Feature-list #2, as it is the case with the unique user ID, and the IDentity and Access Management System (IDAMS) part of the Managed Peer-to-Peer (MP2P) (see for example the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps and Ontologic Net Further steps of the 5th of July 2017, the Clarification of the 29th of July 2017, the Ontonics Further steps of the 10th of September 2017, 6th of October 2017, and 7th of October 2017, and the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps 13th of October 2017).

In the Virtual Object System (VOS) referenced on the 10th of May 2011 the field of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) is included, while in the Feature-list #5 the field of Internet of Things (IoT) is included as well and directly connected with the IPRFID/IPNFC and SecureRFID/NFC networked embedded technologies in particular and the field of Networked Embedded Systems (NES) in general.

The combination of the fields of CPS, IoT, and NES with the unique user ID is also discussed in relation with a citizen network wherein each single citizen, public and private institution, company, association, and so on gets at least one initial account with the postal adresse as the label was mentioned in the Ontonics and OntoLinux Further steps of the 29th of August 2012.

Clarification #3
Messages, channels, and encrypted data streams are also parts of our Channel Computing technology (see also the Ontonics Further steps of yesterday), which again is directly connected with our Managed Peer-to-Peer (MP2P) (see also Clarification #2 and #4 of today).

Clarification #4
The distributed computing paradigm (including Peer-to-Peer (P2P), grid, cloud, and other computing paradigms) and the field of SoftBionics (SB), including the fields of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Swarm Intelligence (SI), Computer Vision (CV), Common Sense Computing (CSC), Cognitive Multi-Agent System (CMAS), Evolutionary Computing (EC), etc., are essential parts of our Ontologic System (OS) and therefore distributed ML based on P2P computing is also included in our OS, obviously.

OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps
We worked on three of our software components.

Ontologic Net Further steps
We improved a basic service of our Ontologic Net (ON).

Ontologic Web Further steps
We improved and extended three of our service platforms of our Ontologic Web (OW):

24.December.2017
Picture of the Day
Santa Clause vs. Alien Crash

© Sci Fi

The same happened some decades ago already around Rosswell, U.S.A.. Obviously, our extra-terrestrial friends still operate their old types of UFOs without our Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) for Air Traffic Management (ATM) with Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool (FACET) and National Airspace System Constraint Evaluation and Notification Tool (NASCENT) of our Superstructure (see the issue Superstructure #17 of the 14th of October 2017) that works even at warp and plaid speeds.

We also read in the police report that the two parties got a verbal fight, as testified by the elves:
Santa: See what happens when you give licenses to aliens?
Alien: See what happens when you let old people keep their licenses?
But following the police report the alien got no pilot's license at all and even no proof of insurance.

Now, our fans and readers also do know why we have to insist on our traffic control for our Highway in the Sky and our Silk Skyway, and even cannot make an exception for the Queen (see the Picture of the Day of the 22nd of May 2017).

And no, we do not think that Santa Clause comes a little later to the children, because we gave him one of our Hovers as replacement vehicle.

26.December.2017
Ontonics Further steps
We worked on one of our battery technologies (see the related Further steps of the last past), specifically on the new battery technology developed recently (see the Further steps of the 2nd of December 2017), and made some more progress.
This also resulted in an extension of our product range based on this new battery technology, which includes a very easily recyclable primary cell as well now.

:(
©© BY 3.0 Frank Murmann

This is the relative rudimentary first generation of our battery technology but we already have

• flat and cylindrical microbattery types (see the image above),
• cylindrical mono D (see the images above) and all other common types inclusive a brandnew type of starter battery for vehicles,
• flat and flexible conformal battery types, as promised,
• large battery types of all kinds of vehicles, and
• massive battery types for renewable energy plants,

Oh, yes, do not forget to mention: The

• smartwatch requires 2 seconds,
• smartphone requires 4 seconds,
• laptop requires 7 seconds, and
• electric vehicle requires 60 seconds.

27.December.2017
Ontonics Further steps
We continued the work on the 2nd and 10th of December 2017 (see also the Further steps of the ...).

OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps
We worked on our Trusted Computing Base (TCB) and Trusted Execution Environment (TEE), specifically on the so-called root of trust and the so-called chain of trust, which comprised the following developments:

The main advantages of our OS and its TCP with TEE and TPM are its

See also the OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update of the 1st of June 2016, where we said that we "planned to implement the Basic Input/Output System (BIOS) as well", which is also connected with the TPM and for example the Trusted eXecution Technology (TXT) and tboot used in the Linux kernel.

29.December.2017
Website update
At first, we thought that it would be obvious but then we thought it would be more comfortable for our readers to give the information related with the BIOS and its connection with the TXT and tboot in the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 27th of December 2017 as well.

31.December.2017
Ontonics Further steps
After we concluded that one of our technologies can be integrated with another one of our technologies (see also the Further steps of the 1st of May 2017) we got as one result a more effective process and as another result a shorter process time. Both results can also be used in combination.

Style of Speed Further steps
We continued the work on three older maritime projects and made some first decision related with two designs.
The third design has taken a surprising turn and become something new and totally different.

King Smiley Further steps
In the last weeks, we were occupied with making decisions about the architectures and locations of the buildings and resorts of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR). So far, we have decided for the following places and activities:

• estate and
• commuter system,

• industry,

• industry,

• industry,

• space tower respectively Ultratower (see issue Space Elevator #3 of the 19th of March 2015),

• spaceport,

• industry,

• resort,

• industry,

• sewer system with sewage plant, and
• Palazzo Stroeti,

• resort and
• estate resort,

• estate hotel and
• commuter system,

• estate resort,

• resort and
• industry,

• estate resort,

• estate resort,

• oasis and
• infrastructure, as promised,

• oasis and
• infrastructure, as promised,

• industry,

and

Besides these projects, we are also working on the realizations of our other projects:

• Superstructure,
• Weather Control (WC), and
• industry,

• resort,
• Moon Rock Cafe,

We are sure that many will be totally fascinated and amazed of what is in this special pipeline.