Home → News 2021 February
 
 
News 2021 February
    
 

01.February.2021

Ontonics Further steps

We looked at a more exotic subject matter and made some related considerations, conclusions, and implications.
A closer look also showed that it is even directly connected with the subject matter, on which we already worked on the 29th of February 2020 and before, and seems to provide something

  • new, if others have not worked it out before, and
  • groundbreaking and revolutionary, if it truly works.

    At least, these new insights complement our knowledge and makes the related fields more familiar.

    02.February.2021

    Ontonics Further steps

    We worked on a detail or a variant of one of our electric energy storage devices, specifically on the utilization of different properties of 3 technologies, which are utilized in separated, connected, and integrated ways for several reasons and sometimes even for similar reasons.
    But what we developed is somehow different to their already existing utilizations and exploits an advantage of one technology to overcome a disadvantage of another technology and vice versa.

    We also thought about a joint large scale production of a vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is over 90% effective, cost effective, and designated as OntoLab SARS-CoV-2 Agent 1.0 by us.

    03.February.2021

    Ontonics Further steps

    We quote a report about a vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 virus designated as OntoLab SARS-CoV-2 Agent 1.0 by us: "Their commentary did note that the design of the Russian vaccine, which relies on a genetically modified cold virus and is similar to half a dozen others including those made by Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, is difficult to mass produce."

    Obviously, it is a vector-based vaccine.
    But we have no clue why below about zero degrees Fahrenheit is a difficult-to-manage temperature, when it is the temperature for long-term freezing of pommes frites and fish sticks at home.
    Despite that it could also be dry-frozen for the shipment and storage in common refrigerators.

    Furthermore, our OntoLab SARS-CoV-2 Agent 1.1 is already in the research and development pipeline.

    05.February.2021

    Comment of the Day

    Urcoin™

    22:02 and 27:44 UTC+1
    SOPR #315

    *** Sketching mode - short before change to next mode ***
    Topics
    This issue will summarize various notes, statements, and comments made to the following subject areas since the last issue:

  • Legal matter [Proposal for a Digital Market Act]
  • Legal matter [Alliances]
  • Infrastucture
  • Infrastucture [Communication and Collaboration System (Co²S or CoCoS)]
  • IDentity and Access Management System (IDAMS)
  • Healthcare System (HS)
  • Social and Societal System (S³) and Media System (MS)
  • Social and Societal System (S³)
  • Ontologic Financial System (OFinS) [Digital and virtual currencies]
  • Ontologic Financial System (OFinS) [Payment system] or Ontologic Bank [Ontologic Payment System (OPS)]

    Legal matter [PfDMA]
    The missing section of the issue #314 of the 7th of January 2021 related to the Proposal for a Digital Market Act (PfDMA) of the European Commission (EC) of the European Union (EU) and our 3 undertaking options regarding business processes ... (see section Legal matter [3 undertaking options])
    A business process of a main contractor, supplier, and service provider of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is viewed as a business process of our SOPR and hence legally covered in the same way as if said business process would be performed by C.S. (1st undertaking option).

    In relation to the 3 undertaking options we would like to make an additional note.
    Indeed, this approach means that the SOPR has a certain legal leeway in regard to the Digital Services Act package of the European Commision of the European Union, but we have to recall that

  • it is still us who opened the Ontologic System and in this way do not insist on compliance with all of our rights in return for royalties, and
  • this approach merely keeps up our legal rights, but does not extend them or creates another questionable legal situation.

    We have the impression that our solution with our 3 undertaking options resolves the legal issue related to the PfDMA and consider it to be accepted by the member states of the European Union.
    So the related measures are not required (anymore).

    Nevertheless, other entities should seek their rights at the courts, if they feel harmed.

    Legal matter [Alliances]
    {not ready} Over the last decade, one could observe that alliances are established more and more for activities other than setting standards or reaching, which are legal and reasonable, such as

  • damaging goals and items,
  • stealing properties,
  • camouflaging goals and strategies,
  • pushing other entities out of the market, and
  • gaining benefits in other illegal ways

    in respect to other entities.
    But such activities are

  • viewed as illegal conspiracies on the one hand , and
  • restricted by our SOPR on the other hand, which is the reason why we always add the phrase that each single legal entitiy and every single activity counts when limiting the counts of Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS), satellites, etc., the height of investments, and so on.

    Obviously, large companies of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) industrial sector and Venture Capital (VC) investors of the finance industrial sector are still acting as if they and their invested companies would not be concerned. But they are concerned and responsible for their actions and therefore have to give up as much as shares in other companies respectively cut as much as ties to other comany as needed to reach the maximal limit of 15 OAOS.

    We were unable to detect a serious will on the part of the governments, companies, foundations, etc. despite we were very accommodating, and even gave recommendations and offered assistance.
    We are not sure if some political pressure will arise to ensure that this solution, which was viewed by all involved as fair and just, is finally implemented. The governments have no tools available to compel a private entity to implement a recommendation by us.

    Infrastructure
    Interoperability is prevailing in case of the so-called walled gardens and superapps of companies.
    In accordance with our original and unique integrating Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) the integration takes place in our original and unique Ontologic System (OS).
    Integrating two or more services should not be done in a single system, platform, application, and service, as well as machine, specifically not exclusively.

    Furthermore, due to

  • the reason that overall (sub)systems are a little more complex, like for example a digital health pass, and
  • all the many other reasons broadly explained in the past,

    no other entity than our SOPR is qualified to manage and operate it together with its main contractors, suppliers, and service providers.
    One needs a spirit, an aether or environment, a pocket god, ghost in the machine, or ghost in the shell, a cybernetical extension (Ontologic System (Components), OntoBot, Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV), Ontologic Collaborative Ontologic Virtual Environment (OntoCOVE)), and an access point or access device (Ontoscope (Components)). :)

    Infrastucture [Communication and Collaboration System (Co²S or CoCoS)]
    As not expected otherwise, Communication and Collaboration (Co²) systems, platforms, applications, and services, including for example Short Messaging Service (SMS), are exploited in unwanted ways by integrating them with other technologies, goods, and services to establish or expand so-called walled gardens and superapps.
    But Co² is an essential part of our OS, as can be seen with the basic property of (mostly) being collaborative and the integration of the Underware software suite for example. Therefore, we do not think that such platforms, applications, and services provided by other companies should just be a platform, an application, or an as a Service (aaS) capability model, but a general functionality, which is also the reason why we made Co²S a part of the infrastructure of our SOPR.

    IDentity and Access Management System (IDAMS)
    comments of the 23rd of January 2021
    Clarification of the 25th of January 2021

    IDAMS of SOPR might become the only and mandatory one

    One of the first regulations of the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is crystal clear and simply described as follows: If there is only one solution based on our OS, then the SOPR is in charge.
    The rational is that if there is only one solution based on our OS, then there is no need to protect and demand freedom of choice, innovation, and competition pro bono publico by the market regulators and therefore no reason to open said solution based on our OS by C.S. and our corporation.

    In case of the field of IDentity and Access Management System (IDAMS) and the related infrastructure with its set of fundamental

  • facilities,
  • technologies (e.g. systems and platforms),
  • goods (e.g. applications, devices, and vehicles), and
  • services,

    the regulative conclusion is implied from premisses, like the following ones:

  • centralized DataBase Management System (DBMS) for travel data and travel pass of the International Air Transport Association (IATA),
  • common pass of the World Economic Forum,
  • universal standards for digital certificates or credentials, cards or passports, and related applications and services, specifically digital vaccination certificates or credentials, cards or passes, and related applications and services, which can be as universally recognized as a passport,
  • next generation of identity infrastructure for the world, enabling trusted peer interactions between individuals, organizations, and things, and
  • digital activities of the United Nations.

    Note the key words or terms international, world, universal and universally, and united nations, and also travel pass in the sense of international pass, and common pass in the sense of world pass, both universally recognized.

    We will not tolerate any interference by the United Nations (e.g. World Tourism Organization and World Health Organization), single governments, organizations, foundations, alliances, companies, and other entities. They all had, are having, and will have more than sufficient possibilities to collaborate with our SOPR.
    has to make any decision in the legal scope of ... the OntoLand. Nothing is unlocked and no precedents are created

    Healthcare System (HS)
    Please note that a digital health pass works with a blockchain-based data safe or another type of digital ledger, and all have to be hooked into the related centrally managed and operated on the basis of Distributed Systems (DSs) subsystems, specifically the

  • data storage,
  • universal ledger,
  • IDentity and Access Management System (IDAMS), and
  • Healthcare 4.0

    of the infrastructure of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) in a way that our SOPR is able to

  • do Business Intelligence (BI), Visualization, and Analytics (BIVA), and Data Science and Analytics (DSA), for example on the basis of validatable, validating, and validated, and verifiable, verifying computing, and
  • get its access to raw signals and data.
  • Members and licensees of our SOPR have to give their consent for using their raw signals and data, informations, knowledge, models, and algorithms in compliance with the
    • national and international laws, regulations, and acts, as well as agreements, and also
    • regulations of the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) of our SOPR.
  • Furthermore, authorized federal bodies decide, which Personally Identifiable Information (PII) a society wants to control in compliance with the national and international laws, regulations, and acts, as well as agreements.

    Social and Societal System (S³) and Media System (MS)
    We thought about the integration of the Social and Societal System (S³) and the Media System (MS) of the infrastructure of our SOPR to one system called the Social and Societal Media System (SSMS).
    But eventually, we concluded that the separation of them is sufficient for achieving the goals of our SOPR.

    Social and Societal System (S³)
    Once again, the uncontrolled press attempted to

  • engineer a public opinion,
  • undermine our measure, which demands to publicate at least a second opinion opposite to a first opinion, and
  • reduce our statement that having heard more opinions has never been wrong to absurdity

    by

  • selecting or composing only those opinions, that
    • serve the goals of that uncontrolled press and their supporting politicians and activists, but
    • still avoid an opposite opinion,

    and

  • acting even in coordination or concert with each other when doing so, which gave the public the opportunity once again to also see which media entities are collaborating or even conspiring.

    For sure, we were so clever as well, when playing around with our regulation, and therefore can assure the public that this dirty trick of the uncontrolled press is not how it works, because every opinion must have a counter opinion and all single opinions must come from different, unconnected entities.

    In our opinion, the same rights, that are granted to the old media, namely a de facto state role taken over in many areas and without any democratic legitimacy or control, must also be granted to the social networking platforms, that is the protection by the constitution or the basic law.
    Of course, as an alternative, one can also withdraw protection of the freedom of the press.
    Social media freedom must no longer be the plaything of unscrupulous entities.

    "Social networks would no longer be able to hide behind the argument that they are merely hosting services."

    But this also means that the algorithms of the social networkig platform providers do nothing else than taking editorial decisions exactly like a press editor (in chief) does and therefore the obligation to open the algorithms, as demanded by the Proposal for a Digitial Service Act of the European Commission of the European Union, would be just void and hence obsolete, because they are protected by the freedom of speech and the freedom of press.

    We already suggested exactly this: Social networking platform providers should be

  • classified as press, which is the reason why we call them social media since we made this suggestion some months ago, and
  • protected by the constitution or basic law like the press, which is just a simple implication of being a media, which again takes editorial decisions.

    And as we also explained several times, the lawmakers have to regulate the freedom of speech in general and hence the uncontrolled press in particular, because without such a regulation the foundational problem cannot be solved.

    We are also considering to increase the fees and shares for the uncontrolled media or make them the 6th licensee class to let them pay for the independent monitoring and moderating entities, which will be provisioned by our SOPR.

    We come more and more back to our first conclusion that social network providers are unable to manage their platforms.
    And the reason is not the foundational business model, capability model, and operational model, but the weakness of character and incompetences of the founders, owners, and operators, their individual business strategies and models, and also personal goals. Eventually, they cannot and they do not want.
    The society in general and the politics in particular would be wise to keep this in mind and conduct the discussion and introduce measures and legal regulations accordingly.

    Ontologic Financial System (OFinS) [Digital and virtual currencies]
    If it looks like Bitcoin, works like Bitcoin, and squeaks like Bitcoin, then it is most likely Bitcoin and definitely an illegal cryptocurrency.

    With the same duck test the use of a cryptocurrency can be characterized as use like a commodity or a security.

    But once again, entities tried to push illegal digital and virtual currencies, despite that

  • our SOPR has given no allowance to utilze our Ontologic System Components (OSC), Ontoscope Components (OsC), and Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) to implement, manage, and operate them, and
  • governments are not interested in making them official means of payment, because of
    • own digital money,
    • misuse as crime money, and
    • use for other illegal activities.

    This raises the question why those illegal cryptocurrencies are still traded at the financial markets. They

  • got not authorization by our SOPR in particular and
  • have no future in general.

    Howsoever, our SOPR took it as the go-ahead and will begin the talks with its main contractors, suppliers, and providers in relation to their payment systems and our Ontologic Financial System™ (OFinS™) with its Ontologic Bank™ (OntoBank™) and digital and virtual currencies OntoCoin™ and OntoTaler™, and also Quantum Coin™ or simply Qoin™.
    Most relevant are the payment systems of the companies Google, Apple, and Microsoft, as well as Facebook without the alliance, and Amazon, if it has an own payment system.

    To stop infringing the rights and stealing the properties of C.S. and our corporation we are already solving the problem at its root and therefore there will be

  • no performance and reproduction of related technologies, goods (e.g. applications, cryptochips, smart cards and credit cards, kiosk systems, etc.), and services in relation to other cryptocurrencies, and
  • no cryptocurrencies others than the one(s) of our Ontologic Financial System (OFinS) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR)

    in the legal scope of ... the OntoLand, but

  • a crackdown of everything that looks like Bitcoin, works like Bitcoin, and squeaks like Bitcoin.

    This does not stifle freedom of choice, innovation, and competition pro bono publico, but merely irons out the negative effects for the public and us.

    If an entity refuses to take down those illegal cryptocurrencies immediately, then our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) has to withdraw its allowance and will give

  • no license for the performance and reproduction of our OSC, OsC, and OAOS, and
  • no registration for our OFinS and at our OntoBank.

    We will provide sufficient evidences to show that an entity is aware about the legal situation, but still infringing our rights and stealing our properties.

    Companies, countries, and other entities

  • are completely mistaken in their assessment of the legal situation and
  • have absolutely no chance to
    • change the facts concerning our rights and properties in general and
    • scam an advantage in particular.

    We have demanded multiple times that the governments and their central banks as well as the media make this crystal clear to the public.
    We do not expect that there will be an observable and reasonable development in this case, specifically that illegal cryptocurrencies are taken down and not accepted anymore As Soon As Possible Or Better Said Immediately (ASAP OBSI) to protect our rights and properties.
    Therefore, establishing our OntoCoin and OntoTaler as the only digital and virtual currencies besides official national digital and virtual currencies and besides our Quantum Coin (Qoin) of our OFinS with our Qoin being the Urcoin, which is the primal or primeval coin at the root of all other digital and virtual currencies in the legal scope of ... the OntoLand.

    Calling illegal digital and virtual currencies the new gold or a competitor to official digital and virtual currencies introduced by central banks of countries and unions of states is nonsense.

    Once again, for the misinformed public and all those enemies of the public:

  • Every digital and virtual currency has to be
    • accredited by our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR),
    • hooked into our Ontologic Financial System (OFinS),
    • based on our exclusive OntoCoin and OntoTaler, as well as Quantum Coin (Qoin) based on our exclusive universal ledger, including our exclusive quantum ledger, quant ledger, or qledger, including our exclusive quantum-based blockchain, quant-informatic blockchain, or qblockchain, of our exclusive infrastructure of our SOPR as general financial information instrument, and also
    • managed and operated with our Ontologic Bank (OntoBank) together, eventually, which means that mandatory joint ventures have to be established between monetary funds, reserve systems, central banks, federal and public financial bodies, etc., and our SOPR and OntoBank, so that we also get our raw signals and data, informations, and so on,

    when used with our Ontologic System Components (OSC) and our Ontoscope Components (OsC), and in our Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV).

  • A digital currency and a virtual currency, which is not accredited by our SOPR, has no value and therefore is void in the legal scope of ... the OntoLand.
  • There are no legal technologies (e.g. systems and platforms), no legal applications, and no legal services for any illegal digital currency and any illegal virtual currency on the basis of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation. Period.
  • Basically, there is no limit for deposits or digital money on account at least in relation to digital currencies, which by definition are digital representations of real monies. In case of virtual money, there should also be no limit, because our OntoCoin and OntoTaler, as well as Qoin are the new noble metals, and Qoins can be viewed as the only legal substitution of illegal Bitcoins and Co., and are handled accordingly by the related members and licensees of our SOPR, who have to
    • be registered at our OntoBank, which is the case of all said joint ventures, and
    • work only with accredited digital and virtual currencies.

    We will hold the responsible entities accountable, specifically if they refuse to stop their fraudulent activities immediately, which could become exorbitant expensive regarding triple damage compensations in this specific case, which will be alligned to the market capitalizations and the exchanges to real moneys of those illegal digital and virtual currencies on the market and the street. Specifically, everybody handling Bitcoin and related things should begin to run away.

    International Monetary Fund (IMF), U.S.America e-Dollar, European Union e-Euro
    talk with other governments, commissions, monetary funds, central banks, and our SOPR about digital and virtual currencies.
    In case of other matter related to

  • federal digital and virtual currencies used as commodities, securities, and so on in particular, and
  • digital and virtual properties, assets, or interests in general

    we do welcome every reasonable regulations and obligations, that do not infringe the rights of C.S. and our corporation, as we already declared in the past.

    Ontologic Financial System (OFinS) [Payment system] or Ontologic Bank [Ontologic Payment System (OPS)]
    If a digital or virtual currency is handled or traded to damage the goals and even threaten the integrity of our SOPR, then addtional measures become effective. Illegal digital and virtual currencies are not required for an open Ontologic System with its

  • Ontologic Net (ON), which is the successor of the old Internet,
  • Ontologic Web (OW), which is the successor of the old World Wide Web (WWW), and
  • Ontologic uniVerse (OV), which is something totally new and also exclusive.

    07.February.2021

    06:41, 10:45, and 13:26 UTC+1
    Preliminary investigation of Reliance Industries started

    Since some months, we are observing the activities of the company Reliance Industries and other entities.
    Since some days, we are investigating the activities of them.

    We quote an online encyclopedia about Reliance Industries: "[...]
    [...]
    In August 2019, Reliance added Fynd primarily for its consumer businesses and mobile phone services in the e-commerce space.[33 [Reliance to buy Google-backed tech start-up Shopsense Retail]][34]
    [...]
    [...] On 28 December 2017, RIL announced that it will be acquiring the wireless assets of Anil Ambani-led Reliance Communications for about ₹23,000 crores.[44]
    [...]

    Associates

  • [...]
  • Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited (RJIL) previously known as Infotel Broadband [Services Pvt Ltd], is a broadband service provider which gained 4G licences for operating across India.[69][70][71]
  • [...]
  • [...]
  • LYF, a 4G-enabled VoLTE device brand from Reliance Retail.[75]"

    [Textbox:] Subsidiaries
    Jio Platforms (67.03%)
    Jio Payments Bank (70%)
    Reliance Retail
    Reliance Petroleum
    Network18 Group (64%)
    Football Sports Development Limited
    Mumbai Indians
    Alok Industries"

    We quote an online encyclopedia Jio Platforms: "Jio Platforms is an Indian technology company and a subsidiary of Reliance Industries Limited, headquartered in Mumbai, India. Established in 2019, Jio Platforms acts as a holding company for India's largest mobile network operator Jio and other digital businesses of Reliance.[2]
    [...]

    History
    In October 2019, Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) announced the creation of a wholly owned subsidiary for its digital businesses including Jio. In November 2019, the subsidiary was named Jio Platforms. The ₹1.08 trillion (US$15 billion) liability of Jio was transferred to RIL and in turn RIL received preferential shares of Jio Platforms.[5][6] According to some observers, the restructuring was done to keep the digital businesses of the group within a debt-free entity.[7]
    In April 2020, Facebook acquired a 9.99% stake in Jio Platforms for ₹435.74 billion (US$6.1 billion).[8] According to this deal, while Jio Platforms retained ₹149.76 billion (US$2.1 billion), the parent company got the remaining ₹285.98 billion (US$4.0 billion) for redeeming the optionally convertible preference shares it held in the subsidiary.[7]
    In May 2020, private equity firm Silver Lake Partners obtained a 1.15% stake with a ₹56.5575 billion (US$790 million) investment in the company.[9] But unlike the previous transaction, the entire investment in this case was retained by Jio Platforms.[7] General Atlantic then announced that it would invest ₹65.988 billion (US$930 million) in Jio Platforms for a 1.34% stake in the company.[10] American PE firm KKR acquired a 2.32% stake in Jio Platforms for ₹113.67 billion (US$1.6 billion).[11]
    In June 2020, Emirati sovereign fund Mubadala confirmed that it would acquire a 1.85% stake in the company for ₹90.936 billion (US$1.3 billion).[12] Silver Lake increased its stake to 2.08% with an additional ₹45.47 billion (US$640 million) investment.[13] Abu Dhabi Investment Authority then bought a 1.16% stake in the company for ₹56.84 billion (US$800 million).[14] On 13 June, TPG Capital, an investment company, took stake in Reliance Industries subsidiary Jio platform of 0.93% worth ₹45.468 billion (US$640 million).[15]
    Catterton also made an investment of ₹18.945 billion (US$270 million) for a 0.39% stake.[16]
    In June 2020, Saudi Arabia's sovereign fund PIF confirmed that it would acquire a 2.32% stake in the company for ₹113.67 billion (US$1.6 billion).[17] In July 2020, United States's Tech Giant Intel confirmed that it would acquire a 0.39% stake in the company for ₹1.89 billion (US$26 million).[18]
    In July 2020, Another United States' Tech Giant company Qualcomm confirmed that it would acquire a 0.15% stake in the company for ₹.730 billion (US$10 million).[19]
    This was followed by Google purchase of 7.7% stake in the company for ₹337.37 billion (US$4.7 billion).[20]

    Businesses

  • [Reliance] Jio [Infocomm], telecommunications and broadband services
  • Jio Apps
    • MyJio[21]
    • JioTV, live TV streaming app, launched on 5 September 2016
    • JioCinema, video-on-demand app[22]
    • JioSaavn, an online music streaming service[23]
    • JioChat, messaging app[24]
    • JioMeet, video-conferencing platform[25]
    • JioPages, web browser[26]
    • JioSwitch, file sharing app[27]
    • JioNews, newspaper and magazine app[28]
    • JioHome, mobile remote control for Jio set-top box[29]
    • JioGate, apartment security app[30]
    • JioCloud, cloud storage services[31]
    • JioSecurity, security app[32]
    • JioHealthHub, health companion[33]
    • JioPOS Lite, Jio recharge commission earning app[34]
    • JioGameslite, online gaming[35]
  • JioMoney, digital currency and payments services[36]
  • JioMart, online grocery delivery services (partnership with Reliance Retail)[37]

    Acquisitions and investments
    [...]
    Haptik[,] AI-based conversational platform US$100 million 87%
    Embibe[,] AI-based educational platform US$180 million 72.69%
    Radisys[40][,] Telecommunication technology US$75 million 100%
    Reverie language technologies Ltd[, ] Vernacular chatbot & Speech Technologies US$35 million 83.3%
    Grab-a-Grub[,] Delivery services US$30 million 83%
    Fynd[,]Analytics US$15 million 87%
    EasyGov[,] Citizen convenience services US$10 million 83%
    Asteria Aerospace[,] Drone technology US$3.3 million 51.78%
    Netradyne[,] AI services [...] 37.4%
    Tesseract[,] Mixed Reality 10.12 crore [US$ 13.9 million] 92.7%
    SankhyaSutra Labs[,] Simulation Services [...] 83%[41]

    [Textbox:] Owners
    Reliance Industries Limited (67.03%)
    Strategic Investors (18.26%)

  • Facebook, Inc. (9.99%)
  • Google (7.73%)
  • Intel Capital (0.39%)
  • Qualcomm (0.15%)

    Private Equity Firms (9.38%)
    Sovereign Wealth Funds (5.33%)

    [Textbox:] Subsidiaries
    Jio Infocomm
    JioMart
    JioCinema
    JioSaavn
    Radisys
    Haptik"

    Wikipedia about Reliance Jio Infocomm: "Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited, d/b/a Jio, is an Indian telecommunications company and a subsidiary of Jio Platforms, headquartered in Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. It operates a national LTE network with coverage across all 22 telecom circles. It does not offer 2G or 3G service, and instead uses only voice over LTE to provide voice service on its 4G network.[5][6]
    [...]
    In September 2019, Jio launched a fiber to the home service, offering home broadband, television, and telephone services. Since April 2020, Reliance Industries has raised ₹152,056 crore (US$21 billion) by selling 32.97% equity stake in Jio Platforms.[9]

    History
    The company was registered in Ambawadi, Ahmedabad, Gujarat on 15 February 2007 as Infotel Broadband Services Limited (IBSL). In June 2010, Reliance Industries (RIL) bought a 95% stake in IBSL for ₹4,800 crore (US$670 million). Although unlisted, IBSL was the only company that won broadband spectrum in all 22 circles in India in the 4G auction that took place earlier that year.[10] Later continuing as RIL's telecom subsidiary, Infotel Broadband Services Limited was renamed as Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited (RJIL) in January 2013.[11]
    [...]

    Products and services
    [...]

    LYF smartphones
    [...]

    JioPhone
    [...]

    Jio apps
    In May 2016, Jio launched a bundle of multimedia apps on Google Play as part of its upcoming 4G services. While the apps are available to download for everyone, a user will require a Jio SIM card to use them. Additionally, most of the apps are in the beta phase.[65] Notable apps include:
    [...]"

    We quote an online encyclopedia about Jio Payments Bank Limited: "[...]
    Jio Payments Bank Limited is a joint venture between the Reliance Industries and the State Bank of India with the stake of 70:30."

    We quote an online encyclopedia about Haptik: "Haptik is an Indian enterprise conversational AI platform founded in August 2013,[1][2] and acquired by Reliance Industries Limited in 2019.[3] The company develops technology to enable enterprises to build conversational AI systems that allow users to converse with applications and electronic devices in free-format, natural language, using speech or text.[4][5] [...]
    [...]

    History
    Haptik was founded by [two persons], both University of Illinois engineering alumni in August 2013.[10][11]
    [...]
    In August 2015, [a third person] from the University of Illinois joined Haptik's board of advisers to make the platform's underlying NLP technology layer smarter.[18] In the same year, Haptik became the official personal assistant of the Mumbai City FC.[19] and also provided a customer support chat-bot to Swipe Telecom.[20]
    [...]
    Haptik is a part of the Reliance group of companies, who bought an 87% stake in the company in a $100 million deal in April 2019.[27][28] This was followed by the acquisition of Mumbai-based start-up, Buzzo.ai, that develops customizable Artificial Intelligence software for e-commerce.[29][30]
    [...]
    In March 2020, The Government of India launched a WhatsApp chatbot called MyGov Corona Helpdesk to create awareness about coronavirus. The bot was built by Haptik.[33][34][35]

    Partnership and customer base
    Haptik built the world's largest WhatsApp chatbot for COVID-19.[36] This was the official helpline for the Government of India which was utilized by over 21 million users across the country.[35] The MyGov Corona Helpdesk was engineered to fight rumors, educate the masses and bring a sense of calm to the pandemic situation. Haptik built the Helpdesk ground-up using official data shared by the Government.[33]
    Kotak Life partnered with Haptik to develop an AI-driven conversational assistant called KAYA which provides 24X7 assistance to consumers.[37]
    The company partnered with Amazon Pay,[38] HDFC Life,[39] Ola Cabs,[40] Uber,[41] Times Internet, Mumbai City FC,[18] Coca-Cola,[42] Ziman,[43] Zomato,[44] BookMyShow,[44][41] Cleartrip, Goibibo, UrbanClap, Via.com, Dineout, Flipkart, and Kotak Life to run campaigns on Haptik app.[45]
    In March 2018, the company partnered with Amazon Web Services (AWS) to provide Al-enabled conversational solutions[buzzword] to customers in India.[46]
    Haptik has entered into a strategic partnership with Y Combinator-backed Leena AI to provide enterprises for all types of bot solutions.[buzzword][47]
    Haptik's repertoire of chatbot customers in India includes Samsung,[2] Future Group,[48] KFC, Dream11, Sharekhan, Edelweiss, Tokio, Club Mahindra and IIFL among others.[49] Haptik has also built assistants for TOI,[50] Samsung, Ziman[43] and Akancha Against Harassment, an online Cyber Safety Initiative.[51]
    Haptik is one of the world's largest conversational AI platforms.[48] In October 2017, The Times of India app incorporated Haptik's virtual personal assistant service with Sprite as the exclusive brand partner.[50] Samsung was the second partner who uses Haptik to power its 'My Assistant' service that is pre-installed on the Samsung Galaxy S7 and Galaxy S7 Edge in India.[2]
    Haptik built a scalable Support Bot for Dream11 which helped the online handle 8x their volume without a large support staff during IPL 2018.

    Funding
    [...]
    Haptik is a part of the Reliance Industries Limited, which acquired a majority stake in the company in a $100 million deal in April 2019.[56][57]

    Software overview
    Haptik builds Conversational AI that understands context.[58][59][60][61]

    [...]

    See also

  • Alisa (virtual assistant)
  • Amazon Alexa [includes Evi]
  • [Samsung] Bixby (virtual assistant)
  • BlackBerry Assistant
  • Clova (virtual assistant)
  • Microsoft Cortana
  • [Amazon] True Knowledge Evi [key part of Amazon Alexa Bingo!!!]
  • Google Assistant
  • Samsung S Voice
  • Apple Siri
  • Samsung Viv"

    We quote an online encyclopedia about about Future Group: "Future Group is an Indian conglomerate company [...].
    [...]

    Joint venture partnerships
    Amazon-Future Retail
    [Amazon-Future Retail] Biyani company valued at ₹43,000 crore: Amazon gets coupons to invest in Future Retail. [...]: Amazon has agreed to acquire an indirect minority stake in Future Retail, the operator of Big Bazaar and EasyDay chains, ahead of an option to buy all or part of the promoters' holding in the company after three years. [...]
    [...]
    Reliance Retail acqusition
    On 29 August 2020, it was announced that Reliance Retail had reached an agreement with Future Group to acquire its retail and wholesale business, and also its logistics and warehousing businesses for $3.4 billion.[10]"

    We also quote a report about Aspada, Qualcomm Ventures, and Reverie Technologies: "Bengaluru-based Reverie Technologies raises $4 M Series A funding from Aspada and Qualcomm Ventures
    31st Aug 2015
    Reverie Technologies, a Bengaluru-based company that offers local language technology solutions, has raised USD 4 million in its Series A funding from Aspada and Qualcomm Ventures."

    We quote a report about Reliance Industries, and Reverie Technologies, EasyGov, and Sankhya Sutra Labs: "To boost e-comm play at bottom, RIL acquires Reverie, EasyGov and Sankhya Sutra Labs
    March 4, 2019
    Reliance has been eyeing several budding startups in Indian Internet space to ramp up its upcoming e-commerce play. Demonstrating aggressive appetite for such deals, the group is acquiring three more firms.
    Soon after entering into agreements to acquire logistics services platform Grab and software firm C-Square Info Solutions, RIL through its subsidiary Reliance Industrial Investments & Holdings (RIIHL) is acquiring three startups namely - Reveries, EasyGov, and Sankhya Sutra Labs.
    According to documents filing at NSE, Reliance will invest up to Rs 190 crore in Reverie to acquire its shares, and further, it will invest up to Rs 77 crore in the Bengaluru-based startup. The deal is likely to be closed by March 2021, shows the regulatory filing.
    Media reports also suggested that RIIHL has entered into an agreement for the acquisition of equity shares of Easygov for up to Rs 18 crore. Moreover, RIIHL will additionally invest Rs 50 crores in the Noida-based.
    The investment will ultimately translate into 76 per cent equity stake in the SaaS-based citizen convenience startup on a fully diluted basis.
    [...]
    While Reverie acquisition will enhance the group's digital initiatives including digital consumer platforms with multilingual capabilities, it will leverage Rajan Anandan-backed EasyGov to further ease the Government to Citizen (G2C) schemes and services.
    Sankhya Sutra, on the other hand, will help the Industry giant to achieve direct numerical simulation of fluid dynamics for industrial problems.
    The startup covers automobile, aircraft manufacturing, oil and gas, and semiconductor manufacturing under its services that will be beneficial for Reliance' other subsidiaries.
    Apart from the aforementioned acquisitions, RIL had acquired 5 per cent stake in blockchain startup Vakt, 73 per cent stake in edtech startup Embibe, and increased its stake in AI startup Netradyne."

    We also quote a report about Reliance Industries and Reverie Technologies: "Why the Reverie acquisition by Reliance is a big win for India
    10th Apr 2019
    News of local language technologies developer Reverie Language Technologies being acquired by Reliance Industries made the headlines for all the right reasons - solid returns for investors; the right rationale and fit; and wealth creation for founders and employees. All good reasons, but there's more. So says Arvind Pani, the Co-founder and CEO of Reverie, in an [interview ...].
    Indeed, Reliance's recent acquisition of the company [...] was a win-win for all involved, but not just because of the combination of all these factors that define a successful startup, says Arvind.
    [...]
    More specifically, however, Arvind points out that the acquisition will allow Reverie - which develops end-to-end voice technology stack for delivering a complete multilingual user experience - to meet its mission of bringing Indian languages on par with English and other European languages in the digital world.
    [...]
    Reliance, in turn, has said its investment in Reverie will enhance the group's digital initiatives, including building digital consumer platforms with multilingual capabilities. The Indian conglomerate will work with Reverie to integrate its services in the group's different digital consumer platforms, the company said in its February 22-dated filing.
    As part of the acquisition, Reliance will hold 83.3 percent equity capital in Reverie on a fully diluted basis, with the total investment of Rs 267 crore [(1 crore = 10,000,000 Indian Rupees)] likely to be completed by March 2021.
    [...]

    Reverie's 'Mission 3/3'
    To be clear, Reverie too has bold ambitions for the next three years - which Arvind terms as 'Mission 3/3' or as the 'business reason' behind Reverie's decision to sign up for this acquisition.
    Mission 3/3, Arvind says, highlights the three core goals that Reverie wants to achieve in the next three years. The first, he says, is to reach 500 million users in the next three years. The second, to become the market leader in Indian language technologies. And the third, he adds, is to be the Indian company that defines and implements Indian language technology standards.
    [...]
    [...] the first phase of the company's journey, was in 2009, when Reverie was launched. At the time, Arvind along with Reverie Co-founders SK Mohanty and Vivekananda Pani focused on creating the building blocks, such as fonts and keyboards, of Indian language technologies for the Internet, and then on content conversion.
    [...]
    As Multilingual Type Design Architect, SK Mohanty has designed more than 200 digital typefaces for various output devices and in different Indic scripts, focusing on the aesthetics and design. [...]
    "The other side we wanted to build was on the content side of things, which is what we launched in 2015 with our language-as-a-service platform; this has the ability to convert content from one language to another and has both text and speech interfaces, where users can interact," Arvind explains.
    Over the years, Reverie, which had raised funding from Qualcomm Ventures and Aspada, has established its market-leading position in the Indic language technologies space. It has won over customers from different industries, including OEMs like Qualcomm and consumer internet companies [...], while also engaging with app developers through its language-as-a-service platform.
    However, Arvind says he and his co-founders [...] faced their fair share of challenges in the early days.
    "During that time, more than eight-nine years ago, when we used to talk about languages, we were met with much skepticism," recalls Arvind. "Languages? In India? Does that have any commercial value at all? Many said, 'you're chasing something that is unlikely to succeed.'"
    Despite this, Arvind and his team consistently stayed true to their vision of making online services accessible to Indian local language users through Reverie's language technologies and services. And for this, Arvind credits the support the Reverie team received from their investors, employees, [...], who believed in their vision."

    Obviously, the founders are not so smart. Its technologies and services are definitely a part of our original and unique Ontologic System, as can be easily seen with our Multilingual, Multimodal User Interface (M²UI), including both text and speech interfaces, as a Service (aaS) capability model, and also typography and type or typeface design. The later has been explained by us in the context of the geometric and semiotic properties of our OS, while we also discussed dialects, whistled languages of peoples living in the mountain, sign languages, visual languages, and even languages of animals in this context, which is like a fingerprint of our original and unique, and hence copyright protected work of art.
    Eventually, it is our vision and those engineers and investors have believed in our vision once again, as we have also proven in the past, specifically in relation to Qualcomm multiple times.

    Also interesting in this relation are the following relations:

  • Amazon utilizes the SoftBionic (SB) based cameras of Netradyne in its delivery transporters.
  • Facebook with its subsidiary Whatsapp and Reliance Industries with its subsidiaries Reliance Retail, including Future Retail, and JioMart announced to integrate these two platforms of them. "In August 2019, Amazon invested in a Future Group entity that gave it a roughly 4.8% stake in Future Retail [...], according to securities filings. The deal gave Amazon the right of first refusal to acquire more shares in Future Retail, according to one of the filings. Amazon argued that the 2019 deal struck between it and the Future Group entity included a non-compete clause [...]. The clause listed 30 restricted parties with which Future Retail and Future Group could not do business, and Reliance [Industries] was on that list [...]."
  • Mukesh Ambani became director of the financial company Bank of America. "Warren Buffett pumps another $400 million into Bank of America, boosting his stock purchases to $1.2 billion in 8 days. This move by Buffett came right before the Ripple partnership announcement."
  • Reports about Indian attempts to foreclose its market against foreign competitiors and Reliance Industries attempts to take the whole country, which seem to be interrelated to some extent.

    Short conclusion:
    Now, the public knows why we have the opinion once again, as also mentioned in relation to certain antitrust procedures, that Whatsapp should be sold to our Hightech Office Ontonics for the Communication and Collaboration System (Co²S of CoCoS) of the infrastructure of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR).
    It should also be crystal clear now why we emphasized in the last days that interoperability prevails and recalled mandatory activities for members and licensees of our SOPR in compliance with the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of our SOPR, including:

  • payment of
    • triple damage compensations,
    • admission fee,
    • outstanding royalties,
  • omission of mimicking our SOPR,
  • omission of establishing certain joint ventures with federal and public bodies instead of joint ventures between federal and public bodies and our SOPR,
  • handover of incorrect, dubious, or illegal Intellectual Properties (IPs) related to our Ontologic System (OS),
  • provision of not more than 15 Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS),
  • use of Publicly Validated and Verified Open Source Hardware and Software (PVVOSHS),
  • provision of unrestricted access to raw signals and data,
  • use of our SOPR infrastructure, and its subsystems and platforms, such as
    • IDentity and Access Management System (IDAMS),
    • Marketplace for Everything (MfE), specifically exclusively for raw signals and data, informations, knowledge, models, and algorithms,
    • Ontologic Financial System (OFinS) and Ontologic Bank (OntoBank),
    • etc.,
  • use of our SOPR ...,
  • registration of OAOS and provision of their Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) to our SOPR Broker or mediator and services catalogue,
  • use of our SOPR Trustee and SOPR Public Trustee services,
  • and so on.

    Honestly, opening our original and unique work of art titled Ontologic System and created by C.S. was not meant this way, specifically not to let one of the richest persons on planet Earth even become richer on the basis of a

  • relatively bold and definitely illegal copy of our corporation, specifically our SOPR, and
  • surely illegal proprietary variant of our Ontologic System (OS) as a so-called walled garden and superapp,

    and that even on the level of a whole country, which by the way is the second-most populous country and the seventh-largest country by land area.
    Reliance Industries is another prime example for those activities, that we have discussed in the last 18 months several times in relation to our SOPR and let to several revisions of the AoA and the ToS with the LM of our SOPR.
    The strategy is obvious and any foul play or fraud will not succeed.
    M. Ambani and his business partners, specifically shareholders of Reliance Industries and joint venture partners, should do everything that protects our rights, properties, and interests, specifically in India, in their own interests. See also our comment India also has no special privileges of the 5th of February 2021.

    The activities of the other entities also speak an obvious language. Reliance Industries has bought companies in accordance with our original and unique Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) and composition for some few millions of U.S. Dollar and only some few months later they payed billions despite

  • all of them are absolutely aware about all aspects of the situation and
  • some of them have business units, which already provide the same technologies, goods, and services as well.

    Sum up the values payed by Reliance Industries for its new subsidiaries, businesses, acquisitions, and investments listed above and compare the sum with the 21 billion U.S. Dollar that the investors of Reliance Industries have payed. Indeed, it is the same discrepance between the true value and what is paid, as is the case with the businesses between Reliance Industries and the government of India, as well as this redundancies. So what have they truly bought? An exclusive access to the Indian market? Sorry, but we were first and are the original (see above once again).

    Maybe, Reliance Technologies sells Reverie Technologies, EasyGov, and something else to our SOPR for the cost price.

    Where there is smoke, there is fire. "So, we are waiting. These are all great companies. They have their own reputations to protect. I am confident they won't violate the law.", [Mukesh Ambani, September 2016]
    We think we should stop here with sharing our honest opinion.

    08.February.2021

    Ontoscope Further steps

    An Ontoscope can have all kinds of sensors and actuators by creation and design of C.S., including sensors to detect

  • gases and also
  • odors or flavors,

    such as a

  • chemosensor or molecular sensor, and also
  • electronic nose according to all natural senses and in line with the hardware already listed in the chapter 5 Conclusion of The Proposal.

    Around the 24th of July 2020, we have configured an Ontoscope as breath analyzer and generalized the related technology to a specific quick test solution, which is based on an electronic nose, which again is trained on the basis of SoftBionics (SB) (Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), etc.) to sniff out the SARS-CoV-2 virus, in addition to other viruses, bacterias, cancer, and other things, like a dog.
    This new quick test sensor can be

  • utilized in the same way like an
    • breath analyzer or breathalyzer, drunkometer, or blood alcohol content estimator or tester (alcotester) and
    • air quality tester,

    and

  • integrated in an
    • Ontoscope,
    • dedicated handheld device, like for example said breathalyzer,
    • wired or wireless extension of an Ontoscope or other mobile devices,
    • USB device, like for example a USB stick,
    • vehicle and other transport and mobility solutions, like for example cars, busses, trains, ships, aircrafts, cable cars or gondolas, etc.,
    • stationary device,
    • Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) unit,
    • and so on.

    These devices are utilized to sense the air quality everytime and everywhere.

    Breath analyzer
    ©© BY 3.0 BR Agência Brasil

    Around 5 months later in January 2021, a company from the Netherlands managed to realize our idea and presented a prototype of a stationary device, which should be able to work in this way and proved our estimation of the precision of at least 96% (see the Ontonics Further steps of the 20th of January 2021).

    Furthermore, in the issue Doctor's Bag #1 of the 20th of September 2014 we showed a micro chemistry laboratory of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), which was specialized by our OntoLab, and also always explained that our Ontoscope can be utilized as a so-called tricorder and a mobile micro chemistry lab, which also comprises its utilization as a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) microsystem for testing at home, if configured in this way (see the Ontonics Further steps of the 1st of April 2020 and once again the Ontonics Further steps of the 20th of January 2021).

    Herewith, these specific utilizations of an Ontoscope are included in the oeuvre of C.S., if they were not included already by creation and design.

    09.February.2021

    Comment of the Day

    Welcome to the Jungle [Guns N' Roses, Appetite for Destruction, 1987]

    Welcome to the jungle
    We've got fun and games
    We got everything you want
    Honey, we know the names

    We are the people that can find
    Whatever you may need
    If you got the money, honey
    We got your disease

    In the jungle,
    Welcome to the jungle
    Watch it bring you to your
    N-n-n-n-n-n-n-n knees, knees

    I wanna watch you bleed

    Welcome to the jungle,
    We take it day by day
    If you want it you're gonna bleed
    But it's the price to pay

    And you're a very sexy girl,
    That's very hard to please
    You can taste the bright lights
    But you won't get there for free

    In the jungle
    Welcome to the jungle
    Feel my, my,
    my serpentine

    Ooh I, I want to hear you scream

    Welcome to the jungle,
    It gets worse here every day
    You learn to live like an animal
    In the jungle where we play

    If you got hunger for what you see
    You'll take it eventually
    You can have everything you want
    But you better not take it from me

    In the jungle,
    Welcome to the jungle
    Watch it bring you to your
    N-n-n-n-n-n-n-n knees, knees

    I'm gonna watch you bleed

    And when you're high you never
    Ever wanna come down,
    So down, so down, so down,
    Yeah!

    You know where you are?
    You're in the jungle baby,
    You're gonna die

    In the jungle
    Welcome to the jungle
    Watch it bring you to your
    Knees, knees

    In the jungle
    Welcome to the jungle
    Feel my, my,
    my serpentine

    In the jungle
    Welcome to the jungle
    Watch it bring you to your
    Knees, knees
    In the jungle
    Welcome to the jungle
    Watch it bring you to your
    Knees, knees

    It's gonna bring you down,
    Huh!

    All those cryptokiddies and very smart gals and guys (not really) should take a look at how it works in other countries, like for example Haiti, Venezuela, Afghanistan, Lybia, Somalia, and so on.

    12.February.2021

    Ontonics Blitz Fund I #14.4.4

    In relation to our Superbolt #4 Electric Power (EP) we are building up our power grid that will be capable to for example charge electric vehicles with at least 800 kW and do other useful things.
    We are also thinking about the possibility to double the output to 1,600 kW, because our power grid and our electric energy storage technology are able to handle such an amount of electric power easily.

    We heard that other recharging facilities are only able to provide up to 350 kW at some few places, though the government of the F.R.Germany is only talking about at least 150 kW for a service grid of 1,000 Quick Charger™ stations.
    But this is neither sufficient for the supply of private vehicles nor definitely for

  • mobile robots, including drones,
  • mobile work machines,
  • industrial vehicles,
  • commercial vehicles,
  • electric buses,
  • rail vehicles,
  • watercrafts, including vessels, ships, and yachts,
  • aircrafts, including Vertical Take-Off and Landing aircrafts, drones, and airliners,
  • and so on.

    Most potentially, we will only allow to recharge the electrice vehicles of the main contractors, suppliers, and service providers of our Societies and our own vehicles.

    Furthermore, if the company Amazon does not sell its business unit Amazon Web Services (AWS) to the cost price to us, because we will not pay for our own ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs), then it looses its option to become the main contractor, supplier, and service provider for the field of logistics of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and other business units of our corporation, but also its option to get the electric energy storage device for the related hardware goods (e.g. electric vehicles and autonomous vehicles).

    Next in line are the companies

  • Alphabet (Google), Hyundai Motor Group, Ford Motor, and so on in case of a takeover by us and
  • Apple if it signs our licensing contract and complies to other legal matters, like for example the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) an our other Societies unreservedly.

    14.February.2021

    Comment of the Day

    Quick swap™
    Quick swapping™
    Battery keg™

    Ontonics Blitz Fund I #15.4.5

    In the issue #14.4.4 of the 12th of February 2021 we talked about building up our power grid of our Superbolt #4 Electric Power (EP).
    But we also presented our battery form factors respectively cylinders and cartridges, and our related battery Quick Swapping™ solution in the Further steps of the 9th of September 2019 and announced that they can be purchased and exchanged for recharged ones virtually everywhere comparable to the availability of the Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) cylinders and cartridges.

    Indeed, electric vehicles have a larger trunk or an additional trunk where the combustion engine was mounted before.
    Furthermore, a common car needs only one larger battery keg or several smaller battery cartridges storing the same amount of electric energy, for example 6 cartridges provided as a six pack for use by a not so strong person, which can be swapped in around 20 seconds.
    With

  • entering a station or a shop,
  • exchanging the one or more batteries,
  • paying with our OntoBank payment app or the payment function included in the EP battery management app, which can be configured to work automatically when exchanging or swapping the battery,
  • going back to the car, and
  • swapping the one or more batteries respectively kegs, cylinders, and cartridges

    we get the overall swapping time of 2 minutes.
    Therefore, we called it Quick Swap™.

    The next step is to find

  • retailers, like for example Walmart, Tesco, Aldi, Lidl, Carrefour, Amazon→Fresh, Reliance Retail, and so on,
  • Electronic Commerce (EC) platforms, like for example Amazon, eBay, Walmart→Global eCommerce, and so on,
  • wholesalers, and
  • other companies,

    which are interested in selling and exchanging our batteries as well.

    10:31 and 15:10 UTC+1
    SOPR #316

    *** Work in progress - some sections not finalized ***
    Topics
    We have another major revision of our SOPR and also another summary of comments regarding the following topics:

  • Legal matter [Next Generation]
  • License Model (LM)
  • Infrastructure
  • Infrastructure [Trust Management System (TMS)]
  • Infrastructure [IDentity and Access Management System (IDAMS)]
  • Infrastructure [SoftBionics (SB)]
  • Ontologic Financial System (OFinS) [OntoCoin and OntoTaler]
  • Communication and Collaboration System (Co²S or CoCoS) and Social and Societal System (S³)

    Legal matter [Next Generation]
    As announced without giving details due to the unclear situation, we have another major revision of the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of our SOPR, which is so far reaching that we even called it SOPR Next Generation of if our fans and readers want to SOPR 2.0.

    No entity has the right to politicize and democratize, and support such activities, and in this way expropriate the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs), such as our Ontologic System and our Ontoscope, as well as all the other works included in the oeuvre of C.S., without legal basis and formal process .

    No company has a so-called walled garden on the basis of the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) inclduded in the oeuvre of C.S., but merely a patch or field laid out in our walled garden, where it is allowed to perform and reproduce its end user goods and services. This means every company has to follow the statutes or laws of our walled garden or allotment garden, also called by us walled paradise due to our Caliber/Calibre, Ontologic uniVerse (OV) or Ontoverse, and New Reality (NR), respectively the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR).

    We will not debate with any entitiy about who holds the rights and therefore the exclusive rights of exploitation and power of control over for our AWs and further IPs, such as our Ontologic System and our Ontoscope, as well as all the other works included in the oeuvre of C.S..
    We asked governments to take a crystal clear position in relation to illegal digital and virtual currencies introduced by private entities other than C.S. and our corporation, and to finally prohibit those illegal financial instruments and vehicles.
    We do have the impression that they still refuse to regulate and prohibit them so that entities are allowed to damage the goals and even threaten the integrity of C.S. and our corporation, including our Societies, specifically our SOPR.

    We also observed that companies refuse to collaborate with us and even continued with damaging the goals and even threatening the integrity of C.S. and our corporation, as described multiple times in the past and former issues of our SOPR.

    We also have said that we will not sell our OS, but instead of respecting the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation, and accepting the status quo, governments and companies continued with their activities of blocking, blackmailing, terrorizing, and so on, which we demanded to stop as one consequence of our opening and licensing, to get the power of control over said rights and properties, which eventually would equal a sale of our OS to them.

    We always said that these goals and related activities are unreasonable and unacceptable. Therefore, we have to take more decisive measures to protect the goals and the integrity of C.S. and our corporation.
    One early idea was to split our OS into an

  • industrial OS or ordinary OS, which would continue the usual mess of governments, non-governmental organizations, and companies, and
  • pure OS, which would realize the original and unique expression of C.S..

    But we conclude directly that the governments, organizations, and companies would have nothing else in mind than to steal the pure OS in the same way, as they did and are still trying with the initial OS.
    Another idea was the so-called clear cut discussed in issues of 2018 and 2019. But due to the fact that our OS already is the worldwide system since many years, a clear cut is not possible anymore.

    Eventually, we concluded that no entity has signed a contract with C.S. and our corporation and therefore there exists no out-of-court agreement.
    Newest insights in unwanted, fraudulent, and even serious criminal activities of too many entities also showed again and again that our legal position is extra ordinary formidable, which is no surprise for us, because this is always the case with what we do and achieve. So certain licensees of our SOPR get not blanket legal certainty as part of an out-of-court agreement anymore. It depends on our goodwill and how well it works with the payment of our damage compensations, royalties, and other legal matters.

    We also came back to what has been discussed in former issues of our SOPR, that is simply described as a further reduced opening and related modification of our Ontologic System (OS) and limitation of the performance and reproduction of parts of our OS being allowed.
    So a mix of walled garden, clear cut, and limitation is the foundation for this revision.

  • maximal 15 Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS)
  • OAOS must have a 1:1 direct connection between 1 (one) independent service provider and 1 (one) end user
  • OAOS must be on the level like Software as a Service (SWaaS) capability models (e.g. app store), but not anymore on lower levels like
    • Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), including
      • Integration Infrastructure as a Service (IIaaS) and
      • Network as a service (NaaS),

      and

    • Platform as a Service (PaaS), including
      • Integration Platform as a Service (IPaaS),
      • Security as a service (SaaS or SECaaS),
      • Trust as a Service (TaaS or TraaS)
        • Smart Contract as a Service (SCaaS), and
        • Blockchain as a Service (BaaS or BlaaS),
      • Mobile Platform as a Service (MPaaS), and
      • Backend as a Service (BaaS or BackaaS)

    capability models and operational models.

    If there are loopholes or other ways to undermine this limitation, then we will revise the AoA and the ToS of our SOPR once again and limit more and more as a Service (aaS) capability models and operational models.

    as multiple times discussed and announced in the last 2 years.

    Either entities are interested in a serious collaboration with us and a constructive design, management, orchestration, and operation of the markets, or we have to enforce law and order, for which we have many options.

    Bad luck for

  • Operating system as a Service (OpsaaS) providers of all other entities and their Operating systems (Ops or os),
  • DataBase as a Service (DBaaS) providers of all other entities and their DataBase Management Systems (DBMSs)
  • and so on

    based on our original and unique OS with its

  • Ontologic System Architecture (OSA),
  • Ontologic Net (ON), which is the successor of the old Internet,
  • Ontologic Web (OW), which is the successor of the old World Wide Web (WWW), and
  • Ontologic uniVerse (OV), which is something totally new and also exclusive,

    including Over-The-Air (OTA) programming for wireless software update functionality.

  • Communication Service Providers (CPSs) of all kinds Telecommunication Service Providers (TPSs); Internet Service Providers (IPSs), Web Service Providers (WPSs), and
  • manufacturers and providers of technologies, applications, and services required for
    • computing and networking, and also
    • on the level of IaaS and PaaS capability models and operational models,

    though

  • on the one hand they can apply for becoming main contractors, suppliers, and service providers of our SOPR and
  • on the other hand they are no children of sadness, as their collaborations and orchestrations with other companies, investments in other companies, and other activities showed.

    License Model (LM)
    The progression of up to 10% for the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) class has been confirmed.
    If a company of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) industrial sector has a high revenue of more than 100,000,000,000 or 100 billion U.S. Dollar, but a low profit of less than 30% in a fiscal year, then it is up to the company to reconsider its business goal, strategy, model, and also structure, but not to our SOPR to reconsider its Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) terms and conditions, and also its License Model (LM).
    For example, pure Electronic Commerce (EC) is classified as retail with ICT. But in case an EC platform is integrated with ICT, then it is classified as ICT.
    An entity that is not willing or just not able to pay the royalty being due in accordance with our License Model (LM), even must change its business goal, strategy, and model, or otherwise stop using our rights and properties.
    Our SOPR makes takeover bids for business units and whole companies under our usual Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (hereafter FRANDAC) terms and conditions.

    Decrease of the maximal possible discount by 1% and 0.333333333%.
    30% - 22% = 8%, 35% - 22% = 13%, 40% - 22% = 18%, and 50% - 22% = 28% with up to 10% as progression, and 30% - 22.666666667% = 7.333333333% for hardware goods, for the ICT class, the other licensee classes accordingly respectively maximal individual discount of -22%.

    We are still not sure between

  • -22% (8%), -22% (13%), -22% (18%), and -22% (28%) with up to 10% progression, and -22.666666667% (7.333333333%) for hardware goods, or
  • -20% (10%), -20% (15%), -20% (20%), and -20% (30%) with up to 10% progression, and -20% (10%) for hardware goods, or
  • 30%, 35%, 40%, and without progression, and 30% for hardware goods in the first year and
  • -15% (15%), -15% (20%), -15% (25%), and -15% (35%) with up to 10% progression, and -15% (15%) for hardware goods in the second and following years

    with all discounts granted respectively the related maximal discounts in case of the ICT licensee class, the other licensee classes accordingly,

    Infrastructure
    If a solution is general, universal, international, and common to all members of our SOPR, such as a

  • backbone, core network, or fabric of our Ontoverse, also wrongly called Smart Network Fabric and cloud, respectively of our
    • Ontologic Net (ON),
    • Ontologic Web (OW), and
    • Ontologic uniVerse (OV),

    or

  • subsystem and platform, like for example our
    • Trust Management System (TMS),
    • IDentity and Access Management System (IDAMS),
    • Consent Management System (CMS or ConsMS),
    • Ontologic Financial System (OFinS),
    • etc.,

    then it is an exclusive task of the infrastructures, including the Superstructure, of our SOPR.

    We would like to recall that the registration of OAOS and provision of their Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) to our SOPR Broker or mediator and service catalogue is mandatory.
    APIs for machine services as part of the fields of Cyber-Physical System (CPS), Internet of Things (IoT), and Networked Embedded System (NES), including Industrial IoT, Industy 4.0, etc. have to be provided to the service catalogue and broker of our SOPR as well.

    Infrastructure [Trust Management System (TMS)]
    The Trust Management System (TMS) of the infrastructure of our SOPR is now the only legal IDAMS.
    Our SOPR is now the only legal Smart Contract as a Service (SCaaS) and Blockchain as a Service (BaaS or BlaaS) provider.
    in addition to the universal ledger and the Quantum Coin (Qoin) provider, the SOPR Trustee and SOPR Public Trustee as part of its exclusive infrastructure.

    We are considering to

  • integrate the universal ledger with the SOPR Trustee and SOPR Public Trustee and
  • provide IDAMS and BaaS together with members and licensees, that are eligible for becoming its main contractors, suppliers, and service providers.

    Infrastructure [IDentity and Access Management System (IDAMS)]
    The IDentity and Access Management System (IDAMS) of the infrastructure of our SOPR is now the only legal IDAMS.
    Our SOPR is now the only legal IDentity as a Service (IDaaS) provider.

    There is no Common Pass, no Travel Pass, no Health Pass, etc., etc., etc. other than the OntoVerse Passport or OntoLand Passport, simply called Ontologic Passport (OntoPass or OPass) with ontologic IDentity (oID) ("every user gets an id, that starts with onto#").

    Our IDentity and Access Management System (IDAMS) and our OPass are already the next generation of our subsystem, which has been implemented for the electronic passport (e-pass), and offers more and better possibilities among other things, especially for the reason that our SOPR does not charge all of its members and licensees for

  • individual signature certificates,
  • digital tokens or coins for qualified signatures, as well as
  • registration

    invoices respectively these are already included in the duties according to the AoA and the ToS and the royalties according to the LM like many other things, in case they are still needed (in this form) at all.
    We can really only recommend governments and companies worldwide to use the exclusive systems and platforms of the infrastructure of our SOPR.

    Infrastructure [SoftBionics (SB)]
    SoftBionics (SB)
    Our SOPR is now the only legal provider of SoftBionics as a Service (SBaaS) (e.g. Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Computer Vision (CV), Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM), Cognitive Agent System (CAS), Multi-Agent System (MAS), Swarm Intelligence (SI) or Swarm Computing (SC), etc.) capability models and operational models (SBaaSx).

    Ontologic Financial System (OFinS) [OntoCoin and OntoTaler]
    Now, the fun is definitely over, once again, and even our opening of our Ontologic System is at stake. Nobody is above the law. See also the section Legal matter above.

    We do not know what problems certain persons have with us, the rest of the world, and even with themselves, but it will not change the national and international laws, regulations, and acts, as well as agreements, specifically in relation to the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation.
    Virtual currencies, specifically cryptocurrencies, based on our original and unique digtial ledger technologies, including our Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), will get no allowance to perform and reproduce our original and unique work of art titled Ontologic System and created by C.S. in whole or in part.
    Specifically the illegal cryptocurrency Bitcoin is not becoming the new gold or an alternative asset.

    Stop that mess immediately or face the legal consequences.
    All payment service providers and other financial service providers have been warned already.
    And with every further illegal action, our decision becomes more and more strengthened, though it is already written in stone and was never a question.

    It does not matter who holds the illegal cryptocurrency Bitcoin and other illegal digital and virtual currencies, because we have not given the allowance to perform and reproduce the related parts of our original and unique work of art titled Ontologic System and created by C.S. in this way, specifically our Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT).
    Therefore, there is no "fresh dose of legitimacy" for all those criminal activities in relation to those digital and virtual currencies, as wrongly claimed by the fake news leader Cable News Network (CNN) and other members of the public press as well as enemies of law and order and hence of the public, because there is no legitimacy for those currencies and activities at all. They are just illegal and serious criminal even if some individual entities refuse to obey to reality, specifically to the fact that Bitcoin and all those other illegal digital and virtual currencies will not be accepted in our Ontologic Financial System (OFinS) and our Ontologic Bank (OntoBank) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR).

    We demand

  • All applications for illegal digital and virtual currencies have to be removed from the app stores and all other Software as a Service (SaaS) platforms immediately.
  • All services related to illegal digital and virtual currencies, inclusive that serious criminal Ethereum system, have to be stopped from working on as a Service (aaS) platforms immediately.
  • All trading platforms of illegal digital and virtual currencies have to be closed immediately.
  • All messages on social media about illegal digital and virtual currencies have to be blocked.
  • All executions of applications and services on Ontoscopes and other devices based on our original and unique work of art titled Ontologic System and created by C.S. have to be blocked next.
  • All entities, that did something on the basis of illegal digital and virtual currencies, will be charged for circulating and handling counterfeit money, trading illegal commodities and securities, supporting crimes, disrupting and even destructing the public order, and so on.

    Furthermore, we demand once again that governments take action, for example by making crystal clear that only official digital and virtual currencies are accepted as legal financial instruments, which by the way are only the digital and virtual currencies of our Ontologic Financial System (OFinS) and our Ontologic Bank (OntoBank), and also the national central banks, which all are derived from our Quantum Coin (Qoin). we demand once again governments to take crystal clear position by banning all inofficial digital and virtual currencies from trading and using as a financial instrument.

    As we already said in the section Legal matter, we asked governments to take a crystal clear position in relation to illegal digital and virtual currencies, and to finally prohibit these illegal financial instruments and vehicles.
    No answer is also an answer and the rift was deepened with a comment related to the digital vaccination card in the European Union, and some other developments in relation to digitalization of the real world. Therefore, we had to act in this case as well.
    The only legal digital and virtual currencies in the legal scope of ... the OntoLand are now our digital and virtual currencies OntoCoin and OntoTaler, as well as our Quantum Coin (Qoin) as Urcoin for them and legal digital and virtual currencies of central banks.

    Our Ontologic Bank (OntoBank) will provide technologies, goods, and services as interfaces between the real world and our fusion of the real and virtual worlds as the New Reality© (NR).

    Co²S and S³
    In fact, we have already integrated Twitter in our Communication and Collaboration System (Co²S) by design of our Ontogic System with its integrating Ontologic System Architechture (OSA) and Social and Societal System (S³) since some months and also sorting out the payment service Square, because the various incompetences and deficits of Jack Dorsey and Twitter and Square could be seen already and are not toleratable anymore for such an important task like a Social and Societal System.

    Tagging will be taken over for our Ontologic System (OS) and Twitter has to use the tags twitter# from now on to correct that fehlentwicklung and attempt to damage our OS in this way of topic tagging.
    And no, Twitter has no copyright on this, but we do have the copyright to integrate semantic tagging inclusive using the sign #, and we also planned many years ago to regulate this as well.

    15.February.2021

    Comment of the Day

    Turbo swap™

    Website update

    In the Style of Speed Further steps of the 5th, 7th, 9th, and 29th of January 2021 we have substituted the list point

  • charging time Turbo Charger™: 2 minutes with
  • swapping time Quick Swap™: 20 seconds.

    We do apologize for being not more precise with the used terms and given times.

    By the way: An alternative designation would be Turbo Swap™.

    Clarification

    Copyright law for beginners

    Santa Cruz Skateboards vs. Jeremy Scott
    © :(

    NHS→Santa Cruz Skateboards got right at the court. The matter was settled in September 2013 with J. Scott admitting error in public and the items being destroyed.

    In general, a copy must not be identical with the original. It is sufficient for a copyright infringement that a single element has been copied, like the big eyes, the teeth, and the wrinkles, and also the facial expression in this case, but also the overall style of painting, the overall composition, and eventually the most important aspect has been reproduced in parts without allowance, that is the expression of the original work of art.

    The same holds for our Ontologic System (OS) with its

  • Caliber/Calibre,
  • Ontologic System Architecture (OSA),
  • Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV), also wrongly called
    • Grid, Cloud, Edge, and Fog Computing (GCEFC), and
    • Cyber-Physical System of the second generation (CPS 2.0), Internet of Things of the second generation (IoT 2.0), and Networked Embedded System of the second generation (NES 2.0), as well as
    • Ubiquitous Computing of the second generation (UbiC 2.0),

    including Industry 4.0, etc., and also Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services, and so on, and

  • Ontoscope (Os), also wrongly called smartphone, iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, Android phone, Google Pixel, Samsung Galaxy, Tesla Model whatsoever, and so on.

    Style of Speed Further steps

    We finally managed to increase the power of the model Continental GT of the brand Porsche/Volkswagen→Bentley to 1001 PS.
    Why we are working on a street legal car with combustion engine? Simply because C.S. is not sure about taking a Porsche, a Ferrari, or another car as large daily driver, specifically for the case when the girls want to take their shopping bags and suitcases with them. :)

    16.February.2021

    Comment of the Day

    Powercartridge™

    Ontonics Further steps

    Based on our experiences gained in our OntoLab™, The Lab of Visions™, over more than 1 decade now, we have made improvements and expansions in relation to an older project.
    Specifically interesting are the new variants and their new functions, and the connection with 2 relative new but not so new technologies, which makes the results really very good and covincing and with a high potential new standards in the related fields.

    It is always nice to see when things start to function as intended, mature, and even come together to new solution, specifically in such elegant and astonishing ways.

    We also continued our activities in relation to plants for producing specific solutions, scaling up their productions, and improving their quantities and qualities.

    Ontonics Blitz Fund I #16.4.6

    In the last days, we worked on real and virtual functions and services in relation to our Superbolt #4 Electric Power (EP), specifically the

  • battery management system,
  • delivery service,
  • application with
    • basic functions
      • monitoring
        • voltage input,
        • voltage output,
        • charge state or battery level,
        • charging time,
        • interior temperature,
        • exterior temperature,
        • network connections,
        • mounting with power consumer,
        • etc.,
      • configuration,
      • data management
        • metadata,
        • configuration data,
        • utilization data
          • count of recharge,
          • utilization profile,
        • location data,
        • etc.,
      • and so on,
    • comfort functions
      • payment and automatic payment,
      • accounting,
      • opener for battery swapping
        • entrance door
        • garage door,
        • vehicle trunk or stowage,
      • reservering of one or more batteries at the next one or more locations,
      • summoning of battery swap service respectively delivery service,
      • and so on,
    • integrated functions provided by our
      • infrastructure of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR),
      • Superstructure of our Society for Superstructure Utilization and Management (SSUM) as part of the infrastructure of our SOPR,
      • subsystems and platforms of the infrastructure of our SOPR
        • Traffic Management System (TMS) of the Next Generation and Intelligent TMS of our SSUM
          • Air Traffic Management (ATM) System (ATMS),
          • Airspace System of the Next Generation, and
          • Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Traffic Management (UTM) System (UTMS),
        • Hyper Connectivity™ System (HCS),
        • etc.,
    • integrated functions provided by other service providers, such as the
      • payment,
      • opener for battery swapping by delivery services of others,
      • and so on
  • distribution, and
  • mass production.

    We also worked on the control system of our electric energy storage device and added some more functions, specifically

  • communication with a vehicle on the basis of its network connection as part of our Ontologic Net of Things (ONoT), also known as Cyber-Physical System of the second generation (CPS 2.0), Internet of Things of the second generation (IoT 2.0), and Networked Embedded System of the second generation (NES 2.0),
  • mounting in a vehicle,
  • and so on.

    We also worked on additional form factors and utilizations, like for example

  • Ontoscope batteries and other mobile devices,
  • robots,
  • drones,
  • electric skateboard,
  • electric bicycle,
  • electric motorcycle,
  • large machines,
  • large vehicles,
  • and so on

    (see also the issue #14.4.4 of the 12th of February 2021).

    We also worked on additional extensions, like for example

  • adapters, plugs, and connectors,
  • lights, lamps, and spotlights,
  • coolers,
  • heaters,
  • cooking stoves and portable stoves,
  • engine starting aid,
  • and so on.

    We also got the impression that our fans, interested investors, and other members of the public might wonder why our Quick Swap™ solution would become successful and even the new standard in the field of battery. Simply, it is a common but much more powerful battery system and as true experts have already calculated, we have a factor of around 3:1 in respect to 3 liter of commoun fuel, like for example gasoline, diesel, and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG), in relation to 1 kilogram of our battery. So for example, if a car has a combustion engine and a gasoline tank of 45 liter, then the electric variant of the same car based on the technologies of our business unit Style of Speed needs only 1 PowerKeg™ of 15 kilogram or 6 mini PowerKegs™ or PowerCartridges™ of 2.5 kilogram each to have the same driving range.

    We always said it is a revolution, that does not only contribute to our further environmental reconstruction and climate change reversal, but also revolutionize other things, like battery swapping and much more, obviously.
    Yes, we are already in full swing since several years and are now entering the hot spot.
    Once again guess why we call EP a Superbolt and include it in the Blitz Fund I of Ontonics.

    18.February.2021

    22:00 UTC+1
    Ontonics Blitz Fund I #17.4.7

    In general, entities have to name C.S. and our corporation respectively the related business unit as the true origin of the original and unique ArtWorks (AW) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. and also enter a licensing contract if provided by our corporation. As licensing option, a non-labelling license can be acquired in relation to many of these AWs and IPs.

    For sure, this legal handling also applies for our electric energy storage technology and devices based on it, also known as batteries.
    ... , we have several options:

  • We keep the performance and reproduction of it exclusive for 10 or 20 years, as suggested more than a year ago, and then decide for one of the options listed below.
  • We manufacture the batteries in our own plants, distribute the final products alone or together with other companies, and manage and operate related facilities and provide related services (see also the issue Blitz Fund #16.4.6 of the 16th of February 2021).
  • We license the performance and reproduction of it under our Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) terms and conditions.
  • Alternatively, we decide for a mixture of the options listed before. In this case, we are considering to only grant such a license for the
    • utilization in our standardized form factors (e.g. PowerBottle™, PowerCan™, PowerKeg™, PowerCylinder™, and PowerCartridge™),
    • members and licensees of our SOPR, and
    • utilization with surface vehicles, particularly cars and trucks,

    but not grant a license for the

    • utilization with robots and autonomous vehicles in general, and self-driving cars and trucks in particular.

    See also the section Legal matter [Licensing of further Intellectual Properties (IPs)] of the issue SOPR #306 of the 26th of October 2020.

    Style of Speed Further steps

    Together with our Superbolt #4 Electric Power (EP) of our Blitz Fund I of our Hightech Office Ontonics, we developed a basic component and a basic module, which allow the integration of our electric energy storage device, also known as battery, of EP in every plug-in hybrid car and truck and pure-electric car and truck.

    20.February.2021

    Ontonics Further steps

    Since many years, we are working on the improvement of a methode or process, but always had a detail problem, which . Despite looking at a technology since many years, we had not connected this problem with this technology as its solution. It will be interesting to see which one of this solution and the solution discussed in the Further steps of the 16th of February 2021 will be more market penetrating. We bet on a mix of the advantages of both.

    24.February.2021

    00:10 and 01:00 UTC+1
    Ontonics Further steps

    We are not sure if our existing business unit Style of Speed or a new business unit to be established will

  • become responsible for our
    • self-driving cars and trucks in general and
    • pure electric self-driving cars and trucks in particular,

    and

  • get the exclusive rights for the utilization of the electric energy storage device, also known as battery, of our Superbolt #4 Electric Power (EP) of the Blitz Fund I of Ontonics for pure electric self-driving cars and trucks, for which our battery technology is ideally suited by providing the required range of 1,000 miles and even far longer ranges in case of trucks, and another guarantee for our market dominance in the fields of transport and logistics (see also the issue Ontonics Blitz Fund #17.4.7 of the 18th of February 2021).

    Below is a brief summary of the deficits of vehicle manufacturers and the reasons why they are no potential competitors anymore or never were:

  • Porsche/Volkswagen - no batteries, small fuel cell, no electric power and hydrogen infrastructures
  • Toyota - no batteries, small fuel cell, no electric power and hydrogen infrastructures
  • Daimler - no batteries, small fuel cell, no electric power and hydrogen infrastructures
  • Tesla - no batteries quantitative (not sufficient amount) and qualitative (not sufficient range), no electric power infrastructure
  • Nikola - no production fuel cell, no hydrogen infrastructure
  • other start-ups - not much of all what is required to become relevant at all

    In addition, there is the certain dependency on our Ontologic System Components (OSC), Ontoscope Components (OsC), Active Components (AC), Hyper Connectivity System (HCS) with all the many original and unique Grid, Cloud, Edge, and Fog Computing (GCEFC) platforms, and so on.

    Entities, including governments and companies, have to

  • obey to the laws, regulations, and acts, as well as agreements,
  • respect and protect our rights and properties, and
  • comply with our terms and conditions

    unreservedly. All of them.
    Entities that refuse to stop

  • mimicking C.S. and our corporation, and
  • copying and stealing our works

    will be excluded from the related subsystems and platforms of the infrastructure of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), including our Hyper Connectivity System (HCS), because refraining from such activities is a term of the licensing contract.

    By the way:

  • Oh, yes, do not forget to mention: Google→Waymo is also a candidate for these tasks in case of a takeover of Alphabet.
  • There are quite convincing reasons why the world has not chosen the miracle water gas in whatsoever colours for transport and other utilizations beyond rockets and special chemical processes.

    Hindenburg Disaster

    ©© Dutch Nationaal Archief
    PD U.S. Navy

  • What is with selling Amazon Web Services (AWS) and becoming main contractor, supplier, and service provider of our transport and logistics?
  • It is always better to be nice and collaborate with us.

    26.February.2021

    Clarification

    C.S. and our corporation combine basic mathematical, cybernetical, bionical, biological, and biotechnological researches with their translations into practical uses. Thanks to their world-renowned expertise in HardBionics (HB) and SoftBionics (SB), including Computational Intelligence (CI) or Soft Computing (SC), Evolutionary Computing (EC), including Genetic Programming (GP), as well as Systems Biology, including mRNA compiler technologies, and Ontologics, including ontology-based technologies, and their tireless efforts over more than 2 decades, they were able to provide the foundations, that enabled the development of

  • advanced therapies against cancer,
  • multiple vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 virus in a very short time, making a critical contribution to the containment of the Corona pandemic, and
  • many other progressive and successful approaches in the areas of medicine and healthcare.

    28.February.2021

    King Smiley Further steps

    Some of our fans and readers might have asked the question, where would be an area sufficiently large for the Palazzo Stroeti (see also the Picture of the Day of the 24th of March 2019) in Venezia, Italy, while others had an idea and tried to disencourage us.
    Howsoever, we let the local citizens decide if they want another magnificant island, more palatial buildings, and a sewage system, and jobs, jobs, jobs in a museum, and restaurants, and transport services, and so on.

    The Galleria==tunnel could also have a different route.
    The problem with the tunnel is its opening in the area around the Palazzo Ducale, specifically the Ponte della Paglia and the other bridges in this waterfront area of the Riva degli Schiavoni, because there are always human crowds and congestions.

    Laguna di Venezia Bacino di San Marco Isola, Galleria, e Palazzo Stroeti and Galleria

    © :(

    But the Galleria might become obsolete, because our Venice Hover Gondola, which is a Hovercar respectively Hovercab or Hovertaxi of Style of Speed, will begin its operation in 5 years (see the Syd Mead Mobilage shown as the cover of the book titled "Oblagon, Concepts Of Syd Mead" Mobileage and in the Original vs. Inspiration of the 3rd of October 2017, and also read the Style of Speed Further steps of the same day).

    We do apologize for our little confusion and fun concerning the terms galleria==tunnel and galleria d'arte==art gallery. :D

    		•    
     
    © or ® or both
    Christian Stroetmann GmbH
    Disclaimer