Legal matter [State-Owned Enterprise (SOE)]
We have always differentiated between

in relation to the License Model (LM).

We have also introduced the regulation of the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), which demands the mandatory establishment of joint ventures between

to

• national sovereignty and security,
• cybernetical sovereignty and security, and
• monetary sovereignty and security,

but also

Correspondingly, the scope of activites of such joint ventures covers only sovereign tasks of a country with a federal or public (e.g. societal and military) characteristic, but not technologies, goods, and services with a private (e.g. personal and commercial) characteristic.

However, the problems with

but deepened and broadened, specifically by establishing and structuring start-ups around SOEs, both of which are now mimicking C.S. and our corporation even in the course of an overall industry and economy policy. Because we are not involved at all, state corruption, cronyism or clientilism, and conspiracy to our detriment and even exclusion from economic activity cannot to be denied out of hand.
In this relation, we always recall that stopping this fraudulent and even serious criminal activity of mimicking C.S. and our corporation is one of the reasons why we modified and opened the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S., specifically our OS, and allow and license the performance and reproduction of them to a more than sufficient extent, specfically certain parts of our OS at all.
We also demanded or just prohibited to not to politicize our AWs and further IPs.

Therefore, we are also considering to

• separation of partially SOEs in purely SOEs and purely privately owned companies, and
• establishment of mandatory joint ventures between the resulting purely SOE and our SOPR, Ontonics, and other business units of our corporation,

or alternatively

• federal and public entities and purely SOEs, and
• partially SOEs and privately owned entities

anymore, which means federal and public entities and purely SOEs would be classified in the same class as partially SOEs and industrial companies respectively non-ICT with ICT. Of course, this makes it more expensive for them.

But we also have reasons to not establish such joint ventures, because we would have to

for example.

Legal matter [Digital properties]
We noticed that more and more companies are generating raw signals and data, informations, knowledge, models, and algorithms, which can be utilitzed for new and existing services and monetized in other ways.
We also noticed a lot of start-ups in the space industry, specifically the satellite industry and the space launch services, as we have seen some few years ago with establishments of new businesses in the fields of logistics, mobility, transportation, and travel, specifically in relation to the field of autonomous automotive system, autonomous automobile, or self-driving car, and the so-called robotaxi.

The infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) also include the Superstructure of our Society for Superstructure Utilization and Management (SSUM), which makes out of the 2D virtual infrastructures of the outdated Internet and World Wide Web (WWW) a 4D real-cyber-physical-virtual infrastructure of our Ontoverse (Ov) respectively New Reality (NR) according to our Caliber/Calibre, and therefore these infrastructures also include space technologies, goods, and services, which are

To avoid any misconceptions we would like to recall some of the few regulations of the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) of our SOPR, which apply if raw signals and data, informations, knowledge, models, and algorithms are directly connected with our OS and used in our Ov.

To get the allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our OS a member, and artwork and technology licensing partner (licensee) of our SOPR has to

• collected with our HardBionic (HB) and SoftBionic (SB) system (e.g. Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Computer Vision (CV), Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM), Soft Computing (SC) and Computational Intelligence (CI), Autonomic Computing (AC), Natural Language Processing (NLP), Cognitive Computing (CogC), Cognitive Agent System (CAS), Cognitive-Affective Personality or Processing System (CAPS), Evolutionary Computing (EC), Swarm Intelligence (SI) or Swarm Computing (SC), etc.), and processed and used with our other Ontologic System Components (OSC), specifically the 2D and 3D
  • map data of roads and traffic data collected and transmitted (anonymously) from multiple vehicles moving around the world, and
  • Earth data collected and transmitted from Earth observation or Earth remote sensing satellites moving around the orbit,

  and

• collected by a State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) exclusively,

• are not a copy of one of the facilities, technologies (e.g. systems and platforms), goods, services of the exclusive infrastructrues of our SOPR, and
• are not common to all members and licensees,

specifically if the other entity is interested in becoming or being one of the main contractors, suppliers, and service providers of our SOPR.

Of course, our SOPR uses all these raw signals and data for the facilities, technologies, goods, and services of the exclusive infrastructures of our SOPR, specifically for our

• OntoMap, and
• OntoGlobe or OntoEarth,

• MapCloud MapSpace,
• AutoCloud AutoSpace,
• BikeCloud BikeSpace,
• PlaneCloud PlaneSpace,
• ShipCloud ShipSpace,
• AutoMapCloud AutoMapSpace,
• CarCloud CarSpace,
• RobotCloud RobotSpace,
• DroneCloud DroneSpace,
• etc.,

See also the

Just as self-evident, an entity is protected by the competition rules or antitrust law against any misuse of her, his, or their raw signals and data by our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies.

We also said in the past that our SOPR will make fair and reasonable monetary contributions in relation to raw signals and data, which comprise the

Legal matter [Media System]
A clause in the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) clearly says that the SOPR has the right to blacklist an entity, if it

Another clause in the AoA and the ToS of our SOPR demands that members, and artwork and technology licensing partners (licensees) do not provide any technology, good, and service to a blacklisted entity on the basis of the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S..

To make it crystal clear for the members and licensees of our SOPR we will conduct legal audits, specifically scrutinies of large media companies, by third parties, specifically prosecutors.
With a court judgment as the result of such an audit, there is no need for further discussion anymore in an individual case.

If at all, the uncontrolled press will get an allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our OS for the very basic work, that

But we might refuse to give an allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our OS for advertisement, entertainment, and other services, which are not in the scope of the constitutional rights.

If media and entertainment companies have an interest that their payed streaming services are hooked into the exclusive Media System (MS) of the exclusive infrastructures of our SORP and our other Societies, which we are for 100% sure the companies have, then they should find a way that

Needless to say, this does not only hold for media and entertainment companies, but also for their shareholders and service partners. If a news service and a streaming service belong both to one company structure, then we do not make a difference between them, specifically not if the holder of the company has an illegal advantage to our disadvantage by fraudulent reporting.

Legal matter [Ontoverse]
Certain parts of our Ontoverse respectively New Reality (NR) spacetime fabric are common to all members and licensees of our SOPR and therefore

To prevent that an entity makes again out of our unclosed Ontologic System (OS) its walled garden based on its illegal copy of our Ontoverse, we introduced some additional regulations.

A member and licensee of our SOPR is allowed to

• home universe of real-cyber-physical-virtual environments and worlds in the sense of a website or
• home world of a perceived real-cyber-physical-virtual universe of real-cyber-physical-virtual environments and worlds in the sense of a home page,

which is connected to the 6 rings and related ID spaces and universes of the management structure of our Ontoverse through our Trust Management System (TMS or TrustMS), IDentity and Access Management System (IDAMS), and Consent Management System (CMS or ConsMS) of the infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies, and

A member and licensee of our SOPR is not allowed to perform and reproduce the common

• eXtended Reality (XR) cloud eXtended Reality (XR) space fabric, including
  • Mixed Reality (MR) cloud Mixed Reality (MR) space fabric, including
    • Augmented Reality (AR) cloud Augmented Reality (AR) space fabric and
    • Augmented Virtuality (AV) cloud Augmented Virtuality (AV) space fabric,
  • Virtual Reality (VR) cloud Virtual Reality (VR) space fabric,
• Simulated Reality (SR or SimR) cloud Simulated Reality (SR or SimR) space fabric, and
• Synthetic Reality (SR or SynR) cloud Synthetic Reality (SR or SynR) space fabric,

• eXtended Reality (XR) mirror world, including
  • Mixed Reality (MR) mirror world, including
    • Augmented Reality (AR) mirror world and
    • Augmented Virtuality (AV) mirror world,
  • Virtual Reality (VR) mirror world,
• Simulated Reality (SR or SimR) mirror world, and
• Synthetic Reality (SR or SynR) mirror world

  respectively

• XR 4D globe, including
  • MR 3D globe, including
    • AR 3D globe,
• VR 3D globe,
• SR or SimR 3D globe, and
• SR or SynR 3D globe,

The societal compromise for unclosing our OS, and allowing and licensing the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our OS is for many very good reasons: All or nothing at all.
If an entity, including a sovereign territory (e.g. union of states, country, and state of union of states) wants to perform and reproduce our

which were all created with our Ontologic System (OS), including our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos), then said entity has to

The convergence and integration are our New Reality (NR) and Ontoverse anyway.

Raw signals and data, informations, knowledge, models, and algorithms are legally available through the Marketplace of Everything (MoE) of our SOPR anyway.

We would like to give companies the recommendation to focus on the

IDentity and Access Management System (IDAMS) [Biometrics]
To protect civil and political rights, specifically privacy and freedom of speech, which are a class of rights that protect the freedom of individuals from infringement by governments, social organizations, and private individuals, governments and agencies have to manage the utilization of biometric technologies, specifically facial recognition technology, and related goods and services.
In fact, legal regulations are missing for the

Luckily, our IDentity and Access Management System (IDAMS)

Media System (MS)
The Media System (MS) of the exclusive infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is taking shape.
With the MS our SOPR is redefining and expanding what

can be by launching our revolutionary channel computing service of the next generation, which

Our MS

The channeling and streaming platform will offer 8 to 12 hours of live programming a day, but will also have new original series and old archives from the other streaming services, which all will be hooked into the MS in accordance with the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) of our SOPR.

In addition, based on our original channel computing paradigm many other services will be integrated as well, including

This is the most important launch for entertainment, social and societal media, marketing, electronic commerce, and news since the inventions of the cable television, and the communication and collaboration platform.
Nothing like this exists. And this is only the beginning of the next revolution created with our OS.

We would like to give companies in the related fields the recommendation to focus on our

which are based on our channel computing paradigm and streaming (see also the section Ontoverse), specifically the

See also the section Legal matter [Media System (MS)].

Main Contract Model (MCM)
When we were beginning with writing this note, then we also thought about the complexity of this endeavour. But after summarizing a little we still cannot see any problem, because everything simply fits together.

At first, we would like to recall that the main contractors, suppliers, and service providers have to

• Ontologic Net (ON) architecture for our Space-Based or Interconnected supercomputer (Intersup) based on our integration of the fields of
  • Wide Area Network (WAN) SuperComputing (SC) (WANSC) and
  • Space-Based Architecture (SBA) for Scalable Infrastructure (SI) and Scalable Framework,

  which is the successor of the Internet and the Internet of Things (IoT) and also called the Next Generation Network (NGN),

• convergence of mobile communication standards, including our 5G Next Generation (5G NG), 6G, telecommunication cloud space, etc.,
• Ontologic Web (OW) architecture for Ontologic High Performance and High Productivity Computing System (OHP²CS), which is the successor of the World Wide Web (WWW),
• and so on,

because our SOPR is responsible for the management and orchestration, and also operation of the common elements of the infrastructures with their facilities, technologies (e.g. systems and platforms), goods (e.g. applications, hardware and other tangible goods, devices, vehicles), and services of our SOPR, which are based on the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S..

At this point, we have to give the information that our SOPR will add something more, which we do not want to discuss in public for various reasons. ;)

On top of these foundational parts for the management and orchestration, and also operation of the SOPR infrastructures come the various subsystems and platforms with their spaces and universes, and Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) of the different and basic societal, economical, and industrial sectors with their enterprise and business models and processes, such as the

which must also be general, neutral, independent, and compliant with the other requirements, so that the

Our SOPR is constantly thinking about the

• Content Delivery Network (CDN) fabric,
• Ontoverse respectively New Reality (NR) spacetime fabric (see also the section Ontoverse),
• multimedia and Ambient Intelligence (AmI),
• logistics,
• Hyper Connectivity System (HCS),
• autonomous automobile, and
• chip and processor.

and

The actual task is to find a harmony that reflects the individual interests in relation to the

Content Delivery Network (CDN) fabric
We had the impression that some companies have expressed their interest to take over the management and orchestration, and also operation of the common Content Delivery Network (CDN) fabric.
We are keeping this in mind when considering the main contracts, but also note that at least the interest and qualification of

respectively Space Service Providers (SSPs) and other Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services Providers (OAOSPs) have to be considered as well.

So far, we have only said in such a situation of broad interest that the responsibilities, tasks, and works will be

Ontoverse
We already have proposed a company as one of the main contractors, suppliers, and service providers, and one of the main interlocutors for the common combination of the

of the infrastructures with their subsystems and platforms of our SOPR.

But we have not made decisions concerning the

Multimedia and Ambient Intelligence (AmI)
In relation to one of our relatively new multimedia projects, which we think

we are looking for a company in the fields of Ambient Intelligence (AmI), which

Logistics
Logistics utilizes technologies, goods, and services of the fields of

• tracking and
• accountability.

If we say without hardware and tangible goods of the fields of AS and RS, then this means that the logistic subsystem and platform of the infrastructures of our SOPR are general, neutral, independent, and compliant with the other requirements with regard to the utilized AS and RS, including autonomous vehicles, such as autonomous automobiles and trucks, or self-driving cars on public roads.

Another point is the distribution subsystem and platform in relation to these logistic subsystem and platform, which are also general, neutral, independent, and compliant with the other requirements with regard to the service providers.

Hyper Connectivity System (HCS)
Potentially, we will exchange the positions of companies suggested as the main contractors and main interlocutors for our Hyper Connectivity System (HCS) to get a

Autonomous automobile
In general, autonomous automotive systems, autonomous automobiles, self-driving cars, and so-called robotaxis are a field, which is intended for the competition between manufacturers and service providers, that have to put their technologies, goods, and services on the exclusive infrastructures with their facilities, technologies, goods, and services, and subsystems and platforms of our SOPR and our other Societies.

Chip and processor.

Our understanding is that companies in the fields of microsystem and integrated circuit and processor are interested in several similar technologies and goods. We have enough to keep them apart and happy, if desired.

In this relation, we have already found

06.August.2021

Comment of the Day

Ispace™

09.August.2021

Ontonics Further steps

Since many years or even some few decades, we are thinking about the construction of infrastructure in poorer countries, which provides

to areas, that have none or only very few of them.

Our endeavour is also called Build Back Better World (B³W) by member states of the Group of Seven (G7) plus the rest of the EU.

Over the time, we developed a requirement specification, which is based on the observations of the

We continued the work and made some changes in relation to the real parts of the general architecture of the designed and planned infrastructure by

to increase the overall

of the

11.August.2021

Ontonics Further steps

We worked on the backup system of our Ontologic System (OS) with its Ontoverse, which provides additional safety and security.

We also made progress in relation to a very critical subsystem of our OS, which is already working and even maturing.

13.August.2021

00:00 UTC+2
SOPR #33z

*** Proof-reading mode - maybe ready ***
Topics
Over the last days, we made considerations and conclusions, that we have summarized under the following topics:

Legal matter
In the last months we got more evidences that governments together with their federal and public bodies, and State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), and also other companies are damaging the goals and even threatening the integrity of C.S. and our corporation, including our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies.
Specifically the government of the F.R.Germany together with several of its ministries, other federal and public authorities and institutes, and SOEs, and also privately-owned companies are not missing any opportunity for

Therefore, we cannot conclude otherwise than that they are rejecting (essential parts of) the societal compromise.
Due to this conclusion we also have to realize finally that the other member states of the European Union (EU), but also the U.K., Australia, and potentially other members states of the intergovernmental fora Group of Seven (G7) and Group of Twenty are doing so as well.

Therefore, member states of the EU or even the whole EU might become the next countries or union of states to fall under the new 26% + 74% ownership regulation (see also the section Legal matter [Ownership regulation]) or even the 51% + 49% ownership regulation.

We are even considering to withdraw our offer to

in the member states of the European Union (EU), the U.K., and other countries and union of states, because of said actions and rejection of (essential parts of) the societal compromise.

In this relation, we have to note as well that the big bluff is busted and the dependencies on our original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) of many entities became obvious, finally, and even increased.

Howsoever, every entity got its chance and we think it was worth the effort even if the undertaking failed virtually exactly as anticipated.

Legal matter [Ontoverse]
The original and unique expression of idea, publication, explanation, and definition of the true creator of the work of art titled Ontologic System, C.S., and our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) are legally binding, at least in the more civilized parts of this solar system.
In fact, some publications have already corrected their contents about the metaverse in accordance with our publications, explanations, definitions, clarifications, and investigations, which make clear that the original Metaverse of the novel titled "Snow Crash"

Furthermore, only our original and unique Ontoverse, which is also wrongly and illegally called metaverse and multiverse,

• HardBionics (HB) and SoftBionics (SB) (e.g. Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Computational Intelligence (CI), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Computer Vision (CV), Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM), Soft Computing (SC), Autonomic Computing (AC), Natural Language Processing (NLP), Cognitive Computing (CogC), Cognitive Agent System (CAS), Cognitive-Affective Personality or Processing System (CAPS), Evolutionary Computing (EC), Swarm Intelligence (SI) or Swarm Computing (SC), etc.) partially of us,
• Space-Based technologies (SBx),
• Service-Oriented technologies (SOx) and as a Service models (aaSx) partially of us,
• cloud computing Space Computing (SC) or Space Computing and Networking (SCN) partially of us, or correctly said Ontologic Computing (OC) or Ontologic Computing and Networking (OCN) of us,
• Resilient Distributed System (RDS) respectively Challenge-Tolerant and Trustworthy Distributed System (CTTDS) (e.g. survivable (fault-tolerant), dependable (reliable), and performant (Quality of Service (QoS)), validated and verified, validating and verifying, and validateable and verifiable technologies, capability-based operating system, smart contract transaction protocol, blockchain technique, Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) protocols, Byzantine-Resilient Replication (BRR) method, etc.) partially of us,
• Cyber-Physical System (CPS), including Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), and Industry 4.0 and 5.0 (Industry 4.0 and Ontoverse) of us, and
• and many other technologies, goods, and services of others and us,

and

Legal matter [Ownership regulation]
The rejection of (essential parts of) the societal compromise by governments, federal and public authorities and institutes, and State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), and also other companies and privately-owned companies is more far reaching and demands to view and handle the situation in more countries in a different way.

Therefore, our SOPR has drafted the new 26% + 74% ownership regulation, which is basically the same regulation like the 51% + 49% ownership regulation, also known as Chinese win-win policy, but is aimed at sovereign territories with a social market economy and partially State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), which could be described as a hybrid of capitalist economy and planned economy, and has the rate adjusted accordingly to this hybrid characteristic to 26% + 74% worldwide outside a home jurisdiction.

License Model (LM)
Our SOPR has introduced 5 licensee classes of its License Model (LM):

Class	BasicOAOS	MidOAOS	SuperOAOS	difference	Δ old vs. new LM
1	0.60	2.80	5.00	2.20	+0.00
2	2.95	5.85	8.75	2.90	+0.25
3	5.30	8.90	12.50	3.60	+0.50
4	7.65	11.95	16.25	4.30	+0.75
5	10.00	15.00	20.00	5.00	+1.00
Δ	2.35	3.05	3.75	0.70

Plus progression of up to 10% maximal

Our SOPR has introduced 1 licensee class of its License Model (LM) for HardWare (HW) and other tangible goods utilized in and based on our OS:

Class	BasicGood	MidGood	SuperGood	difference	Δ old vs. new LM
1	6.10	7.10	8.10	1.00	+0.10

Plus progression of up to 1% maximal

All values in %
All percent values With All Discounts Granted (WADG) if not said otherwise

The royalties for the performance and reproduction of Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) already increased (see the table above).
But due to our conclusion that governments are rejecting the societal compromise (see also the section Legal matter), we were forced to revise our License Model (LM) once again. Specifically in the cases of the F.R.Germany and other member states of the European Union (EU), and also other countries with governments, federal and public authorities and institutes, and State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), and also privately-owned companies, that are acting incomprehensibly and sometimes even irrationally, said royalties might increase further as a reaction on said actions and rejection to

for the ICT licensee class, the other licensee classes accordingly, and With All Discounts Granted (WADG).

As already discussed in the last past in relation to the same reasons, we are also considering to

Please keep in mind that our SOPR would still allow and license the performance and reproduction under Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) terms and conditions.

In this relation, we would also like to note that we have taken a ratio of 50:50 as the basis for evaluation of the contributed assets of licensees and our unclosed original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. when drafting the LM.
But in recent days, we concluded that this ratio is not correct anymore, but is moving to 40:60 or even 30:70, for sure in our favour, because the

Trust Management System (TMS)
In relation to the carefully thought-out creations and innovations presented with our Ontologic System (OS) and their implementations as technologies (e.g. systems and platforms), goods (e.g. applications and tools), and services, which

we would like to give the explanation once again that they

but rather

All foundational fields are basic properties and functionalities of our Ontologic System (OS) with its integrating Ontologic System Architecture (OSA), Ontologic System Components (OSC), and Ontoscope Components (OsC) by creation and design, and they are as revolutionary as or even more revolutionary than the smart contract transaction protocol, blockchain technique, Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) protocols, Byzantine-Resilient Replication (BRR) method, etc. integrated in our OS as well.

In this relation, we have to ask the question, if another company is qualified to execute something like a matching function for raw signals and data, informations, knowledge, models, and algorithms based on the field of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and other subfields of SB, and the related scrutiny of flagged digital properties at all.
And we also would like to give the answer that our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) with the Trust Management System (TMS) of the exclusive infrastructures of our SOPR or more correctly our Ontologic System (OS) is the digital property (handling) trustee, including trusted data intermediary, data fiduciary, and data notary in our OS with its Ontoverse and therefore shoud do it or even has to do it, but not a government or another entity, that have to comply with the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) of our SOPR to get the allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S..

Ontoverse [Enterprise]
Of course, the foundational part of our Ontoverse related to various different and basic societal, economical, and industrial sectors with their

correspondingly also called Enterprise metaverse multiverse Ontoverse of our original and unique Ontoverse, including our metaverse multiverse and also wrongly and illegally confused with the original Metaverse

See also the section Main Contract Model (MCM) [Ontoverse].

Main Contract Model (MCM) [Ontoverse]
The following list point is our suggestion for the allocation or distribution of responsibilities, tasks, and works, and the main contracting in relation to enterprise and business processes and models as part of the so-called Enterprise metaverse multiverse Ontoverse:

• SOPR (IBM and NN)
• NN

• Salesforce
• {~} SAP
• Oracle
• evenly distributed among OAOSPs

{~} means that the proposal is more doubtful than the others.

Obviously, companies suggested as main contractors, suppliers, and service providers have already much responsibilities, tasks, and works in relation to the

of the exclusive infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies, and the proposed allocation or distribution seems to be a better balance.

See also the

In this context, we would like to give the recommendation that entites, specifically main contractors, suppliers, and service providers of our SOPR, must take care to remain in-between the legal limits.
In more detail, the scope of a technology, good, and service should

We also would like to recall that companies have to

because this is required in order to be eligible as main contractor, supplier, and service provider.

We also would like to ask for showing more harmony and commitment without having to address the topic every time.

20.August.2021

00:10 UTC+2
SOPR #33a

*** Work in progress - reduction of redundancy; we are running in circles at least since January 2021 ***
Topics
The central theme of this issue is sovereignty in relation to the following topics:

Legal matter
In general, any legal agreement is limited to an individual sovereign territory or jurisdiction.
In particular, we only enter an out-of-court agreement on the basis of the regulations related to

and also

Furthermore, we would like to recall that we do not want anything from any sovereign territory (union of states, country, and state of union of states) in addition to the rights and properties granted by their jurisdictions, but all sovereign territories want everything from C.S. and our corporation, and have already stolen virtually everything presented and performed by us in ways, which have to be viewed as acts of threat and extortion respectively gunboat diplomacy and the law of the jungle, and are still refusing to grant C.S. even the basic rights and properties. We even do not think about the possibility anymore, that this would have an ending.

Honestly, we do not have the impression that the societal compromise is effective due to the very disharmonic if not to say quite hostile attitude of the other sides.
We do not know about which topic a deeper dialog should be conducted if there is not even a minimum of harmony, which is required for such an action. But governments and their cliques have never shown any willingness for that and the attempt to extinguish our existence (in the public mind) together with other governments, companies, and the lying press is also not very constructive in this regard.
In fact, neither gunboat diplomacy nor any other kind of power projection, and the jungle law are considered as diplomacy.
This is particularly eye-opening for so-called democracies.

Therefore, the protocol says that we have to take the usual way, which by the way is long overdue at least since the 1st of January 2014.

If they refuse all compromises eventually, then

The strategy of joining forces with other

does not avoid the dependency on us, because these companies and countries are just as dependent on us. On the contrary, such joint ventures and collaborations only deepen the serious criminal actions and conspiracies of all involved to our disadvantage.

Legal matter [Ownership regulation]

The general policy and the resulting general problem in relation to our Ontologic System (OS) and even to the whole oeuvre of C.S. and our whole corporation is now that we have the demands for

But we have no need to tolerate the last point.

Indeed, governments can do as well what the governments of other sovereign territories (unions of states, countries, and states of union of states) can do.
But we are very confident to get (most and much more than sufficient of) our claims confirmed at the courts in most jurisdictions.

But neither the countries and governments nor their economies and companies can resolve the dependence.

Correspondingly, just another measure is to start with individual licensing, and sanctioning or blacklisting countries in other countries reflecting sovereignty in general and the limit of national sovereignty in particular.
This is also common in relation to copyright and patent right, and licensing practice worldwide.
But we wanted to avoid the problems related to national diversification.

In general, the proposed 50:50 or 50% + 50% ownership regulation in case of partially SOEs is in itself an interesting variant.
But it is not convincing us, because it is not sufficient as dead pleadge, and our SOPR would lose its neutrality and trustworthiness if we would grant a single entity such a preference.

potentially

It is a little bit different to P.R.China.
Potentially, 51% + 49% or blacklisting also for the U.K..

Legal matter [Ontologic Financial System (OFinS)]
That the Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)==Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (FFSA) of the F.R.Germany or another regulatory body has given a crypto trading and custody license to a blacklisted company does not change the legal situation in relation to the rights and properties (e.g. copyright) of C.S. and our corporation, and the fact that our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) does not give performance and reproduction license to such a company. Therefore, those crypto trading and custody licenses issued by federal and public authorities or bodies are worthless.
We also wonder why the BaFin acted against another illegal crypto exchange and even gave this license, while the regulatory body of the U.K. prohibited the trading of that other crypto exchange.

Furthermore, we do not know why the BaFin is allowed to give a crypto custody license at all. Is not this the exclusive right of our SOPR?
We also said that our SOPR is the only trustee in relation to digital property sharing respectively our Trust Management System (TMS or TrustMS) and that our Ontologic System (OS) even does it by design without an explicit entity, though a transaction is the process between two different depositories of one or more custodies.

It is quite interesting to see that once again a federal authority of the F.R.Germany is supporting fraudulent activities, specifically to our disadvantage.
The same holds for its partially State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs). We do know many of their investments in unwanted and fraudulent entities.

License Model (LM) [Individual LM]
We begin with the discussed and announced individual licensing practice in relation to sovereign territories, including

Foundational ideas

• its HeadQuarters (HQ) or Head Office (HO) is located,
• full responsibility for managing all activities is taken, and
• most or even all of its important functions are coordinated.

The latter addresses a political and economical union of member states, where the home jurisdiction is not equal to the location of the HQ or HO (e.g. European Union).

• its HeadQuarters (HQ) or Head Office (HO) is located,
• full responsibility for managing all activities is taken, and
• most or even all of its important functions are coordinated.

• its HeadQuarters (HQ) or Head Office (HO) is located,
• full responsibility for managing all activities is taken, and
• most or even all of its important functions are coordinated.

either as a

• contractor, supplier, and service provider, or
• artwork and technology licensing partner (licensee)

of our SOPR, Ontonics, and other business units of our corporation.

But this is only one more measure.
The ownership regulation is another measure to handle the general problem.
But we have to say that we had neither the intention to buy 50% of the Germany Inc. or the rest of the world, nor to become the shareholder neither in case of pure SOEs nor in case of other companies.

Howsoever, we are not sure if these measures solve all problems, though at least they will be confined and contained.
All other regulations of the AoA and the ToS with the LM of our SOPR, specifically the regulations concerning the

seem to be untouched of this revision or need only minor revision as well.

Especially interesting are the cases of partial SOEs, that are located in member states of a first sovereign territory, and also have one or more subsidiaries in a second sovereign territory, though all what we do is absolutely legal, and executed under Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) terms and conditions.

License Model (LM) [Revision]
Unfortunately, we had to revise our License Model (LM) once again due to mimicking C.S. and our corporation, politicizing our OS and SOPR, gambling, etc.. (see the section License Model (LM) of the issue SOPR #33z of the 11th of August 2021.

Our SOPR has introduced 5 licensee classes of its License Model (LM) and handles partially State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) like normal companies and not as a joint venture partner of mandatory joint ventures. Potentially, we have not said the latter precisely, though in the context it was always crystal clear.

When we looked at the rates of royalties in relation to the increase of royalties for federal and public entities and purely SOEs as the regulative measure for said unwanted activities, then we got the idea to move the public and federal authorities and institutes, and purely SOEs with ICT of the licensee class 3 to the licencess class 4. (* new licensee classes):

Eventually, the royalties do not increase by 5%, but only by 2.10% to 3.50%, though in case of a country we always have a SuperOAOS, obviously.

Ontologic Financial System (OFinS) [Digital money supply]
We already do have the

• Ontologic Bank (OntoBank)
  • Ontologic Payment System (OPS or OntoPay), (see the related section below),
  • Ontologic Payment Processing System (OPPS),
  • Ontologic Exchange (OEx, OntoEx, or OntoExchange), and
  • Ontologic Bank Financial Information and Communications (OBFIC or OntoBankFinIC),

and

as part of the exclusive infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies (see also the issue #32x or #33y of the 14th of July 2021).

All those illegal cryptocurrencies, blockchains, and platforms will not become the standard in the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse, including our metaverse multiverse and also wrongly and illegally confused with the original Metaverse.

In fact, illegal financial things based on digital tokens, which have been declared as ordinary moneys, securities, and commodities, are nothing else than unregulated digital and virtual counterfeits of them, including counterfeit moneys, counterfeit securities, and counterfeit commodities.

If governments still refuse to act against illegal and inofficial digital and virtual currencies and related platforms, and instead tolerate the damages to the societies and us, then we have no reason anymore to not make our

the only currencies in our Ontoverse.
In this case, said governments would have to use our Ontologic Exchange all the time.

Ontologic Bank [Ontologic Payment System (OPS)]
Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) will cut off a company from all Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) (e.g. applications will be removed from Software as a Service (SaaS) platforms (e.g. app stores) and Cloud Space Service Providers (SSPs)), if it accepts an illegal digital and virtual currency (e.g. cryptocurrency) for selling its goods and providing its services.
In addition, the payment transaction with prohibitied digital and virtual currencies will not work on the

It has been very well explained and discussed that all those illegal crypto technologies, goods, and services are not allowed and get no license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our original and unique, copyrighted, and prohibited for fair use work of art titled Ontologic System, created by C.S., and exclusively managed and exploited by our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) with the consent and on the behalf of C.S..

In fact, all those so-called crypto innovations

Therefore, the situation is totally different to the situation of other companies, which contribute own Intellectual Properties (IPs) and other assets.
Investing in such illegal technologies, goods, and services is just only a waste of time and money.

If admission of guilt and 100% of shares as damage compensation, then out-of-court agreement, including declaration of confidentiality as long as all other legal matters remain effective and intact.

28.August.2021

Ontonics Further steps

We were able to make progress on one of our projects by utilizing a new technology, analyzing the foundational working principle of this new technology, and developing an own advanced technology.

31.August.2021

15:47 UTC+2
SOPR #33b

*** Work in progress - some better wording ***
Topics
This issue is once again a summary mostly about regulatory matters:

Legal matter
In general, freedom of contract applies. :)

In general, getting a license from a federal and public authority or body is not sufficient in the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse, also known as the OntoLand, if the license is related to the allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our Ontologic System.

We also would like to recall once again that

Legal matter [Ownership regulation]
First of all, we remembered that the ownership regulation is meant to be a measure for reacting on any interference and prohibition of a sovereign territory. If such a prohibition is not in place, then no reason exists for its execution.

But state corruption and cliquishness, and the related exclusion are also some kind of interference and prohibition, specifically if State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) are taking part and misused as legal loopholes to gain the power of control over the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation.

"A sovereign wealth fund (SWF) is a fund owned by a state (or a political subdivision of a federal state) composed of financial assets such as stocks, bonds, property, or other financial instruments."
In this context, Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) are another problem, because the

We also concluded that the 50% + 50% ownership regulation is not sufficient as dead pledge.

Another variant is the 51+% + 49-% ownership regulation

But in general, it is an uncomfortable measure and requires additional administrative work, though it would only require some more columns in the related databases.

Legal matter or Infrastructure
After reviewing once again the still quite shocking and even more disappointing espionage activities conducted around the years 1996 to 2006 and resulting damages of certain entities we are still thinking about further reasonable and adequate measures to restore the rights, properties, reputations, and momenta of C.S. and our corporation, such as making the

exclusive respectively give no allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of related parts of our OS, including our Evoos, and potentially only award main contracts related to them.

Due to the huge damages caused by the Cyber-Physical System (CPS) fraud, including the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and Industry 4.0 frauds, and other not so nice actions, specifically those that show a certain

our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) has decided to make

another one of the Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) of the exclusive infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies.

Please remember that from the start of our SOPR in 2017 we said explicitly that not all items discussed on the webpage Terms of the 21st Century are licensable. Obviously, Quantum Computation is listed on this webpage and was always one of the items we were not sure whether it should be licensable or not. But that changed in the last months.
We also cannot see any collision with or violation of the grandfathering clause or any other legal requirement.

Howsoever, QCaaSx a

of the infrastructures of our SOPR is up for tender for the main contractors, suppliers, and service providers.

Legal matter [Satellite constellations]
We anticipated it, we observerd it, and we recognized it directly even if entities tried to camouflage their true intention by talking about satellite-based broadband Internet access and material sciences, though the cat is already out of the bag since the year 2020 and called the European space infrastructure in case of the member states of the European Union (EU).
Needless to say, the members of a related feasibility consortium established by the European Commission (EC) of the EU include the usual federal and public authorities and institutes, and State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), but not our corporation, including our related Societies. Even more disappointing is the claim of one of the partially SOEs that there would be no vision, leadership, and governance despite of knowing very well the works and activities of C.S. and our corporation, which has to be viewed at least as disrespect of our rights and properties, and C.S. and our corporation themselves, but also as rejection of our competences and the collaboration with us.

Therefore, we would like to recall once again that the

exclusively by our

with the consent and on the behalf of C.S..

Furthermore, the rules of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies are crystal clear, specifically in relation to the exclusive infrastructures of our SOPR, including the common backbone, core network, or fabric with overall network slicing respectively Space Radio Access Network (Space RAN) of our Ontoverse, and Superstructure, with their set of fundamental

See the

Main Contract Model (MCM)
We would like to recall once again that a company has to give up its support for illegal digital and virtual cryptocurrencies and crypto platforms to become eligible as main contractor, supplier, and service provider of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR).

IDentity and Access Management System (IDAMS)
The features and functionalities of the

of the infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) can also be used for all kinds of things and not only for persons.
A Vehicle registration certificate is obsolete. Just add a cryptographically secured memory chip into a vehicle, which can be

• manufacturer,

• vehicle owner and
• vehicle authority or department,

• vehicle authority or department,

and

• law enforcement agency and
• other authorized federal and public authorities or bodies.

Cybersecurity and cybersafety
Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) estimates that the annual financing for cybersecurity and cybersafety for at least 5 years will be around 40% of the collected royalties, which corresponds to

The