we got all parts together and the overall design has even improved and matured.

15:55 UTC+1
Investigations::Mutlimedia

Cable News Network and Wired
The television channel and news broadcaster Cable News Network and the magazin Wired together refuse democracy once again.
We quote an interview about the uncontrolled media and our Metaverse Ontoverse (Ov): ""Every time the industry goes after a new name for something and tries to pivot, something new inevitably comes out of it. It's just not clear yet what it will be," [reporter 2] said. "I think one has to be really critical of this tendency and call out what is just marketing and hype, which is a large part of it, whilst remaining open-minded to the fact that something new does emerge."
[...] featuring actor [...] on the cover, [who portrayed incarnations of Morpheus and Agent Smith in The Matrix Resurrections,] focuses on the future of reality.
[Reporter 2] spoke with [Creatures of the News Network (]CNN[) ...] about how tech journalism's evolution, diversity in media and his predictions of next year's biggest tech stories.
[...]
[Reporter 1 asking:] I recently read a tweet from [...] an analyst [...], who wrote, "[T]he media cycle shift toward crypto, web3, metaverse etc. increasingly feels like tech has architected a successful pivot to redirect attention on to the next thing, rather than dealing with what they've already built and broken." Do you agree with that sentiment?
[Reporter 2 answering:] When people are talking about the metaverse, they're appropriating a term from this novel ["Snow Crash"] that imagines the metaverse as a certain kind of thing [(immersive 3D Virtual World (VW) or Immersive Virtual Environment (IVE or ImVE) respectively Virtual Reality Environment (VRE))] and they're trying to bring the idealism or that idea to a very different and very disparate set of experiences. Web3 similarly feels like an attempt to put a new, easy to understand catchy label on a bunch of stuff that is happening. And that was true Web2 as well, and yet, in hindsight, you can say that having that label helped coalesce or crystallize some shifts that were happening on the web and on the internet in industry in general. That did mark a real trend, mark some changes.
[...]
[Reporter 1 asking:] What do you see as the biggest tech stories of 2022? How would you say that the media industry [...] should be covering these stories?
[Reporter 2 answering:] I think the crypto and NFT boom is going to continue to be a big one, and the way I want us to cover that is to try to, again, nuance. Sort the wheat from the chaff, sort the reality from the hype, but at least try to forge a path between these really polar opposites of discourse about the industry, which it's either it's all a scam or it's going to completely change the world. There's something in there that I don't know what it is yet that is going to emerge. I've not yet seen a long-term application of crypto that really convinces me that is transformative. But that doesn't mean that's not there, and I want us to keep looking for it.
I think that the metaverse conversation will continue and at this point it feels to me it's almost like a terminological land grab. In other words, people are fighting for the definition of what the metaverse is. I don't think we're going to get the answer to that, at least not in the next year. But I think we should continue to cover the companies that are claiming to be building the metaverse and asking the serious questions about what are you actually building and how is it different? And continue to ask the same questions we were asking before which is how is it going to be safe for people? Who's benefiting from it?
[...]
[Image caption:] [... shows a protagonist of the fourth sequel of the The Matrix movie saga, The Matrix Resurrections] [The Future Of Reality]"

Comment
The uncontrolled press does not need to play down our achievements, because they all are documented in an undeniable and court-proof way.

In fact, that misleading report with that wired interview is also full of terms taken from the website of our Ontologic System (OS) OntoLinux, like evolution, diversity, emergence, prediction, Web3, Metaverse, and so on.

And indeed, metaverse and also crypto, NFT, and web3 are terminological land grabs, but not the next thing at all, because the definitions of what our revolutionary Caliber/Calibre, New Reality (NR), and Metaverse Ontoverse (Ov) respectively future of reality truly are have been given since the end of October 2006 on our websites. The fact is that governments and industries all do know since more than a decade already that this something new, which has emerged as a result of the creative process of C.S. and is being building by us, is our Metaverse Ontoverse (Ov), including our real-time metaverse, metaverse multiverse, and what is wrongly called crypto, Web3©™, Web 3.0™, and so on.
See also the related

and the related sections of the issues

for the legal regulations.

Obviously, all answers have been given multiple times, the tide has turned for everybody, and there will be no rip-off 3.0, but only tripple damage compensations and royalties.

05.January.2022

20:20, 21:26, 22:17, 22:42, and 34:19 UTC+1
Clarification

We quote a video which recorded the staged stage presentation of the company Hyundai and its subsidiary Boston Dynamics and their following panel discussion at a large consumer electronics show on the 5th of January 2022, which was attended by a manager of the company Microsoft, who said the following: Today, we're going to explore the very leading edge of technology: robotics.
[Moderator:] It's natural for us as a smart mobility provider to think about robotics.
[...]
[Hyundai Chief:] Robotics will create a horizontal connection across all of our business areas.
[...]
Currently, the metaverse is seen as a gaming platform. But can they think the possibility of the metaverse in infinite.
[Projection:] Metaverse as the third living space
Our mobility solutions will be expanded into what we call metamobility.
[Projection:] Metamobility
Our robotics exist to expand human rights on companion robots that collaborate with humans.
[Projection:] Expanding Human Reach
[...]
[Boston Dynamics Chief:] [...] we're going to launching Stretch which is a logistics robot for the warehouse.
[Projection:] Advancing mobility with robots
We're working on the concept of companions that is Hyundai and Boston Dynamics both envision the future in which people and machines work together in order to improve safety of people, improve productivity, and broadly improve the quality of life
[Projection:] Robots as companions for humans
[...] exoskeletons [...]
[Scientiest 1:] [...] plug in drive module [...]
We can add mobility to anything just by attaching png module. It's adaptive, expandable, and matches human need that makes configuring spaces on demand possible. This includes living spaces, workplaces, and even retail areas
[Moderator:] So now a room can essentially become one-size-fits-all solution. So it may even change the way that we think about our architectural layouts. The idea would be moving an entire hospital to a disaster location.
[...]
[Scientiest 2:] Cars will evolve from mobility devices to smart devices.
[Projection:] Robotics and the metaverse
Robots are ready and waiting for us to connect to them through the metaverse. In the future, the metaverse with the advancements of sensors, actuators, artificial intelligence, software, and hardware we'll be able to control and guide our companion robots as if we were actually there and that's what it means to use robots as physical avatars.
[Projection:] Robots as physical avatars
Let's say I'm at a future CES in Las Vegas. With my physical avatar companion robot in Korea I can hug and feed my dog and I can feel all the joy of being right next to my dog back home in South Korea
[Projection:] Robots as physical avatars [] Me in the physical world [] Las Vegas ↔ Physical avatar in the physical world [] Seoul ↔ Me in the metaverse [] My home's digital twin
It all comes together to the concept called metamobility. By connecting robots to the metaverse we'll be able to move freely between both worlds.
The smart factory is actually a great example of how humans, robots, and the metaverse all come together.
[Microsoft Scientiest 3:] We're not just going to look at a camera view of a factory floor for example, we're actually going to sit there and be part on the floor working with the workers and robots and machines and as these digital worlds and physical worlds merge we are creating this entirely new platform layer, which we call the metaverse.
[Projection:] Factory - Azure IoT - Digital twin
We as Microsoft are building this platform. Based upon the Microsoft Cloud we're building together or bringing together Azure IoT, Azure Digital Twins, various Dynamics capabilities, like connected spaces, and last but not least Microsoft Mesh, which we've just announced last October at Ignite.
[Projection:] Me in the physical world [] Office ↔ Physical avatar in the physical world [] Factory ↔ Me in the metaverse [] Digital twin factory
[Boston Dynamics Chief:] We've been using Spot to build digital twins by mounting scanner sensors on its back and it can go around our customers sites and very reliably capture the data you need to build a very realistic digital.
The other thing, that we've done to get started on the vision you've described, is used immersive systems, where an operator is immersed in a space not only with their eyes, but also with their hand and at the other end there's a robot that's doing precise manipulation, because you have this very direct connection even thought there's a network in between between the two.
It's a great way to begin dreaming about the future together."

We also quote a report about our Ontoverse (Ov): "1. Welcome to the metaverse.
[...]
For another, many of us were willing to splurge on our digital selves. Hordes of investors bought NFTs, or nonfungible tokens, which are one-of-a-kind digital objects purchased with cryptocurrency. [...]
[...]
Google has also developed virtual reality products for years, and Microsoft has offered a virtual reality headset [hyperlink to Hololens] for businesses and government agencies. [But the hyperlink to Hololens is Augmented Reality (AR) wrongly marketed as Mixed Reality (MR).]
"

Comment
We as the true creator hold the worldwide copyright for our original and unique expressions of ideas respectively works of art, which means we have the exclusive right to name and define our properties, and also demand their use.

Firstly, it is called Ontoverse (Ov) and Interverse©™, but not metaverse, omniverse, or whatsoeverse© (see also the Feature-List Ontoverse and the Clarification of 25th of December 2021).

Secondly, our Metaverse Ontoverse (Ov) is neither a new platform nor a new platform layer, but the manifestation of our New Reality (NR) or the New Reality Environment (NRE) of our Ontologic System (OS).

Thirdly, the original Metaverse of the novel titled "Snow Crash" is only an immersive 3D Virtual World (VW) or Immersive Virtual Environment (IVE) respectively Virtual Reality Environment (VRE).

• is not based on Mixed Reality (MR) and our eXtended Mixed Reality (XMR) or simply eXtended Reality (XR) with new limits, and
• it is not connected with what is wrongly called crypto and Web3.

Fourthly, in case of a human and other living beings it is called surrogate and not physical avatar in our Ontologic System (OS) with its Ontoverse (Ov), though the differentiation between a real and physical avatar and a virtual and metaphysical avatar might be useful.

Fifthly, a Non-Fungible Token (NFT) is not connected with digital and virtual currencies, including cryptocurrencies, in general.
In particular, it has to be purchased and traded like any other item by using real fiat money or official digital and virtual money.

Sixthly, smart device × metaverse platform is not called metamobility, but something like cybernetics, and because we are talking about our Ontologic System (OS) and our Ontoscope (Os) it is called something like Ontonics, and Ontologics, as well as Ontoverse (Ov).

The correct terms for the mobility of items in this context is (user centric) migration or teleportation of applications and data, which represent processes and services, but also cybernetic self-portraits or digital twins of a user.
See for example the Feature-list #1 "User centric migration of applications and data from one computing machine to another, even from a personal computer to a cell phone, or an automotive media center" and Feature-list #2 "Personal World Wide Web-based infrastructure, network, and virtual drive, that supports the user centric migration 'Max-Mig', synchronization 'Max-Sync' of applications and data, and communication 'Max-Com'", which are circumscriptions of what was called cloud computing at that time, because that cloud concept did not lift up and was also declared a failed attempt for another time, exactly like the fields of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), and so on, Internet of Things, smart home, autonomous vehicle (self-driving car), etc., etc., etc..
Please note that our Ontoscope (Os) is also described as a cognitive robot (head), including an immobile robot (immobot) respectively a combination or integration of mobile phone and robot, which are "inward-focused, self-reconfiguring machines", and "machines injected with robotic self-awareness are reliable problem solvers", which again "have a commonsense model of the physics of their internal components and can reason from that model to determine what is wrong and to know how to act", [1st of December 2002], and based on our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) described in The Proposal, as well as a cyborg head, including a hardware-based cybernetic self-portrait of a user, and the Feature-Lists are merely explicit explanations or enumerations of exemplary prominent features of our Ontologic System (OS), which our OS has by creation and design, and therefore the relevant publication dates begin with the start of our OS variants OntoLix and OntoLinux on the 29th of October 2006 and not with the publication dates of the individual feature-lists.

But that is not all. Hyundai and Microsoft merely presented matter, that it found on and copied from our websites, such as our

• national and international laws, regulations, and acts, as well as agreements and conventions, and
• regulations of the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) of our SOPR.

This worldwide legal regulations do not address only entities from the P.R.China, but also entities from India, South Korea, Singapore, Japan, and other Asian areas.

By the way:

07.January.2022

Comment of the Day

Ontom™
Ontoo™
Oobject™
Ontoself™
Otwin™
Cyber self™
Cyber selfie™
Cyfie™

08.January.2022

11:19 UTC+1
Website revision

The document about immobot also mentions: "[... T]he information-gathering capabilities of the Internet, corporate intranets, and smaller networked computational systems supply additional test beds for autonomous agents of a different sort. These test beds, which we call immobile robots (or immobots), have the richness that comes from interacting with physical environments yet promise the ready availability associated with the networked software environment of softbots."
"We are only now becoming aware of the rapid construction of a ubiquitous, immobile robot infrastructure that rivals the construction of the World Wide Web and has the potential for profound social, economic, and environmental change."
Somehow, these statements are only about the test beds, the difference between the fields of softbot and immobot, and the construction of such an infrastructure for the fields of Ubiquitous Computing (UbiC) and Internet of Things (IoT), but they are not Teaching, Suggesting, and Motivating (TSM) another Internet or World Wide Web (WWW) of the next generation in the sense of the Web 2.0 and our Web 3.0 based on the immobot and the integration of both fields, the

We quote an online encyclopedia about the subject Semantic Web: "The Semantic Web (sometimes known as Web 3.0) is an extension of the World Wide Web through standards [...]. The goal of the Semantic Web is to make Internet data machine-readable.
[...]
[A fraudulent dreamer] originally expressed his vision of the Semantic Web in 1999 as follows: "I have a dream for the Web [in which computers] become capable of analyzing all the data on the Web - the content, links, and transactions between people and computers. A "Semantic Web", which makes this possible, has yet to emerge, but when it does, the day-to-day mechanisms of trade, bureaucracy and our daily lives will be handled by machines talking to machines. The "intelligent agents" people have touted for ages will finally materialize."
[...] In 2006, [that fraudulent dreamer] and colleagues stated that: "This simple idea ... remains largely unrealized". [...]
[...]

Background
The concept of the semantic network model was formed in the early 1960s by researchers such as the cognitive scientist [...] as a form to represent semantically structured knowledge. When applied in the context of the modern internet, it extends the network of hyperlinked human-readable web pages by inserting machine-readable metadata about pages and how they are related to each other. This enables automated agents to access the Web more intelligently and perform more tasks on behalf of users. [... that fraudulent dreamer] is "a web of data that can be processed directly and indirectly by machines"."

We quote the slides 4, 13, and 16 of the presentation titled "Semantic Web on XML", which was publicated by that fraudulent dreamer on the 6th of December 2000: "Philosophy - "Semantic"

• not natural language, human inference

Killer App for the SWeb
Too general to be aimed at any specific application

[...]

We quote the slides 7 and 8 of a presentation titled "Representing Knowledge in the Semantic Web", which was publicated around the 27th to 29th of June 2005: "The Semantic Web stack
Semantic Web is ...

What are Metadata?

We quote a report, which is about the SWWW and that variant of the Web 3.0, which again is not our Web 3.0, and was publicated on the 23rd of May 2006: "Just when the ideas behind "Web 2.0" are starting to enter into the mainstream, the mass of brains behind the World Wide Web is introducing pieces of what may end up being called Web 3.0.
[...]
In this version of the Web, sites, links, media and databases are "smarter" and able to automatically convey more meaning than those of today.
For example, [that fraudulent dreamer] said, a Web site that announces a conference would also contain programming with a lot of related information embedded within it.
A user could click on a link and immediately transfer the time and date of the conference to his or her electronic calendar. The location - address, latitude, longitude, perhaps even altitude - could be sent to his or her GPS device, and the names and biographies of others invited could be sent to an instant messenger list.
In other words, the "mark-up" language behind each Web page would be cross-referenced into countless other databases, once developers agreed on a common set of definitions.
[...]
For instance, some early experiments in highlighting new relationships from existing Web data have come out of [...] a photo-sharing site that members categorize themselves, and FOAF, which stands for "friend of a friend," a research project to describe the various links between people.
Both add "meaning" where such context did not exist before, just by changing the underlying programming to reflect links between databases, [someone] said.
[...]
[...] aims to use semantic programming to manage personal information online [...] focuses on message-driven trading communities.
[...]
[...] the Web of data, which will be the result of the semantic programming languages.
"People keep asking what Web 3.0 is," [that fraudulent dreamer] said. "I think maybe when you've got an overlay of scalable vector graphics - everything rippling and folding and looking misty - on Web 2.0 and access to a semantic Web integrated across a huge space of data, you'll have access to an unbelievable data resource.""

We also quote a document, which is about the SWWW, security challenges in implementing SWWW-unifying logic, and that variant of the Web 3.0, which again is not our variant of the Web 3.0, and also our variant of the Web 3.0, and was publicated in December 2014: "The Web 3.0, is likely to be a pre-cursor of the real semantic web, is going to make our computers more intelligent by making them capable of processing web data by themselves. [...]
There are actually several major technology trends that are about to reach a new level of maturity at the same time. The simultaneous maturity of these trends is mutually reinforcing, and collectively they will drive the third-generation Web. From this broader perspective, Web 3.0 might be defined as a third-generation of the Web enabled by the convergence of several key emerging technology trends:

Web 3.0 will be more connected, open, and intelligent, with semantic Web technologies, distributed databases, natural language processing, machine learning, machine reasoning, and autonomous agents."

Comment
First of all, we note that by the original definitons of the Semantic (World Wide) Web (SWWW) and its so-called Semantic Web stack, the descriptions in other publications, and the given examples the SWWW is about machine-readable data for the use with the field of software robot (software bot or softbot) only, but not with the fields of Mobile Robotic System (MRS), Autonomous Robotic System (ARS), and Model-Based Autonomous System (MBAS) or Immobile Robotic System (ImRS or Immobot), and also Intelligent Agent System (IAS), and Cognitive Agent System (CAS).
Please do not be confused about designations like cognitive agent and cognitive robot, and note that the

The true reason why the SWWW is still not realized is that they have espionaged and cheated one of the true inventors and the leading figure in this field all the time, who is C.S., so that we were blocked by everybody to realize our SWWW.
Therefore, we moved on with our Evoos and ontology to our OS and Ov presented in 2006 when they still tried to steal our SWWW and our Service-Oriented technologies (SOx) respectively what is wrongly called Grid, Cloud, Edge, and Fog Computing (GCEDC).

And if we remember correctly, then we added some parts to the SWWW with our Evoos and our OS. For example,

And if we remember correctly, then we added some parts to the so-called Semantic Web Stack with our OS. For example,

• one prior art is about combining ontology and rule languages and compares a first-order function-free language with signature A, and a DL knowledge base with signature subset of A as part of the research for a unified logical framework and was publicated on the 6th of September 2004, but it is only in relation to any DL based system, and
• one proposal for a SW unifying logic was publicated in 2013, and seems to be based on stable models and well-founded semantics, which is our OntoBot,

Since some years, the same fraudsters are trying to steal the parts of our OS, which are wrongly called

and since at least 2014 even our whole OS and Ov by explaining that the part of our Web 3.0 called Ontologic Web (OW) is their real semantic web, which merely has the Semantic Web as a feature (see once again the last quoted document).

As usual for our ontonic and ontologic approach, we integrated all the webs and their variants Web 1.0, Web 2.0, Web 2.5, and Web 3.0. For example, Evoos added ontology and hence the Semantic (World Wide) Web (SWWW) to the robotic Web and even the cognitive web.

We made crystal clear once again the scope of this part of our Web 3.0 and Ontoverse (Ov), which also shows that CPS 3.0 is us and we are already beyond all these other web variants with our Web 3.0, Web 4.0, Web 5.0, and Ov.

12.January.2022

Comment of the Day

Onton™

06:22 and 10:37 UTC+1
And the winner is: Onton

We already listed an OntoObject in our unpublicated notes about our Onto# of the year 2006 and named it an Ontom in relation to an atom and somehow also in relation to an overall ontological object (ontoobject, oobject, ontoo, or oo) on the 7th of January 2022. But then we remembered that due to the

we already have an Ontologic holon™ (Ontological holon™ or Ontoholon™) and eventually the Onton™.

Accordingly, the correct term for what is called twin model, digital twin, or digital twin model in relation to the fields of

is also Onton™.
And because we already hold the trademark for Ontonics™ and the domain Ontonics.com, there is also no legal disput about Onton™. Is not it? :)

Please note, that the most relevant property of an Onton, also wrongly called a digital twin model, is that CPS, IIoT, Industry 5.0, and so on are in our fusion of the real and virtual realities and their (information) spaces, environments, worlds, and universes respectively in our New Reality (NR). Therefore, an digital twin model Onton must not be passive, active, interactive, intelligent, cognitive, embodied, and so on.
An Onton is conceptually initiated by the Zero Ontology or Null Ontology O# and the rest comes with the basic properties of (mostly) being reflective/fractal/holonic and relationships with other Ontons. Philosophers, logicians, mathematicians, informaticians, and computer scientists know directly what we mean.

13.January.2022

Clarification

We explained multiple times in more or less detail that our Ontologic System (OS) includes our Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) and integrates the functionalities of the

with our

• Ontologic roBot (OntoBot) and
• Ontologic File System (OntoFS),

and

• Grid Computing (GC), and
• Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2PC),

and their utilization for

• Volunteer Computing VC),
• Collaborative Computing (CC), and
• Swarm Computing (SC),

  including the software of the VC efforts

  • Distributed.net, and
  • Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC),

    and their utilization for

    • primality testing (BOINC Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search (GIMPS) and PrimeGrid) and
    • integer factorization (Distributed.net Data Encryption Standard (DES) and RC5 symmetric-key block cipher contests, and BOINC WEP-M+2 Project (Mersenneplustwo numbers) (2006))

(see the sections Grid Systems - Volunteer Computing and P2P Integrated Systems and Applications of the webpage Grid Computing Info Centre (GRID Infoware)), which is the foundation for computing single blocks of the blockchain respectively mining single coins of that illegal cryptocurrency Bitcoin.
Nix Nick Szabo, nix Satoshi Nakamotoa, nix Craig Wright, nix Blockhead, Beavies, and Butthead. Just only C.S..

Style of Speed Further steps

We heard about the problems in relation to the building of the Global Dream ocean liner by the MV Werften and asked if it is for sale.

Our offer:

14.January.2022

King Smiley Further steps

We heard about the New Mannahatta project in New York City, New York, U.S.America, and asked if it is for sale.

Let us calculate: 1776 acre × 43,560 square foot × 1,500 U.S. Dollar = 116,043,840,000 U.S. Dollar
This is a no-brainer.

Our offer:

• all 1776 acres without Governors Island (172 acres),
• docks for at least the SS US and the CS 1 (see also the Style of Speed Further steps of the 15th of March 2020 and 22nd of March 2021),
• 1K or better 1,776 meter tower (see the King Smiley Further steps of the 2nd of January 2020) ideally between The Battery and Governors Island or alternatively south of Governors Island, and
• all other infrastructures, buildings, and landscapes.

For the architecture of the tower we already imagined a similar one as shown in the images below and made some first design sketches 2 years ago for a bigger, brighter, and better tower.

© :(

But the shown architecture of the surrounding landscape would also provide sufficient area for our

• community and
• Societies and their members,

and

The water channel network would not be connected with the Hudson River and the East River estuary directly, so that we would always have crystal clear and blue water and also a large swimming pool with gondolas.

We also thought about the construction of a flood barrier, like for example the MOdulo Sperimentale Elettromeccanico (MOSE)==Experimental Electromechanical Module in the Laguna di Venezia or Laguna veneta==Lagoon of Venezia, Italy, named to allude to the biblic Moses. But there seem to be better locations.

15.January.2022

Clarification

In the last months we

is not sufficient to circumvent the rights of C.S. and our corporation, specifically for other companies, because there are more legal regulations in addition to the copyright, that prohibit certain business strategies and actions in this regard.

For all unknowing, unteachable, or unconscious entities, specifically in government, science, media, and industry, we would like to recall some basic principles about

©© BY-SA 4.0 Predatorix

The problem of companies in relation to our original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs), in addition to the proven acts of

with governments, federal and public authorities and bodies, scientific institutions, competitors, and individuals to kill competitors as part of a death strategy, as it is called in correspondences, as well as the infringements of the

specifically are the points, if the other points would not be more than enough and totally beyond anything tolerable,

21.January.2022

King Smiley Further steps

For sure, we took a look at the Casino dell'Aurora di Villa Ludovisi in Roma, Italian Republic, Planet Earth, which is for sale:

General

Exterior

• glass house or palazzo di cristallo as cover for the villa and its garden

Interior

Garden and annex

Diverses

As one can see, the overall cost will potentially be between 350,000,000 euro + 150,000,000 to 200,000,000 euro. But then it is more perfect than perfect and more beauty than beauty.

Honestly, we are not sure about this project due to the reasons that the villa is monumental, but has not enlighted a fire of enthusiasm and it is not more favourable than two alternative projects of us in this city, because it is too small and further actions have to be done, which we have to do at the alternative projects as well, where we are already looking and planning.

In relation to one of these two alternative projects, we got much more real estate offers.

29.January.2022

12:33 UTC+1
Success story continues and no end in sight - More evidences
potentially Clarification

We quote a webpage about an alleged impact on certain companies: "Our Impact on the World's Most Valuable Public Companies: 1. Apple, 2. Alphabet (Google), 3. Microsoft, 4. Facebook, 5. Amazon ...
Our deep learning methods developed since 1991[, but only named so in 2003,] have transformed machine learning and Artificial Intelligence (AI), and are now available to billions of users through the five most valuable public companies in the world: Apple (#1 as of 9 August 2017 with a market capitalization of US$ 827 billion), Google (Alphabet, #2, 654bn), Microsoft (#3, 561bn), Facebook (#4, 497bn), and Amazon (#5, 475bn) [1].
Many of the most widely used AI applications of these companies are now based on our Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) recurrent neural networks (RNNs), which learn from experience to solve all kinds of previously unsolvable problems. The LSTM principle has become a foundation of what's now called deep learning (see survey), [...].
[...]
Apple explained at its WWDC 2016 developer conference how our LSTM is improving its iPhone [2b], for example, the Quicktype function. Apple's Siri also uses LSTM in various ways [2b+].
Google's speech recognition [2] for over two billion Android phones and many other devices is also based on LSTM (1997) [8] with forget gates (2000) [9] trained by our "Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC)" (2006) [10]. In 2015, this approach dramatically improved Google's recognition rate not only by 5% or 10% (which already would have been great) but by almost 50% [2a].
Google is using our rather universal LSTM also for image caption generation [2g], automatic email answering [2h], its new smart assistant Allo [2i], and its dramatically improved Google Translate [10b, 10b+, 2i].
In fact, almost 30% of the awesome computational power for inference in all those Google datacenters [data centers] is now used for LSTM [10c] (and 5% are used for convolutional neural networks or CNNs - see below). You are probably using LSTM all the time in your daily life. Will Google itself end up as one huge LSTM?
Microsoft uses LSTM not only for its own greatly improved speech recognition [2c,2c+] but also for photo-real talking heads [2k] and for learning to write code [2m], amongst other things.
Amazon's famous Echo or Alexa also speaks to you in your home [2e] through our bidirectional [9b] LSTM which has learned to sound like a woman. (No, it's not a recording!)
In August 2017, Facebook announced that it is now using our LSTM to handle a whopping 4.5 billion translations each day, for more than 2,000 translation directions from one language to another [2n].
This completes the list of the five most valuable public companies as of August 2017. All of them state that AI is central to their business, and all of them are massively using LSTM, which is now permeating the modern world.
What can we learn from that? If you want your company to be among the world's most valuable ones, better use LSTM!
Interestingly, Samsung has been exploring LSTM as well (e.g., [2o]), and has become the world's most profitable company [2p] as of Q2 2017 :-)
Other great Asian companies such as Chinese search giant Baidu are also building [2d] on our deep learning methods such as CTC [10].
IBM used LSTM to analyze emotions [2j], amongst other things.
Numerous other famous companies are using LSTM for all kinds of applications [...].
[...]
Today, many startups as well as established companies such as Facebook & IBM & Google are using such deep GPU-CNNs for numerous applications [22]. Arcelor Mittal, the world's largest steel maker, worked with us to greatly improve steel defect detection [3]. In May 2015, we also had the first working very deep NNs with hundreds of layers [11]; a special case thereof was used by Microsoft [12] to improve image recognition. NVIDIA rebranded itself as a deep learning company. BTW, thanks to NVIDIA for our 2016 NN Pioneers of AI Award, and for generously funding our research!
Even earlier, in 2009, our CTC-trained LSTM [10,10a] became the first recurrent neural network to win competitions. [...] DeepMind, a startup company heavily influenced by other former students of my lab: DeepMind's first people with publications and PhDs in Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning were PhD students [...] one of them DeepMind's co-founder [...], one of them the first employee [...]. (The other two co-founders were not from my lab and had different backgrounds in biological neuroscience and business.) DeepMind was later bought by Google for about $600M; [...] DeepMind's recent Nature paper [10d]. BTW, thanks to Google DeepMind for generously funding our research!
[...]
Although our work has influenced many companies large and small, most of our pioneers of basic learning algorithms and methods for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) [...]."

Comment
Bingo!!!

We also looked at the referenced survey and concluded that as a matter of fact almost 100% of the awesome developments since the year 2000 was created with or is inspired by our works of art.

Obviously, our creation of the Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) described in The Proposal integrates the fields of

• Artificial Intelligence (AI),
• Machine Learning (ML),
• Computational Intelligence (CI), including
  • Many-Valued Logic (MVL) Fuzzy Logic (FL),
  • Artificial Neural Network (ANN), including for example
    • FeedForward NN (FNN or FFNN),
    • Cybernetical Neural Network (CNN or CybNN) or Feedback Neural Network (FNN or FBNN)),
  • Evolutionary Computing (EC), including for example
    • Evolutionary Strategy (ES),
    • Evolutionary Algorithm (EA),
    • Genetic Algorithm (GA),
    • Genetic Programming (GP),
  • Cognitive Agent System (CAS),
  • Cognitive-Affective Processing System (CAPS), and
  • Emotive Computing (EmoC) and Affective Computing (AffC), or Emotional Intelligence (EI), including
    • Emotion-Expressing Artificial Intelligence (EExpAI) and
    • Emotion-Detecting Artificial Intelligence (EDetAI),
• Artificial Life (AL),

and

• microkernel os,
• Real-Time os (RTos),
• Reflective os (Ros or Refos),
• Distributed os (Dos),
• Agent-Based os (ABos),
• Robotic os (Ros or Robos),
• Artificial Intelligence os (AIOS), and
• Cognitive os (Cos or Cogos),

which includes what has been later called the fields of

Doubtlessly,

Also note for example that a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) is one of the alternatives to a CTC-fitted ANN and even an efficient forward-backward inference algorithm for HMMs exists.
And this is not the end of the whole story, as we already discussed and will discuss again in the not so far away futures.

Definitely, that CTC, LSTM, and the rest of what is called deep learning are neither a legal nor a technological loophole to circumvent our Cognitive Agent System (CAS) and Cognitive-Affective Processing System (CAPS) Evoos and our OS with its Os. Quite contrary, the documented relations and utilizations only confirm our points of view, explanations, and claims.

Our Ontologic System (OS) includes our Evoos, our Ontoscope (Os), and much more.
And the whole world is already using our OS, including our Evoos.

And of course, these listed companies are not so valuable, because they use a special variant of Artificial Neural Network (ANN). In fact, they would be in the similar position anyway by performing and reproducing only our works of art.

We always said that the revival or renaissance, and also the breakthrough of all these fields, including for example cybernetics and SoftBionics (SB), and much more fields, including for example cybernetical physics, Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), intelligent Tablet computer (intelliTablet, iTablet, or iTab), Mixed Reality (MR), Augmented Reality (AR), and Virtual Reality (VR), and also self-driving cars or robot cars, came with our works of art. Before, they were considered to be no gos and carreer killers.
So guess, who truly impacted them and therefore is now taking the scepter in the hand and putting on the crown..

By the way (BTW):

• Ontologic System (OS),
• Ontoscope (Os), and
• business activities,

  and

• companies, that perform and reproduce our works of art, including Apple, Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta (Facebook), and also Samsung, Nvidia, IBM, Baidu, and so on to name just some very few, and
• many highly dubious entities, that we are also observing since many years.

31.January.2022

SOPR #33l

*** Work in progress - some better wording ***
Topics:

Legal matter [Ontoverse (Ov)]
We are not sure what metaverse platform means for other entities and honestly we even do not bother about it, because it is our Ontologic System (OS) and our Metaverse Ontoverse (Ov), and the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) with the License Model (LM) and the Main Contract Model (MCM) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) are Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC), and also very easy to understand.

Any work in relation to the common Ontoverse (Ov) respectively New Reality Environment (NRE) (spacetime or space and time) fabric and any work jointly with entrepreneurs in the Metaverse Ontoverse (Ov) other than our SOPR, Ontonics, and other business units of our corporation is deeply monitored and investigated.
But we would like to note the following in this relation: If such a work is jointly infringing the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation, then we will consider that as conspiracy and file lawsuits with prosecutors worldwide without warning.
Therefore, we would like to recommend once again to read the related issues of our SOPR very carefully.

Specifically some larger companies have not given up their illegal business strategies to implement their own variants of our OS and our Ov, while other entities have not given up to implement parts of threm.

For sure, there prior art exists in relation to the fields of

and also

for example with the Virtual Object System (VOS).
But we are already talking about our

Furthermore,

show more than sufficient and significant evidences, which prove the causal link to the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S., specifically our OS.

And to make the legal situation crystal clear once again our Ontologic System (OS) with its

is copyrighted, because it is at least an original and unique

and everybody else has the freedom to present an own work of art on this level and in this genre, so to say, which

For example, we have different approaches in the fields of operating system (os), Distributed System (DS), resilient system (rs), secure system, Mixed Reality Environment (MRE), and also ontological argument or ontological proof, Theory of Everything (ToE), self-portrait, self-extension, and so on. But eventually, every other entity proves to be incompetent and therefore follows us blindly and slavishly.
The latter is also regulated by national and international laws, regulations, and acts, as well as agreements and conventions, including the national and international copyright laws.

Another review of prior art in the fields of

• Multi-Agent System (MAS),
• Intelligent Agent System (IAS), and
• Cognitive Agent System (CAS),

showed once again that

But eventually, what is called

are all parts of our Ontoverse (Ov) and therefore our integrating Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) is the truly relevant matter no matter how diffuse the white, yellow, or red line is in some cases of works of prior art due to various reasons. In other words, if a white, yellow, or red line between a work of prior art and our work of art cannot be drawn, then just adding another integration of prior art by us and our OSA eventually always draws the white, yellow, or red line in one way or another to our advantage.
In fact, we are already in the era of our Web 3.0 and our Ontoverse (Ov).
This also shows that

is not sufficient to circumvent the rights of C.S. and our corporation, specifically for other companies. Indeed, there are more legal regulations in addition to the copyright, that prohibit certain business certain business strategies and actions in this regard.

According to the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR)

of the infrastructures of our SOPR.

We also discussed the difference between utilization of our OS for

independent of the situation and location in regard to private or closed, public or open, on-premise or internal, off-premise or external, on-edge, hybrid, and other variants.

We did not want and intend to go so far, but the regulations imply that they are also apply for OAOS of OAOS Providers (OAOSPs), also wrongly called Cloud Service Providers (CSPs), Communications Service Providers (CSPs), Internet Service Providers (ISPs), Web Service Providers (WSPs), and so on, and have to comply with these regulations of the AoA and the ToS in relation to all external utilization of our OS and provide options for our SOPR in their data centers for our OntoX where integration of prior art according to our Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) takes place.
This leads to situations where a first Main Contractor (MC) (e.g. Amazon) operates in the data center of a second MC (e.g. Alphabet (Google)) or other artwork and technology licensing partner (e.g. Microsoft, Nvidia, Meta (Facebook), etc.) in relation to provisioning of OAOS for IaaS and PaaS for internal and external entities and OAOS for external entities respectively customers.
This also provides us the possibility to monitor OAOSPs and evaluate if they are not damaging the goals and even threatening the integrities of C.S. and our corporation, including our collecting and managing Societies, as observed again and again even in the negotiation phase.

An entity that does not comply with the AoA and the ToS, and hence does not agree to the proposed societal compromise looses the

as regulated by the AoA and the ToS.

Finally, we can see once again that our relatively few and short regulations of the AoA and the ToS with the LM and MCM are suitable to handle most if not all legal situations.

Legal matter [Infrastructure]
The infrastructure of our SOPR is a personal, original and unique creation of an artist, but not a Person of Ordinary Skill In The Art (POSITA), and therefore a copyrighted work of art.

Everything related to our OS has been created in 1999 and 2006, nothing is to be invented or even implemented, we are only reconfiguring and scaling up our OS, with its OS Architecture (OSA) and OS Components (OSC).

Legal matter [Satellite] [Satellite constellation] or Infrastructure [Satellite Constellation] or Superstructure or Ontologic eXchange [Satellite]
We recalled in relation to other developments that all kinds of network are part of the common backbone, core network, or fabric of the exclusive infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and Society for Superstructure Utilization and Management (SSUM), and our other Societies, including public and private

• wireless technologies, like for example
  • Wireless Local Area Network (LAN) routers for hot spots of Telecommunications Service Providers (TPSs) and
  • proprietary network technologies for fields like for example Internet of Things (IoT) respectively Ontologic Net of Things (ONoT), Cyber-Physical System (CPS), Smart Environment (SE), Ambient Intelligence (AmI) (e.g. Samsung SmartThings), etc.),

  and

• Ontoscope (Os) variants (e.g. iPhone for Apple AirTag and Echo for Amazon Sidewalk),

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our Society for Superstructure Utilization and Management (SSUM) demand satellite interoperability, but not only on the level of the

including ground stations on-premise of Cloud Service Providers (CSPs) Space Service Providers (SSPs) respectively Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services Providers (OAOSPs) (e.g. Google and Amazon) and on-edge (e.g. Microsoft)

but also on the level of the

as part of our common backbone, core network, or fabric of the exclusive infrastructures (e.g. Superstructure) of our SOPR and SSUM, and our other Societies.

Legal matter [Media advertising]
Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is considering to prohibit media companies, including publishers of the uncontrolled press the placement of advertising in any space and time in our Ontoverse (Ov).
For sure,

Eventually, we decided for deciding about the advertisement content by exploiting the control over the online advertisement estate of C.S. and our corporation, so that they cannot damage the goals or even threaten the integrity of our SOPR in this way.

Infrastructure [HardBionics (HB) and SoftBionics (SB)]
Obviously, an essential part of our Ontologic System (OS) {not correct formulation Cybernetics and Robotics} includes and integrates our

{as basis for/as part of/...}

The fields of Softbionics (SB) and HardBionics (HB) include the fields of

• Fuzzy Logic (FL),
• Artificial Neural Network (ANN),
• Evolutionary Computing (EC), including
  • Evolutionary Strategy (ES),
  • Evolutionary Algorithm (EA),
  • Genetic Algorithm (GA),
  • Evolutionary Programming (EP),
  • Genetic Programming (GP),
  • Hybrid Evolutionary Computing (HEC),
  • and so on,

  and

• Swarm Intelligence (SI) or Swarm Computing (SC),

• Natural Language Processing (NLP),
• Natural Image Processing (NIP),
• and so on,

• Multi-Agent System (MAS),

The

which collectively are our Ontoverse (Ov), which again is the representation of the fusioned realities and worlds, the manifestation of our New Reality (NR), or the New Reality Environment (NRE) of our Ontologic System (OS).

The Ontoscope (Os) is the main access place and access device of the Ontoverse (Ov) and has many manifestations respectively is realized in many variations and variants.

The infrastructures of our Societies include for example

which are common to all members of our Societies (see also the issue #327 of the 7th of June 2021).

We also recall that in accordance with the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) the following regulation applies:
If a part of our OS is common to all members, and artwork and technology licensing partners (licensees) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), then it is a part of the exclusive infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and Society for Superstructure Utilization and Management (SSUM), and our other Societies.

Specifically the HB and SB systems, which are included in our ON respectively Intersup and utilized to do computationally difficult tasks, seem to be common to all members of our SOPR.

Infrastructure [Co²S and S³] or Social and Societal System (S³)
We worked on our Communication and Collaboration System (CoCoS or Co²S) and Social and Societal System (SoSoS or S³) in relation to 4 basic tasks.
The first task was the finalization of the basic architectures of our Co²S and S³ and their fine integration with our overall infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and Society for Superstructure Utilization and Management (SSUM), and our other Societies, including our Ontoverse (Ov).
Because these basic archtiectures and social networking protocols are based on communication protocols they integrate seamlessly with each other and the other parts of the infrastructures.

The second task was the transfer or migration of user data respectively Personally Identifiable Information (PII) from existing social service platforms to our Co²S and S³ to the social service platforms of other entities, which are hooked into our systems.
Luckily, at least in the European Union (EU) the legal situation is crystal clear and we even imagine that a mandatory menu button for easy transfer of PII will be added to social service platforms by law in the future.
Basically, we also see no problems in other sovereign territories, such as for example the U.S.America, though a court order might be required.

As the third task, we were also able to solve the last problem, which was filtering hate speech out of our S³ and accomplishing other tricky tasks of

from billions of members of our Societies for

for the benefit of all of them thanks to the basic properties of our original and unique, copyrighted, and prohibited for fair use work of art titled Ontologic System, created by C.S., and exclusively managed and exploited by our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) with the consent and on the behalf of C.S., such as our fields of HardBionics (HB) and SoftBionics (SB) included and integrated in our Ontologic Net (ON) respectively Interconnected supercomputer (Intersup) (see also the section Infrastructure [HardBionics (HB) and SoftBionics (SB)]).

And because we do own the OS with the Ov, we will continue to increase the pressure on entities that still think they would be allowed to damage the goals and even threaten the integrities of C.S. and our corporation, including our SOPR.
In total contrast, the Main Contractors (MCs) of our SOPR will have a lot of fun in the not so far away future respectively near future.

The fourth task is related to the management and orchestration of our S³. Specifically in relation to the social part of our S³, we thought once again about Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), because we are only interested in the proper

The graphic below shows the old interconnections of the common Ontoverse (Ov) Social and Societal System (SoSoS or S³) platforms with underlying social networking protocols (color shows communications and functions) for federated Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS), including

• microblogging,
• macroblogging,

• link,
• file,
• image,
• 3D model,
• audio,
• video,

• link,
• file,
• image,
• 3D model,
• audio,
• video,

• text,
• audio,
• video,
• game,

• event planning,

©© BY-SA 4.0 Imke Senst, Mike Kuketz, and RockyIII modified by C.S.

Actually, we do not know how many users we already have, but we guess that together with the users of our (designated) MC it might be around 500 million users, which will increase rapidly in the not so far away future, because only we own the metaverse Ontoverse (Ov) and the ad estate in our OS with Ov and Os, and provide truly interesting user data. So guess what the industries will do in the not so far away future.

Now, we do get freedom of choice, innovation, and competition pro bono publico==for the public good in this field as well, though the allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our OS is still required by the

{?}
"In this case, the rules include a new personal information protection law that requires Chinese government permission for customer data to be transmitted outside the country's borders.
The Chinese internet is one of the most difficult operating environments for foreign companies in the world, with state-dictated censorship and disclosure rules that can force companies to hand over consumer data.
Recent laws in China designed to protect consumer data have made things even more difficult for foreign firms, which must seek state permission to transmit data outside the country."

Ontologic Trustworthy System (OTrustS)
In the

our SOPR is the data trustee respectively manages and operates the

But first things first:
Modern automobiles

Thus, the related technologies, goods, and services, and their manufacturers and mobility service providers are within the

This means, among other things, that because of our licensing terms, the

Furthermore, a buyer or owner, or a user of such an automobile respectively Ontoscope on Wheels owns the Personally Identifiable Informations (PIIs), that are generated by the individual use of the automobile (e.g. driving route, length of use, maintenance, driving style, etc.).
All Personally Identifiable Informations (PIIs) are protected by relevant data protection laws and may neither

within the limits of such data protection laws.

Furthermore, the exclusive infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies include the following mandatory subsystems and platforms:

Furthermore, virtually all service providers use at least one element of our Ontologic System (OS) and therefore they

• legal scope of our Ontologic System (OS),
• domain of our New Reality (NR) respectively
• sovereign space of our Ontoverse (Ov), also known as our digital state OntoLand (OL),

and

We would also like to give the reminder that the European Commission (EC) has already submitted a corresponding proposal. However, in the end this will not change our requirements, particularly the point that our SOPR will be the trustee, that manages and orchestrates the related subsystems and platform, including a so-called trust center, as well as jointly operates them with the Main Contractors (MCs).
Here, neither for the automobile industry nor the insurance industry clientele politics is made.

We will not explain the legal aspects and related subsystems and platforms of the infrastructures in detail once again and refer to the relevant issues of our SOPR.

In the following, we outline the handling of car data in our OS, NR resp. Ov, aka. OL.

• vehicle technic related raw signals and data in agreement with our SOPR, and
• vehicle-specific informations, knowledge, models, and algorithms.

• freely use all raw signals and data, and
• freely use all Personally Identifiable Informations (PIIs), vehicle-specific informations, knowledge, models, and algorithms, if they are common to all members of our SOPR and thus serve the public benefit.

• competition laws,
• data protection laws, and
• copyright laws.

There is no need for further discussion and negotiation as well as new legal regulation.

We would also like to point out once again that we have already unclosed our Ontologic System (OS) and allow and license the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our Ontologic System (OS) under Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) terms and conditions. There is no more without a court, but at most less if our rights and properties are not respected and our terms and conditions are not accepted.