(comparison to a customary battery cell based on Lithium Nickel Cobalt Aluminium Oxide (LiNiCoAlO2 or NCA) with a gravimetric (specific) energy density of 254 W*h/kg, (volumetric) energy density of 720 W*h/L, and capacity of around 3,000 mA*h).
Of course, the servers of the related crowdfunding platforms will melt down due to high demand.

©© 0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) PD Alexis Jazz

The other products have already been discussed and comprise

for the members, and artwork and technology licensing partners of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR).

We also worked on the second generation of our electric energy storage technology, now designated as Battery 2.0 and better known as the Game Changer™ in New Energy™.

02.November.2021

Ontonics Further steps

We never said that our Superbolt™ #4 Electric Power (EP) has only stationary Quick Swap™ and Quick Charger™ stations. In fact, we always said our

• exchange, swapping, or switching service, and
• other possibilities of utilization and distribution (see the issues Ontonics Blitz Fund I #3 of the 7th of September 2019 and #15.4.5 of the 14th of February 2021),

• Speeder™,
• Hover™, and
• Hoverpod™, and also
• Delivery Drone™,

• PowerBottle™ PowerCan™, PowerKeg™, PowerCylinder™, and PowerCartridge™ (see the Further steps of the 9th of September 2019),
• projects Hoverland™ and Hovercity™, and also the Silk Skyway™, and
• European Union Hover Association™ (EUHA™), United States Hover Association™ (USHA™), and World Wide Hover Association™ (WWHA™),

• Intelligent Mobility System (IMS) and
• Traffic Management Systems (TMSs),

Just count 1 and 1 together and then look at the image below, showing a Servicio de baterias portatliles a domicile==Service for portable batteries to home.

© Rodrigo de Salvo et al.

And of course, we can also Quick Charge™ empty batteries but also fill up fuel tanks of vehicles and other machines with our service, whenever and wherever a customer wants to.

By the way:

03.November.2021

15:55, 16:44, 18:33, and 21:33 UTC+1
Ontonics Further steps

The economical situation and thus the entrepreneurial situation have changed and therefore we have adjusted the choreography with its coordination and orchestration of our business activities and projects, including for example our

Specifically, we will direct our focus and concentrate our resources more on fewer projects at the same time to increase their penetrating powers.

05.November.2021

02:44, 04:37, and 20:33 UTC+1
Clarification

*** Work in progress - better order and wording ***
There is only one OntoLand.

This description of our Ontoverse (Ov) shows why other entities are calling a part of our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) also included in our Ontologic System (OS) the fields of Cyber-Physical System (CPS) and Ubiquitous Computing of the second generation (UbiC 2.0), including the field of Internet of Things of the second generation (IoT 2.0), including the field of Industry 5.0.
But our Ontoverse goes even beyond embodiment due to the reflection and inclusion of a certain spirit and ghost in the machine respectively environment. This is the reason, why we are also calling a part of our Evoos and OS the field of Cybernetical Intelligence (CI), which goes beyond the ordinary and outdated cyberspace of the 20th century also known by for example the original Metaverse of the novel titled "Snow Crash", which was only a Virtual Reality Environment (VRE).

Our OS also integrates the

as part of its basic properties and integrating Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) (see the webpage Overview of the website of OntoLinux), and also Ontologic Collaborative Ontologic Virtual Environment (OntoCOVE) component.
Eventually, this integration is part of the creation of something totally new with the original and unique expression of idea to "bridge seamlessly between these different application modes [and these different realities]" on the basis of our creation of the eXtended Reality (XR) and the Caliber/Calibre of our New Reality (NR) respectively our Ontoverse (Ov).

But as we always make clear at this point, none of them has it all in contrast to our OntoCOVE and OntoScope, and the other Ontologic System Components (OSC), and all of the rest missing is created or comes with our OS, including our Evoos and Ontoscope, as well, such as

• on the one hand that is exactly the failure why it never worked (see for example Second Life), and
• on the other hand they all want and they all need Augmented Reality (AR) and also all the rest of our Ontologic System (OS) as well, such as the
  • access places and access devices, which are our Ontoscopes (Oss) in the various versions and variants, such as
    • hand-held,
    • wrist-worn,
    • head-worn,
    • head-mounted,
    • implanted,
    • driven,
    • etc.,
  • resilience, including
    • fault tolerance,
    • smart contract transaction protocol,
    • blockchain technique,
    • etc.,
  • backbone, core network, or fabric,
  • etc..

Obviously, the world is talking about our original and unique, copyrighted, and prohibited for fair use work of art titled Ontologic System, created by C.S., and exclusively managed and exploited by our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) with the consent and on the behalf of C.S..
Once again for our beloved fans and readers: What is wrongly called metaverse here is not the original Metaverse of the novel Snow Crash, which indeed is boring and was never tried susccesfully, but our Metaverse Ontoverse (Ov).
Our Metaverse Ontoverse (Ov) and our Ontoscope (Os), which is one of the access places or access devices of the Ov, or correctly said in the Ov, are parts of our Ontologic System (OS) and "the core idea of the metaverse Ontoverse (Ov), a physical and digital mash-up" is our Caliber/Calibre and New Reality (NR), including our eXtended Reality (XR) interpretation of the Mixed Reality (MR) spectrum or continuum.
Furthermore, there existed not so much at all at the time of our creations in the years 1999 to 2006. In fact, there merely existed

Literally spoken, that virtually was it already in the years 1999 and 2000. Just simple and common hardware and software items. All the rest came from C.S. and not from Bill Gates (Microsoft), Steve Jobs (Apple), Larry Ellison (Oracle), Jeff Bezos (Amazon), Larry Page and Sergey Brin (Alphabet (Google)), and Co..
C.S. has

with the Ontologic System (OS), which is the integration of the

and therefore not just a system, but a work of art with the perfectly matching title Ontologic System.

Since the Motorola smartphone with Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and its clone Google Android Smartphone of the first generations, as well as the Semantic (World Wide) Web (SWWW) and Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) (not to confuse with Service Object-Oriented Architecture (SOOA)), all results of simple espionage, it was absolutely clear that our OS was unforeseeable and unexpected for all expert respectively all Persons of Ordinary Skill In The Art (POSITAs) and they will take our OS as blueprint, which eventually made it the worldwide consent and standard.
And a much older worldwide consent is that such a work of art is protected and its author is entiteled to hold the copyright, including the copyright holder personal right or moral right, get a fair share in relation to any performance and reproduction, and so on.

Therefore, it is not a (virtual) land grab by us at all, but what is called an unclosed paradise by us and a walled garden in Silicon Valley and elsewhere, and definitely not a (virtual) land grab by Meta (Facebook) and if the latter abuse of market power and illegal exploitation of monopoly would be the case, then Mark Zuckerberg would be dismissed and put to another location than Lake Tahoe, Sierra Nevada, California and Nevada, or Pilaa Beach, Kulikoa Point, and Larsen's Beach, Kauai, Hawaii, quite rapidly.

In addition, all leading companies in all industrial sectors, that have an interest in the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S., are happy that we have unclosed our OS, and allow and license the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our OS under Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) terms and conditions, so that they get legal certainty and a patch with ornamental wall in our paradise.

Furthermore, uploading might be just around the corner and Minecraft is based on our original and unique Lego Massively Multiplayer Online Game (MMOG), as already confirmed by the company Microsoft, but also by the company Roblox and several other companies with their illegal plagiarisms.

07:50, 09:06, and 21:13 UTC+2
SOPR #33g

*** Work in progress - maybe a quote missing ***
Topics
This issue is focused on matters and already publicated informations related to the following topics:

Legal matter
Once again for the unknowing, unteachable, or unconscious entities, the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation are not politicized and democratized, and in total contrast to all other so-called Big Tech companies we are immune to lawmakers and market regulators, because we

for the benefit of the public worldwide.

Therefore, all that marketing and lobbying in relation to our OS is just only ridiculous.

The image of the C.S.' life and our coporation's performances and achievements had been grossly distorted and their integrities have been seriously attacked and damaged by the actions of many entities.
If companies refuse to sign our set of legal documents, including contracts and agreements, pay damage compensations, and so on, and also refuse to do the other legally demanded actions, then

The same holds for all major Cloud Space and Time Computing and Networking (STCN) or simply Space Computing (SC) or better Ontologic Computing (OC) platforms, Intelligent Virtual Assistants (IPAs), Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS), Metaverse Ontoverse (Ov) platforms, and so on, which will be taken down in the same speedy way.

Without the

which seems to be happening only since some few weeks, and

no confidential agreement exists.
The negotiation phase ended on the 31st of December 2020.

Without any modification of our original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) no individual performance and reproduction respectively business activity on the basis of our AWs and further IPs is possible in a legal way.

Every single performance and reproduction of every individual entity counts.

C.S. does enjoy also the copyright and not only the copyright holder personal right or moral right worldwide, which covers every edition of our original and unique AWs and further IPs made by other entities, which again we already have resolved, edited back, and explained for our legal teams and the courts.

License Model (LM)
Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) will not decrease the royalties for at least the next 4 years and most likely not for the next 9 years, because

• get no patent or software system license, but a complete space and time, universe and future, and economic system for their Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) share, which is much more than what is usual and
• are able to generate much more revenue and profit,

and

• restore the reputations, integrities, and momenta of C.S. and our corporation, which we have calculated in our License Model (LM), and
• reinvest a major portion of our royalties in the infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies and eventually in the members,

as every entity interested and concerned does know very well.

In fact, reducing a cut 10 years after the start of a platform, application, service, and so on is still customary, because the other companies did so as well. :)

But our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) will review and potentially revise its License Model (LM) during operation, because

law and order in general and
• reputations, integrities, and momenta of C.S. and our corporation in particular

has not happened.
If the latest projections of consulting agencies about market trends and developments prove true, then a revision seems to be FRANDAC, too.

Ontologic Financial System (OFinS) [Digital money supply]
No other entity will neither dominate crypto nor anything else, which is related to our Ontologic System (OS), because we created and own virtually the whole world of digital and virtual currencies in addition to our Metaverse Ontoverse with all our

which is the successor of the old Internet, and also wrongly called the Internet of the next generation.

One of the seismic technological shifts created with our OS is our Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), which is the foundational technology underlying cryptocurrencies and platforms, which again truly work for the first time ever.

It should be crystal clear since some years now, that only

are allowed in our Metaverse Ontoverse (Ov), including the platforms of companies as part of our Ontologic Economic System (OES).

None of those illegal stablecoins and cryptocurrencies has the allowance and license from our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), which adds to their overall illegal pyramid scheme and many other special schemes.

Obviously, all the other illegal stablecoins and cryptocurrencies will be replaced per se and vanish now one way or another, because Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services Providers (OAOSPs) have to remove related illegal platforms, applications, and services from their platforms in accordance with the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) with the License Model (LM) and the Main Contract Model (MCM) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) or they will loose their allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our original and unique, copyrighted, and prohibited for fair use work of art titled Ontologic System, created by C.S., and exclusively managed and exploited by our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) with the consent and on the behalf of C.S..

Furthermore, it is more than obvious that the financial vehicle of the cryptocurrency Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) has the same and even more "awe-inspiring and unsettling" issues and is much more worse than the asset backed stablecoin from the legal points of view. But incomprehensibly, the same administration, that is supporting those illegal cryptocurrency ETF through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), only wants to regulate the stablecoins.

Eventually, the stablecoin is done, because it is not needed at all anymore with an official digital currency of a sovereign territory and with any proposed regulation, including the supervision by a central bank, reserve bank, or monetary authority, which by the way is the regulation of the digital money supply of our Ontologic Financial System (OFinS) with its Ontologic Bank (OntoBank), Ontologic Exchange (OntoEx), and so on of our SOPR.

Ontologic Bank (OntoBank)
Our Ontologic Bank (OntoBank) has begun to add the next superior financial element.

We are also working on additional measures for our truly rule-based law and order for digital and virtual currencies in contrast to many governments and their financial supervisory authorities and commissions.

We also came back to our initial consideration once again, which is to make our

the only currencies in our Metaverse Ontoverse (Ov) after we had to learn that too many governments are not truly interested in compliance with their own legislations and so on.
There are also more implications and supporting evidences for our related implications already made in the past.

Digital and virtual tokens are allowed for

as is the case with real tokens.

Digital tokens have to be

22:10 UTC+1
Ontonics Further steps

Sometimes a solution is much simpler.

Since some weeks, we continued to think about to set up more OntoLab Vision Funds™ and Blitz Funds™ in addition to our

Each of the initial funds has a volume of 1 trillion U.S. Dollar and covers 10 Superunicorns™ respectively 10 Superbolts™.
In the Further steps of the 10th of June 2021 we already discussed to

due to the huge but unsurprising interest and demand for our investment programs by industries and governments.

Since some days, we are thinking about the immensly increased interest and demand for our environmental restauration and climate change reversal, and related investments of others and us. For example,

have committed and announced to change their asset managements to a more environmental friendly way and invest into Clean and Green™ processes and enterprises, which virtually in all cases eventually will result in attempts to invest in activities and entities, that are mimicking our activities, and copying and stealing our works and businesses. In fact, we are already documenting such attempts worldwide.

Since some hours, we are also thinking about transforming individual Superunicorns of our OntoLab Vision Funds and Superbolts of our Blitz Funds into individual OntoLab Vision Funds and Blitz Funds themselves by making their business units, and also technologies, goods, and services individual Superunicorns and Superbolts of these new funds.

The industries under the leadership of our Hightech Office Ontonics and our Societies will solve the problems in the next years.

Of course, required is a worldwide legally binding agreement, that they invest in our endeavours and not in bad actors, so that synergies can be set free, the goals are really achieved, and the win-win is truly realized.
In this regard, we have already begun to

06.November.2021

Comment of the Day

"2035: The fuel-powered ship is dead.
Maybe as early as the year 2032 the fuel-powered ship will no longer by relevant.", [C.S., Today]

One can already factor the significant reduction of emission in the climate models with 100%, as in the case of aircrafts.

Picture of the Day

:D
No, we will not reveal too much.

Ontonics Further steps

Our Big Deal is guarded by the contractual clause, that demands that both sides deliever, what they have announced or the contract is invalid and any transaction has to be reversed.
We have already publicated the specifications and performances of some of our solutions for our environmental restoration and climate change reversal. For sure, we will not publicate the details, specifically due to the reasons that

We expect that banks, insurers, and investors, and also alliances and philanthropic foundations will sign the legal documents and make their investments in our funds in the next step.

As we have already begun more than 10 years ago and will be continuing in the next decades, over the next 10 years we will

Together with our electric energy storage technology this should be sufficient to reach the goals for 2030 to 2035, though according to our calculations these measures will even exceed these goals by far already.
But as we said, the overall endeavour will take some more ramp-up time at first before it will decrease the temperature and increase the quality faster and faster.

By the way: The blue line is the conservative projection for our further environmental reconstruction and climate change reversal of Ontonics and OntoLab."
It is quite simple, of course if one knows how to do it and gets the fair share of just only 250 trillion U.S. Dollar for such revolutions. A bargain to enjoy the magic of a proven creator.
So do not throw away your down jacket and puddle cap, specifically when we will let it snow, let it snown, let it snow.

07.November.2021

Comment of the Day

blah³™
Blah³™
BLAH³™

08.November.2021

Ontonics Further steps

For sure, we have already added the countries Australia and India to our list of countries, that will enjoy our already existing Clean Coal, Clean Gas, and Clean Diesel technology and other related technologies, goods, and services, like the countries U.S.America and the P.R.China.

We are sure that specifically other countries, that have not signed to phase out coal, will see the many benefits of our Clean Coal, such as for example jobs, jobs, jobs.

Ontonics Blitz Fund I #24.4.11

As we already said, our Superbolt™ #4 Electric Power (EP) has simply reimagined the battery again and again.

In relation to our first generation of our electric energy storage technology, we would like to give the following additional information:
Due to the formidable thermal properties, battery packs based on our electric energy storage technology do not require additional cooling.
This translates directly into lower complexity, lower manufacturing and production costs, higher safety, and more advantages.

The processes of the Product Lifecycle Management (PLM), including the

are also much more environmental friendly and cost effective in comparison to the other batteries, because we do not need for example certain expensive resources, which in addition are produced in not so ideal ways.

What is more, the manufacturing and production costs will be on par with the costs of the other batteries.
But we provide a

in comparison to the best battery technology available for commercial utilization.
One can guess easily who sweeps the board and takes the biscuit jar, including the market sector and the energy market sector.

The worldwide

We expect that the values will be a little higher, but also that we will get around 50% of this market with our Superbolt #4 EP. Projected on 20 years we are talking about at least 132 trillion U.S. Dollar.
10% of the shares of our Superunicorns and Superbolts are available, though we have the impression somehow that 1 billion U.S. Dollar for 1 percent of one Superunicorn or one Superbolt is a little bit too low.

Please note, that our Superunicorns and Superbolts are guarded by the competition laws of the societies and the regulations of our Societies against mimicking, copying, and stealing, or said in other words we cannot recommend such activities.

09.November.2021

Ontonics Further steps

We improved a technology to generate power by converting wind energy into mechanical and electrical energy.

We do not claim to overcome the Betz's law, which

Like the Shockley-Queisse limit or radiative efficiency limit, which "is the maximum theoretical efficiency of a solar cell using a single p-n junction to collect power from the cell where the only loss mechanism is radiative recombination in the solar cell", these are just physical laws and scientific facts, and therefore any claim to exceed such a limit must be viewed skeptically, as we do with our works.

But nevertheless, overall solutions with higher efficiency and other advantages are possible and we really love to play on the edge.

10.November.2021

Ontonics Further steps

For sure, we do know that the first generation of our Clean Coal, Clean Gas, Clean Diesel, and Clean Kerosene is phasing out over the next 40 years.
But at least over the next 30 years we will use our solutions to support our friends in the U.S.America, P.R. China, Australia, India, Indonesia, and other sovereign territories and solve their related environmental problems.

Nevertheless, we have begun to develop a new, second generation of our Clean and Green™ technologies and related techniques and methods, which already resulted in a first substitute of one of them.

11.November.2021

Ontonics Further steps

We added a second substitute for one of our Clean and Green™ technologies and related techniques and methods, which are phasing out over the next 40 years, which again is quite progressive, surprising, and even fascinating.

Style of Speed Further steps

For sure, the shipping is responsible for only 3% of carbon dioxide (CO2) emission, which would be 17% in the year 2050, but also for 15% of nitrogen oxide (NO) emission and 13% of sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission, which summed up to 13.5% of all greenhouse gas emissions in the year 2018. Therefore, reducing this emission is worth the effort in this case as well.
For example, we will convert, or better said, electrify

and build thousands of new ones together with our other subsidiaries in countries that sign our set of legal documents (see also the Comment of the Day of the 6th of November 2021).

Please keep in mind that we are talking about (virtually) gross zero, but not net zero until 2035 to 2040, and also about the whole transport sector, but not only shipping (see also the Comment of the Day of the 27th of October 2021).

As one can see, this is the way our corporation with its various business units is selling technological progress and acceleration, but also conduct our further environmental restauration and climate change reversal, which saves 10 to 15 years.
This also implies that for example no Clean and Green™ technology transfer between sovereign territories is required, because we will be at the locations with our businesses.

16.November.2021

Style of Speed Further steps

According to an estimation of an external entity, around 39,000 new passenger and cargo aircrafts will be needed worldwide by the year 2040.
According to an estimation of us, they will be electrified and become highly electrifying from around the year 2027 (see for example the Further steps of the 26th of October 2021).

Please note that at least in the first 10 years only we get all electric aircrafts, specifically electric airliners, due to many exclusive contracts, which only we can make.
It is virtually the same situation as with shipping (see for example the Further steps of the 11th of November 2021.

Even better, flying will not become more expensive with us in total contrast to another claim made by incompetent entities.

17.November.2021

Clarification

With our original and unique work of art titled Ontologic System, also called OS, and created by C.S., including our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos), Caliber/Calibre, Ontoverse (Ov), and New Reality (NR), C.S. is now also the proven creator of the fourth paradigm shift in the field of physics based on

following

But it does not stop here, because "its implications arguably extend far beyond the discipline [of physics]", as we already know by the other proofs of creation, innovations, and revolutions.

We have never claimed something else or less.

20.November.2021

Ontonics Further steps

We reviewed some technologies once again and have thereby noticed that some facts and properties

Eventually, we got a lot of new possibilities and began to systematically identify all of them, sort them out, and play around with them.

So far we have improved said older reinvention.

Hopefully we do not get the selection problem.

23.November.2021

Ontonics Further steps

We improved a machine. But we are not sure if it has another use than being a part of a specific variant of the solution improved today as well.

We also improved a technology or solution.

24.November.2021

Ontonics Further steps

We improved a first technology. This is really interesting.

We improved a second technology. This is really fascinating.

We improved a machine.

We developed a new machine in four basic variants, and also two basic subvariants of a first variant and two basic subvariants of a second basic variant. Interestingly, we could exploit our knowledge and development gained in relation to another technology.

We improved a third technology or first solution.

We improve a fourth technology or second solution. If this works as researched and developed, then it will also be revolutionary. Intriguingly, we were not expecting a further evolution in this field so early in time.

Ontonics Blitz Fund I #25.4.12

Our Superbolt™ #4 Electric Power (EP) has made decisions in relation to several details.
One decision is to make an intermediate step by using a relative new but suboptimal technology, which nevertheless is sufficient to reach our goals.

Another decision is to focus on another one of our electric energy technologies at least in the next future, which might even be more attractive from the economical point of view than another favoured technology. Our first estimation produced a rather surprising result.
This also harmonizes our overall development plan and time frame.

A further decision is related to our electric energy infrastructures with their set of fundamental

This is specifically interesting for the main contractors, suppliers, and service providers, but eventually also for all other members of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR).

By the way:

Style of Speed Further steps

We improved a first engine in two variants. Interestingly, we could exploit our knowledge and development gained in relation to a similar solution. This is really interesting.

We improved a second engine. This is really fascinating.

We improved a third engine. This is really crazy.

28.November.2021

Ontonics Further steps

We improved a machine in multiple basic variants.

We developed a new machine in multiple basic variants.

29.November.2021

Comment of the Day #1

Off Black™
"Off-Black"™
"3%"™
"55.555%"™
"©"™
"®"™
"™"™

Comment of the Day #2

"Off-Black", [C.S., Today]

Just our "3%". ":)" "©" "™" Though the difference is "55.555%".

Style of Speed Further steps

We developed another variant of an overall solution.

21:11, 23:33, and 30:11 UTC+1
Investigations::Multimedia, and AI and KM

*** Revision - prior art of immobile robot, Cougaar, etc. ***

In the past, we already showed that the

are in large parts based on our OS and have become a partial OS variant.
In fact, Azure is already sufficient to show that Microsoft has taken our OS as a blueprint for its technologies, goods, and services.

This time we also wanted to work out the evidences that provide the causal link between the fields of

and our OS.
Specifically, the focus of this investigation was to work out when the tide has turned in these specific fields of CRM and ERP, but also in our fields of CI and CPS.

At first, we quote an online encyclopedia about several ERP software applications and suits, and then add informations collected from the websites of the company Microsoft and its business partners, and from publications of the specialized media in a chronological order regarding the events and activities to work out, since when our OS is performed and reproduced in this specific market sector as well.

We quote an online encyclopedia about Solomon and Microsoft Dynamics SL: "[...] Solomon's roots go back more than 35 years, when co-founders Gary Harpst, Jack Ridge and Vernon Strong started TLB, Inc. in 1980. TLB, Inc. stands for The Lord's Business. TLB was named to remind the founders why the business was started: to conduct the business according to biblical principles. TLB was later renamed Solomon Software, and then Microsoft Dynamics SL,[1]
In April 1999, Solomon Software refocused the product on an all Microsoft technology strategy: Microsoft SQL Server as the database technology; Visual Basic as the software language; and Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) as the customization language.
Solomon was acquired by Great Plains Software in June 2000. Great Plains was subsequently acquired by Microsoft Corporation in [April or] May 2001."

We quote an online encyclopedia about the Great Plains Software and Microsoft Dynamics GP: "It is one of four accounting packages acquired by Microsoft that now share the Microsoft Dynamics Business Solutions brand. Dynamics GP is written in a language called Dexterity[, which "was designed in the late 1980s for the implementation of platform independent graphical accounting software.[1] Dexterity itself is written in the C programming language.[2][3]"].
The Dynamics GP product was originally developed by Great Plains Software, an independent company [...]. Dynamics Release 1.0 was released in February 1993.[1] It was one of the first accounting packages in the United States that was designed and written to be multi-user and to run under Windows as 32-bit software.[2] In late 2000, Microsoft announced the purchase of Great Plains Software.[3 [Why Microsoft bought Great Plains Software [...]. [29th off December 2000]]] This acquisition was completed in April 2001."

We quote an online encyclopedia about IBM Axapta and Microsoft Dynamics AX: "Microsoft Dynamics AX was originally developed as a collaboration between IBM and Danish Damgaard Data as IBM Axapta. Axapta was initially released in March 1998 in the Danish and U.S. markets. IBM returned all rights in the product to Damgaard Data shortly after the release of Version 1.5. Damgaard Data merged with Navision Software A/S in 2000 to form NavisionDamgaard, later named Navision A/S. Microsoft acquired the combined company in July 2002.[4]

[...]

Architecture
The Microsoft Dynamics AX software comprises four major components:

We quote an online encyclopedia about Navision and Microsoft Dynamics NAV: "Microsoft Dynamics NAV originates from Navision, a suite of accounting applications which Microsoft acquired in 2002.
Navision originated at PC&C A/S (Personal Computing and Consulting), a company founded in Denmark in 1984. [...] The success of the product prompted the company to rename itself to Navision Software A/S in 1995.
In 2000, Navision Software A/S merged with fellow Danish firm Damgaard A/S (founded 1983) to form NavisionDamgard A/S.[4] In 2001 the company changed its name to "Navision A/S".
On July 11, 2002 Microsoft bought Navision A/S to go with its previous acquisition of Great Plains. Navision became a new division at Microsoft, named Microsoft Business Solutions, which also handled Microsoft CRM.[5]
In 2003 Microsoft announced plans to develop an entirely new ERP system (Project Green). But it later decided to continue development of all ERP systems (Dynamics AX, Dynamics NAV, Dynamics GP and Dynamics SL). Microsoft launched all four ERP systems with the same new role-based user-interface, SQL-based reporting and analysis, SharePoint-based portal, Pocket PC-based mobile clients and integration with Microsoft Office.
In September 2005 Microsoft re-branded the product and re-released it as Microsoft Dynamics NAV.[6]
In December 2008 Microsoft released Dynamics NAV 2009, which contains both the original "classic" client, as well as a new three-tier GUI called the RoleTailored Client (RTC).[7]
In October 2013, Microsoft released Dynamics NAV 2013, which was available with the RTC only, and introduced support for 64-bit Windows operating systems as well as a redesign of storing dimension sets, interoperability with SharePoint, and a web client."

In the following we list more historical facts and connect the dots.
Microsoft Business Solutions Customer Relationship Management v1.0 was released in January 2003.
rudimentary business application layer on top of SQL server
rudimentary template of business entities, that several years later developed into the Common Data Model of the first generation or v1.0 (CDM 1.0).

Microsoft Azure was released on the 27th of October 2008.

Dynamics CRM v3.0 was released in December 2005.

The anything Relationship Management (xRM) platform and Dynamics CRM apps based on it are marketed as "One Platform. Many Applications. Infinite Possibilities." since around the 15th of July 2009
But this solution was still based on Microsoft SQL, business application layer, and SharePoint on top of the very early version of Microsoft Azure.

Project Crescent was a Business Intelligence (BI) tool add-on for SQL Server, designed in summer 2010, discussed on 9th of November 2010, and released on 11 July 2011, and became the Power BI low-code and no-code tool.
Power BI connects to various data sources, such as for example the yet to develop Dynamics 365.

Dynamics 365 unites Dynamics CRM, Dynamics AX and Dynamics NAV ERP, and Azure cloud computing platform, and was announced in July 2016 and released on the 1st of November 2016.

Microsoft developed a so-called citizen developer friendly relationship data store or database, which is based on AzureSQL and already had a predefined set of common data objects, like for example contacts, accounts, activities, etc.. The

Dynamics 365 for Customer Engagement, the business application layer, and the Common Data Service v1.0 (CDS 1.0) were merged into a new version of the CDS respectively the Common Data Service of the second generation or v2.0 (CDS 2.0).

Project Siena was developed as low-code and no-code tool with some features of the Visual Programming (VP) paradigm to allow non-developers to build custom applications, became the Power Apps tool, and was rolled out on 31st of October 2016.
No Integrated Development Environment (IDE) is required, like for example Visual Studio, but Visual Studio is integrated in the overall solution.

Microsoft Flow was also developed as next gen workflow tool for SharePoint and Office 365 and was rolled out in 31st October 2016 and became the Power Automate low-code and no-code tool.
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is included since December 2019.

With the introduction of Power Apps the

Project Oakdale was used for Dataflex for Teams and became Microsoft Teams.

Dataverse was first announced by Microsoft on the 21st of July 2020. The announcement incorporated two products, which renamed the earlier Common Data Service (CDS) (CDS 2.0) and became Dataverse and Dataverse for Teams.
Microsoft notes that the "Common Data Service [v2.0] was renamed to Microsoft Dataverse in November 2020" and announced the Microsoft Dataverse and Microsoft Dataverse for Teams on the 16th of November 2020.
Dataverse is described as a data warehouse and cloud-based Software as a Service (SaaS) solution respectively a Data Warehousing as a service (DWaaS) solution founded on the Azure cloud computing platform.
In general, it provides a

• low-code and no-code development tools and productivity applications, like for example the Power Platform frontend tool suite,
• Power Apps and Power Automate applications,
• Dynamics 365 applications, and
• several other standalone and custom applications.

In particular, it provides a

Conclusion
Project Green was what Microsoft wanted to realize at the time when we presented our OS at the end of October 2006.
But Project Green was only about the unification of its ERP suites and was not referenced anymore since around March 2007. Nevertheless, the overall goal was still persuaded, but it had to happen on the basis of our OS.

The anything Relationship Management (xRM) platform, which is promoted since at least the 15th of July 2009, already reflects the Resource Description Framework (RDF) and also Object-Relationship Model (ORM) and Object-Role Model (ORM).

For sure, Microsoft Business Solutions Customer Relationship Management v.10 with its business application layer and template of business entities was released in January 2003. But its Dynamics 365, Power Platform, Dataverse (formerly Dataflex Pro formerly Common Data Service) and Dataverse for Teams (formerly Dataflex), and Teams are based on our OS as well, specifically their integration with

• basic properties (e.g. validated and verified, well-structured and formed, and collaborative) and
• Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) (e.g. integrates all in one by being liquid and microservice-oriented, and synchronous and asynchronous),

of our OS in general, and also

in particular, doubtlessly and definitely, and the Common Data Model of Microsoft consists of "modular and extensible business objects with semantic metadata", which is

With Dynamics 365 we can eventually see the unification of CRM and ERP since at least July 2016, but also the liquification of applications, services, and functions based on our foundations of the Service-Oriented technologies (SOx), including our foundation of the microService-Oriented Architecture (mSOA) (see also the section Enterprise/Business/Commerce of the webpage Links to Software and the section integrating Architecture of the webpage Overview of the website of Ontolinux).

But the really interesting and relevant innovations came with our Evoos in the year 1999 and our OS in the year 2006, and the further development shows even more that it is our Evoos and OS.
In this regard we quote a member of the so-called Most Valuable Partner (MVP) program of Microsoft describing the overall solution consisting of Azure, Dynamics 365, Power Platform, and Dataverse: "The result is NOT a cobbled together bunch of software, but something that is truly greater than the sum of the all the parts.
[...]
The combination of all these amazing features is what became and is the "Power Platform". This has become the "xRM" platform that many of us have been dreaming about for many years, but in some ways so much better than we imagined.
With new technologies being implemented such as AI, Mixed Reality, Bot Agents and dozens more makes the Power Platform a solid foundation for building advanced enterprise business applications.
The Power Platform has truly become "One platform, Many applications, Infinite possibilities"."

And exactly this synergy and this dream and this much more were unforeseeable and unexpected by an expert in the related fields respectively a Person of Ordinary Skill In The Art (POSITA) at the time of their creation by C.S. and therefore an original and unique expression created as part of our OS, which proves our copyright once again.
In this sense One OS.

Eventually, since around 2014 to 2016 there is absolutely no need for discussion of details anymore and we can show retrospectively that Microsoft was always interested in the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. since the end of the 1990s.

For this and other reasons, our SOPR exists, holds the supervision, and collects royalties.
Nevertheless, we do appreciate the many benefits and synergies unleashed through the competences and expertises, and also artwork and technology licensing partnerships with all other entities.