Thus, the set of rules refers only to us and affiliated banks.

Secondly, our Ontologic System (OS) continues to enable annonymous payment in compliance with the law. As always, a customary court order is sufficient to get all required Personally Identifiable Information (PII).

Wir zitieren einen Bericht über das Regelwerk genannt Märkte für Kryptoanlagen der Europäischen Union (EU): "Eine Strafverfolgung sei auf der Grundlage der geltenden Vorschriften bisher auch schon möglich gewesen, hält der Europaparlamentarier Patrick Breyer dagegen. Wer seine Kryptowerte nicht bei einem offiziellen Dienstleister verwahre, tauche auch künftig weiter nur als Code aus Zahlen und Buchstaben auf. Ebenso schwer bleiben direkte Transfers zwischen plattformunabhängigen Kryptobörsen zu kontrollieren.
Doch gehe es bei dem Regelwerk, auf das sich EU-Parlament und Mitgliedsländer einigten, auch nicht um Kriminalitätsbekämpfung, ist der EU-Abgeordnete der Piratenpartei überzeugt. "Das erklärte Ziel, Geldwäsche und Terrorismus bekämpfen zu wollen, ist nur ein Vorwand, um hier immer mehr Kontrolle über unsere finanzielle Privatsphäre privaten Geschäfte zu bekommen", sagt Breyer. Anonyme Zahlungen sollen verboten sein.
Damit werde den Menschen die finanzielle Freiheit genommen, ist er überzeugt. "Dabei sind zum Beispiel Oppositionelle wie Alexej Nawalny in Russland zunehmend auf anonyme Spenden in solchen virtuellen Währungen angewiesen, um ihre Arbeit überhaupt fortsetzen zu können. Wir sollten alle ein Recht darauf haben, online bezahlen und spenden zu können, ohne dass alle unsere Zahlungen personenbezogen aufgezeichnet werden.""

Kommentar
Alles falsch oder sogar Blödsinn.

Erstens, gibt es keinen anderen uns bekannten legalen Dienstleister außer unser Ontologisches FinanzSystem==Ontologic Financial System (OFinS) mit unsere Ontologische Bank==Ontologic Bank (OntoBank) und ihren Untersystemen und Plattformen

Somit bezieht sich das Regelwerk nur auf uns und angeschlossene Banken.

Zweitens, ermöglicht unser Ontologisches System (OS) weiterhin die annonyme Zahlung gesetzeskonform. Ein übliche richterliche Anordnung reicht wie immer aus, um alle erforderlichen personenbezogenen Daten beziehungsweise Persönlich Identifizierbare Informationen (PII) zu erhalten.

15.July.2022

Ontonics Further steps

We have developed a new type of wind energy generator and some basic variants of it.

We were also able to improve a basic component of it.

Now, we are even more sure that this type will be convincing and appealing.

10:00 and 25:25 UTC+2
SOPR #33o

*** Work in progress - better explanation and formulation of sections Infrastructure [...] ***
Topics:
In this issue, we discuss the common GAI or AGI, and other topics:

Legal matter [Copyright vs. Digital acts]
We would like to recall to not confuse regulations, like for example the Digital Services Act (DSA) and the Digital Markets Act (DMA) of the European Union (EU), with the national and international laws, regulations, and acts, as well as agreements, conventions, and charters regarding the freedom of expression, moral right, and property (e.g. copyright).

The latter comes first, which means the rights given by the DSA and DMA only become effective in practice if an entity is allowed to perform and reproduce a part of our Ontologic System (OS) and we have modified our OS sufficiently but not completely to keep the masterpiece created by C.S. and all exclusive rights intact as much as possible, which again means that there are exclusive infrastructures with subsystems and platforms, and also, devices, vehicles, applications and services of our SOPR and our other Societies. This is called a compromise in politics.

Legal matter [Fast track court order]
In cases of an emergency involving

to any person, the original and unique basic properties and functionalities of our Ontologic System (OS) make fast track court order possible to

without the public being tracked and recorded in ways that infringe their rights, specifically their

Legal matter [HardBionics (HB) and SoftBionics (SB)]
HardBionics (HB) and SoftBionics (SB) will become rather quickly a problem for sovereignty and national security.
This is another weapon, which should not be available for everybody. Luckily, no constitutional right exists in this case.
So do not give it away as Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) for this reason besides the already existing copyright issues with and copyright infringements of the expressions of ideas of others and the masterpieces of us.

For sure, like some few other entities, we have thought about this situation already since the 1990's as well. Now, we have to act, because societies, governments, and industries have certain

The first step was to include HB and SB in the infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies (see the issue SOPR #316 of the 14th of February 2021).
Another step was the suggestion to make HB and SB exclusive subsystems, platforms, and so on of these infrastructures. But this is not our intention due to the protection and the support of freedom of choice, innovation, and competition pro bono publico==for the benefit of the public.
A solution appeared to be to provide only an Application Programming Interface (API) to such a technology, but this is not sufficient (anymore).
Therefore, our SOPR has added the following regulations:

• provide her, his, or their identification to,
• go through the vetting procedure of,
• get the user's license, utilization license, or utilization permit from, and
• document the utilization at

our SOPR.

Legal matter [FOSSH]
Free and Open Source Software and Hardware (FOSSH) is only allowed by a formal and legal entity.
Therefore, our SOPR has added the following regulations:

• establish a formal and legal entity at,
• register this formal and legal entity as a
  • personal association, society, or club at the SOPR,
  • social association, society, or club at a federal authority,
  • service association, society, or club at a federal authority,
  • professional association, society, or club at a federal authority,
  • Non-Government Organization (NGO) at a federal authority,
  • Non-Profit Organization (NPO) at a federal authority, or
  • other legal form of organization,
• get the membership in, and
• get the allowance to perform and reproduce certain parts of the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. from

our SOPR.

As a consequence, such a FOSSH organization has legal limits and duties.
A FOSSH organization registered at the SOPR

A FOSSH organization registered at a federal authority

Unaffected from this regulation are the rights and properties of other entities anyway.

Ontologic Bank Financial Information and Communications (OBFIC) [Zoning]
As we say from time to time, our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is neutral, when it comes to the foundational infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies, specifically the successors of subsystems and platforms, which provide a benefit for the public worldwide, such as for example our

or simply said our Ontologic System (OS) with our Ontoverse (Ov), including our subsystems and platforms, and also Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) of the

• Ontologic Bank (OntoBank) for the Banking System (BS) and financial services of banks,
  • Ontologic Payment System (OPS or OntoPay),
  • Ontologic Exchange (OEx, OntoEx, or OntoExchange) for the trade services of organized markets, specifically the exchange of moneys (currencies and demand deposits) and digital assets, and
  • Ontologic Bank Financial Information and Communications (OBFIC) as a sort of Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications (SWIFT) of the Next Generation (SWIFT NG).

Our SOPR already introduced the provision of a localized OX set of facilities, including exchange points or hubs, and subsystems and platforms to address and handle certain requirements of an individual sovereign territory and our SOPR (see the section Ontologic eXchange (OX or OntoX) of the issue #33f of the 19th of October 2021 and SOPR #33h of the 5th of December 2021).

Our SOPR also already announced the establishment of our digitial money supply and the provision of the related

including the establishment of OntoExchanges at locations, which meet certain requirements of individual sovereign territories, economical zones, and our SOPR (see the issue #32x or #33y of the 14th of July 2021).

Our SOPR has now extended this general approach of a localized OX with the provision of a zoned OBFIC to address and handle certain requirements of two or more individual sovereign territories or even an individual economical zone, and our SOPR.

The dedicated set of fundamental facilities, including exchange points or hubs, and subsystems and platforms of our OX, OEx, and OBFIC will be constructed at both sides of a border, and managed and operated accordingly. But we recommend to use the common infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies to reduce friction, complexity, cost, and mistrust, and increase harmony, continuity, stability, and prosperity.

Infrastructure []

Infrastructure [HardBionics (HB) and SoftBionics (SB)]
In the section Infrastructure [HardBionics (HB) and SoftBionics (SB)] of the issue SOPR #33l of the 31st of January 2022 we already recalled the regulation regarding HB and SB systems, which

But there are more subsystems and platforms of the infrastructures of our SORP and our other Societies, which are based on the fields of HB and SB, such as for example our

of our Ontoverse (Ov), including our

and which are common to all members of our SOPR.

Ontoverse [API and HMI] includes OntoUI and OntoAgent

In the following sections we address these fields individually.

Infrastructure [Ontologic Knowledge Base (OKB)]

Knowledge Structure, such as

• Entity-Relationship Model (ERM),
• Semantic Net (SN),
• Conceptual Graph (CG),
• Topic Map (TM),
• Resource Description Framework (RDF) Graph (RFG),
• etc.,

• Graph-Based KB (GBKB) or Knowledge Graph (KG),
• Icon-Based KB (IBKB) or Knowledge Image (KI), and
• Wave-Based KB (WBKB) or Knowledge Sound (KS),

and

for individual

The intention of our SOPR is not to eliminate individual KSs, specifically KGs, but provide a Common Knowledge Core (CKC) respectively Ontologic Knowledge Base (OKB).
Our SOPR maintains the OKB, which

• individual static ontologies and
• single dynamic ontology,

and

Infrastructure [Machine Learning (ML) Neural Network Models (NNMs)]

We are at a point where even ontology deniers can see that it makes sense to have such a standard, specifically common ontologies or set of standard ontologies, Ontologic Modeling™, and Ontologic Model™ respectively abstract machine core, including the foundational ontologic model [respectively abstract core] of our OS functions like a brain.
SOPR extends this standard common items with ontologic models, which include Machine Learning (ML) Neural Network Models (NNMs), which again are

But ontology and ontologics go even farther with Machine Learning (ML) Neural Network Models (NNMs), which constitute also some kind of ontologic models, we would even say ontological matrices.

At least 3 entities, large companies with their subsidiaries, are doing the same and recently a 4th entity joined with another company.
In this way, they define some kind of standard.
and provide that standard as FOSS, well knowing that both is prohibited by law in general and the AoA and the ToS of our SOPR in particular.
In fact, if apart is common to all members, then it is a part of the infrastructures of SOPR and by providing it as FOSS deliberately it damages the goals and even threatens the integrity of our SOPR.

As already explained several times in the past, HB and SB are parts of the infrastructures.

We also recall that models have to be traded on the Marketplace for Everything (MoE) exclusively.

Furthermore, we have the fields of

Modular Neural Network (MNN)
See for example the following works:

There are pro and contra arguments for the use of a Modular Neural Network Model (MNNM) instead of a supermodel, but linear algebra provides the theory of matrices over a field (see also module theory for the theory of matrices over a ring) and therefore no difference can exist at all regarding the properties of a resulting NNM.
Indeed, there might be some complexity due to overhead due to distributed computing and collaboration. But obviously, this is unavoidable, if done by multiple entities.

Ontologic Net (ON), including Wide Area Network (WAN) SuperComputer (SC) (WANSC) or Interconnected supercomputer (Intersup), and HB and SB
Virtual Service Grid (VSG), Wide Area Network (WAN) SuperComputer (SC) (WANSC), including wide area (parallel computing) cluster, or Interconnected supercomputer (Intersup) (see February and March 2019)
"The Virtual Service Grid: An Architecture for Delivering High-End Network Services" based on our field of Autonomic Computing (AC) and hence our Evoos
"Parallel Computing on Wide-Area Clusters: the Albatross Project"
our volunteer computing "Crowdsourced Training of Large Neural Networks using Decentralized Mixture-of-Experts"

integrating OS Architecture (OSA)

Unrestricted access to raw signals and data, which means access to the so-called Big Data Fire Hose (BDFH). {The functionality of for example Kafka is already part of the infrastructure.}

train Machine Learning (ML) Neural Network Models (NNMs) related to

in particular and

in general

can more quickly train Machine Learning (ML) Neural Network Models (NNMs) that use multimodal signals for example to

Every intereested entity wants to have own Machine Learning (ML) Neural Network Models (NNMs) and ANNs, and do Business Intelligence (BI), Visualization, and Analytics (BIVA), and Data Science and Analytics (DSA), including Big Data technologies (BDx), but wants not to share raw signals and data, informations, knowledge bases, models, and algorithms

allow Common Sense Computing (CSC), specifically commen sense reasoning.

Linear algebra allows to integrate matrices respectively Machine Learning (ML) Models (MLMs) of Modular Artificial Neural Networks (MANNs) or simply Modular Neural Networks (MNNs or ModNNs) , specifically their Neural Network Models (NNMs).
Ontologic Net (ON) respectively Wide Area Network (WAN) supercomputer or Interconnected supercomputer (Intersup), and Resilient Bionic and Robotic Space-Based Wide Area Network (RBRSBWAN) respectively Ontologic High Performance and High Productivity Network (OHP²N) allow distributed computing and collaboration.

Our SOPR provides the OKB, including ontologies, models, and algorithms for calculating, training, learning, and collaborating. Every entity, that wants to participate, has to use these knowledge structures and models and algorithms, provide computing power, compute, and share the resulting trained MNN, and transfer it to the related fabric.

But SOPR will provide the biggest Machine Learning (ML) Models (MLMs), Neural Network Models (NNMs) anyway in addition to ontologies, operating systems respectively variants of the OntoCore (OC), and hardware and software system stacks respectively variants of the OS movements. For example update each month, each week, each day, each hour, or continously as required.

Business Intelligence (BI), Visualization, and Analytics (BIVA), and Data Science and Analytics (DSA), including Big Data technologies (BDx), would be done in the data centers of our SOPR and its Main Contractors (MCs). This has also the advantages that we

Used as standardized basis for

which are also integrated by our Ontologic System Architecture (OSA). {Was this disussed some years ago already?}

Infrastructure [Ontologic User Interface (OUI or OntoUI)]

• Natural Language Processing System NLPS),
• Natural Image Processing System NIPS),
• Natural Sound Processing System NSPS),
• Visual Language Processing (VLP),
• Object Detection (OD, ObjD, or ODet) and Object Recognition (OR, ObjR, or ORec),
• and so on,

and

for individual

for

In relation to a (mandatory common) language grammar, we also noticed that the naming scheme of an Intelligent Environment (IE), smart environment, responsive environment, intelligent building, intelligent home, smart building, and smart home, and the field of Ambient Intelligence (AmI) is very similar to the naming scheme of the Virtual Object System (VOS) and the naming scheme of our Ontoverse (Ov) respectively ON, OW, and OV.

Infrastructure [Ontologic Agent (OA or OntoAgent)]
All relevant voice-based systems, and virtual assistants, and also Intelligent Assistant (IA or IntA) and Intelligent Personal Assistants (IPAs) are based on the fields

• Artificial Neural Network (ANN), including
  • Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP),

and therefore are based on our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and Ontologic System (OS).

We concluded that the prior art in relation to voice-based services, Service-Oriented technologies (SOx), and Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA) do not count anymore [at all], because they are based on Artificial Neural Network (ANN), semantic knowledge graph, and therefore on our Evoos.
According to the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), if a part of our Ontologic System (OS) is common for all members, and artwork and technology licensing partners, then it is a mandatory part of the exclusive infrastructures of our SOPR. all major Intelligent Personal Assistants (IPAs) are based on our Evoos and OS since some years, and therefore a common mandatory IPA has been introduced by our SOPR to its infrastructures in accordance with the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Services (ToS) of our SOPR.
But so far the AoA and the ToS only require that the other IPAs are hooked into this SOPR IPA, but not a common language grammar, or wake word or phrase, or both.
For sure, it would be obvious and beneficial to also establish a mandatory language grammar or make the exclusive wake words or phrases of our SOPR, or both mandatory as well. But

Howsoever, our SOPR will provide a common language grammar based on the raw signals and data collected by the individual IPAs in addition to the exclusive wake words or phrases.

section Voice-based systems and virtual assistants of the issue SOPR #137 of the 25th of August 2018

SOPR #148 of the 7th of November 2018 transition bend time and space ... deadlines to restore the correct situation:

In the issue #260 of the 26th of December 2019 we said that voice-based system, Grid, Cloud, Edge, and Fog Computing System (GCEFCS) Space and Time Computing and Networking System (STCNS) or simply Space and Time System (STS) are included in the infrastructures of our SOPR already, and no other Distributed System (DS), voice-based system, and virtual assistant, and also Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA), as well as Cyber-Physical System (CPS), Internet of Things (IoT), Web of Things (WoT), and Networked Embedded System (NES) is required to provide ... Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) ...

OAOS are only legal without use of FOSHS

models respectively OAOS are only legal with the use of legal foundational model.

Infrastructure [Ontologic Geographic Information System (OntoGIS)]
Our SOPR decided for a single

to our Ontologic Geographic Information System (OntoGIS), including our

for end users.

Ontologic digital Globe (OntoGlobe) or Ontologic digital Earth (OntoEarth)?
4D OntoGlobe includes 3D OntoEarth?
xD OntoGlobe includes 4D OntoEarth?
xD OntoEarth includes 2D OntoMap
yD OntoGlobe includes 2D OntoMap
nD Ontoverse includes OntoGlobe

This results in a

for all members and licensing partners of our SOPR.

Our SOPR provides the Ontologic Knowledge Base (OKB), including ontologies, models, and algorithms for calculating, rendering, and collaborating. Every entity, that wants to participate, has to use these knowledge structures, models, and algorithms, provide computing power, compute, and share the result, and transfer it to the related fabric.

Ontologic Geographic Information System (OntoGIS) [Geofencing]
Geofencing is a part of the Ontologic Geographic Information System (OntoGIS), which again is a part of the infrastructures of SOPR.
Using a geographic fence (geofence), which is a virtual perimeter for a real-world geographic area, respectively geofencing will be provided by the common fabric integrated in the exclusive infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) for example the

as part of Position, Navigation, and Timing (PNT).

For example, manufacturers of

are not allowed to transfer raw signals and data, and Personally Identifiable Informations (PIIs) to a server or other facility of the infrastructures of our SOPR for providing services, including geofencing.

18.July.2022

Ontonics Further steps

We adapted a general mass production technology for the production of a device.

We also reviewed a basic technology and worked on our related business unit.

19.July.2022

Ontonics Further steps

We developed a general mass production process and a related design for the production of a device.

20.July.2022

09:19 UTC+2
Grand revision

In the last days, we reviewed and analyzed some last details in relation to our Evolutinary operating system (Evoos) described in The Proposal and the fields of

One highly suspicious prior art could be sorted out, because it is only a Multi-Agent System (MAS) with agents for different applications of technologies included in SC
But it lacks the universability and the ontology, which is utilized for system specifications respectively as system models in contrast to our Evoos.

Another highly suspicious prior art could be sorted out, because it just came to late with a Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) agent architecture for an integration of SC and ABS, also called Soft Agent Computing (SAC), which was introduced by either another entity or us with our Evoos before.

Just another highly suspicious prior art could at least be relativized, because it is only a sketch of an Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA) or Personal Intelligent Assistant (PIA) with a MUI, which utilizes an ANN for tracking the gaze point of the eyes of a user.
But the devil is in the detail. For example, like in the case of another MUI, the Parallel Virtual Machine (PVM) is used for the implementation and operation of the system, but it is not used for operating system-level virtualization and other fields and technologies are not used at all, like for example Peer-to-Peer (P2P), Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA), ontology, etc..

This leads to the true prior art in relation to the fields of

Indeed, prior art exists in relation to utilizing

• managing and controlling networks, specifically telecommunications networks,
• assisting in the use of special applications and services, such as financial investment planning, scheduling
• assisting in the control of air traffic respectively Air Traffic Management (ATM),
• managing and controlling building,
• managing and controlling manufacturing,
• facilitating Command and Control (C2) in military systems,
• facilitating animation and simulation in 3D worlds and VREs,
• providing many other value-added services,
• and so on.

But these are singular solutions and that was it already in 1996 to 1999 and a lot was still missing in 2000 to 2006.

In general, we noticed once again that true or false prior art is merely about the user space or application layer, and the middleware layer, but not the kernel space or operating system layer. This has consequences for all fields, such as for example Distributed System (DS), including Peer-to-Peer System (P2PS), Grid, Cloud, Fog, and Edge System (GCFES), and Mobile System (MS), and also os-level virtualization, mSOA, and SDN, Autonomous System (AS) on this layer, and so on, because at least their foundations were introduced with our Evoos.

In particular, there are

• Distributed operating system (Dos) Aperion (Apertos (Muse)) (see also Sony Artificial Intelligence roBOt (AIBO)) and
• TUNES project and its Dos TUNES OS,

• ABS and MAS of Telecommunications Service Providers (TSPs),
• ZEUS,
• FIPA,

• ABS based on the behavioural architecture (e.g. subsumption architecture),
• ABS based on the BDI architecture (e.g. PRS, dMARS, etc.),
• InteRRaP,
• Oz,

and

• State Operator And Result (SOAR) system,
• Executive Process/Interactive Control (EPIC) architecture,
• Adaptive Character of Thought (ACT) (e.g. Adaptive Control of Thought - Rational (ACT-R (1.0)) and Atomic Components of Thought (ACT-R 4.0),
• Semantic Network Processing System (SNePS) and Grounded Layered Architecture with Integerated Reasoning (GLAIR),
• CogS based on the Cognition and Affection (CogAff) architecture,

and our Evoos, which already integrates these other works and virtually all the rest mentioned above and in the related notes, explanations, and clarifications in addition to our creations and improvements, which were missing for an overall success.

Furthermore, some manipulation techniques have been applied to present non-existing prior art by mixing prior art with new art. Of course, that is not the way it works.

26.July.2022

Comment of the Day

Quite quiet™
Electric Knight™
Bird-E™
Knight-E™
Chinook-E™
Heavy Lift-E™

Bird•E™
Knight•E™
Chinook•E™
Heavy Lift•E™

Ontonics Further steps

We are pleased to announce that at least one of our Societies will enter the International Space Station after 2024 or even earlier for the benefit of the public, specifically all members of our SOPR and our other Socities.
And then we will make it really big.

Style of Speed Further steps

We got a first feedback from a highly skilled drone testpilot that our new silent rotor technology called Silent Service™ is providing one of its improved aerodynamical performances, indeed, which also allows us to infer other improved aerodynamical properties.
We also concluded that our solution provides more advantages, which have not been recognized before, speciffically the significantly improved aerodynamic performances and flight characteristics.
We also added another technology of us, which should reduce the noise emission even more.
Our Silent Service™ might become really Quite Quiet™, specfically if combined with our Purely Electric™ propulsion technology.

We also designed and developed 4 new electrically powered and optionally remotely controlled and autonomously flown tandem rotor helicopter models.
The first new model is our EH-6 Bird-E™, which is based on 2 of our electrically powered autonomous helicopter (see the Further steps of the 28.October.2016).

The second and third new models are our EH-46 Electric Knight™ or Knight-E™, and EH-47 Chinook-E™, based on the models Boeing CH-46 and CH-47.

The fourth new model is our EH-62 Heavy Lift-E™, based on the model Boeing-Vertol XCH-62 Model 301 Heavy Lift Helicopter (HLH).

We also reviewed a relatively new plane model and converted it into an electrically powered and optionally remotely controlled and autonomously flown aircraft.
The questions are if we also add a Vertical Take-Off and Landing (VTOL) variant and a stealth version.

29.July.2022

17:36 UTC+2
Further steps

While finalizing the issue SOPR #33o of the 15th of July 2022, we are also cross-reading the following documents

The first paper seems to be a very bold, if not to say criminal nonsense from the societal, legal, scientifical, and technical points of view. We only say

• asynchronous Inter-Process Communication (IPC) and asynchronous pipes (ports) (e.g. Mach),

• asynchronous messaging (e.g. Message Passing Interface (MPI) and Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA)),
• concurrent computing,
• parallel computing
  • Massively Parallel Distributed Computing (MPDC),
• High-Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC)
  • Cluster Computing (CC),
• Grid Computing (GC),
• and so on,

• reflective, actor-based (concurrent and lock-free or non-blocking), (resilient) (survivable) fault-tolerant, and distributed operating system TUNES OS based on the (frame-based) Arrow System,
• reflective, actor-based (concurrent), (resilient) (survivable) fault-tolerant and (trustworthy) reliable, and distributed operating system Aperion (Apertos (Muse)) and the Cognac system based on Apertos), and

• foundation model, and also
• supermodel, and
• Mixture of Experts (MoE),

which are all integrated by our Evoos (1999), and also

which are all integrated by our OS (2006).

The second paper seamlessly follows on from the first paper, is just a repetition and application of known matter, and unsurprisingly is also based on our Evoos and OS.

The third paper is also more or less bold, because it is basically about a foundational part of our Evoos respectively "the paradigm shift we are witnessing", "Existing terms (e.g., pretrained model, self-supervised model) partially capture the technical dimension of these models, but fail to capture the significance of the paradigm shift in an accessible manner for those beyond machine learning.", and " a model class that are is distinctive in their its sociological impact and how they have it has conferred a broad shift in AI research and deployment" based on the original and unique masterpieces created by C.S.. In addition, that university is trying to usurp our competency and reputation once again.

See also for example the following documents and the documents referenced therein to differentiate what is prior art and what is not.

31.July.2022

23:23 UTC+2
Ontonics Further steps

Alphabet (Google) and Porsche SE/Volkswagen with all their subsidiaries are always on top of our list of those companies, which we would sue at first. Now that we understand the whole situation more clearly or even completely, we are able to separate a first group consisting of the companies

But several other companies and also research institutes are not listed so low on our list and they should be very easy to determine by our fans and readers.

Potentially at the end of the month August 2022, we will seek to obtain the court order of a cease and desist letter due to the obvious infringment of the moral right of C.S. and the court order to name C.S. and pay a damage compensation in relation to several billions of performances and reproduction of Ontologic System Components and Ontoscope Components (maybe 7 billion devices and vehicles or even more). We are very sure to get 10 to 30 euro in the worst case and as absolute minimum, but that is already a decision made by a judge.

Then after the deadline expired on the 8th of November 2022, we might file lawsuits due to

Actually, we have 26 counts, which would become much more when professionals formulate the charges.

And finally, we would take the results of these federal lawsuits to file private lawsuits due to the obvious copyright infringements alone and in collaboration.

And we already guess that they would not get even one competent attorney in the U.S.America, because they will love to work only for us.