Btw.: If the company Boeing or another aircraft manufacturer uses our Ontologic System in whole or in part, then a licensing from our corporation is required (see also the related Clarification #1 of the 20th of May 2017).

In relation with the Further steps of the 21st of May 2017 we improved an object in another way.

09.June.2017
Ontonics Further steps
We are thinking about the possibility to seek crowdfunding for our hoverboard in the next weeks.

Roboticle Further steps
We have designed three more hoverbot models.

Furthermore, we are thinking about the possibility to seek crowdfunding for our new Delivery Drone™ Model T (see the Original vs. Inspiration and Roboticle Further steps of the 10th of May 2017) in the next weeks.

10.June.2017
Original vs. Inspiration
1. row: C.S., Ceci n'est pas un ballon.==This is Not a Balloon. (Today)
2. row: Tadao Cern, Black Balloons (2016)
3. row: Unknown, Black Balloons
4. row: Kyle Thompson, Untitled (2012)
5. row: Tran Quang Vinh, Back to Black (2011)
6. row: Dino e Lucia, Collection Winter 2011 (2011)
7. and 8. row: Albert Lamorisse, Le Ballon Rouge==The Red Balloon, Screenshot (1956)
9. row: Christian Dior, Miss Dior Chérie, Advertisement (2005)

© Pioneer Balloon Company and King Smiley, Tadao Cern, :(, Kyle Thompson, Tran Quang Vinh, Dino e Lucia, Albert Lamorisse, Christian Dior

11.June.2017
Ontonics Further steps #1
We worked on a new transistor, which has a highly interesting feature.

Roboticle Further steps
We worked on the design of the basic model of one of our robot platforms. This leads us to the old insight: If it looks right, it will fly right. But this model looks really great.

12.June.2017
Ontonics Further steps
We continued the work on our new transistor (see the Further steps of yesterday) and in the course of this developed another new transistor and a new paradigm of computing, which has a revolutionary property.

We also applied a technique in two similar ways that resulted in the improvement of an existing device and the development of a new device.

13.June.2017
Ontonics Further steps
On the 4th of June 2017, we also reviewed the pioneeruing work done in the field of the Mach Effect Thruster (MET) and made an interesting observation by pure happenstance. Today, we achieved to get two physical principles together, which showed the path to other integrations of principles, techniques, and improvements.

The problem with reactionless drives, anti-gravity devices, and repulsorlift engines is that gravity is the weakest of the four fundamental interactions of nature. The gravitational attraction is approximately

So even if there is some kind of an effect, it still requires an amplification by a factor of 10^38 or another approach to make its application as a drive, device, or engine possible and practical.
At this time we cannot say exactly how high the performances of our techoloiges are or if we have already over-engineered again. Nevertheless, anti-gravity technologies are becoming real respectively are materializing.

We also designed a device in two basic variants.

We also integrated a first technology with a second technology to solve an old problem with an application of the first technology. We are not sure if either another entity got this idea as well or why nobody got this idea at all.
We also integrated the first technology with a third technology to solve the old problem with the application of the first technology in another way. These developments seem to be revolutionary breakthroughs in the corresponding field.

We also applied a physical principle on a technique and developed a related first new technique in this way.
In a subsequent step, we applied another development in relation with physical principles on this first new technique and developed a second new technique.

Furthermore, we worked on one of our basic technologies and approached it from the other side so to say, that means we compared it with the common solutions and the state of the art, and found out where we have over-engineered by our unconstrained thinking and acting in the OntoLab.
In this relation we already noticed some weeks ago that we have developed a variant that is useful for a first application but not for an intended second application. With the new insights we finally brought order into our little chaos.

Nevertheless, after we balanced the various requirements and redesigned the related devices we concluded that our related statements and data must still be correct.

15.June.2017
Ontonics Further steps
We have founded a new business unit that will provide highly progressive and correspondingly very interesting products and services.

Style of Speed Further steps
We developed the next generation of an engine.

We also improved a basic engine.
In the course of this we developed the next generation of this engine.

Some still call it science fiction. We call it Style of Speed.

16.June.2017
Comment of the Day
Hovering system cam™
Hover system cam™

Ontonics Further steps
After we ordered our works in relation with one of our basic technologies (see the Further steps of 13th of June 2017), balanced the requirements, and redesigned the devices, we were also able to confirm our statements and data. Even better, in this development phase we also improved the devices, developed new device models, and solved the selection problem eventually. Simply said, the technology matured.

We also developed another new transistor and a new paradigm of computing (see the Further steps of 11th and 12th of June 2017).

In relation with our Hoverinium material class we are pleaced to inform the public that the production of a first composite and modules based on it is ready to go and that related products will be available to an acceptable cost.

Ontologic Web Further steps
We worked on our online shopping platforms, specifically on their many special services (see also the Further steps of the 11th of May 2016, 13th of March 2017, and 5th of May 2017), which also include the natural and organic food producers, such as farms for example, with our copyrighted and otherwise protected proprietary and advanced techniques and technologies, products and services that cannot be provided by any other company. This extents and even turns the whole retail market upside down in a terrific way once again. :)

Ontoscope Further steps
We worked on the Hoverorb models of our Hoverscope series (see the Further steps of the 11th of May 2017 and 1st of June 2017).

Roboticle Further steps
We worked on the great looking basic models of our TIE Drone series (see the Further steps of the 10th and 11th of May 2017) and our Hover Delivery Drone (HDD) series (see the Further steps of the 23rd of February 2017). Sadly to say, we are not sure if our Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are only on par with the performance of multicopters or multirotors, or around 90% or even considerably better.

We also worked on our Hovering Camera System (HCS), Hovering System Camera (HSC), and Hovering Personal Reconnaissance System (HPRS) platforms (short Hovercam platform; see the Further steps of the 5th of February 2017 and the Ontoscope Further steps of today). Sadly to say, we are not sure if our Hovering Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (HUAV) are only on par with the performance of multicopters or multirotors, or around 90% or even considerably better.

Style of Speed Further steps
We worked on our Swoops, Hoverorbs, and Hoverpods. Sadly to say, we are not sure if our Hovering Aerial Vehicles (HAVs) are only on par with the performance of helicopters and multicopters, around 90% better, or even in another dimension already. But who cares anyway.
Said this, go back to the Original vs. Inspiration of the 8th of June 2017, watch the video again, and make your pre-order by email at Style of Speed.

We also developed a new Active Component.

In addition, we also continued the work on a specific type of engine.

In the last days, we also worked on our first airyachts.
In this relation, we can tell the following funny anecdote: We designed a catamaran sailship and in the course of this we noted at first that it floats on water and not in air, and then we concluded eventually that we were still designing a vessel instead of our airyacht Magic Carpet³. This shows that the transformation process does not come automatically and naturally, because of its slight surreality.

17.June.2017
Original
Alejandro Burdisio
1. row: Universo Chatarra, Tranvias==Tramcars and David y Goliat
2. row: Universo Chatarra (?)
3. row: Maxi Kiosco (?)
4. row: Il Nonnino
5. row: actually unknown
6. row: actually unknown

© Alejandro Burdisio

See also his other paintings.
The difference between the works of Salvadore Dali (see for example the Original of the 21st of May 2017) and Alejandro Burdisio on the one hand and the multimedia works of art series titled Hoverinium, Pervasive Hovering, and Hovering Computing as well as the works of the directly connected 0 Gravity, Hovercity, and Hoverland projects of C.S. on the other hand is that S. Dali and A. Burdisio are painting and photographing (visual arts) while C.S. is transforming from virtuality and surreality into reality by implementing, sculpturing, constructing, and tangibly realizing (multimedia art and kinetic art) in this case.

Reality as the Media.

Btw.: Unforeseeable and unexpected and unbelievable. But true.

Style of Speed Further steps
Based on the Active Component developed yesterday, we developed another new Active Component.

We also worked on a new chassis.

18.June.2017
Ontoscope Further steps
We are thinking about the possibility to incorporate the Hovering Camera System (HCS), Hovering System Camera (HSC), and Hovering Personal Reconnaissance System (HPRS) platforms, also designated together as the Hovercam platform, of the Roboticle business unit into the Ontoscope business unit.

Style of Speed Further steps
We continued the work on our newest air launch system (see the Further steps of the 4th of February 2017 and 29th of April 2017).

19.June.2017
Ontonics Further steps
We worked on a first older system of others and us, specifically on its construction and deployment as well as its efficiency and range of applications.

We also worked on a second older system of us that exploits the old and new features of the first older system. Incredibly exciting.

Ontonics Superstructure #9
We have added another arrangement of High-Altitude Platform Stations (HAPSs) to our 3D infrastructure.

23.June.2017
Interim injunction to ban Volkswagen operating systems and services required
We made a very rough estimation about the damage that has been inflicted in the last 3 years and is sharply increasing by the activities of the vehicle manufacturer Volkswagen, specifically by its marques Audi and Porsche, other marques of Volkswagen, and other companies based on the following facts:

For sure, we have to consider the effect of spreading our works so much in a short time by the company Volkswagen, but obviously this would have happened as well when handled in a legal way by Volkswagen, and it also blocked the development of our corporation so that we are unable to distribute it, obviously as well. The latter has to be prized in again with other issues.

Furthermore, the

require an interim injunction as soon as possible to ban the

Since years, the question is not only if license fees have to be paid when using our copyrighted works in whole or in part, but in the meantime also why serious criminal actings alone and together with other entities in an orchestrated way are done to avoid paying these license fees.

It appears quite clear that Volkswagen and the actual government of the B.R.D. as well as other entities want that the truly biggest scandal of the post-war era comes to the surface.
At least at this point in time it is valid: Only cash is king. The rest is lies and deception, fraud and fake.
Es sieht ganz danach aus, dass Volkswagen und die aktuelle Bundesregierung als auch andere Entitäten wollen, dass der wirklich größte Skandal der Nachkriegszeit publik wird.
Zumindestens z.Z. gilt: Nur Bares ist Wahres. Der Rest ist nur Lug und Trug.

Investigations::Multimedia, AI and KM

"A[n illegal OntoBot clone]-powered watch face, which automatically displays the information most relevant to you. "In the morning, I might see commute time and my first meeting … and throughout the day, the face will dynamically update with information that’s relevant to you". (Interestingly, this is [the company] repositioning [its illegal clone of our Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA) or Personal Intelligent Assistant (PIA)] as a general AI assistant. There’s no voice-control element to the feature). Personalised activity notifications aimed to push you to fill your activity circles more often, and monthly challenges for those who want to improve their fitness long-term. [Obviously, we have a copy of our original and unique wrist-worn Ontoscope of iRaiment, which is operated by our original and unique Ontologic System (OS), as can be seen with the connection to the user's schedule and habits on the one hand and as it is not expected otherwise on the other hand. Why the company does not provide the voice-control element could be either to save electric power or to apply a legal trick to avoid a causal link that is not working at all.]", and "A[n illegal OntoBot clone-powered watch] face will show more info from the assistant, like flight times, controls for smart home devices and third-party notifications."

"And [the company]’s [graphic card] API, which allows developers to code directly for [the company's computer] graphics cards, gets an update. [The graphic card API wi]ll also be hooked into machine-learning frameworks. [The graphic card API i]s also gaining [...] a specific implementation for Virtual Reality. [So we have an operating system that has machine learning and VR support, which are essential elements of our OS, as can be seen on the website of OntoLinux.]", "[The company] is pushing the [workstation] as a machine that's made for virtual reality, with new hardware and software updates built for VR.", "[The company] says the machine is fast enough for real-time 3D rendering, code compiling and designing virtual reality content. [Because the functionality of its hardware is controlled by the functionality of its software, including its operating system with its system libraries and components to run its and others' applications, we have here also the related parts of our OntoBot, OntoScope, and OntoBlender software components of our Ontologic Ssystems OntoLix and OntoLinux.]", "[The graphic card API]’s also gaining support for external GPUs [...] [See the related point of the Feature-List 1 of OntoLinux.]", "[... mobile]OS. It’s getting [the graphic card API] and a new set of machine learning APIs letting developers use [the company]’s natural language comprehension and facial recognition tools [Apple's mobile operating system features now a voice-based agent or assistant, voice-based virtual assistant, or voice-based personal assistant, AR and VR, and support for Multimodal User Interfaces (MUIs) as well as mobile devices with dual-lens camera and other sensors. Once again, we have a clear evidence that a part of our OS has been copied in an illegal way, as can be seen on the website of OntoLinux for example, specifically on its webpage Links to Software.]"

"[The company's illegal OntoBot clone] gets a new, deep-learning powered voice. It’s more natural-sounding, but still not that natural-sounding. But it can also do translation now (from English to Chinese, French, German, Italian and Spanish, for now), as well as offer multiple answers to some questions. [The illegal IPA]Kit [...] can now hook into more apps, more easily. And more generally, [The illegal IPA i]s getting more proactive in offering help across apps like [the company's] News and [web browser]. [A non-expert has recognized our OntoBot and our Ontologic Applications in the illegal IPA clone of the company Apple, as can be easily seen with for example the natural characteristic, the multilingual feature, though our OS is multilingual in respect to every modality, and every natural and artificial language, the connection and integration with app(lication)s, and the term "proactive".]"

"Mixed reality [-] Tools that let app designers add virtual objects to a real-world view from the phone's camera, in real time, were also revealed. The mobile game [of a company] is a well-known example of mixed-reality technology in action. [The company] said the new ARkit would make use of the dual-lens camera on the [handheld mobile device], making the integration of virtual objects and the real world more realistic. [Besides that a journalist of a well-known public-law broadcaster deliberately misled the public by using the term Mixed Reality (MR) and telling that an Augmented Reality (AR) mobile game is an MR mobile game, because we are talking about an MR spectrum that includes AR and Virtual Reality (VR), see for example the webpage Overview of the website of OntoLinux, we have here essential parts and characteristics of our OntoScope"[The company] is introducing a number of effects into [an application related with] Photos feature. It will use machine learning to turn your [application related with] Photos into shareable looping images and select individual clips from the photo. [Somehow this reminds us of our Ontoscope powered by our OS.]"

""Intelligent tracking prevention", which uses machine learning to prevent ads from following you around the web. [Obviously, we have here a feature of the web browser of the company, that is closely related with some features of our OS.]"
"[The company service] Pay gets updated for person-to-person payments, so you’ll be able to send money through [a messaging application] to other [mobile]OS users.", "In [the company]'s forthcoming mobile operating system, the company is introducing peer-to-peer payments through [a messaging application]. [Like cloud computing, Peer-to-Peer (P2P) computing is referenced by the link Grid Computing Info Centre (GRID Infoware) in the section Network Technology of the webpage Links to Software and by the Virtual Object System (VOS) on the website of OntoLinux. We also see a connection with our Managed Peer-to-Peer (MP2P) computing or networking.]", "Another feature that [the company] probably didn’t want to make too much of because it’s basically copied from a competitor, [mobile operating system] now gets the same password-sharing feature that Microsoft introduced with [an operating system]. If one [mobile operating system] device is already on your home network, a nearby device can join it simply by clicking on the network SSID. A request comes up on your device, and if you accept, the password will be sent over the air to the new phone. [We are not quite sure if it is related with the distributed computing features of our OS or Managed Peer-to-Peer (MP2P) computing or networking.]", "[The company i]s removing most of the social network integration from [its mobile]OS [...], resetting the board for app integrations. On the plus side, that means that smaller networks can compete on equal terms, rather than having to deal with the fact that a few sharing services, like [this] and [that], get priority. [A closer look reveals easily, that the company also began to steal parts of our Ontologic Web (OW), because it merely substituted the social networking service with some kind of app(lication) based Channel Computing respectively distributed social networking based on Peer-to-Peer (P2P) computing, as we have already observed and documented with another only stealing company, and Managed Peer-to-Peer (MP2P) computing based on Channel Computing.]"

"[The company] aims, "rock the house"; "spatial awareness"; and a "Musicologist" living inside it. [Musicology is the scholarly analysis and research-based study of music. The parent disciplines of musicology include for example cultural studies, philosophy (particularly aesthetics and semiotics), ethnology and cultural anthropology, psychology and sociology, physiology and neuroscience, acoustics and psychoacoustics, and computer sciences or information sciences and mathematics. Obviously, we have here the same disciplines that are also related with our OS, which provides us another relevant causal link just for free.]", "[Its smart (loud)speaker] is controlled using [its illegal IPA clone], the company’s voice-activated personal assistant, which has, according to [the company], been trained to be better at answering questions about music [...]", "And [the company's illegal IPA clone] lives inside it. Say "Hey [illegal clone]", and you can give it a huge array of questions and commands about music [... The company's illegal IPA clone] can answer non-music questions, too, setting timers, reading you the news, and so on.", "The device can also be used to send messages, get updates on news, sports and weather and control smart home devices connected using [the company]’s HomeKit. [See for example the section iArchitecture in the Innovation-Pipeline of Ontonics to get the connection with our OS.]", "[The company] has placed an emphasis on audio quality [...] as well as "spatial awareness" that detects its location in a room and adapts the output automatically. [Spatial awareness or spatial reasoning, location awareness, and spatial self-awareness are essential features of our OntoBot software component as well as our Ontoscope paradigm respectively hardware (component), as we already explained several years ago (see for example the Clarification of the 13th of November 2008, the Investigations::Robotics of the 24th of August 2012, and the Clarification of the 8th of June 2013).]", "If you put it in the corner of the room, a spokeswoman said, it would quickly recalibrate itself in order to fill the room with sound. [In fact, recalibrating is a reflective, self-improving function and together with Apple's illegal clone of our OntoBot we have here also a part of the Ontoscope powered by our OS.]", "If you have other devices connected to [the company]'s smart home app, you can control them though the speaker as well. It also does the usual smart speaker tasks, like playing the news, setting timers and answering basic questions. [Distributed computing and the related functions can be found in the Feature-List 2 of OntoLinux.]", "The permanent listening may be common at Amazon and Google. For [the company] it is exactly a unique selling point not to do this. [The company] emphasizes that as much as possible of artificial intelligence is run on the devices themselves and as less as possible data is sent to the servers. [What an utter nonsense of a commentator respectively troll. Guess what Apple does with all of its devices and services? Furthermore, we have here once again the impression that the company is imitating our corporation in this way as well, like we have observed it before in the cases of user data protection and safety of an operating system.]"

Bingo. Bingo. Bingo. We have already discussed this issue several times in the last years with the same illegal actings of the companies Google, Microsoft, Facebook, and Amazon, and the automobile manufacturers. Apple has provided the evidences that it has taken our original and unique multimedia works of art Ontologic System and Ontoscope as blueprint in a top-down approach by copying essential elements and arranged them in exactly the same composition.
That said, Apple has stolen intellectual properties of us once again and as not expected otherwise, and therefore it has to pay license fees if it continues to use our IPs, definitely.

A little hammer we found out at the sideline is that Alex Hern of the The Guardian quoted Dave Lee of the British Broadcasting Corporation. Also interestingly in this relation is to note that the British Broadcasting Corporation reported about the subject of the voice of Apple's illegal IPA clone as well some days ago. It seems to be that we have already found another evidence of a serious criminal network.

It has also become obvious that we do not have here an ordinary technological progress but a planned product and service evolution, development, and introduction of companies like Apple.

If companies like Apple still refuse to pay their license fees and educate the public correctly about the true origins of our original and unique multimedia works of art, then we will refuse to give them any allowance to reproduce our Ontologic System and Ontoscope in whole or in part as soon as possible. And this moment may already be now or will come in the not so far away future.

Furthermore, what the industries show in relation with the Ontologic System and Ontoscope of C.S. and our corporation has nothing in common with entrepreneurial activity and competition or so-called free press anymore, but is only fake and fraud.
What makes this a situation also totally ridiculous and grotesque is the fact that despite companies like Apple, Google, Microsoft, Samsung, and Co. are sitting on huge piles of patents the only interesting things for them are to steal our IPs and to react on our activities.

Even more worse is the fact that once again we could provide evidence that this is also an ethnic, religious thing, that cannot be accepted by the public.

24.June.2017
Ontonics Further steps
In the Further steps of the 16th of June 2017 of our business units Roboticle and Style of Speed we said that we are not sure if our Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), Hovering Aerial Vehicles (HAVs), and Zero Gravity Vehicles (ZGVs) are only on par with the performance of helicopters and multicopters or multirotors, or around 90% or even considerably better. After we reviewed our newest generation of the basic technologies we could see now that the statement about the performance mixed two views on our UAVs, HAVs, and ZGVs:

• ionocraft, aka. lifter 1.6 practical - 11 g/W experimental, but relatively low thrust and only with weight of ElectroHydroDynamic (EHD) thruster and without weights of voltage generator and power source
• helicopter 6.1 g/W = 10 lb/hp
• winged aircraft e.g. Piper J-3 Cub 9.4 g/W = 15.38 lb/hp
• OntoLab UAVs, HAVs, and ZGVs 12 g/W = 19.67 lb/hp
• parachute 34 g/W = 55.8 lb/hp practical, but no thrust and only in downward direction

The data is for the very basic variant of our UAVs, HAVs, and ZGVs. The performances and efficiencies of their advanced variants are in another dimension, but we will not tell in which dimension and the reasons for their performances and efficiencies (see also the Style of Speed Further steps of the 22nd of May 2017). Instead, we refer to the Original vs. Inspiration of the 8th of June 2017.
For a better understanding by the non-experts under our fans and readers we can give the short explanation that this is more revolutionary than what the Wright Brothers did. Oh, yeah, Rock 'n' Roll. :D

A blink of an eye and you are in the sky.

Ontologic Web Further steps
We had the impression that the so-called Facebook Groups of a social networking service are some kind of a substitute for Channel Computing respectively distributed social networking based on Peer-to-Peer (P2P) and Managed Peer-to-Peer (MP2P) that are also parts of our Ontologic Web (OW) since the start of our Ontologic Systems OntoLix and OntoLinux (see for example the Further steps of the 3rd of November 2016 and 12th of December 2016, and also the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 1st of April 2017).

25.June.2017
Original vs. Inspiration
Fantasy Aerial Vehicle, Steampunk Aerial Vehicle

© :(

We removed the rear-mounted pusher propeller from the original image, because such a type of propulsion is not required for moving the Hoverorbs and Hoverpods of Style of Speed.

See also the Original vs. Inspiration of the 13th, 17th, and 27th of April 2017.

26.June.2017
Roboticle Further steps
In the last week we also worked on the designs of a model series based on one of our robot platforms. A quick look on the prognosis showed, that we are 20 years ahead with the introduction of its basic technology, which belongs to those technologies that are said to not work in practice at all. Who cares? We simply bent time and space respectively continued with the creation of our reality.

29.June.2017
Clarification
We thought again about the reasons, arguments, etc. why our Ontologic System and our Ontoscope are original and unique multimedia works of art.
One aspect that came into mind is their direct relation with the Ontological argument and the Ontological proof, which denote the theological, philosophical, or/and even logical and mathematical discipline and related debate to make the proof (of the certainty) of the existence of God (that use ontology), and the Proof of the Truthful (that is said to use or emphasize cosmology). Alone this aspect is sufficient for showing the originality and uniqueness of these two works.
But while we were thinking about this specific aspect and the aspects of

we also came back to the aspect that

and also all of the features of the

that we have discussed over the many years (see for example the Clarification of the 16th of April 2016) or not discussed until now.

We concluded once again that the originality and uniqueness, specifically the relation with the creator of the Ontologic System and the Ontoscope, is given in differnent ways, which is important to note for us, because a (not really) clever company could argue that copying parts from our Ontologic System and our Ontoscope would by covered by some kind of a fair use or would not be protected at all by our copyright, because said parts existed before and are not connected with the expressions of our works.
Examples for such parts would be a

which are connected in a combination or composition in relation with a single software system, such as an operating system for example, or a single digital environment, but so to say are unconnected with the specific expression in the form of for example the self-portrait of C.S. or even an Ontological proof as a self-portrait of the OS creator.
In fact, at this point the Ontologic System with its Ontologic System Archtiecture (OSA) has to be viewed as a successor for an operating system and this original and unique ontology-based, ontology-oriented, and ontologic successor includes the parts listed above as examples to establish or realize its other original and unique parts including the Ontologic Applications, the Ontologic Net, the Ontologic Web, and the Ontologic uniVerse.
In this relation, we also emphasized many times the composition of the components in accordance with the Ontologic System Architecture.

Eventually, to argue in such a (not really) clever way is not sufficient

Maybe we have repeated some statements once again, but it does not harm.

Ontonics Further steps
We continued the work on our Reactor technology. After reviewing our records, we noted a specific property once again and also that we have not exploited this property completely (see also the Further steps of the 21st of February 2017 and 9th of March 2017). In a subsequent step, we designed a first new variant, then a second new variant, and then we simply put all together which resulted in a simple design of a third new variant. An interesting point is that this last development step has something in common with the step that added the chain to the bicycle: very simple, very elegant, very efficient, very reliable, very cost effective, very etc..

We also worked on a device.

Style of Speed Further steps
We continued the work on an an engine technology (see also the Further steps of the 3rd of June 2017).

30.June.2017
Ontonics Further steps
We extended the range of products and services of one of our new business divisions by the application of one of our technologies in a common way, by the adaption and the application of this technology in a different way, and by the development of a new business process based on this technology.