This concept led to the consideration to take a big hump instead of one or two small bumps and the thought that it would be more interesting than merely cutting off the upper deck of the jet model 747 of Being for constructing a flight simulator to use it for the construction of a real flight deck or flight lounge, which was the starting point for our jet model 7x7 Very Very Very Important Person (VVVIP).
The image below shows our 7x7 VVVIP (top), which is a conversion based on the models 777-9 and 747-8, and also known as the 777 Double-Decker (DD) or Routemaster, as well as a 747-8 (middle), and a 777-8 (bottom).

© :I and Style of Speed

Indeed, the design looks a little unusual at first, but only for a minute until the effect is developing.
We also removed the mount for the wheather radar scanner, mounted it directly on the front pressure bulkhead, arranged the other devices, and flattened the radome for getting a more beautiful curved shape of a large nose.
The upper deck could be made of advanced composite materials and potentially even get a special glass cockpit, but sadly to say no second pair of flight sticks actually. :)
The crew door of the upper deck must not be functional and can be removed completely for further weight reduction.

This is only the beginning and in the next step we must decide where to position the pool.

By the way: Such a conversion also works with a jet of the manufacturer Airbus.

04.May.2019
Comment of the Day
Crashproof™
Crash-proof™

Ontonics Further steps
We have begun with

Furthermore, we have begun with developing our

which are very efficient, mildly said.

Style of Speed Further steps
Despite it does not make so much sense anymore due to our reviewed and revived Hover technologies (see the Further steps of the 28th of April 2019), we continued the work on our special project, in which we develop a specific type of Vertical TakeOff and Landing (VTOL) aircraft with an intermeshing transverse rotor configuration mentioned in the Further steps of the 21st, 23rd, and 25th of April 2019, and selected the basic design of the three variants, which is shown in the image below to give a first impression about it.

© :(, :I, and Style of Speed

But maybe much more interesting for our fans and readers is the message that we began with

of our Hoverboard of the first generation.

Crashproof™

We also continued the work on our Plasmajet™. To describe the results of related projects encouraging must be called misleading because they indicate that our Plasmajet is at least 30 times more advanced in comparison to a contemporary turbojet. Honestly, we knew all the time that our technology is superior, but only now we are realizing how huge the advancement and far beyond our expectations and estimations truley is, despite we have not yet bent time and space.

07.May.2019
King Smiley Further steps
We continued the work on our multimedia work of art series titled Hoverinium, Pervasive Hovering, and Hovering Computing, which are related to the themes of hovering and anti-gravity as well as our theme of Reality as the Media.
As is the case with our works of art titled Ontologic System and Ontoscope, these work of art series have also aspects of

while they

or in short they

as already discussed in the following publications:

Style of Speed Further steps
We continued the finalization of the design of our Hoverboard of the first generation, which basically reduced to the straightforward task of scaling and arranging the basic components.

Specification:

08.May.2019

16:48 UTC+2
More evidences Google mimicking C.S. and C.S. GmbH

*** Work in progress - link missing ***
At its latest developer conference the company Google presented the new generation of its voice-controlled Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA), which is now capable to run on a mobile device with nearly no connection to another computing system, such as a cloud computing platform for example.

We already explained several years ago that our Ontologic System

in total contrast to all the other systems like for example Apple Siri, Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant (until recently), and Microsoft Cortana (see the Clarification of the ...).

Having said this, Google has not a huge lead ahead of the competition, but provided another significant and profound evidence, that proves a causal link with our unforeseeable and unexpected, personal, original and unique, iconic masterpieces of art titled Ontologic System and Ontoscope, and created by C.S.
Indeed, the question is not at all what would Google do, but what will Google take and license from us next.

By the way: Since several years, such a device is not called a telephone or smartphone anymore but an Ontoscope.

Style of Speed Further steps
In relation to a specific type of Vertical TakeOff and Landing (VTOL) aircraft with an intermeshing transverse rotor configuration mentioned in the Further steps of the 21st, 23rd, 25th of April 2019, and 4th of May 2019, we beautified the basic design and designed the basic propulsion system of its first generation.
This includes 2 turbines, that can work together, and 1 special transmission on both sides, that are connected with each other to guarantee the orderly intermeshing of the rotors. The open questions are the dimensions of the turbines, the configuration of the gearing, and the overall interplay of them.

09.May.2019
Comment of the Day
Hoverjet™

Ontonics Further steps
We continued the work on one of our extremely interesting technologies.

Style of Speed Further steps
We continued the work on our types of highspeed airship, Hoverbus, and Hoverliner™ based on the transformation of conventional airliner models (see the Further steps of the 11th and 24th of May 2017).
In this relation, we also looked on

See also the Original vs. Inspiration of the 3rd of October 2017.

The more tricky part is to answer the question what the requirements are in relation to conventional wings, shape, and so on if all possibilities and options are on the table.

10.May.2019
Ontonics Further steps
We began with considering the establishments of more collecting societies for the performance and the reproduction of other original and unique works of art created by C.S., which are artistically independent from the two other works of art titled Ontologic System and Ontoscope.

We also continued the work related to an older project. Our contributions and advantages based on other undisclosed projects and their solutions are manifold.

13:33 UTC+2
SOPR #177

*** Proof-reading mode ***
We have a bunch of topics to discuss:

Ontologic System (OS) device and point

We already discussed the potentially confusing matter of doing something "on our OS respectively in our OS" and doing something "with our OS respectively in our OS" in the issue #138 of the 28th of August 2018.
In this context, we also used the terms access device and access point (see the issues #21 of the 2nd of October 2017 and SOPR #29 of 13th of October 2017), for example in relation to our Ontoscope (Os) despite one is in the OS all the time and space, and therefore we should call it an OS terminal device or OS terminal point or simply OS device or OS point in relation to the notions of

Superapps, platforms, and proprietary nets and webs
The aspirations of companies, their susbsidiaries, and their partly owned or independent partner companies to create and grow

or better said echos, shadows, or even clones of our Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV)

are possible under the provisions of

which also set the natural, technical, and legal limits of these business activities, indeed (see also the issue #150 of the 20th of November 2018).

At this point, we always refer to the general provisions of our SOPR, that are demanding

from everybody participating for establishing the guiding principles of our SOPR, that are guaranteeing

for everybody participating.

Telecoms and broadcasters
We would like to recall that we already

• computing,
• networking,
• communication,
• applications, and
• performing as a Service (aaS),

specifically by the corresponding overlap of

• lookup services (name, directory, and discovery services),
• routing service,
• forwarding service,
• caching service,
• composition service, and
• other services.

(see also the Website update of the 8th of March 2019 and the issue #169 of the 18th of March 2019).

Regulation of internet platforms and companies
Once again, the media, specifically public-law broadcasters and large media companies, criticized the privatization of opinion forming by social networking services.
We quote from a report a relatively subjective opinion and hence misleading statement: "Public debate completely privatized
The fundamental problem remains, that private companies without any transparency decide on central questions of democratic societies - for example on the limits of freedom of opinion.
The digital public discusses almost completely on the platforms of corporations - and correspondingly they also preset the scope and define what is permitted and what is not by their algorithms and guidelines of presentation."

From other statements we got some more points of criticism like the following ones:

We refer to our related statement about the privatization of the social watchdog made in the issue #176 of the 13th of April 2019.
Furthermore, we would like to recall that the

of the SOPR infrastructure are based on the basic properties of our OS, specifically

but not on Common Sense Computing (CSC) and crowd-sourced activities (e.g. Web 2.0 with wikis and blogging platforms), which are highly subjective and manipulated, and hence not sufficient.
As can be seen with the design of our OS with its ON, OW, and OW, we have created related solutions, and together with the AoA and the ToS of our SOPR we also have installed related regulations.

But also the break-up of large internet companies, that also are (potential and designated) members of our SOPR already acting in the developing ON, OW, and OV, has become a subject of political discussion. Somehow this is surprising, because the matter is discussed now but did not happen 15 years ago.

Coping parts of our AoA and our ToS as federal laws was already discussed in the issue #176 of the 13th of April 2019 as well and we still hope that such conductions are not misused as a means of political interference, though we had to notice other once again.
For example, the European Comission (EC) suggested once again a data-for-all law, that would require large companies to share the data that fuels them with start-ups and small companies. But in fact, this

Howsoever, the dependencies and consequences are simple to understand:

• control is taken away from our SOPR and
• interference is done in our SOPR.

• management of the SOPR is done like a normal competitor at the market with a normal platform put on top of the old infrastructure, and
• the existence of our SOPR and the agreement is questioned.

License Model
We are in the process of reworking the License Model (LM).
For example, we created packages in regard to classification criteria to delineate or categorize

• Ontologic System Architecture (OSA)
• Ontologic System Components (OSC) and Ontoscope Components (OsC),
• Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS), and
• integrations of these packages according to our OSA.

This allows

• free to use on the one hand and
• licensable on the other hand,

and

in better and fairer ways.

Benefit program
Indeed, as part of the benefit program of our SOPR we have invited our members to

(see once again the issue #29 of the 13th of October 2017 and also the King Smiley Further steps of the 31st of December 2017). But we have not elaborated in more detail how this will be realized.
As initial steps, we decided that said technologies, products, and services, and also said projects, which are unrelated to our OS and our Os from an artistic point of view but nevertheless already connected with them, will be

by other collecting societies for their performance and reproduction, that may have a different AoA, ToS, and LM than the SOPR.
For sure, members of our SOPR can express their wishes and request that a work of art or a part thereof will be considered as an object of license.
Please note that a work of art can consist of one or more different parts, can be utilized in one or more different ways, or both.

King Smiley Further steps
As announced in the King Smiley Further steps of the 7th of May 2019, we got the proposals for two new works of art, which belong to the multimedia work of art series titled Hoverinium and Pervasive Hovering, and were created by C.S..
We are very sure that these surreal works even are beyond the expression respectively folks wisdom that beauty is in the eye of the beholder due to their huge fascination radiated on everybody.

And this is only the beginning.

12.May.2019
Comment of the Day
"Do not think about it, do not risk it, and do not try it.", [C.S., Today]

Style of Speed Further steps
We noticed in relation to the specific type of Vertical TakeOff and Landing (VTOL) aircraft with an intermeshing transverse rotor configuration (see the Further steps of the 4th of May 2019 and also follow the given links) that our design direction is also similar with the combination of the

We also continued the work on the VTOL aircrafts based on our Hover technologies, which basically comprised the review and confirmation of our work made so far in relation to airliners, supersonic and hypersonic jets, and aerospaceplanes.

King Smiley Further steps
We got the proposals for two new works of art, which are based on related works of art, belong to the multimedia work of art series titled Hoverinium and Pervasive Hovering, and were created by C.S..

16.May.2019
SOPR #178
We would like to share some thoughts in relation to the following topics:

Reproduction of our OSC
Potentially, the reproduction of our Ontologic System Components (OSC) will not be allowed and licensed anymore in the future.
As a consequence,

In fact, this is no problem at all due to the reasons that the

• reproducing our OSC,
• implementing an OS variant, and even
• utilizing an operating system

is not required at all, and

Benefit program
We continued with drafting a regulation for the

• copied or extracted from our related works of art created by C.S. and
• connected with our OS already,

and

Further steps
We also would like to suggest a protocol for the further procedure comprising the following steps:

• the AoA and the ToS with the LM of our SOPR and
• additional material,

• a preliminary agreement or memorandum of understanding, and
• the final agreement,

• preliminary agreement and
• final agreement,

• administration of the joint business activities and
• payment of the
  • damage compensations, resulting from
    • unpaid royalties for unauthorized performances and reproductions,
    • obmitted referencing respectively citation with attribution,
    • damaged reputations,
    • harmed integrities,
    • frustrated momenta, and
    • thwarted, obstructed, blocked, and otherwise missed commercial business possibilities and follow-up opportunities,
  • admission fees, and
  • outstanding royalties for authorized performances and reproductions,

17.May.2019

21:19 UTC+2
More evidences Microsoft mimicking C.S. and C.S. GmbH

*** Work in progress - better order and wording ***
We would like to make clear that our Ontologic System includes

as explained in the

Eventually, the copyright

• Augmented Reality (AR) based foundation of Pokemon called Pokemon Go of the subsidiary Niantic owned by the companies Google and Nintendo, and
• AR game story, AR experience, or AR version of Minecraft titled Minecraft Go (see the Ontonics, and OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 12th of July 2016), which was copied as Minecraft Earth. Bingo!!!

On the one hand, it is a luck for Microsoft that Minecraft Earth merely belongs to our Ontologic Applications but on the other hand it is a pity for the same reason as well, because every other entity is allowed to license it for a 5% share of the overall revenued generated with it.

18.May.2019
Comment of the Day
"I decide over my works.", [C.S., Sometimes]

King Smiley Further steps
As announced in the King Smiley Further steps of the 7th of May 2019, we got the proposal for a whole new series of artworks, which belong to the multimedia work of art series titled Hoverinium and Pervasive Hovering, and were created by C.S. (see also the Further steps of the 10th and 12th of May 2019).
Fascinatingly, C.S. was able to incorporate even more.

19.May.2019

00:17 and ... UTC+2
Ontonics Further steps

*** Work in progress - better explanation, order, and wording ***
We continued the considerations about our

(see also the King Smiley Further steps of the 7th of May 2019).

In general, we have the two alternatives of a

The consense does not place us in a less favourable position with respect to our monopoly over a work of art and therefore the consideration of the advantages or benefits, and the disadvantages or drawbacks given with both alternatives is still going on.
In this respect, we have to make the statement that with merely some warm words or medals, which by the way were even not said and given in relation to our Ontologic System, we will not come together with other entities and go further.

Despite art is not defineable, eventually, in most of the cases it is nevertheless possible to

The common way of protection is given by the copyright, patent, and antitrust laws. But due to various reasons these laws are

for the protection of outstanding cases (anymore), specifically for the works created by C.S. viewed as

pro-momentum clause is demanded

The works in question have the characteristics of being

which allows the declaration as a work of the art forms of

and all other suitable art forms.

In relation to the art form of surrealism we refer to the King Smiley Further steps of the 7th of May 2019.
In relation to the art form of found object we quote an online encyclopedia in relation to the art form found object: "Found object originates from the French objet trouvé, describing art created from undisguised, but often modified, objects or products that are not normally considered materials from which art is made, often because they already have a non-art function.[1] Pablo Picasso first publicly utilized the idea when he pasted a printed image of chair caning onto his painting titled Still Life with Chair Caning (1912). Marcel Duchamp is thought to have perfected the concept several years later when he made a series of ready-mades, consisting of completely unaltered everyday objects selected by Duchamp and designated as art.[2] [...] In its strictest sense the term "ready-made" is applied exclusively to works produced by Marcel Duchamp,[3] [...] and especially to works dating from 1913 to 1921.
Found objects derive their identity as art from the designation placed upon them by the artist and from the social history that comes with the object. This may be indicated by either its anonymous wear and tear (as in collages of Kurt Schwitters) or by its recognizability as a consumer icon (as in the sculptures of Haim Steinbach). The context into which it is placed is also a highly relevant factor.
[...]
As such, found objects can prompt philosophical reflection in the observer ranging from disgust to indifference to nostalgia to empathy.
As an art form, found objects tend to include the artist's output - at the very least an idea about it, i.e. the artist's designation of the object as art - which is nearly always reinforced with a title. There is usually some degree of modification of the found object, although not always to the extent that it cannot be recognized, as is the case with ready-mades. Recent critical theory, however, would argue that the mere designation and relocation of any object, ready-mades included, constitutes a modification of the object because it changes our perception of its utility, its lifespan, or its status."
design

In all cases we hold the moral rights for the system architectures, that means C.S. has to be named as the creator and asked for changes.

It is an interplay of powers and various interests in the dark grey zone. Due to this reason, the reason that we have not started the building up of that house of cards more than 20 years ago, and other reasons we have to be pragmatic and install our own regulations. If an entity wants to fight our regulations to the court, either politics, industries, or both, then the whole matter comes on the table (see also the Comment of the Day of the 12th of May 2019).

In general, we would allow the utilization of our works for a fair share. "But [as said recently as well] we also observered and discussed activities conducted by [various entities] that are counterproductive and require countermeasures, so that they cannot damage, destroy, or even steal our intentions, goals, intellectual properties, and momenta (anymore), but without cancelling [out] our rights."

We already discussed the following provisions, which from our point of view are very interesting and constructive:

• presented as an unforeseable and unexpected, personal, and original and unique work of art or part thereof, which includes such a work of art declared before as esotericism, fantasy, science fiction, metaphysics, or such alike, and
• copied or extracted later from said work of art or said part thereof,

is protected

An entity, that utilizes said work of art or said part thereof respectively said technology, product, or service before it has become an object of license, will be banned from any related

What is in our artwork scrapbook or Innovation-Pipeline and the subject matter of the debate here? The publication, protection, and licensing of works created by C.S. that

It would take days to list all creations of C.S. on the one hand, while some may be existing already on the other hand, though we have not seen related developments or successes.

20.May.2019
King Smiley Further steps
What a performance still going on since 2 decades. We got the proposal for a whole new art form of found and tried objects, which is similar to the art forms found object and readymade, and a related series of artworks, which were all created by C.S..

Like with Henri-Robert-Marcel Duchamp's first readymades, the audience and the critics will be ignorant or moved, shake their heads, discuss, shout, and most potentially also declare C.S. as mad, but eventually conclude these works of art are

21.May.2019
Comment of the Day
Blitz™
Blitzer™
Blitz fund™

Ontonics Further steps
We concluded that all outstanding works created by C.S. eventually are artworks, indeed and as we already said in the past, including artworks of the art form found object, also known as readymades. One reason for this acknowledgement is the thoroughly, exhaustively, and completely proven and documented fact that most of the works develop these incredibly and unbelievably huge and broad positive and negative

which to prove was also a very important aspect of the creation of the works of art titled Ontologic System and Ontoscope.
See also the complete discussion of the subject matter in the Further steps of the 19th of May 2019.

But there are differences to found objects and readymades and hence many works of art created by C.S. could even define a new art form:
The first difference is that that these works are not found objects in accordance with the credo "I don't search, I find." of Pablo Picasso but tried objects in accordance with the credo "I find and try." of C.S..
The second difference is that these works are not readymades but have properties of handmades and readymades, simply said.
The third difference is that these works are not made for expressing an anger about the way the arts are viewed or an angry nihilism but made for having fun.

In relation to this confirming conclusion and differentiation, we also continued with the legal work, that comprises

as also discussed in the Further steps of the 10 and 19th of May 2019.

As results, our second and third collecting societies have been established under the names

(see the related issues SUUP #1 and SWC #1 of today below).

Oh, what a funny shortcoming. We only concluded today that our newest processor technology also allows a higher clock rate besides its already known improvements.
Even better, this property demands a rework of the whole processor technology and its production to exploit the whole capabilities, but also a recreation of the related found objects or however they are correctly designated.

Ontonics Blitz Fund I #1
We are very pleased and more than proud to announce that we have begun with the activities for our

under the lead of our Hightech Office Ontonics.
Investors get the

But we must also give the note that there will be a limit for investors with respect to the amount of capital.

As one of the first steps, our Hightech Office Ontonics transferred the

to the Blitz Fund I (see also the Ontonics Further steps of the 15th of February 2019 and 29th of March 2019, and the Style of Speed Further steps of the 14th of April 2019).
The latter means that the Blitz Fund I is planned as a 350 billion U.S. Dollar fund, though we intend to scale it up to 500 billion U.S. Dollar. This should be sufficient to outgun even the most unteachable entities on planet Earth. :)

See also the issue OntoLab Vision Fund I #1 of the 4th of October 2018 in relation to the start of our OntoLab Vision Fund I, which has similar characteristics and opportunities.

SUUP #1
We are pleased to announce the start of our collecting society titled Society for Unobtainium Utilization and Production (SUUP).

We quote an online encyclopedia to give our fans and readers a first impression and better understanding about the area of activity of our SUUP: "In fiction, engineering, and thought experiments, unobtainium is any fictional, extremely rare, costly, or impossible material, or (less commonly) device needed to fulfill a given design for a given application. The properties of any particular unobtainium depend on the intended use. [...] The word unobtainium derives humorously from unobtainable with the suffix -ium, the conventional designation for a chemical element.
[...]
Since the late 1950s,[a][1] aerospace engineers have used the term "unobtainium" when referring to unusual or costly materials, or when theoretically considering a material perfect for their needs in all respects, except that it does not exist.
[...]
Later, unobtainium became an engineering term for practical materials that really exist, but are difficult to get."

Obviously, our SUUP will control and manage the licensing of the production and the utilization of materials created by C.S., including

SWC #1
We are pleased to announce the start of our collecting society titled Society for Weather Control (SWC).
We guess that the name of our SWC is self-explanatory with respect to its area of activity. :D

King Smiley Further steps
C.S. is in the hot spot once again. While trying to write the notes about the latest proposa for a work, the work developed into a much broader one. Accordingly, the proposal of 20th of May 2019 (yesterday) was extended.
Very nice.

We also got another proposal for a new found kinetic art object, which belongs to the multimedia work of art series titled Hoverinium and Pervasive Hovering, and were created by C.S..
Eventually, this work and closely related works will show that the outcome of the discussions of the last days is right.

22.May.2019

18:41 and 23:12 UTC+2
SOPR #179

*** Work in progress - some general properties of works of art OS and Os missing ***
This issue focuses on the

Not only the works of art titled Ontologic System and Ontoscope are much broader, and so on, but also many other works included in the oeuvre of C.S. have similar or even the same overall characteristic properties, that demands the same handling as discussed in more detail in the Ontonics Further steps of the 19th of May 2019.
The latter is also emphasized by our impression that we got from the observation of activities conducted by entities in relation to a superordinate agreement, which provides the legal foundation for our collecting societies.
More for legal reasons but also for artistical, social, and technological reasons, a complete separation of the Ontologic System (OS) and Ontoscope (Os) as well as Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) on the one side and said other works on the other side is not always possible or reasonable.
Eventually, it has been shown that a complete liberalization is not constructive.

Nevertheless, we complied with the various aspects by introducing our benefit program for members of the SOPR that collaborate harmonically with us.
Beginning with the issues #177 of the 10th of May 2019 and #178 of the 16th of May 2019, our Hightech Office Ontonics and our SOPR also began to

But still missing is an extension of the AoA and the ToS of the SOPR by a provision that regulates the relation between the SOPR and the other collecting societies established by Ontonics, that all act on behalf and in compliance with the creator of said works of art included in the oeuvre of C.S..
A work of art or a part thereof, which was created by C.S. and is

also becomes the subject of the provisions included in the AoA and the ToS with the LM of our SOPR as follows:
The SOPR reserves the right to revoke an allowance for any

if a provision included in the AoA and the ToS with the LM of said other collecting society has been broken by a member of the SOPR as long as said provision of said other collecting society is broken by said member of the SOPR.

King Smiley Further steps
First of all, we would like to suggest the title found and tried object or simply tried obejct for the new art form in regard to the

Furthermore, we got the proposal for a new series of artworks and three related works of art, which are readymades, though they also have aspects of tried objects, and will be highly copied and adapted, and accordingly discussed.

We also got the proposal for a third work of art, which is a surreal readymade and belongs to the multimedia work of art series titled Hoverinium and Pervasive Hovering.

All new works of art were created by C.S..

23.May.2019
Ontonics Further steps
The general regulation for artworks included in the oeuvre created by C.S. have been confirmed (see the Further steps of the 19th and 21st of May 2019). The particular regulations will be given in the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of the individual collecting societies.

The

are guaranteed and checkable by antitrust authorities.
For example, a licensee of one work of art must not become a licensee of another work of art respectively become a member in the related collecting societies.
In the case that two or more works of art are composed, such a mandatory requirement might become effective but would still be reasonable. For example, some of the works of art handled by the Society for Unobtainium Utilization and Production (SUUP) are tightly connected with the works of art handled by the Society for Weather Control (SWC), and further all the works of art handled by both collecting societies are ideally utilized together with the works of art handled by the Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR). Howsoever, such interdependencies merely reflect the oeuvre of C.S. that eventually integrates all in one and cannot be broken up in independent pieces, obviously.
In this relation, we would like to point to the related extension of the AoA and the ToS with the LM of the SOPR introduced with the issue SOPR #179 of the 22nd of May 2019 (yesterday).

For keeping up said guarantee and demands we concluded that some kind of a self-limitation is constructive for example by

• a limited amount of collecting societies or
• unconnected collecting societies,

Btw.: Now, you have the next 30 or 40 years to make faults, learn, and screw up your world on your own. We recommend to leave some stones standing on top of each other and some water on the ground because E/c²=m is not so easy.

24.May.2019
King Smiley Further steps
We got two more proposals, that add more variants to the initial works of art mentioned in the Further steps of the 21st and 22nd of May 2019, which hopefully explain and impart to the public in better ways the aspects and views of fields, like for example philosophy, that are relevant for their creation.

25.May.2019
Ontonics Further steps
We are considering to include in the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) of a collecting society a provision that regulates the utilization of a work of art for a

purpose, for example by a obtaining a prohibition.
Such a suggested provision might be formulated in a tightened form that would also cover an entity under its scope if said entity

In this relation, we would like to recall once again that we

• avoid any interference and misuse, and
• respect the neutrality and sovereignty of our SOPR

in the same way as we do.

We also announce that some collecting societies most potentially will use up a maximal grace period of 20 years for reestablishing

Furthermore, our fourth, fifth, and sixth collecting societies have been established under the names

(see the related issues SZUG #1, SSUM #1, and SWIFT #1 of today below).

At the end, we would like to highly recommend to take notice of the legal implication of an infringement of an AoA or a ToS of one of our collecting societies by taking a look at the issue SOPR #179 of the 22nd of May 2019.

SZUG #1
We are pleased to announce the start of our collecting society titled Society for Zero gravity Utilization and Generation (SZUG) for handling the works of art series titled 0 Gravity, which is related to the themes of hovering and anti-gravity as well as our theme of Reality as the Media.

SSUM #1
We are pleased to announce the start of our collecting society titled Society for Superstructure Utilization and Management (SSUM) for handling the work of art titled Superstructure and the included artworks titled

The Superstructure is a real 3D infrastructure, which is

• Hovercity,
• Hoverland, and
• Weather Control System (WCS),

and

For our readers, who do not know what our Superstructure is, we have listed on the webpage Past Issues all issues publicated so far.
We also would like to recall one of the interdependencies between our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and the SSUM mentioned in the last section of the Roboticle Further steps of the 31st of January 2019 and a general discussion of such interdependencies in the Ontonics Further steps of the 23rd of May 2019.

SWIFT #1
We are pleased to announce the start of our collecting society titled Society for Worldwide and Interstellar Flight and Transport (SWIFT) for handling the work of art series aerospacecrafts and the included artworks titled

which are related to the themes of flight and spaceflight respectively movement of objects through an atmosphere or beyond it and are even more works of art than our works of art that together constitute the foundation of our mobility revolution and were also presented on the website of Style of Speed.

Parts of this work of art series are their components and engines, like for example the Active Hypersonic/Plasmajet Engine.

26.May.2019
Style of Speed Further steps
We worked on the integration of two systems, that were brought to practical working before and then to perfection by us. Especially interesting are the effects of interaction between these two system but also between them and a third system.
We also begun to think about the creation of a work of art as demonstrator for our related collecting society, which in general is not too difficult for items of science fiction. :)

We also improved our X-3*/LittleStar with the latest perfect adaptions of related works of art also created by C.S.. From our point of view it is the safest and most cost-effective first stage actually, which makes even no sense to compare with those heavy fire work rockets at all.

Another review of the basic designs of our aeroplanes, spacecrafts, and aerospacecrafts (see also the Further steps of the A href="#12.May.2019">12th of May 2019) resulted in the conclusions that their evolution will happen in several distinct phases characterized by a massively accelerated development due to the works of art created by C.S. for Style of Speed (SoS) and managed by our Society for Worldwide and Interstellar Flight and Transport (SWIFT) (see also the issue SWIFT #1 of the 25th of May 2019 (yesterday)).

27.May.2019
Ontonics Flightsuit #7
This is a quite funny thing. Since quite some time, we are working on the flight control system of our flightsuit and also a training simulator for wearers of it. But we felt it is not so easy to overcome the natural instincts when falling down and making turns in all directions with high velocity. In fact, coming down is not the hardest thing (anymore) (read also the Comment of the Day of the 24th of September 2014).

Yes indeed, the ability to fly of Superman and Captain Marvel, and the armor of Iron Man, and colleagues have been sourced out of the world of fantasy by C.S. as a further work of art like artistically performed before with our hoverboard.
The flightsuit might even be cooler than our hoverboard. But why not have both? Even better, wearing our flightsuit makes hovering much more safe. :D

28.May.2019

09:21 and 22:19 UTC+2
SOPR #180

*** Work in progress - better wording ***
Due to recent developments, we would like to recall some known points and also add some new ones in relation to the following topics:

Superstructure
As it should be very well known already, our Superstructure is a 3D infrastructure realizing a part of our Ontologic uniVerse (OntoVerse or OV) based on the foundational concept of our Caliber/Calibre, which all are essential parts of our original and unique, iconic works of art titled Ontologic System and Ontoscope. As such the Superstructure is also a part of the infrastructure of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and in the normal case would be managed and controlled by our SOPR. But due to the reason that the Superstructure has this very special characteristics, that realizes the fusion of reality and virtuality as part of our New Reality (NR), our Hightech Office Ontonics decided to establish its own Society for Superstructure Utilization and Management (SSUM) (see the Ontonics Further steps and the issue SSUM #1 of the 25th of May 2019).
The Superstructure comprises various technologies, and also devices and applications, and provides various services (see the issues linked in the related list on the webpage Past Issues). Most important to note here are the Internet access and communications services based on our Wireless Supercomputer (WiSer) and SwarmSat technologies(see also the Ontonics Further steps of the 16th of August 2015) and our Ontologic Net (ON), which is the result of the transformation of the Internet into an Interconnected supercomputer (Intersup) and the integration of SoftBionics (SB) with the Internet and the Intersup (see for example the issue #125 of the 5th of July 2018 and the Clarfication of the 21st of October 2018).
Recently, a joint venture of several entites and an aerospace manufacturer and space transportation service company launched into Earth orbit the first communications satellites for their space-based Internet communication systems, while another company announced its new plan for such a satellite constellation some months ago as well. Honestly, we do not buy their marketing stories, which say that they merely want to provide satellite Internet access and communications services to individual users having no or insufficient connectivity or demanding an alternative to the common Internet services.
Howsoever, because the Superstructure is tightly connected with our Ontologic System (OS) and our Ontoscope (Os), adding more of the services listed in the issue Superstructure #1 of the 29th of October 2016 and discussed in other issues would infringe the regulation that the infrastructure of our SOPR is controlled and managed by our SOPR exclusively. Such an infringement might be effective if satellite Internet access and communications services are connected with for example one of the fields of

and without explicit award of contract given by our SOPR.
In addition, telecommunications service providers and broadcasters are affected by our convergence and integration of stationary and mobile technologies (e.g. systems and platforms), products (e.g. applications, devices, and vehicles), and services (e.g. electronic commerce and social networking), as recalled in issue #177 of the 10th of May 2019. Obviously, this also holds for satellite-based systems.

Indeed, after the grace period of our SSUM will be over most of its listed tasks and services can be done by every member of our SOPR and SSUM, though there are some special limitations. For example, some tasks and services are metatasks and metaservices, which are accounted by a higher share of the overall revenue generated with them. Moreover, some tasks and services pertain to the SOPR infrastructure and therefore will still remain under the management and control of the SOPR.

SOPR light
We already

We also made clear in the issues #150 of the 20th of November 2018 and #177 of the 10th of May 2019 that

are allowed under specific provisions.
But one of these provisions prohibits to mimick the SOPR and its infrastructure provided for all members. Simply, said a SOPR light would not comply with the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of our SOPR.

Investment strategies
We noticed that besides the so-called blitzscaling strategy another strategy is to list a company at more than one stock market to

The common goal of such strategies is to raise capital as much as possible and then to use it for gaining a market dominace as quick as possible or even a monopoly in our Ontologic Economic System (OES), eventually by merely generating hot air. But this might lead or even should lead to a situation where a market dominance or monopoly gained in this way is misused as a leverage to

Hopefully, it is needless to say that we will not risk such developments, accept such relative simple business ideas and strategies with potentially huge impacts on our OES, and wait for actions of antitrust authorities.

For regaining more order and design leeway, we established collecting societies that have their own AoA, ToS, and LM, including the special general regulation of a grace period, which is also directly connected with an extension of the AoA and the ToS of our SOPR (see the issue #179 of the 22nd of May 2019 once again).

We look forward to further good cooperation with you.

29.May.2019

23:10 UTC+2
More evidences Deutsche Telekom and Deutsche Flugsicherung mimicking C.S. and C.S. GmbH

*** Work in progress - maybe some more explanations ***
For sure, we were aware about the attempt of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) company Deutsche Telekom to act in the field of Unmanned Aerical Vehicles (UAVs) or Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs) just right from its start. In this relation, we already began at the same time as well to make clear where the limits of such activities are for example by describing in more detail our 3D infrastructure called Superstructure, which is included in our works of art titled Ontologic System (OS) and Ontoscope (Os), specifically as part of our Ontologic uniVerse (OntoVerse or OV) based on the foundational concept of our Caliber/Calibre.
See also the project MultiDrone™ of the Innovation-Pipeline of the business unit Ontonics, which is the first class of multirotor air vehicles, to which quadrotors/quadrocopters belong as well, that is controlled via mobil communication standards, like for example the industry standards Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), Long-Term-Evolution (LTE), and succeeding ones, and optionally applies multimedia techniques, like video/moving image transmission and Augmented Reality (AR) among others".
From a report of a public-law broadcasters in the B.R.D. about a joint venture of the Deutsche Telekom and the Deutsche Flugsicherung==German Air Traffic Control we got the following informations: "The drone as flying smartphone
[...] The joint venture is said to control and coordinate drone flights.
[...]
The drone as helper and preceding eye. This sounds promising, researching it is already , but there is a snag: Normally, so-called Unmanned Aerical Vehicles [(UAVs) or Unmanned Aerial Systems] (UAS[s]) are only allowed to be moved in Germany, if their pilot continuously keeps an eye on them.
At this point, the Deutsche Flugsicherung and the Telekom want to hook up and make drone flights not only in the·range of vision possible, but also over larger distances. The problem thereby: The air traffic control is able to capture and depict aircrafts per radar, indeed, but not drones. They are too small and fly too low. So how create an "air situation picture" inclusive drones, so that these can be controlled from a distance?
The idea: turn drones quasi into flying smartphones, which continuously transmit via radio their position data to a center over the mobile phone network. For this purpose, they will be equipped with a modem and a mobile phone card.
In addition, data can be transmitted to the drone and it can be remotely controlled from the ground over the mobile phone connection. [...]
Telekom and Flugsicherung report that one has the technology well in hand. They have established a joint company [...]. Here all drone data should be processed and laid over the position data of the classic aviation, so that an overall view of the air traffic arises and it becomes clear where drones can safely fly without getting in the way of aircrafts or helicopters.
When a drone is logged in to the system, the drone pilot gets instructions how he has to fly his device and when he has to stop or avoid. The DFS-boss [...] talks about the "Germany-wide first operational UAS Traffic Management System".
[...]
Piloting drones from a distance is not only attractive for companies argues [the joint venture], but could also provide benefit for professional helpers like [Deutsche Lebens-Rettungs-Gesellschaft (]DLRG[)==German Life Saving Association], fire brigade and rescue teams: Up to now, one would be limited to start drones by oneself only on the spot and at the deployment site, explains [a fireworker] of the fire brigade [of a city] in a promotional video of [the joint venture].
[...]
For the moment, the [Deutsche FlugSicherung (]DFS[)] and [Deutsche] Telekom approach only professional users with their system: for example energy companies, that want to regularly fly and inspect their power lines, pipelines, and wind turbines for damages. They could utilize drones for it instead of a helicopter.
[...] So, it could become tighter in the sky, the need for control could increase and a system like [the joint venture] could awaken greediness of politicians, who wish more control over all drones - not only the commercial ones."

An airspace management system or air traffic control system, and a drone with features of a mobile device are not legal problems for us. But in the report such a drone was called a "flying smartphone", which by the way could be understood as the wrong designation of a mobile device based on our flying Ontoscope Architecture (OsA).
Furthermore, we are not gullible or naive, and therefore are able to guess already what the true goals of the various concerned entities are. Accordingly, we took preparations years ago, as can be read for example in the last section of the Roboticle Further steps of the 31st of January 2019 and ... elsewhere, to make clear the original and unique source, the limits, and also the provisions to contain and regulate the various developments.
See also the related sections of the issues SOPR #177 of the 10th of May 2019 and SOPR #180 of the 28th of May 2019.

If our related works of art are reproduced, performed, or both, then proper licensing and compliance with the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of the Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and the Society for Superstructure Utilization and Management (SSUM) is mandatory.
Providing technologies, goods, and services for the infrastructures of our SOPR, including the Superstructure and hence the infrastructure of our SSUM, as a contractor and supplier is possible.

issue Superstructure #1 of the 29th of October 2016 "including our management systems for [...] air traffic control Autobahn in the Sky [...] utilized for flying cars [...] and air vehicles"
issue Superstructure #2 of the 31st of October 2016 "developement of our superinfrastructure for planet wide communication and control"
Ontonics Hovercity #2 of the 5th of February 2017 where we said that "specifically the following rules have to be changed accordingly that are related to the [...] requirement to fly with a UAV in line of sight by a pilot, because improved air traffic regulations (altidude, velocity, path, etc.) and control systems avoid dangerous situations and therefore they cannot pose a risk in a common overall traffic system"
issue Superstructure #10 of the 10th of July 2017 "In this relation, we would like to ask the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and other federal aviation authorities to install vertical and horizontal passages, aisles, or skyways for our various piloted and unmanned aircrafts and spacecrafts, so that collisions with the retrograde vehicles of the old aerospace industry are avoided [...]. Furthermore, we will control our 3D infrastructure and make it compatible with common air traffic control services."
issue Superstructure #17 of the 14th of October 2017 "our Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) for Air Traffic Management (ATM) with Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool (FACET) and National Airspace System Constraint Evaluation and Notification Tool (NASCENT)"
compatibility to advanced Air Traffic Management (ATM) systems
issue SOPR #163 of the 29th of January 2019
Roboticle Further steps of the 31st of January 2019 "
Roboticle Further steps of the 9th of February 2019 "a control system for Unmanned Aerical Vehicles (UAVs) that comprises a receiver [...] can be added as a second receiver to drones operated by Remote Control (RC) [...] feature a wireless communication system"

31.May.2019

02:17, 06:23, and 08:12 UTC+2
More evidences Amazon mimicking C.S. and C.S. GmbH

*** Review ***

The company Amazon announced to

All listed items and their compositions and integrations are based on the reproduction and the performance of our iconic works of art titled Ontologic System and Ontoscope, and created by C.S..

Despite that a media company said that "[i]t was not immediately clear why [Amazon] would want the wireless network and spectrum", it is very clear for our fans and readers as well as us that the company is copying the infrastructure of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), including our Superstructure (see for example the issue SOPR #180 of the 28th of May 2019 and also the note More evidences Deutsche Telekom and Deutsche Flugsicherung mimicking C.S. and C.S. GmbH of the 30th of May 2019 (yesterday)), by applying the very well known and exhaustively discussed legal but also illegal business practices.

But there are even many more limits given and already broken:

If we take everything together than a share of 5% of the overall revenue of Amazon is already due and some services are licensed for a share of 10% of the related revenue. Honestly, we do not know if Amazon's business strategy can be kept going, because an entity has either to pay what we demand or stop any reproduction, performance, or both of our works of art.
But the latest development raises also the question how a combination of different service platforms have to be accounted if allowed at all. For example, if we assume that an entity would be allowed to provide a metaplatform for communications services and in addition to control and manage its own part of the Ontologic Net (ON), then we would have a situation in which a share of 10% + 10% of the overall revenue is due even under our absolutely voluntary obligation for ridiculously low Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory (RAND) terms, also known as Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) terms.

The License Model lists the official shares of 5% and 10% of the overall revenue generated with the performance of related Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services.

Proper licensing and complying with the Articles of Association (AoA) and the Terms of Service (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of the Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and the Society for Superstructure Utilization and Management (SSUM) is mandatory if our related works of art are reproduced, performed, or both.
See also the related sections of the issues SOPR #177 of the 10th of May 2019 and SOPR #180 of the 28th of May 2019.
Providing services for the infrastructure of our SOPR and our SSUM as a contractor is possible.

Amazon wants to integrate its variant of our IPA into stationary and mobile technologies according to our Ontologic System Architecture (OSA). But this is a part of the infrastructure of our SOPR.
Somehow, this seems to be an activity that has been worked out more carefully than it looks like on first sight.
Amazon can use a carrier but not own one. But a carrier like for example the Deutsche Telekom can be one but not own other parts of our infrastructure.
Once again, providing services for the infrastructure of our SOPR and our SSUM as a contractor is possible.

Also interesting is the fact that the prepaid cellphone wireless service belongs to the carrier Sprint, 80% of Sprint is owned by Softbank, and the Deutsche Telekom wants to buy this share from Softbank. But we have the impression that this is not the whole story, specifically because it makes not much sense to connect a smartspeaker or smartdisplay to such a mobile phone network when it is already connected to the Internet.

We think that we should proceed with the outstanding tasks at first that include signing the agreement and paying the damage compensations, including outstanding royalties.

General informations will be turned into the issue SOPR #181 of today.

11:33 UTC+2
Style of Speed Further steps

We continued with the conversion of helicopters. Somehow, we understood only now how much quieter the resulting rotorcrafts truly are due to an effect related to one of our new rotors that we cannot disclose at this time.
Eventually, we could confirm once again that our new helicopters are better than multicopters, tiltwings, tiltrotors, tiltducts, and so on for many utilizations in the fields of mobility and transportation.

20:51 UTC+2
Website update

We updated the note More evidences Deutsche Telekom and Deutsche Flugsicherung mimicking C.S. and C.S. GmbH of the 29th of May 2019 by adding more links to and quotes of relevant publications of us.

The whole thing is odd somehow and raises several questions like the following ones:

Für diejenigen PolitikerInnen, die kein Englisch sprechen können, übersetzen wir einfach einmal die bekannten Aussagen==For those politicians, who are not able to speak English, wie simply translate the known statements:
We are absolutely aware about that what we are doing.==Wir sind uns absolut bewußt über das, was wir tun.
All or nothing at all. Now and not in the future.==Ganz oder gar nicht. Jetzt und nicht in der Zukunft.
We will not make any further concessions.==Wir werden keine weiteren Konzessionen machen. :)

04:11 and 27:10 UTC+2
SOPR #181

*** Work in progress - better explanation of critical matters ***
In this issue, we would like to recall some facts and also add some more informations about the following topics:

Convergence of stationary and mobile technologies
In the last days, our convergence of stationary and mobile technologies, products, and services, inclusive the fields of

respectively the related general and special parts and properties of our

• Superstructure,
• Hovercity, and
• Hoverland

were better understood and the whole endeavour got more momentum.
Needless to say, this has awaken desires and greediness of entities at first, that do not accept rules. Due to the visionary abilities and creativity of C.S., we have foreseen this development, made preparations, and decided to be rigorous by

Air Traffic Management (ATM) system
We anticipated more than a decade ago already that the national Air Traffic Management (ATM) systems will become a special issue in relation to our Ontologic uniVerse (OntoVerse or OV), because they are

The impacts and interferences possible in this way ...
What is if another mobile provider wants to do the same as well like a joint venture of a telecommunications provider and an air traffic control?

In general, we have two constellations:

While there might be some convincing arguments in the first case, we cannot see that in the second case. Specifically, we cannot see why a monopolist should grow instead of an entity that would became a monopolist or already is a monopolist. Guaranteeing security for a state is no problem with the establishment of a local subsidiary.

The only entities that are legally allowed to have these monopolies are states and C.S.. Therefore, shares of related private companies owned in whole or in part by other entities than states or C.S. (e.g. joint ventures of air traffic control services and telecommunications services) have to be transferred to our corporation, so that said private companies can be controlled and managed together with our Hightech Office Ontonics, which eventually means together with our SOPR.
The same holds for similar endeavours such as for example mobile and space-based networks utilized for technologies, products, and services based on our OS and our Os, and as part of the infrastructure of our SOPR and for other reasons. Such networks are possible but only completely separated from our OS and our Os.
Providing services for the infrastructure of our SOPR and other collecting societies as a contractor is possible for members.

Diverses
In the last months, we continued with looking for real properties used to locate our headquarters and club estates. Needless to say that our headquarters will be in an area with sufficient legal or social protection.
So the Trump-tariff-agnostic 51st state of America, Puerto Rico, is the favorite followed by the United States Virgin Islands and The Bahamas.
But the areas for our club estates are also very nice, including areas in the U.S.A. (L.A., in the middle, and N.Y.C.), F.R., P.R.C., and so on.
Yeah!!!